簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉昀晴
Liu, Yun-Ching
論文名稱: 選擇權隱含波動度微笑曲線對期貨市場下單積極度之影響
The Effects of options implied volatility smile on Order Aggressiveness in futures market
指導教授: 蔡蒔銓
Tsai, Shih-Chuan
賴慧文
Lai, Christine W.
口試委員: 楊曉文
Yang, Sharon S.
賴慧文
Lai, Christine W.
蔡蒔銓
Tsai, Shih-Chuan
口試日期: 2022/07/08
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Management
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 22
中文關鍵詞: 下單積極度隱含波動度微笑曲線
英文關鍵詞: Order Aggressiveness, implied volatility smile
研究方法: 實驗設計法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201361
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:104下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 選擇權商品具有損失有限及高槓桿之特性,使得資訊交易者優先於選擇權市場中交易,並使選擇權市場具有價格發現的功能,因此本研究希望探討期貨交易人是否參考選擇權市場中的隱含波動度微笑曲線之斜率及曲度而決定其下單積極度,並再進一步分析不同類型的期貨市場交易人,在獲取選擇權市場之資訊時,對於其下單積極度的影響。
    實證結果顯示,選擇權隱含波動度微笑曲線之斜率及曲度對期貨下單積極度有顯著之影響。選擇權之買權斜率上升時,外資、國內法人及散戶之買方下單積極度與國內法人及散戶之賣方下單積極度皆上升,外資之賣方下單積極度則下降。而選擇權之賣權斜率上升時,國內法人及散戶之買方下單積極度下降,國內法人及散戶之賣方下單積極度上升,外資之買方可能因認為市場有較悲觀之看法時,投資人可能會過度反應負面消息或忽視正面之消息使下單積極度不減反增及賣方下單積極度不增反減。
    外資及國內法人當選擇權之曲度增加時,下單積極度將增加,但國內法人於選擇權之買權對於買方下單積極度及外資於選擇權之賣權對於賣方下單積極度則呈負相關,可能因國內法人及外資在投資策略上較保守。散戶之下單積極度在曲度增加時不減反增,可能因散戶對於投資時有過度自信之現象,因此低估市場之風險。

    The limited loss and high leverage characteristics of options make informed traders preferentially trade in the options market and make the options market a price discovery function. Therefore, this study aims to examine whether futures traders determine their order aggressiveness with reference to the slope and curvature of implied volatility smile in the options market, and further analyze the impact of information from the options market on order aggressiveness by different types of futures traders.
    The results show that the slope and curvature of the implied volatility smile of the options have a significant effect on the aggressiveness of futures orders. When the slope of the call options increases, the aggressiveness of buy orders placed by foreign institutional investors, domestic institutional investors and retail investors, and the aggressiveness of sell orders placed by domestic institutional investors and retail investors all increase, while the aggressiveness of sell orders placed by foreign institutional investors decreases. When the slope of the put options increases, the aggressiveness of buy orders placed by domestic institutional investors and retail investors decreases, while the aggressiveness of sell orders placed by domestic institutional investors and retail investors increases. Foreign institutional investors may consider that investors tend to overreact to negative news or ignore positive news when they think the market has a more pessimistic view, leading to an increase rather than a decrease in foreign institutional buyers' order aggressiveness and a decrease rather than an increase in foreign institutional sellers' order aggressiveness.
    When the curvature of the options increases, the order aggressiveness will increase for both foreign and domestic institutional investors, but there is a negative correlation between the buyers' order aggressiveness of the domestic institutional investors for the call options and the sellers' order aggressiveness of the foreign institutional investors for the put options. It is probably because domestic institutional investors and foreign institutional investors are more conservative in this investment strategy. When the curvature increases, retail investors' aggressiveness of orders increases rather than decreases, perhaps because they are overconfident in their investments and therefore underestimate the market risk.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 1 第三節 研究流程 2 第二章 文獻探討 3 第一節 下單積極度分類方式 3 第二節 影響下單積極度之因素 3 第三節 隱含波動度微笑曲線 4 第三章 研究方法 5 第一節 資料來源與樣本選取 5 第二節 研究假說 5 第三節 變數定義與說明 7 第四節 模型設定 9 第四章 實證結果與分析 10 第一節 敘述統計 10 第二節 單因子模型迴歸結果 13 第三節 多因子模型迴歸結果 14 第五章 結論 19 第一節 結論 19

    Admati, A. R., & Pfleiderer, P. (1988). A theory of intraday patterns: Volume and price variability. The review of financial studies, 1(1), 3-40.
    An, B. J., Ang, A., Bali, T. G., & Cakici, N. (2014). The joint cross section of stocks and options. The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 2279-2337.
    Baltussen, G., van der Grient, B., de Groot, W., Hennink, E., & Zhou, W. (2012). Exploiting option information in the equity market. Financial Analysts Journal, 68(4), 56-72.
    Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000). Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. The journal of Finance, 55(2), 773-806.
    Barber, B. M., Lee, Y. T., Liu, Y. J., & Odean, T. (2009). Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 609–632.
    Biais, B., Hillion, P., & Spatt, C. (1995). An Empirical Analysis of the Limit Order Book and the Order Flow in the Paris Bourse. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1655–1689.
    Chou, R. K., & Wang, Y. Y. (2009). Strategic order splitting, order choice, and aggressiveness: Evidence from the Taiwan futures exchange. Journal of Futures Markets: Futures, Options, and Other Derivative Products, 29(12), 1102-1129.
    Duong, H., Kalev, P. and Krishnamurti, C. (2009). Order aggressiveness of institutional and individual investors. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17(5), p.533-546
    Ederington, L. H., & Lee, J. H. (1996). The creation and resolution of market uncertainty: the impact of information releases on implied volatility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(4), 513-539.
    Feng, S., Pu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2018). An empirical examination of the relation between the option-implied volatility smile and heterogeneous beliefs. The Journal of Derivatives, 25(4), 36-47.
    Fong, K. and Liu, W. (2010). Limit order revisions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(8), p.1873-1885.
    Griffiths, M. D., Turnbull, D. A. S., & White, R. W. (2000). The costs and determinants of order aggressiveness. Journal of Financial Economics, 24.
    Hayre, L. S., & Chang, H. (1997). Effective and Empirical Durations of Mortgage Securities. The Journal of Fixed Income, 6(4), 17-33.
    Hung, P. H., Chen, A. S., & Wu, Y. L. (2015). Order Aggressiveness, Price Impact, and Investment Performance in a Pure Order‐Driven Stock Market. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 44(4), 635-660.
    Lee, J., & Cheong, H. Y. (2001). Trade size and information-motivated trading in the options and stock markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36(4), 485-501.
    Lo, I., & Sapp, S. G. (2010). Order aggressiveness and quantity: How are they determined in a limit order market?. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 20(3), 213-237.
    Ranaldo, A. (2004). Order aggressiveness in limit order book markets. Journal of Financial Markets, 7(1), 53–74.
    Menkhoff, L., Osler, C. L., & Schmeling, M. (2010). Limit-order submission strategies under asymmetric information. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(11), 2665– 2677.
    Xing, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhao, R. (2010). What does the individual option volatility smirk tell us about future equity returns?. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(3), 641-662.
    Xu, Y. (2009). Order aggressiveness on the ASX market. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(1), 51-75.
    Yan, S. (2011). Jump risk, stock returns, and slope of implied volatility smile. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(1), 216-233.

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE