簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 周志建
Chih-Chien Chou
論文名稱: 敘事治療的理解與實踐 : 以一個諮商個案為例之敘說研究
The Comprehension and Practice of Narrative Therapy--Explain with a Counseling Case in Narrative Research
指導教授: 金樹人
Jin, Shuh-Ren
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2002
畢業學年度: 90
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 238
中文關鍵詞: 敘事\敘說外化敘事治療敘說研究
英文關鍵詞: narrative, externalizaing, narrative therapy, narrative research
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:366下載:216
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文研究主要在敘述研究者對敘事治療的理解與實踐的歷程。研究目的包括:1.以一個諮商案例做說明,描述在敘事治療取向的諮商歷程中,案主所經歷的變化歷程。2.在這樣敘事治療取向的諮商歷程中,瞭解使案主能產生上述改變歷程的敘事治療介入方式與特殊問話有哪些。3.瞭解在諮商歷程與研究歷程的實踐過程中,研究者內在產生怎樣的反思與對敘事治療的新理解。
    本研究諮商個案為一位二十多歲女性,案主問題原屬生涯議題。本研究以敘說研究為研究方法,將諮商歷程當成文本,做進一步詮釋與產生反思。
    本研究結果顯示:1.案主在諮商中的變化歷程,包括了四個階段:茫然期、混亂期、沈澱期與豁朗期。2.在諮商歷程中,諮商師所運用的敘事治療的各種介入方式與問話技術,包括:詮釋性的問話、問題外化與命名、相對影響的問話、獨特結果的問話、行動藍圖與意義藍圖的問話、重新入會、他人觀點的問話、未來願景的問話、自我偏好的問話等,介入的方式也包括了:運用故事與隱喻、運用證書、圖畫、信件等等。促使這些問話與介入技術能發揮功能的,尤其是諮商師的態度,包括好奇、欣賞、幽默、不確定等。3.最後,研究者進一步去整合諮商歷程與研究歷程中對敘事治療所產生的新理解與實踐性反思,闡述後現代生涯諮商如何回歸到人的本質,以及互為主體的諮商與敘說研究方式,如何使諮商師與研究者更能真實地與案主互動。

    The main purpose of this thesis is to describe the comprehension and practice process of the researcher to narrative therapy. The purposes of the study are as follows:
    1. There is a counseling case to explain how the process of the client had changed by
    applying narrative therapy.
    2. In the process of counseling, to understand what intervention methods of narrative therapy and special dialog could change the counseling process of the client.
    3. To understand the process of counseling and the practice of the narrative therapy how influence the researcher to have new thinking and understanding of it.
    The client of the thesis is about twenty years old female, and her problem is categorized to career issue. The study method of the thesis is narrative research.
    To take the whole counseling process as text and further to interpret and introspect.
    The result of the study is shown as follow:
    1. The counseling process of the client includes the four phases: disorientation phase, confusion phase, the phase of contemplation and the phase of clear mind.
    2. In the counseling process, counselor had used the different intervenient method
    and question technique from narrative therapy. They are including the interpretation question, externalization, name, relative influence question, unique outcomes question, meaning landscape question and active landscape question , re-membering question, the question of others aspect, the prospected question, self-preference question and so on. The intervention methods are also including story, metaphors, certificates, drawing and letters and so on. To push ahead of these intervention method and question technique work is especially from the curious, appreciated attitude and the sense of humor and non-so sure of the counselor.
    3. At last, the researcher further to integrate all of the new understanding and introspection of the practice during the counseling and the different thinking of the practice during the counseling and study process, and to expound how the postmodern counseling should return to one is innate character, the intersubjective counseling and the method of narrative research, how to make the counselor and research could have truly interactive with clients.

