研究生: |
吳茹茜 Wu, Ju-Chien |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
高中生自主學習現況與問題之探討─以丹鳳高中為例 The State of Self-directed Learning of DanFeng High School |
指導教授: |
陳昭珍
Chen, Chao-Chen |
口試委員: |
宋雪芳
Song, Sheue-Fang 徐筱玲 Hsu, Hsiao-Ling |
口試日期: | 2021/01/14 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖書資訊學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 97 |
中文關鍵詞: | 自主學習 、自我導向學習 、108課綱 、個案研究 |
英文關鍵詞: | Self-directed learning, Case study, Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education |
研究方法: | 個案研究法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101259 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:326 下載:90 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以新北市立丹鳳高中為個案,瞭解自主學習於高中學校實施之現況、問題與挑戰,以協助學校建立自主學習的發展模式。學校從107學年度開始規劃自主學習相關活動,108年9月配合課綱開始推動學生進行自主學習,一切都還在摸索與調整的階段,學校於上學期提供3個自主學習主題,未選擇上述主題之學生留在班上由導師指導,下學期改為14個學科主題,學生依自身的興趣做選擇。
研究採用問卷分析法以及訪談法,對於108學年度之全體高一學生進行三次的問卷調查,探究學生是否具備自主學習的能力,分析學生經過一整年的自主學習活動後自主學習知能之改變,以及對於自主學習活動的看法,並於整學年活動結束後,訪談丹鳳高中的四位師長,包含校長、圖書館主任、圖書館採編組長以及負責老師,以理解高中實施自主學習之問題與挑戰。
研究結果顯示:1.學生對自主學習的認同度經過一年自主學習後並無明顯提升,尋求協助的認同度最高,自我評估的認同度最低;2.學生知道自己選擇之自主學習主題,選擇自主學習主題的因素以自身興趣為主,其次為同儕影響,一週花費在自主學習的時間從原本較分散到集中在兩小時;3.學生肯定自主學習,但真的要執行時卻仍回到傳統的方式去尋求教師指引或者希望有可以參考的範本;4.上下學期的自主學習活動不完全相同,且時間安排不足,導致學生產出成果受限;5.學校自主學習的空間不足,教師對自身角色定義不夠明確,且學生培養自主能力需要時間,短時間難看出成效;6.校方應持續推動自主學習,給學生更多自主的空間,並達成共識找出適合的發展方向。
The study analyzes the case of self-directed learning in Danfeng High School in New Taipei City. The intention of this paper is to understand the current situation, problems and challenges of self-directed learning in high schools, so as to help them establish a development model of self-directed learning.
The school cooperates with the “Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education" to promote students' self-directed learning, and begin planning related learning activities in the previous year. Three self-directed learning topics were provided in the last semester. Students who did not choose the above topics will be guided by their instructors in class. In the next semester, 14 subjects will be taken as the themes of self-directed learning, and students will choose according to their own interests.
The research adopts questionnaire analysis methods and interview methods. Three questionnaire surveys were conducted for all high school freshmen to understand if they have the ability to learn independently. And to analyze the changes in students' autonomous learning knowledge and abilities after a whole year of self-directed learning activities, as well as their points of views on these activities. By the end of the school year, interviews will be conducted with four teachers in Danfeng High School. The interview content was used for analyzing the difficulties and challenges of the self-directed learning programme during the implementation.
The research results show that: (1) There is no significant improvement being shown after a whole year’s self-directed learning activities. In terms of that, the identification of help-Seeking is the highest, while the identification of self-evaluation is the lowest on the survey. (2) Students understand the themes they have chosen for the programme. The main factors for choosing themes are their own interests, followed by peer influences. The duration of self-directed learning per week is concentrated in two hours. (3) Students are certain about the advantages of self-directed learning. However when they implement it, they tend to seek guidance from teachers or look for a model they can refer to. (4) Self-directed learning activities in the two semesters are not exactly the same and the time schedules are insufficient, which result in the limited outcome of students. (5) The school doesn't have enough space for self-directed learning. Teachers' definition of their own roles is not clear enough. Additionally, it takes time to cultivate students' abilities on self-directed learning, so it is difficult to see the results within a short period of time. (6) The school should encourage self-directed learning with more time and space, in order to reach a consensus for a suitable development direction with students.
