研究生: |
洪崇峻 Hung, Chung-Chun |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
鑑別並量化台灣資訊電子工業之重大性氣候風險 Identifying and Quantifying the Materiality of Climate Risks in the Information and Electronics Industry in Taiwan |
指導教授: |
葉欣誠
Yeh, Shin-Cheng |
口試委員: |
彭啟明
Peng, Chi-Ming 李堅明 Lee, Chien-Ming 葉欣誠 Yeh, Shin-Cheng |
口試日期: | 2023/06/30 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
環境教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Environmental Education |
論文出版年: | 2023 |
畢業學年度: | 111 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 96 |
中文關鍵詞: | TCFD 、台灣資訊電子業 、重大性氣候風險事件 、氣候風險管理 、企業永續 |
英文關鍵詞: | TCFD, Taiwan's Information and Electronics Industry, Materiality Climate Risk Events, Climate Risk Management, Corporation Sustainability |
研究方法: | 主題分析 、 內容分析法 、 主題分析法 、 層級分析法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202300875 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:121 下載:7 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
IPCCAR6報告發布後,人為引致氣候變遷的確定性升高,氣候變遷對企業帶來的風險卻愈發不確定,並影響全球金融穩定,其中的關鍵點為氣候變遷各面向資訊的缺乏,尤其是氣候風險的鑑別。台灣資訊電子工業以出口為主,且該行業為全球近年來的重大產業,台灣在其中為關鍵角色。然而,缺乏氣候風險對台灣企業的影響的實證研究,資訊電子產業面臨的氣候風險仍不明確。現行全球用來進行氣候相關財務揭露的TCFD雖提供實體和轉型風險的列表,但應用性及細緻度不足,無法反映台灣企業面臨的氣候風險。即便是依循TCFD建立的最新的永續性框架,IFRS S2,也提及各單位需要自行鑑別更具體的氣候風險。
已有許多文獻證明,TCFD為新穎的研究領域,幾乎所有所需的研究都是缺乏的,其中更是少有針對企業如何實施TCFD的「策略」核心的研究。而「策略」中的氣候風險鑑別的缺乏更是導致後續氣候風險管理障礙的肇因。企業的氣候情境分析的質與量受限於,其所依賴的顧問及使用工具和揭露方式,故整合不同企業的氣候風險評估結果有助於全盤釐清氣候風險事件。
本研究依照氣候情境分析的架構,將TCFD對於氣候風險的類型、項目、事件層級化後,著重關注氣候風險事件的鑑別以及重大性排序。本研究採用了質性和量化的研究方法,使用主題內容分析法,分析台灣企業共191份TCFD質性內容,並歸納出49個氣候風險事件。這些歸納出的風險事件擴充原有TCFD氣候風險列表。接著,使用層級分析法讓專家針對這些氣候風險事件對資訊電子產業的「營運衝擊程度」及「發生可能性」進行評估。最後,運用IPCC氣候風險定義,結合脆弱性維度,對風險事件量化後進行重大性排序。此兩種研究方法的使用,在不偏離企業永續實務的工作模式,又兼具學術的嚴謹性,是為本研究的重要價值之一。
本研究之結果驗證學術文獻對於短期實體風險之主導地位的看法,而台灣的資訊電子業也有著相同現象,建議未來研究者專注於探討轉型風險的相關議題。在風險揭露不足的情況下,風險脆弱度難以有效降低,同時也弱化氣候風險管理。本研究填補了TCFD策略面向的學術空白,而研究結果的發現,有助於深化金融監管機構、氣候相關研究單位、企業以及永續顧問業和金融相關單位對TCFD框架下的氣候風險的理解及增進資訊交換。這不僅縮小各方對TCFD的誤用和知識落差,此外,此研究也為未來在台灣資訊電子業中建立氣候情境分析及氣候財務衝擊模型提供了基礎。
Following the release of the IPCC AR6 report, there is growing certainty of human-induced climate change. However, the risks posed by climate change to corporations have become increasingly uncertain, affecting global financial stability. This uncertainty is largely due to the lack of information on various aspects of climate change, especially the identification of climate risks. Taiwan's information electronics industry, a significant global player in recent years, primarily relies on exports. However, there is a dearth of empirical research on the impact of climate risk on Taiwanese corporations, rendering the climate risks faced by the information electronics industry ambiguous. Although the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) offers a list of physical and transition risks, its applicability and granularity are insufficient to reflect the climate risks faced by Taiwanese corporations. Even the latest sustainability framework established in accordance with TCFD, the IFRS S2, mentions that individual units need to independently identify more specific climate risks.
