隨著二十一世紀科學快速變遷的時代，各國的技術快速發展於各項科學與新科技的研究，積極改善基礎的科學教育，以提倡課外之科學競賽，本研究以機關王競賽將其創意思考融入積木材料，應用科學知識及激發學生在作品設計的創意巧思，培養學生科學知識應用力是受到現代教育的重視，特別是參賽學生在參與團隊競賽過程當中，團隊成員個人特質的表現以及團隊互動之間所遇到問題並且討論與協調問題下，皆是賽程中是最重要的一部分，進而也會影響科學知識應用能力在競賽作品的呈現。
本研究對象範圍為2016年機關王世界賽之參賽學生，欲達成研究之目的以及證實樣本更明確，所以採取之抽樣方式為立意抽樣(purposive sampling)，進行本研究問卷調查法為主的實施方式，共回收322份有效問卷，資料分析方法主要使用SPSS21及AMOS20統計軟體加以分析驗證，並以結構方程式(SEM)來檢定本研究的假設內容。本研究結果發現（1）個人利他特質對於團隊效能與團隊向心力皆呈現正向相關（2）個人科學好奇心對於團隊效能與團隊向心力皆呈現正向相關（3）團隊效能與團隊向心力之間以及兩者對於科學知識應用力皆呈現為正向相關。因此，對於在競賽過程當中，團隊成員個人若具有利他特質與科學好奇心，會提升團隊之間共同產生出效能以及向心力，在團隊向心力會影響團隊效能，為達到共同一致的目標，進而彼此團隊之間的科學知識應用力也會隨之提高。

To study the group performance in STEM competition is very essential to promote the group capability to win. How group members’ characteristics affect group cohesiveness underlies their knowledge application that affects their competition performance has been rare studied. This study aimed to explore the correlates among individual characteristics (i.e., altruistic tendency and scientific curiosity), collective states (i.e., collective efficacy and cohesiveness) that affect scientific knowledge application. In line this attempting, this study took a STEAM competition, named GreenMech contest, which required 4 members in a group to assembly all parts to many conjunctures for ball to run and trigger next juncture function in the morning and to be assessed in the afternoon. The most scoring index in this assessment was scientific knowledge applications in the whole design. Taken this assessment, this study additionally used questionnaire survey for participants to self-rate their perceptions on those individual traits and collective states.
Purposive sampling method was used, and data of 322 was collected in 2016 GreenMech contest, then SPSS21 and AMOS20 were applied to confirm the hypotheses by the confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The present results showed that: (1) Altruistic tendency was positively related to collective efficacy and cohesiveness. (2) Scientific curiosity was positively related to collective efficacy and cohesiveness. (3) Collective efficacy was positively related to cohesiveness, and two collective states were positively related to applicability of scientific knowledge. The implication of this study suggested that the team members have higher level of altruistic tendency and scientific curiosity can provide collective efficacy and cohesiveness which facilitate them to achieve competition goal by increasing the applicability of scientific knowledge in the contest.