    目 錄 中文摘要..................................................Ⅰ 英文摘要..................................................Ⅱ 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的.....................................1 第二節 研究問題........................................2 第三節 名詞解釋.......................................…..2 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 範典的轉移---從現代的實證世界觀 到後現代的敘事觀點.....................5 第二節 敘事治療的理論與技術.............................10 第三節 敘說研究的理論與分析....….......................32 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究方法的選擇...............................45 第二節 研究對象(研究參與者).......................54 第三節 研究者.......................................55 第四節 研究歷程........................................58 第五節 文本的分析與研究的效度..........................61 第四章 研究結果與反思 第一節 案主在諮商中的改變歷程...........................63 第二節 諮商歷程中諮商師的介入方式與問話技術.............81 第三節 諮商與研究的反思................................107 第五章 結論與建議.......................................123 參考文獻................................................127 ◎附錄: 附錄一、我的故事.....................................132 附錄二、諮商的故事---諮商歷程的詮釋與解析............148 ◎附件: 附件一:研究目的與諮商歷程說明、研究同意書...........231 附件二:挑戰宣言...................................…233 附件三:爸爸對小琪的支持.............................234 附件四:證書.........................................235 附件五:小琪「人生的畫」.............................236 附件六:小琪「媽媽的畫」.............................237 附件七:我的「未來人生的畫」.........................238 表目次 表2-1 各典範知本體論、認識論與方法論的差異...….......33 圖目次 圖3-1:本論文敘說研究呈現流程圖..............…...…...50 圖3-2:不同時空的詮釋觀點..............................51 圖3-3:經驗學習的循環歷程..............................52 圖3-4:敘說研究的歷程流程圖............................61

    參考文獻
    一、 中文部份
    王沂釗(民89) 婚姻衝突的敘說性研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導系博士論文。
    王明智(民89) 男同志性別認同的顛覆與移動。輔仁大學應用心理研究所碩士論文。
    金樹人(民86) 生涯諮商與輔導。台北市:東華書局。
    余德慧(民87) 詮釋現象心理學。台北:會形文化。
    余德慧(民87) 生活受苦經驗的心理病理:本土文化的探索。本土心理學研究,10,69-115。
    易之新譯(民89) 敘事治療—解構並重寫生命的故事。台北:張老師文化。
    易博生(民79) 說自己的一00一夜。張老師月刊,10月號,13-24。
    林美珠(民89) 敘事研究:從生命故事出發。輔導季刊,36卷,4期,27-35。
    林香君(民87) 「變」知識建構與建構知識的「變」。台灣師範大學教育心理與諮商輔導系博士論文。
    周華山(民82) 意義:詮釋學的啟迪。台北:台灣商務。
    周志建(民89) EASY生活輕鬆過。台北:方智出版。
    洪美琴、陳祥美(民90) 後現代主義敘事治療概論。諮商與輔導,第181期,2-7。第182期,20-25。第183期,21-25。
    柯寶絢(民87) 尋愛—諮商過程中,生命故事的建構。輔仁大學應用心理研究所碩士論文。
    洪國尹(民89) 阿媽—一個很像男人的女人。輔仁大學應用心理研究所碩士論文。
    吳熙琄(民90,12月) 敘事治療---解構並重寫生命故事工作坊講義,未出版。台中張老師中心主辦。
    范幸玲(民90) 敘事治療的介紹及應用---她的故事。輔導季刊,37(4)P.51-62.