Extant literature underscores that TCFD is a novel research domain where almost all necessary research is lacking, particularly studies on the core strategy of how corporations implement TCFD. The absence of identification of climate risks in this strategy further impedes subsequent climate risk management. The quality and quantity of corporate climate scenario analyses are constrained by the consulting services they rely on, the tools they use, and the way they disclose information. Therefore, integrating the climate risk assessment results of different corporations can help clarify the full picture of climate risk events.
This study follows the framework of climate scenario analysis and categorizes the types, items, and event levels of climate risks according to TCFD. It focuses on identifying and prioritizing significant climate risk events. This study employs qualitative and quantitative research methods, using thematic content analysis to analyze 191 TCFD qualitative content from Taiwanese corporations and summarize 49 climate risk events. These summarized risk events expand the original TCFD climate risk list. Then, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is utilized to allow experts to evaluate the operational impact and likelihood of these climate risk events in the information electronics industry. Finally, combining the vulnerability dimension with the definition of climate risk from the IPCC, a prioritization of risk events is conducted after quantification. The use of these two research methods, which align with practices of corporation sustainability while maintaining academic rigor, is one of the important values of this study.
The results of this study corroborate academic literature's view on the dominance of short-term physical risks, a phenomenon also observed in Taiwan's information electronics industry. Future researchers are recommended to focus on exploring issues related to transition risks. In situations where risk disclosure is insufficient, it's difficult to effectively reduce risk vulnerability, which in turn weakens climate risk management. This study fills the academic gap in TCFD strategy and its findings contribute to a deeper understanding of climate risks under the TCFD framework by financial regulatory agencies, climate-related research units, corporations, sustainability consulting firms, and financial-related units, enhancing information exchange. This not only reduces misuse of the TCFD and knowledge disparity among stakeholders, but also lays the foundation for establishing climate scenario analyses and climate financial impact models in Taiwan's information electronics industry in the future.
Ackers, B., & Grobbelaar, S. E. (2021). The impact of the integrated reporting framework on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures–the case of South African mining companies. Social Responsibility Journal.
Allen, M. W., & Craig, C. A. (2016). Rethinking corporate social responsibility in the age of climate change: A communication perspective. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 1-11.
Ameli, N., Drummond, P., Bisaro, A., Grubb, M., & Chenet, H. (2020). Climate finance and disclosure for institutional investors: why transparency is not enough. Climatic Change, 160(4), 565-589.
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177– 194.
Asiyanbi, A. P. (2015). ‘I don’t get this climate stuff!’Making sense of climate change among the corporate middle class in Lagos. Public Understanding of Science, 24(8), 1007-1024.
Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2004). Risk management, in risk management and governance.
Bebbington, J., & Unerman, J. (2018). Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: an enabling role for accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
Beerbaum, D. (2021). Green Quadriga?-EU-Taxonomy, TCFD, Non-Financial-Reporting Directive and EBA ESG Pillar III/IFRS Foundation. IFRS Foundation (April 11, 2021).
Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., & Gann, D. M. (2006). Learning to adapt: Organisational adaptation to climate change impacts. Climatic Change, 78(1), 135 – 156.
Bernstein, L.A. (1967), “The concept of materiality”, the Accounting Review, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 86-95.
Bolton, P., Despres, M., Da Silva, L. A. P., Samama, F., & Svartzman, R. (2020). The green swan. BIS Books.
Bowman, E. H. (1980). A risk/return paradox for strategic management,Working Paper Alfred P. Sloan School of Management. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. WP 1107-80 (pp. 1 – 25). https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/48928/riskreturnparado00bowm.pdf?sequence
Brennan, N. and Gray, S. (2005), “The impact of materiality: accounting’s best kept secret”, Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 1, pp. 1-31.
Briassoulis, H. (2001). Sustainable development and its indicators: through a (planner's) glass darkly. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(3), 409-427.
Busico, G., Giuditta, E., Kazakis, N., & Colombani, N. (2019). A hybrid GIS and AHP approach for modelling actual and future forest fire risk under climate change accounting water resources attenuation role. Sustainability, 11(24), 7166.