一、中文部分
王玉惠（2015）。家長式領導與差序式領導對團隊效能之影響-以團隊凝聚力為中介變項。淡江大學，新北市。
王志賢（2009）。以SWOT分析和藍海策略促進科學應用教學之行動研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立東華大學，花蓮縣。
王俊明（1999）。問卷與量表的編製及分析方法。體育測驗與評價。臺北：中華民國體育學會。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2012）。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北：五南。
吳秉潔（2012）。員工心情對離職傾向、團隊凝聚力、創造力角色認同之影響。國立成功大學，臺南市。
吳盛、林東清（2007）。以計劃行為理論探討資訊人員的知識分享行為。資訊管理學報，14（2），75-110。
周延達（2014）。團隊情緒智商對團隊效能的影響-以團隊凝聚力為中介變項。東吳大學，臺北市。
周建和、李舒婷（2003）。動手做科學大師-托里切利神燈。高雄：海軍官校。
邱淑妙（2006）。團隊人格特質、轉換型領到與團隊效能之關係探討-團隊凝聚力之中介角色。國立中山大學，高雄市。
洪榮昭（2007）。水晶計畫-以工廠為資源中心教學模式研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號95-2511-S-003-012-MY3)。臺北：中華民國行政院科學委員會
洪榮昭、蔡志敏、李岷憲（2011）。科學與科技競賽相關活動之辦理-以活動理論觀點進行分析。教育資料與研究雙月刊，101，159-192。
胡婉玲、蔡明宏（2008）。重建使用創新性，使用擴散與創新採用意圖關係之實證研究。中華傳播學刊，13，37-73。
夏淑蓉、盧俊宏（2002）。大專網球選手運動動機與運動員身心倦怠之相關研究。大專體育學刊，4(1)，145-156。
徐毅穎（2001）。國中生活科技教師對九年一貫課程關注之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
張忻婷（2014）。轉換型領導、團隊凝聚力與知識分享意願之研究-以國際觀光旅館員工為例。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。
張偉豪（2011）。SEM論文不求人。高雄：三星統計。
張淑慧（2002）。從旁觀到實踐-一位準教師面對規訓與自主間的掙扎。國立新竹師範大學，新竹市。
張惠博（2001）。九年一貫課程實施與教師的專業成長。科學教育月刊，239，13-25。
教育部（2003）。國民中學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北：教育部。
教育部（2008）。國民中學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北：教育部。
教育部（2015）。科學教育白皮書。臺北：教育部。
許庭銓（2010）。自我效能與利他主義對大學專題知識分享之知識。嶺東科技大學，臺中市。
陳文靜（2014)）。組織氣氛對射箭教練訓練成效-以團隊凝聚力之中介因素之研究。朝陽科技大學，臺中市。
陳其昌（1993）。排球教練領到行為對團隊凝聚力的影響既驗證運動情境領導理論之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立體育大學，桃園市。
陳品豪（2016）。高階經營團隊自我效能與競爭積極性對組織績效之影響-以信任為干擾因素。國立成功大學，臺南市。
陳雅惠（2012）。運用探索教育提升國小五年級學生班級凝聚力之行動研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
彭張紘（2011）。團隊內組織公民行為影響因素之探討-跨層次模式分析。元智大學，桃園市。
游佳琳（2014）。探索教育活動實施對提升國中班級團隊凝聚力之行動研究。國立臺灣海洋大學，基隆市。
黃巧瑛（2010）。自我效能、團隊效能級領導風格與軟題開發專案績效之研究。元智大學，桃園市。
榮泰生（2011）。AMOS 與研究方法。臺北：五南。
劉書瑋（2015）。倫理領導與團隊效能對團隊創新影響之研究。銘傳大學，臺北市。
劉襄、李惠婷（2012）。團隊規模對團隊凝聚力之影響。高師大體育期刊，10， 107-116。
蔡執仲、段曉林（2005）。探究式實驗教學對國二學生理化學習動機之影響。科學教育學刊，13（3）， 289-315。
盧素娥（1995）。大專籃球選手的知覺運動動機氣候與團隊凝聚力之相關研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立體育大學，桃園市。
盧愛雲（2015）。自我揭露對團隊凝聚力及績效之影響。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
蕭淑分（2009）。創造性問題解決融入科學遊戲教學之行動研究-以「光」為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
謝祥宏、龍麟如、段曉林（2004）。國小學童對自然科評量知覺初探之研究。科學教育學刊，12，27-52。
謝紹彥（2015）。主管不同領導風格對團隊效能影響之研究-以員工人格特質為干擾變項。國立中央大學，桃園市。
蘇文義（2002）。情境式評量中的科學認知與科學應用能力及影響學生科學學習成就的因素。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
蘇秀玲（2004）。科學遊戲融入國小自然學童的科學態度與問題解決能力之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。

二、英文部分
Anderson, G. R. (1998). Inference of phylogeny and taxonomy within the Didymozoidae (Digenea) from the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) of ribosomal DNA. Systematic Parasitology, 41(2), 87-94.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, BOS: Allyn & Bacon.
Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of arm glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464-477.
Antonuccio, D. O., Davis, C., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Breckenridge, J. S. (1987). Therapist variables related to cohesiveness in a group treatment for depression. Small Group Behavior, 18(4), 557-564.
Arnone, M. P., Grabowski, B. L., & Rynd, C. P. (1994). Curiosity as a personality variable influencing learning in a learner controlled lesson with and without advisement. Educational echnology Research and Development, 42(1), 5-20.
Asimov, I. (1975). Biographical encyclopedia of science and technology: The lives and achievements of 1195 great scientists. London, England: Routledge.
Aydin, M. N. A. (2016). The effect of active learning based science camp activities on primary school students' opinions towards scientific knowledge and scientific process skills. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 6(2), 108-125.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation for structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey, NJ : Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
Barnes, B. (2013). Scientific knowledge and sociological theory. London, England: Routledge.
Bartal, D. (1986). Altruistic motivation to help: Definition, utility and operationalization. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 13(1), 3-14.
Batson C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. New York, NY: McGrawHill.
Baumann, D. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Kendrick, D. T. (1981). Altruism as hedonism: Helping and self-gratification as equivalent responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(6), 10-39.
Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, WA: National Academies Press.
Bentler, P. M. (2009). Alpha, dimension-free, and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika, 74(1), 137-143.
Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, General Section, 45(3), 180-191.
Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153(3731), 25-33.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316.
Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69(2), 479-504.
Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1‐2), 52-69.
Brawley, L. R., Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1987). Assessing the cohesion of teams: Validity of the group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 9(3), 275-294.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Burlingame, G. M., McClendon, D. T., & Alonso, J. (2011). Cohesion in group therapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 34-42.
Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(2), 147-158.
Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4(2), 402-410.
Chen, G., & Bliese, P. D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 549-556.
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83.
Chi, M. T., Slotta, J. D., & De Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27-43.
Choi, J. I., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53-69.
Clore, G. L., Ortony, A., & Foss, M. A. (1987). The psychological foundations of the affective lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 751-766.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences lawrence earlbaum associates. New Jersey, NJ: Hillsdale.
Cothron, J. H., Giese, R. N., Rezba, R. J. (1993). Students and research: Practical strategies for science classrooms and 129 competitions. Dubque, DBQ: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, BOS: Harvard Business Press.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (2008). Bootstrap inference in a linear equation estimated by instrumental variables. The Econometrics Journal, 11(3), 443-477.
Doll, W.J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 10-40.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
Earley, P. C. (1993). Culture, self-Identity, and work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Earley, P. C., Gibson, C. B., & Chen, C. C. (1999). “How did I do?” versus “How did we do?” Cultural contrasts of performance feedback use and self-efficacy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(5), 594-619.
Eckel, C. C., Fatas, E., Godoy, S., & Wilson, R. K. (2016). Group-level selection increases cooperation in the public goods game. Plos One, 11(8), 1-13.
Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Schaller, M., Carlo, G., & Miller, P. A. (1991). The relationship of parental characteristics and practices to children’s vicarious emotional responding. Child Development, 62(6), 1393-1408.
Fazio, R. H., Herr, P. M., & Powell, M. C. (1992). On the development and strength of category-brand associations in memory: The case of mystery ads. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(1), 1-13.
Festinger, L., Schacter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informed groups: A study of a housing project. New York, NY: Harare.
Filho, E., Tenenbaum, G., & Yang, Y. (2015). Cohesion, team mental models, and collective efficacy: Towards an integrated framework of team dynamics in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(6), 641-653.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
Funnell, M. M., Brown, T. L., Childs, B. P., Haas, L. B., Hosey, G. M., Jensen, B., & Siminerio, L. M. (2009). National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care, 32(1), 87-94.
Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in CognitiveSsciences, 4(1), 14-21.
Gao, S., Mokhtarian, P., & Johnston, R. (2008). Nonnormality of data in structural equation models. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2082(14), 116-124.
Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). Dissecting practical intelligence theory: Its claims and evidence. Intelligence, 31(4), 343-397.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392.
Grossnickle, E. M. (2014). The expression and enactment of interest and curiosity in a multiple source use task. Retrived from http://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/16421
Gruber, J. J., & Gray, G. R. (1981). Factor patterns of variables influencing cohesiveness at various levels of basketball competition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 52(1), 19-30.
Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 87-106.
Haas, B. W., Brook, M., Remillard, L., Ishak, A., Anderson, I. W., & Filkowski, M. M. (2015). I know how you feel: The warm altruistic personality profile and the empathic brain. Plos One, 10(3), 1-15.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 17-52.
Hartenian, L. S., & Lilly, B. (2009). Egoism and commitment: A multidimensional approach to understanding sustained volunteering. Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(1), 97-118.
Harty, H., & Beall, D. (1984). Attitudes toward science of gifted and nongifted fifth graders. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(5), 483-488.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Irwin, K., Tsang, J. A., Carlisle, R., & Shen, M. J. (2014). Group‐level effects of forgiveness: Group cohesiveness and collective action in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 280-286.
Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2012). Children’s scientific curiosity: In search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental Review, 32(2), 125-160.
Jones, D. (2016). Socially enforced nepotism: How norms and reputation can amplify kin altruism. Plos One, 11(6), 1-13.
Kane, A. A., & Rink, F. (2016). When and how groups utilize dissenting newcomer knowledge: Newcomers’ future prospects condition the effect of language-based identity strategies. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(5), 591-607.
Kanfer, R. (1987). Task specific motivation: An integrative approach to issues of measurement, mechanisms, processes, and determinants. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5(2), 237-264.
Kashdan, T. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2009). Curiosity and interest: The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge. Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, 2, 367-374.
Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(3), 291-305.
Keller, R. T. (1986). Predictors of the performance of project group in R & D organization. Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 715-726.
Kim, M., & Shin, Y. (2015). Collective efficacy as a mediator between cooperative group norms and group positive affect and team creativity. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(3), 693-716.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2 nd Eds.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Knight, D., Durham, C. C., & Locke, E. A. (2001). The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 326-338
Koballa, T. R. (1988). Attitude and related concepts in science education. Science Education, 72(2), 115-126.
Koufteros, X. A. (1999). Testing a model of pull production: A paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling. Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 467-488.
Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching children science: A project-based approach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill College.
Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. Massachusett, MA: Context and Consciousness.
Laforgia, J. (1988). The affective domain related to science education and its evaluation. Science Education, 72(4), 407-421.
Lederman, N. G. (1986). Relating teaching behavior and classroom climate to changes in students’ conceptions of the nature of science. Science Education, 70(1), 3-19.
Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1998). The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 338-345.
Li, X., Zhou, M., Zhao, N., Zhang, S., & Zhang, J. (2015). Collective-efficacy as a mediator of the relationship of leaders' personality traits and team performance: A cross-level analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 50(3), 223-231.
Litman, T. (2014). Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions implications for transports. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 28, 36-42.
Littlepage, G. E., Cowart, L., & Kerr, B. (1989). Relationships between group environment scales and group performance and cohesion. Small Group Research, 20(1), 50-61.
Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75-98.
Lu, C. S., Lai, K. H., & Cheng, T. E. (2007). Application of structural equation modeling to evaluate the intention of shippers to use internet services in liner shipping. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(2), 845-867.
MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193-210.
MacKenzie, K. R. (1987). Therapeutic factors in group psychotherapy: A contemporary view. Group, 11(1), 26-34.
Mark, S., & Scott, C. (2002). The process-outcome connection in foreign policy decision making: A quantitative study building on groupthink. International Studies Quarterly, 46(1), 45-68.
Martens, R., & Peterson, J. A. (1971). Group cohesiveness as a determinant of success and member satisfaction in team performance. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 6(1), 49-61.