    邱惟真(民85) 朱光潛自我之建構:一種敘說式研究。輔仁大學應用心理研究
    所碩士論文。
    黃光國(民84) 知識與行動:中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋。台北:心理。
    黃宜敏(民86) 一個諮商員的故事—僵局的建構與轉變。台灣師範大學教育心理與諮商輔導系博士論文。
    張慈莉(民88) 生命主題的敘說與理解。台灣師範大學教育心理與諮商輔導系碩士論文。
    廖本富(民90) 敘說治療之外化VS.病理文化之內化。諮商與輔導,第181期,8-13。
    廖本富(民90) 敘說治療之治療信件。輔導季刊,第37卷,2期,43-54。陶陶蕃瀛(民90) 行動研究:一種增強權能的實務工作方法(初稿)。未出版。
    畢恆達(民85) 詮釋學與質性研究。見胡幼慧(民85)質性研究—理論、方
    法與本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
    翁開誠(民90,2月) 敘事治療專業工作坊研習手冊。台中張老師中心主辦。
    翁開誠(民86) 同理心開展的再出發---成人之美的藝術。輔仁學誌,第26期
    ,261-274頁。
    蔡敏玲(民83,1月) 教育民族誌中研究者的角色。「社會科學研究方法檢討與
    前瞻」第二次科際研討會:質化研究、次級分析與綜合方法。中央研究院民
    族學研究所。
    蔡敏玲(民85) 教育質性研究者請在文本中現身:兩項重要思慮。國民教育,
    37卷2期,21至30頁。
    二、 英文部份
    Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems:
    Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implication for clinical theory.
    Family Process, 27,371-393.
    Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1990). Beyond cybernetics:Comments on
    Atkinson and Heath’s ”Futher thoughts on second-order family
    therapy.”Family Process,29,157-163.
    Baltes, M. M., & Carstensen, L. L. (1991). Commentary[Commentary on the article by Cross,S.,& Markus, H.(1991).Possible selves across the life span.Human Development , 34,230-255]. Human Development,34, 256-260.
    Barker, C., Pistrang, N.,& Elliott, R. (1994). Research methods in clinical and counseling psychology. New York: Wiley.
    Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind . New York: Ballantine.
    Berg, D. N., & Smith, K. K. (Eds.). (1988). The self in social inquiry.
    London:Sage.
    Berg, I. K., & de shazer, S. (1993). Making numbers talk: Language in therapy. In S.
    Friedman(Eds.), The new language of change(pp.5-24).New York:Guiford.
    Bohart, A. C. & Tallman, K. (1998). The person as active agent in experiential
    therapy.L.S.Greengerg,J.C.Waston & G.Lietaer.
    Borgen, F. H. (1992). Expanding scientific paradigms in counseling psychology
    (2rd ed.).New York:Wiley.
    Bruner, J. (1986). Experience and its expression. In V. Turner & E. Bruner (Eds.).The
    Anthropology of experience,pp.3-30. Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois
    Press.
    Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Works. Campridge,MA: Harvard University
    press.
    Bruner, J. (1992). Narrative construction of reality. In H. Beilin & P.Pufall (Eds.).Prospects and possibilities. Hillsdale NJ:LEA.
    Carroll, J. S. (1987). The effect of imaging an event on expectations for the event: An
    interpretation in terms of the availability heuristic. Journal of Experimental
    Social Psychology, 14, 88-96.
    Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1991). Narrative and story in practice and
    research . In D.A. Schon(Eds.),The reflective turn (pp.258-282).New York:
    Teachers College Press.
    Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M.(1999). Narrative Inquiry: experience and story in
    Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Corey, G. (1990). Theory and practice of group counseling. Pacific Grove,
    CA:Brooks/Cole.
    Denzin, N. K. (1989). The Research Act: A theoretical to Sociologgical
    Method.p183-209.New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. S.(1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitive
    research . In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln(Eds.),Handbook of Qualitive Research.
    pp.1-17. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
    Freedman, J. & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative Tgerapy: The Social Construction of
    Preferred Realities. New York: Norton. 易之新譯(民89) 敘事治療—解構
    並重寫生命的故事。台北:張老師文化。
    Foucault, M. (1965). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of
    reason (R.Howard, Trans.). New York: Random House.
    Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology.
    American Psychologist,40(3), 266-275.The Paradigm Dialog.
    Goldman, L. (1989). Moving counseling research into 21st centry. Counseling
    Psychologist,17,81-85.
    Gottlieb, D.T.& Gottlieb, C. D. (1996). The narrative/collatorative process in couples
    therapy: A postmoderm perspective. Women & therapy,19(3),37-47.
    Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1990). Competing paradigms in qualitative research .