Calice, P., & Miguel, F. (2021). Climate-Related and Environmental Risks for the Banking Sector in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Campiglio, E., Monnin, P., & von Jagow, A. (2019). Climate risks in financial assets. Council on Economic Policies, Discussion.
Carney M (2018) Remarks at the accounting for sustainability summit 2018 — Mark Carney, governor of the Bank of England. Bank of England, London. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/review/r181122b.pdf
Carney, M. 2015. Breaking the tragedy of the horizon—Climate change and financial stability. http://www.bank of england.co.uk/publications/Documents/speeches/2015/speech844.pdf (last accessed 21 December 2016).
Chen, S., & Fan, J. (2011). Measuring corporate social responsibility based on a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, 3(5), 13.
Chenet, H. (2021). Climate change and financial risk. In Financial Risk Management and Modeling (pp. 393-419). Springer, Cham.
Chiu, M. C., Wei, C. J., Wang, Y. C., & Kao, M. C. (2023). Applying unsupervised learning method to develop a regional risk model based on TCFD: A case study in the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136669.
Christophers, B. (2017). Climate change and financial instability: Risk disclosure and the problematics of neoliberal governance. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(5), 1108-1127.
Courbage, C., & Golnaraghi, M. (2022). Extreme events, climate risks and insurance. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 47(1), 1-4.
CSRone. (2021). Trends of Sustainability in Taiwan and APAC 2021. https://csrone.com/reports/4284
de GALHAU, VILLEROY. (2019, June). Climate change: central banks are taking action. In FSR (p. 7).
De Villiers, C., Unerman, J. and Rinaldi, L. (2014), “Integrated reporting: insights, gaps and an agenda for future research”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 1042-1067.
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Accounting, auditing & accountability journal.
Demaria, S., & Rigot, S. (2021). Corporate environmental reporting: Are French firms compliant with the Task Force on Climate Financial Disclosures' recommendations?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 721-738.
Dohr, J.L. (1950), “Materiality – what does it mean in accounting?”, Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 122 No. 1, pp. 54-56.
Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2018). Why companies should report financial risks from climate change. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(3), 1-6.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
Eccles, R. G., Krzus, M. P., Rogers, J., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The need for sector‐specific materiality and sustainability reporting standards. Journal of applied corporate finance, 24(2), 65-71.
Eccles, R.G. and Krzus, M.P. (2014), The Integrated Reporting Movement: Meaning, Momentum, Motives, and Materiality, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Edgley, C. (2014), “A genealogy of accounting materiality”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 255-271.
Ernst and Young. 2014. Let's talk: sustainability, http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY_Lets_talk_sustainability_2014-01/$FILE/EY%20Let's%20talk%20sustainability,%202014-01.pdf
FCA. (2021). Climate-related reporting requirements. https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/climate-change-sustainable-finance/reporting-requirements
Fiedler, T., Pitman, A. J., Mackenzie, K., Wood, N., Jakob, C., & Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S. E. (2021). Business risk and the emergence of climate analytics. Nature Climate Change, 11(2), 87-94.
Finke, T., Gilchrist, A., & Mouzas, S. (2016). Why companies fail to respond to climate change: Collective inaction as an outcome of barriers to interaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 58, 94 – 101.
Fitzpatrick KR and Palenchar MJ (2006) Disclosing special interests: Constitutional restrictions onfrontgroups.Journal of Public Relations Research18(3): 203–224.
FSB. (2015). FSB to establish Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. https://www.fsb.org/2015/12/fsb-to-establish-task-force-on-climate-related-financial-disclosures/
Gasbarro, F., &Pinkse, J. (2016). Corporate adaptation behaviour to deal with climate change: The influence of firm-specific interpretations of physical climate impacts. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(3), 179 – 192.
Gasbarro, F., Rizzi, F., & Frey, M. (2016). Adaptation measures of energy and utility companies to cope with water scarcity induced by climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(1), 54 – 72.
Global Reporting Initiative. 2014. Materiality in the Context of the GRI Reporting Framework, https://www.globalreporting.org/reporting/G3andg3-1/guidelines-online/TechnicalProtocol/Pages/MaterialityInTheContextOfTheGRIReportingFramework.aspx
Goldenberg, S. (2015). Exxon knew of climate change in 1983, email says – but it funded deniers for 27 more years. The Guardian. Retrieved December 29, 2015 from http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/08/exxon-climate-change-1981-climate-denier-funding.