王俊斌 (2019)。「自主學習」的圖像、實踐與反思:從實驗理念到課程轉化。Journal of Curriculum Studies/Kecheng Yanjiu, 14(1)。
朱倩慧 (2015)。自主學習=自動學習=自學?敦煌英語教學電子雜誌。檢自http://www.caves.com.tw/CET/ArtContent_tw.aspx?CDE=ART20150210105416JEC
李坤崇 (2001)。綜合活動學習領域教材教法。臺北:心理出版社。
吳佩儒 (2018)。高級中等學校推動學生自主學習,圖書館將扮演積極角色。教育部國民及學前教育署電子報。
吳善揮 (2015)。香港中學中文科教師推動學生自主學習之研究。學校行政,(95), 133-154。
吳善揮 (2013)。淺談自主學習的首要配套-小班教學的實施。臺灣教育評論月刊,2(7),95-98。
吳璧純 (2018)。學生自主學習,老師「做什麼」?。教育脈動,15。取自https://pulse.naer.edu.tw/Home/Content/d8a3c858-52cf-46ad-9fdb-7c3b6ce40bb8?insId=91ab8aef-7dae-4133-8bf3-30ff7a11530b
林吟霞 (2010)。自主學習取向之適性課程與教學研:究臺灣小學與德國小學「方案教學」個案比較。課程與教學,13(3),47-76。
林佳慧 (2020)。國中自主學習校訂課程之實踐。中等教育,71(3),67-80。doi:10.6249/SE.202009_71(3).0021
林思騏、陳盛賢 (2018)。自主學習-教師專業發展的現實之需及其概念探析。教育脈動,15。取自 https://pulse.naer.edu.tw/Home/Content/1dd2574e-718f-4bfc-abf5-608541c6b723?insId=91ab8aef-7dae-4133-8bf3-30ff7a11530b
林素卿 (2009)。潛在課程之研究:以一所公辦民營學校為例。教育科學研究期刊,54 (1),179-208。
范信賢 (2016)。核心素養與十二年國民基本教育課程綱要:導讀《國民核心素養:十二年國教課程改革的DNA》。教育脈動,(5),r1-7。
洪雯柔 (2018)。邁向未來取向,專業治校,學習者中心的十二年國教新課綱-談新課綱對普通高中的衝擊。台灣教育,(710),65-71。
洪詠善、林佳慧、楊惠娥 (2018)。十二年國教課綱自主學習之實踐探究。教育脈動,15。取自https://pulse.naer.edu.tw/Home/Content/543153f1-6e99-4728-bd1b-4bc9376aed89?insId=91ab8aef-7dae-4133-8bf3-30ff7a11530b
洪詠善編、范信賢編 (2015)。同行-走進十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。新北市:國家教育研究院。
香港課程發展議會 (2014)。中國語文課程及評估指引(中四至中六)。
范綺萍 (2019)。「圖書館引導學生自主學習手冊」資源分享平台使用與滿意度調查研究。全國高中職圖書館電子報。
高寶玉 (2018)。香港自主學習的探索:融合東西方理念的嘗試。Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13(1), 29-53。
許大偉 (2018)。教室中,自主學習的實務分享。教育脈動,(15),1-11-014。
陳木金 (2007),問題導向學習法與反思學習法在校長學習之應用,刊載於2007.05.27.國立台北教育大學舉辦「校長的學習國際學術研討會」會議手冊(p.237- 252)。
陸希平、王本榮、陳家玉 (2006)。問題導向學習。醫學教育,10(2),89-97。
教育部 (2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市:教育部。
教育部 (2018)。高級中等學校課程規劃及實施要點。臺北市:教育部。
教育部統計處 (2020)。高級中等學校校別資料檔(班級、學生、畢業生)-按學程別分。取自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/News_Content.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96&s=596D9D77281BE257
陳志銘 (2012)。問題導向學習。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678753/
陳益興、王先念 (2007)。十二年國民基本教育政策規劃歷程研析,教育研究,158,5-14。
梁雲霞 (2012)。以自主為弓,學習為箭,做個自主學習的人。T&D飛訊,74-80。
梁雲霞、陳芸珊 (2013)。國中小學生學習策略使用之分析。教育研究與發展期刊,9(2),33-64。doi:10.3966/181665042013060902002
程炳林、林清山 (2001)。中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信效度研究。測驗年刊,48(1),1-41。
程炳林 (2000)。自律學習。教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1305182/
童鳳嬌 (2012)。十二年國教的因應策略。學校行政,(78),157-182。
黃麗莉(2018)。個人化數位學習環境中學習策略、學習成效與自主學習之相關研究–以國中生為例。淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,新北市。 取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/s38r3e
萬文隆 (2004)。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育月刊,37(4),17-23。
楊怡婷 (2019)。十二年國教校訂課程實施之挑戰與因應。臺灣教育評論月刊, 8(1), 201-204。
劉潔玲 (2010)。校本協作計劃中語文教師在閱讀教學的觀感和教學模式的改變。教育研究學報,25 (2),287-324。
賴光真 (2019)。從學習風格談自主學習策略之指導-師資培育觀點。台灣教育,(719),59-65。
謝金城 (2018)。校長推動十二年國民基本教育新課綱的領導作為。中等教育。
簡菲莉 (2019)。十二年國教課綱高中自主學習建制化之實踐研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系博士論文,台北市。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2vx6u6
魏麗敏 (1996)。影響國小兒童數學成就之自我調節學習與情感因素分析及其策略訓練效果之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文,台北市。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/e7237h
Baldwin, R.S., Peleg-Bruckner, Z., & McClintock, A.H. (1985). Effects of topic interest and prior knowledge on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(4), 497–504. doi:10.2307/747856
Barrows, H. S. & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York, NY: Springer.