    In N.K. Denzin, &Y. S. Lincoln(Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research
    (pp.105-117).Lonon:Sage.。邱惟真(民85) 朱光潛自我之建構:一種敘
    說式研究。輔仁大學應用心理研究所碩士論文。
    Henry, T. Close. (1998). Metaphor in Psychotherapy:clinical applications of stories
    and Allegogies .Impact Publishers。劉小菁譯(2001) 故事與心理治療。台
    北:張老師文化。
    Hermans, H. M., Kempen, H. G., & Van Loon, R.J.P. (1992). The dialogical self ---
    Beyond individualism and rationalism . American Psychologist,47(1),23-33.
    Hoffman, L. (1990). Constructing realities:An art of lenses. Family Process,29,1-
    12.
    Hoshmand, L. T., & Polkinghore, D. E. (1992). Redefining the science-practice
    relationship and professional training. Ameeerican Psychologist, 47(1),55-66.
    Kolb, G. A. (1984). Experience learning: Experience as the source of learning and
    development. New York: Englewood Cliffs.
    Lieblich A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T.(1999). Narrative Research : reading,
    analysis and interpretation. CA: Sage.
    Maxwell, J. A.(1994). Qualitation research design: An interactive approach. Sags
    Publication, Inc.。高薰芳、林盈助、王向葵譯,(民90) 質化研究設計。
    台北:心理。
    Mcleod, J. (1994). Doing counseling research. London:Sage.
    Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research . London:Sage.
    Nichols. M. P., & Schwartz, R.C. ( 1995). Family therapy: concepts and methods
    (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    O’Hanlon, B. (1994). The third wave. Network, Nov/Dec,19-29.
    Orlinsky, D. E., & Russell, R. L. (1994). Tradition and change in psychotherapy
    reassessing psychotherapy research. New York: The Guilford Press.
    Pare’ , D .A. (1995). Culture and Meaning: Expanding the Metaphorical Repertoire of
    Family Therapy. Family Process 35: 21-42.
    Pocock, D. (1995). Searching for a better story :harnessing modern and postmodern
    positions in family therapy. Journal of Family 17 :149-173.
    Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. NY:State university of New York Press.
    Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative Analysis . Cali.:Sage.
    Roger, C. R. (1942). Counseling and Psychotherapy . Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    Sarbin, J. R. (1986). Narrative psychology: The stories nature of human conduct. NY:Paeger.
    Scheibe, K. E. (1986). Self-narratives and adventure. In T.R. Sarbin(Eds.), Narrative
    Psychology: The storied nature of human conduct(pp.129-151).New York:
    Praeger.
    Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
    Skovholt & Ronnestad. (1992). The evolving professional self. New York:Wiley.
    Spence, D. P. (1982). Narrative Truth and Historical Truth: Meaning and
    Interpretation in Psychoanalysis. NY:Norton.
    Tomm, K. (1989). Externalizing the problem and internalizing personal
    agency. Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies,8(1),spring ,54-59
    Trand, P. S. (1997). Toward a developmentally informed narrative therapy.
    Family Process 36:325-339.
    Turner, V. (1986). Dewey, Dilthey, and Drama: An essay in the anthropology
    of experience. In V. Turner & R. Price (Eds.), Therapeutic
    Coversztions (pp.62-80).New York :Norton.
    Van Maamen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography . Chicago:
    University of Chicago Press.
    White, M.,& Eptston, D.(1990). Narrative means to therapeutic end. New
    York:Guilford. 廖世德譯(民90) 故事、知識與權力。台北:心靈工坊。
    White, M. (1991). Deconstruction and theory . Dulwich Center Newsletter,
    3,21-40.
    Wong, K. C. (1995). A Narrative Approach to Empathy. Doctoral of University
    of Minnesota.
    Zimmerman, J. L., & Dickerson, V. C. (1994) Using a narrative metaphor :
    Implications for theory and clinical practice. Family Process 33:
    233-245.1

    QR CODE