Gonzalez-Perez, M. A., & Leonard, L. (2015). The Global Compact: Corporate sustainability in the post 2015 world. Advances in Sustainability and Environment, 17, 1 – 20.
Goodall, A. H. (2008). Why have the leading journals in management (and other social sciences) failed to respond to climate change? Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), 408 – 420.
Govindan, K., Diabat, A., & Shankar, K. M. (2015). Analyzing the drivers of green manufacturing with fuzzy approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 182-193.
Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 98, 66-83.
Granados, N., Gupta, A., & Kauffman, R. J. (2010). Research commentary—information transparency in business-to-consumer markets: concepts, framework, and research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 207-226.
Greenberg, J., Knight, G., &Westersund, E. (2011). Spinning climate change: Corporate and NGO public relations strategies in Canada and the United States. International Communication Gazette, 73(1-2), 65-82.
GreenBiz. (2022). Systems change is harder than it looks: Systems shift may be the answer. https://www.greenbiz.com/article/systems-change-harder-it-looks-systems-shift-may-be-answer
GreenBiz. 2014. 4 top sustainability reporting trends for 2014, http://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2014/02/20/top-sustainability-reporting-trends-2014
Harley, M., Horrocks, L., Hodgson, N., & van Minnen, J. (2008). Climate change vulnerability and adaptation indicators. ETC/ACC technical paper, 9.
Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change. Environment and behavior, 38(1), 48-71.
Hicks, E.L. (1964), “Materiality”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 158-171.
Holmes, W. (1972), “Materiality: through the looking glass”, Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 133 No. 2, pp. 44-49.
Hopwood, A. G. (2009). Accounting and the environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3-4), 433– 439.
Hsu, C. W., Lee, W. H., & Chao, W. C. (2013). Materiality analysis model in sustainability reporting: A case study at Lite-On Technology Corporation. Journal of cleaner production, 57, 142-151.
Huang, C. J., Ke, W. C., & Lin, C. P. (2020). Does CSR Materiality Affect Financial Performance in Taiwan?. 財務金融學刊, 28(4), 59-109.
IFRS. (2023). IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. The International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation
Ilhan, E., Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2023). Climate risk disclosure and institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 36(7), 2617-2650.
International Integrated Reporting Council. 2013. Materiality, http://www.theiirc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IR-Background-Paper-Materiality.pdf
Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2016). Materiality in corporate sustainability reporting within UK retailing. Journal of Public Affairs, 16(1), 81-90.
Kahraman, C., Onar, S. C., & Oztaysi, B. (2015). Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review. International journal of computational intelligence systems, 8(4), 637-666.
Khorramshahgol, R., & Moustakis, V. S. (1988). Delphic hierarchy process (DHP): A methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 37(3), 347-354.
Kılıç, M., & Kuzey, C. (2018). Assessing current company reports according to the IIRC integrated reporting framework. Meditari Accountancy Research.
Kouloukoui, D., Gomes, S. M. D. S., Marinho, M. M. D. O., Torres, E. A., Kiperstok, A., & de Jong, P. (2018). Disclosure of climate risk information by the world’s largest companies. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 23, 1251-1279.
KPMG. (2014). The essentials of materiality assessment, http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/materiality-assessment.pdf
Lai, A., Melloni, G. and Stacchezzini, R. (2017), "What does materiality mean to integrated reporting preparers? An empirical exploration", Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 533-552. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2017-0113
Lee, C. C., Kuo, S. Y., Hsu, H. H., Mo, T. L., Chang, E. Y., & Huang, K. C. (2022). How does the research community contribute to corporate climate‐related risk disclosures? The gap between ideals and reality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
Lee, S. Y., & Klassen, R. D. (2016). Firms' response to climate change: The interplay of business uncertainty and organizational capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), 577 – 592.
Li, Q., Shan, H., Tang, Y., & Yao, V. (2020). Corporate climate risk: Measurements and responses. Available at SSRN 3508497.
Lin, S. C., Lee, C. M., Hong, Y. R., & Chang, C. K. (2020). Climate risk assessment and response in the semiconductor industry: Application of TCFD and hedge accounting methods. Journal of Business Administration, 45(2), 1-27.
Linnenluecke, M. K. (2017). Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews , 19 (1), 4-30.
Linnenluecke, M.K. and Griffiths, A. (2013). The 2009 Victorian bushfires: a multilevel perspective on organizational risk and resilience. Organization & Environment, 26, pp. 386–411.