Bercher DA. (2012) Self-monitoring tools and student academic success: when perception matches reality. J Coll Sci Teach.
Berkson L. (1993). Problem based learning: Have the expectations been met? Acad Med 1993; 68: S79-88.
Brockett, R.G. & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-Direction in Adult Learning: Perspectives on Theory, Research and Practice. London: Routledge.
Butler DL , Winne PH. (1999). Feedback and Self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Rev Educ Res, 65:245–81.
Candy, P.C. (1991). Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning: A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Dam, L. (1995). Learner Autonomy 3. From Theory to Classroom Practice. Dublin: Authentik.
Dickinson, L. (1992) Learner Training for Language Learning. Dublin: Authentik.
Edens, K. M. (2000). Preparing problem solvers for the 21st century through Problem-based Learning. College Teaching, 48(2), 55-60.
Garrison, D.R. (1993). A Cognitive Constructivist View of Distance Education: An Analysis of Teaching-Learning Assumptions. Distance Education, 14(2), 199-211. Retrieved December 23, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/164836/.
Garrison, D.R. (1997). Self-Directed Learning: Toward a Comprehensive Model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48 (1), 18-33.
Grow, G.O. (1991). Teaching Learners to be Self-Directed. Adult Education Quarterly, 41 (3), 125-149.
Guglielmino, L.M. (1989). Reaction to Field’s Investigation into the SDLRS. Adult Eduation Quarterly, 39 (4), 235-245.
Guglielmino, Lucy M. (1977). Learning Preference Assessment. Available: http://www.lpasdlrs.com/.
Hong, J. C. Sheu, S. W. (2000). A study of competence development in project work. The Eleventh International Conference on College Teaching and Learning. Jackson ville, Florida.2000, April,12-15.
Houle, C.O. (1993). The Inquiring Mind: A Study of the Adult Who Continues to Learn. (Third Edition). Norman, Oklahoma Research Centre for Continuing Professional and Higher Education.
Ibabe, I., & Jauregizar, J. (2010). Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge.Higher Education,59(2), 243-258.
Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed Learning. A guide for teachers and learners. Chicago: Follett.
Kulich, J. (1970). A historical overview of the adult self-learner. Paper presented at the Northwest Institute Conference on Independent Study: The adult as a self-learner, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Lüftenegger, M., Schober, B., Van de Schoot, R., Wagner, P., Finsterwald, M., & Spiel, C. (2012). Lifelong Learning as a goal - do autonomy and self-regulation in school result in well prepared pupils? Learning and Instruction, 22, 27-36. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.001
McMillan, James H.; Hearn, Jessica. (2008). Student Self-Assessment: The Key to Stronger Student Motivation and Higher Achievement. Educational Horizons, v87 n1 p40-49
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning.Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.
Perry, N. E., Hutchinson, L., & Thauberger, C. (2008). Talking about teaching self-regulated learning: Scaffolding student teachers’ development and use of practices that promote selfregulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 97-108.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M.Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Oddi, L.F. (1987). Perspectives on Self-Directed Learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 38 (1), 21-31.
Schmidt, HG.(1983). Problem-based learning: rationale and description. Med Educ. 17: 11-6.
Schuitema, J., Peetsma, T., & van der Veen, I. (2012). Self-regulated learning and students’ perceptions of innovative and traditional learning environments: A longitudinal study in secondary education. Educational Studies, 38(4), 397-413.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmeman, B. J. (2007). Infl uencing children’s self-effi cacy and self-regulation reading and writing through modeling. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 7-25.
Siegesmund, A. (2016). Increasing student metacognition and learning through classroom-based learning communities and self-assessment. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 17(2), 204-214.
Sile´na, Charlotte and Uhlin, Lars. (2008). Self-directed learning - a learning issue for students and faculty! Teaching in Higher Education.
Taylor, M. (1987). Self-Directed Learning: More Than Meets the Observer’s Eye. In D. Boud & V. Griffin. (eds). (1987). Appreciating Adults Learning From the Learners’ Perspective. London, Kogan Page.
Tanner, C. K. (1997). Problem-based learning in advanced preparation of educational leaders. Educational Planning,10(3). 3-12.
Wenden, A. L., (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy: Planning and implementing learner training for language learners. Hertfordshire, UK: Prentice-Hall International.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.