研究生: |
裴安東 Jorge Antonio Rivera Perez |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
太平洋沿岸巴拿馬和中美洲港口競爭力分析 Competitiveness Analysis of Panama and Central America Ports in the Pacific Littoral |
指導教授: |
林舒柔
Lin, Shu-Jou |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
全球經營與策略研究所 Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy |
論文出版年: | 2019 |
畢業學年度: | 107 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 48 |
中文關鍵詞: | Port competitiveness 、Port competition 、transshipment 、port 、Pacific littoral 、container 、factors |
英文關鍵詞: | Port competitiveness, Port competition, transshipment, port, Pacific littoral, container, factors |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GGBS.002.2019.F08 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:242 下載:10 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
無中文摘要
Maritime trade is a very significant key in the economic and technological development of any country, there are many factors that directly influence the competitiveness of ports and the growth of them over time. The purpose of this research paper is to carry out an analysis of the competitiveness between the ports on the Pacific Littoral of Central America, been more specifically Balboa in Panama and its main competitors in the Pacific Littoral.
ECLAC classified the maritime transportation logistic sector in the Pacific littoral as fast growing and developing. This classification demonstrates the different factors that are making Balboa the first in the area.
The methodology used is based on interviews done to ports services experts in the public and private sectors. Result show that the Panama is the leading competitor in the Pacific Littoral, but transshipment has been decreasing dramatically in the last 5 years. The main factors being: cost, quality of services and the lack of policies at the government level that allow boosting port development in the country.
References
Georgia Tech Panama Logistics Innovation and Research Center. (n.d.). https://www.gatech.pa/.
Acosta, M. &. (2011). Bunkering competition and competitiveness at the ports of the Gibraltar Strait. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.11.008
Asgari, Nasrin & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Goh, Mark, 2013. (2013). Network design approach for hub ports-shipping companies competition and cooperation. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.020
Bandenburger and Nalebuff (1996). (1996). Co‐opetition: Competitive and cooperative business strategies for the digital economy. doi:10.1108/eb054655
ECLAC. (2017). Maritime and Logistics Profile of Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved from http://perfil.cepal.org/l/en/portmovements_classic.html.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (n.d.). https://www.cepal.org/en.
Esmer, S. &.-O. (2016). Non-Price Competition in the Port Sector: A Case Study of Ports in Turkey. International Association of Maritime Economists Conference. doi:10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.03.001
Helen A. Thanopoulou & Anthony K. C. Beresford. (2010, May 12). Transhipment Port Selection and Decision-making Behaviour: Analysing the Taiwanese Case. doi:10.1080/13675560310001626990
Hoshino, H. (2010, June). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257737356_Competition_and_Collaboration_among_Container_Ports
https://www.gatech.pa/. (n.d.).
James Wang, Brian Slack. (2004, October). Regional Governance of Port Development in China: A Case Study of Shanghai International Shipping Center. doi:10.1080/0308883042000304467
Magan M. Sammons A. 2008. (2014, June). Port strategy in the era of supply chain management: the case of Hong Kong. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.863434
Malchow, M. and Kanafani, A. (2004). (2004). A Disaggregate Analysis of Port Selection. Transportation Research Part E, 40, 317-337. . doi:10.1016/j.tre.2003.05.001
Notteboom (2008). (n.d.). ThRelationship between Seaports and the Inter-Modal Hinterland in Light of Global Supply Chains. doi:10.1787/9789282102251-3-en
Peter W. De Langen and Athanasios A. Pallis. (n.d.). Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100194
Professor D John Mangan, Professor Chunnilal Lalwani. (2002). Modelling port/ferry choice in RoRo freight transportation. doi:10.1016/S1471-4051(01)00003-9
Tai, Hui-Huang. (2005). Analysis of hub port choice for container trunk lines in East Asia. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies. 6. 907-919. Retrieved from East Asia is the most blooming area among global container shipping services. Most of the oceangoing lines select major.
Tiwari, Piyush & ITO, Hidekazu & Doi, Masayuki. (n.d.). Shippers' Port and Carrier Selection Behaviour in China: A Discrete Choice Analysis. Maritime Economics and Logistics. 5. 23-39. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100062
Tongzon and Heng. (2005, June). Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Retrieved from Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 405-424, June.: RePEc:eee:transa:v:39:y:2005:i:5:p:405-424
Wei Yim Yap, J. S. (2006). Developments in Container Port Competition in East Asia, Transport Reviews, 26:2, 167-188. doi:10.1080/01441640500271117
Yuen, Chi-lok Andrew & Zhang, Anming & Cheung, Waiman, 2012. (n.d.). Port competitiveness from the users' perspective: An analysis of major container ports in China and its neighboring countries. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2011.11.005
https://www.prensa.com/opinion/Estrategia-Maritima-Nacional_0_5218728093.html
https://www.gatech.pa/?lang=en
https://www.pancanal.com/eng/