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The delphi method: Techniques and application. London , England: Addison-Wesley.
Liu, I., & Tung, C. P. (2020, May). The application of climate adaptation algorithm to physical climate risk assessment and management of the TCFD. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (p. 4276).Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications–Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert systems with Applications, 42(8), 4126-4148.
Manes‐Rossi, F. & Nicolo', G. (2022). Exploring sustainable development goals reporting practices: From symbolic to substantive approaches—Evidence from the energy sector. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management. doi:10.1002/csr.2328
Manes-Rossi, F., Nicolò, G., Tudor, A. T., & Zanellato, G. (2020). Drivers of integrated reporting by state-owned enterprises in Europe: A longitudinal analysis. Meditari Accountancy Research.
Mazutis, D., &Eckardt, A. (2017). Sleepwalking into catastrophe: Cognitive biases and corporate climate change inertia. California Management Review, 59(3), 74 – 108.
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2-3), 100-133.
Messier, W.F., Jr., Martinov-Bennie, N. and Eilifsen, A. (2005), “A review and integration of empirical research on materiality: two decades later”, Auditing a Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 153-204.
Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of management & governance, 16(3), 477-509.
Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59– 78.
Milman, A., & Short, A. (2008). Incorporating resilience into sustainability indicators: An example for the urban water sector. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 758-767.
Mio, C., Panfilo, S., & Blundo, B. (2020). Sustainable development goals and the strategic role of business: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3220-3245.
Monasterolo, I., Battiston, S., Janetos, A. C., & Zheng, Z. (2017). Vulnerable yet relevant: the two dimensions of climate-related financial disclosure. Climatic change, 145, 495-507.
Murry, Jr., J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi:, A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423-436.
Nicolò, G., Tiron-Tudor, A., Manes-Rossi, F., & Zanellato, G. (2019). Beyond Financial Reporting: Integrated Reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the context of European state-owned enterprises. Beyond Financial Reporting: Integrated Reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the context of European state-owned enterprises, 43-72.
Nicolò, G., Zanellato, G., Tiron-Tudor, A., & Polcini, P. T. (2022). Revealing the corporate contribution to sustainable development goals through integrated reporting: a worldwide perspective. Social Responsibility Journal , (ahead-of-print).
Nijhof, A. H. J., & Jeurissen, R. J. M. (2010). The glass ceiling of corporate social responsibility: Consequences of a business case approach towards CSR. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30 (11/12), 618 – 631. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443331011085222
NOAA. (2022). Trends in atmospheric CO2. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/
O'Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2020). Shifting the focus of sustainability accounting from impacts to risks and dependencies: researching the transformative potential of TCFD reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
Orencio, P. M., & Fujii, M. (2013). A localized disaster-resilience index to assess coastal communities based on an analytic hierarchy process (AHP). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 3, 62-75.
Palea, V., & Drogo, F. (2020). Carbon emissions and the cost of debt in the eurozone: The role of public policies, climate‐related disclosure and corporate governance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 2953-2972. Achenbach, M. (2021). Transparency of Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities: Determinants Influencing the Disclosure in Line with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. Glocality, 4(1).
PGS. (2013). Determining materiality: a key for corporate sustainability, http://www.pgsadvisors.com/2013/07/determining-materiality-a-key-tool-for-corporate-sustainability/
Pizzi, S., Caputo, A., Corvino, A., & Venturelli, A. (2020). Management research and the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs): A bibliometric investigation and systematic review. Journal of cleaner production, 276, 124033.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1 – 2), 62 – 77.
Rajan, R. G. (2011). Fault lines. In Fault Lines. princeton University press.
Rampton S and Stauber J (2002)Trust Us, We’re Experts!How Industry Manipulates Science andGambles with Your Future. New York: Penguin.
Rasulo, M. (2022). Dialogic patterns of the oppressor-oppressed dynamic in climate change denial. Journal of Pragmatics, 189, 147-159.
Reininga, W. (1968), “The unknown materiality concept”, Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 125, pp. 30-35.
Reuters. (2022). U.S. SEC proposes companies disclose range of climate risks, emissions data. https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/us-sec-set-unveil-landmark-climate-change-disclosure-rule-2022-03-21/
Robertson, F. A., & Samy, M. (2015). Factors affecting the diffusion of integrated reporting–a UK FTSE 100 perspective. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal.