Mestre, J. P., & Lochhead, J. (1990). Academic preparation in science. New York, NY: The College Board.
Morgan, S., & Miller, J. (2002). Communicating about gifts of life: The effect of knowledge, attitudes, and altruism on behavior and behavioral intentions regarding organ donation. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30(2), 163-178.
Mulaik, S. A. (2009). Foundations of factor analysis. New York, NY: CRC Press.
Mullen, R., Faull, A., Jones, E. S., & Kingston, K. (2015). Evidence for the effectiveness of holistic process goals for learning and performance under pressure. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 17, 40-44.
Naylor, F. D., & Gaudry, E. (1976). A state-trait model of curiosity. Critical review of state-trait curiosity test development. Motivation and Emotion, 7, 377-397.
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). On multilevel model reliability estimation from the perspective of structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(1), 130-141.
Roberts, G. (2015). Human cooperation: The race to give. Current Biology, 25(10), 425-427.
Rosenfeld, L., & Bohr, N. H. D. (1961). Niels Bohr an essay dedicated to him on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, October 7, 1945. Science and Society, 23(1), 79-84.
Rushton, J. P. (1981). Altruism and helping behavior: Social, personality, and developmental perspectives. New Jersey, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., & Fekken, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2(4), 293-302.
Schneider, A., Von Krogh, G., & JäGer, P. (2013). “What’s coming next?” Epistemic curiosity and lurking behavior in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 293-303.
Schroeder, D. A., Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., & Piliavin, J. A. (1995). The psychology of helping and altruism: Problems and puzzles. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. London, England: Routledge.
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221-279.
Shaw, R. (1981). Strange attractors, chaotic behavior, and information flow. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, 36(1), 80-112.
Shin, Y., & Eom, C. (2014). Team proactivity as a linking mechanism between team creativity efficacy, transformational leadership, and risk-taking norms and team creative performance. Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(2), 89-114.
Spektor-Levy, O., Baruch, Y. K., & Mevarech, Z. (2013). Science and scientific curiosity in pre-school: The teacher's point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 35(13), 2226-2253.
Spink, K. S. (1990). Group cohesion and collective efficacy of volleyball teams. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 12(3), 301-311.
Stein, D. (1998). Situated learning in adult education. Retrived from http://www.cctc.org/acve.docgen.asp?tbl=digest&ID=48
Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8(1), 26-43.
Stokes, J. P. (1983). Predicting satisfaction with social support from social network structure. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11(2), 141-152.
Takano, M., Wada, K., & Fukuda, I. (2016). Reciprocal altruism based cooperation in a social network game. New Generation Computing, 34(3), 257-272.
Thompson, I., Jones, D. S., & Ropes, J. W. (1980). Advanced age for sexual maturity in the ocean quahog Arctica islandica (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Marine Biology, 57(1), 35-39.
Thompson, W. C., Cowan, C. L., & Rosenhan, D. L. (1980). Focus of attention mediates the impact of negative affect on altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 291-300.
Tjosvold, D. (1988). Interdependence and power between managers and employee: A study of the leader relationship. Journal of Management, 15(1), 49-64.
Torkzadeh, G., Koufteros, X., & Pflughoeft, K. (2003). Confirmatory analysis of computer self-efficacy. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(2), 263-275.
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35-57.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399.
Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45-69.
Weible, J. L., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2016). Science curiosity in learning environments: Developing an attitudinal scale for research in schools, homes, museums, and the community. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1235-1255.
Williams, J. M., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1991). The cohesion performance outcome relationship in a coacting sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(4), 364-371.
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407-415.
Yalom, I. D. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York, NY: A Divission of Harper Collins Publishers.
Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, V., Peterson, C., & Zazanis, M. (1995). Collective efficacy in self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment. New York, NY: Plenum.
Zappalà, D. A., Pluchino, A., & Rapisarda, A. (2014). Selective altruism in collective games. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 410, 496-512.
Zimmerman, H. T., & Bell, P. (2014). Where young people see science: Everyday activities connected to science. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 4(1), 25-53.