Romero, S., Ruiz, S., & Fernandez‐Feijoo, B. (2019). Sustainability reporting and stakeholder engagement in Spain: Different instruments, different quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 221-232.
Rupley, K. H., Brown, D., & Marshall, S. (2017). Evolution of corporate reporting: From stand-alone corporate social responsibility reporting to integrated reporting. Research in accounting regulation, 29(2), 172-176.
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (1980). Hierarchical analysis of behavior in competition: Prediction in chess. Behavioral science, 25(3), 180-191.
Sakhel, A. (2017). Corporate climate risk management: Are European companies prepared?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 103-118.
Sanderson, H., Irato, D. M., Cerezo, N. P., Duel, H., Faria, P., & Torres, E. F. (2019). How do climate risks affect corporations and how could they address these risks?. SN Applied Sciences, 1(12), 1-6.
Schäfer, M. S., Ivanova, A., & Schmidt, A. (2014). What drives media attention for climate change? Explaining issue attention in Australian, German and Indian print media from 1996 to 2010. International Communication Gazette, 76(2), 152-176.
Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., & Hughes, E. (2016). The private sector and the SDGs: The need to move beyond ‘business as usual’. Sustainable Development, 24(6), 371-382.
Securities and Exchange Commission. (2010). Commission guidance regarding disclosure related to climatechange: Final rule. https://www.sec.gov/rules/interp/2010/33-9106fr.pdf
Shabana, K. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility reporting as substantive and symbolic behavior: A multilevel theoretical analysis. Business and society review, 121(2), 297-327.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2011). Fire sales in finance and macroeconomics. Journal of economic perspectives, 25(1), 29-48.
Siddayao, G. P., Valdez, S. E., & Fernandez, P. L. (2014). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in spatial modeling for floodplain risk assessment. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, 4(5), 450.
Simnett, R., & Huggins, A. L. (2015). Integrated reporting and assurance: where can research add value?. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal.
Slawinski, N., Pinkse, J., Busch, T., & Banerjee, S. B. (2017). The role of short-termism and uncertainty avoidance in organizational inaction on climate change: A multi-level framework. Business & Society, 56(2), 253 – 282.
Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J., & Wandel, J. (2000). An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability (pp. 223-251). Springer Netherlands.
Soler-Domínguez, A., Matallín-S aez, J. C., Mingo-L operz, D. V., &Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2020). Looking for sustainable development: Socially responsible mutual funds and the low-carbon economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1 – 16. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2713
Stroebel, J., &Wurgler, J. (2021). What do you think about climate finance?. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 487-498.ISO 690
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20(3), 571-610.
Surminski, S., Di Mauro, M., Baglee, J. A. R., Connell, R. K., Hankinson, J., Haworth, A. R., ... & Proverbs, D. (2018). Assessing climate risks across different business sectors and industries: an investigation of methodological challenges at national scale for the UK. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2121), 20170307.
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. (2014). Determining materiality, http://www.sasb.org/materiality/determining-materiality/
Swart, R. (2019). Assessing physical climate risks for investments: A risky promise. Climate Services, 14, 15-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2019.04.001
Tashman, P., Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2019). Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 153– 171.
Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures(TCFD). (2016a). Phase I report of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. https://www. fsb-tcfd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Phase_I_Report_v15.pdf (last accessed 21 December 2016).
TCFD. (2017).Recommendations of The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Switzerland: Financial Stability Board.
TCFD. (2021). The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures: Status Report 2021. Switzerland: Financial Stability Board.
TCFD. (2022). Statement of Mary Schapiro on the SEC’s Proposed Rules to Enhance and Standardize Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors. https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/press/statement-of-mary-schapiro-on-the-secs-proposed-rules-to-enhance-and-standardize-climate-related-disclosures-for-investors/
The WhiteHouse. (2021). Executive Order on Climate-Related Financial Risk. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/05/20/executive-order-on-climate-related-financial-risk/
Thomä J, Chenet H (2017) Transition risks and market failure: a theoretical discourse on why financial models and economic agents may misprice risk related to the transition to a low-carbon economy. J Sustain Finance Investment 7(1):82–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1204847
Todaro, N. M., Testa, F., Daddi, T., &Iraldo, F. (2021). The influence of managers' awareness of climate change, perceived climate risk exposure and risk tolerance on the adoption of corporate responses to climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment , 30 (2), 1232-1248.
Toledo, R., Engler, A., & Ahumada, V. (2011). Evaluation of risk factors in agriculture: an application of the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) methodology.
Tripathi, S. H., & Lanka, K. (2022). Evaluating Climate Change Risks in Supply Chain within the Indian E-Commerce Industry Using Ahp and Dematel Techniques.
Velez-Ocampo, J., & Gonzalez-Perez, M. A. (2019). Analyzing foreign expansion and corporate reputation: Review and future research agenda. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 26(4), 586 – 608.https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-06-2019-0110
Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M., & Garzoni, A. (2019). How pressure from stakeholders affects integrated reporting quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1591-1606.
Wachira, M.M., Berndt, T. and Romero, C.M. (2020), “The adoption of international sustainability and integrated reporting guidelines within a mandatory reporting framework: lessons from South Africa”, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 613-629.
Wedawatta, G. and Ingirige, B. (2012). Resilience and adaptation of small and medium-sized enterprises to flood risk. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 21, pp. 474–488.
WEF. (2022). The Global Risks Report 2022 17th Edition INSIGHT REPORT. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2022.pdf
Weinhofer, G., & Busch, T. (2013). Corporate strategies for managing climate risks. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(2), 121-144.
Winn, M.I. and Pogutz, S. (2013). Business, ecosystems, and biodiversity: new horizons for management research. Organization & Environment, 26, pp. 203–229.
Winston, A. (2014). Resilience in a hotter world. Harvard business review, 92(4), 56-64.
Zhongming, Z., Linong, L., Xiaona, Y., Wangqiang, Z., & Wei, L. (2020). TCFD recommendations continue to play a key role in accelerating the transition to a low-carbon society.
Zscheischler, J., Westra, S., Van Den Hurk, B. J., Seneviratne, S. I., Ward, P. J., Pitman, A., ... & Zhang, X. (2018). Future climate risk from compound events. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 469-477.
丁志華。2018。《科學發展》2018年1月,541期,21 ~ 29頁。財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。https://ejournal.stpi.narl.org.tw/sd/download?source=10701-03.pdf&vlId=672d24c723ea4b0bac4e1d308f165518&nd=1&ds=1
中技社。(2021)。台灣半導體產業面對國際政經環境變動的挑戰及因應。財團法人中技社。https://www.ctci.org.tw/media/9162/2021-03-%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E5%8D%8A%E5%B0%8E%E9%AB%94%E7%94%A2%E6%A5%AD%E9%9D%A2%E5%B0%8D%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E6%94%BF%E7%B6%93%E7%92%B0%E5%A2%83%E8%AE%8A%E5%8B%95%E7%9A%84%E6%8C%91%E6%88%B0%E8%88%87%E5%9B%A0%E6%87%89.pdf
王仁傑。2018。《科學發展》2018年1月,541期,30 ~ 36頁。財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。https://ejournal.stpi.narl.org.tw/sd/download?source=10701-04.pdf&vlId=672d24c723ea4b0bac4e1d308f165518&nd=1&ds=1
王晧軒。(2020)。企業導入氣候相關財務揭露(TCFD)之現況研究-以台灣上市(櫃)公司為例。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/99ar72
台灣銀行家。(2021)。氣候變遷衝擊金融穩定性,面對風險、迎接挑戰與機會。143期。https://taiwanbanker.tabf.org.tw/paperDetail?id=3580
吳天佑。(2020)。國際經濟情勢對我國高科技產業之機會與挑戰。國家發展委員會《經濟研究第20期》。https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xMzUwNi81OTVhZGY4NC03NDYxLTRlYjUtYWM1Yy03MGU3MzI3NDRhMTMucGRm&n=OeWci%2Bmam%2Be2k%2Ba%2Fn%2BaDheWLouWwjeaIkeWci%2BmrmOenkeaKgOeUoualreS5i%2Bapn%2Bacg%2BiIh%2BaMkeaIsC5wZGY%3D&icon=..pdf
林聖忠(2021)。建構TCFD氣候風險評估架構–以產業層級與城市層級應用為例。國立臺北大學公共事務學院自然資源與環境管理研究所博士論文。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mh38f7
國家防災中心。(2019)。以IPCC風險定義探討氣候變遷下水資源風險評估與調適應用。https://tccip.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/publish_01_technical_report_one_download.aspx?tr_id=20210825201002
鄧振源。(2005)。計畫評估-方法與應用。臺北: 海洋大學運籌規劃與管理研究中心。