研究生: |
童琦芳 Tung, Chi-Fang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
大專女子排球不同攻擊位置之攻擊效益 The efficacy of attack in different positions in collegiate female volleyball |
指導教授: |
劉錦璋
Gin-Chang Liu |
口試委員: |
劉錦璋
Gin-Chang Liu 胡舉卿 Chu-Chin Hu 施惠方 Hui-Fang Szu |
口試日期: | 2024/07/26 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
運動競技學系 Department of Athletic Performance |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 32 |
中文關鍵詞: | 運動表現分析 、攻擊 、效益 、不同位置 |
英文關鍵詞: | Performance analysis, Attack, Efficacy, Different positions |
研究方法: | 觀察研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401363 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:109 下載:3 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
緒論:排球運動中攻擊是影響比賽勝負相關性最高的動作,本研究以大專女子排球為
研究對象,歸納文獻所提出的攻擊效益分級與方法,探討大專女子排球不同攻擊位置
之攻擊效益。方法:以112 年大專排球聯賽公開女子組第一級決賽之隊伍之決賽的比
賽數據(共計6 場,22 局,906 分,1582 次攻擊動作)進行不同攻擊位置的攻擊效益
分析,以出現次數、百分比及攻擊效益係數等描述性統計和卡方 (Chi- Square) 百分
比適合度檢定分析5 項攻擊效益(攻擊得分、對方無攻擊回球、受限攻擊效果、無攻
擊效果、攻擊失分)分別在不同攻擊手位置與不同排名隊伍之間的差異,卡方檢定顯
著性水平定為p< 0.05。結果:1.不同位置的攻擊手所表現出來的整體攻擊效益的比例
是相似的(2
= 1.48, df=8, p =0.99 > 0.05, φ =0.03),2. 從不同排名隊伍的所有位置攻擊
效益達顯著差異(2
= 39.99, df=20, p < 0.05, φ =0.15)以及各隊伍之間對不同位置攻擊手
的使用達顯著差異(2
= 128.67, df=10, p <0 .05, φ =0.29), 3. 不同攻擊位置在排名領先
攻擊手的攻擊效益皆未達顯著差異。結論:這5 項攻擊效益的分級是評估攻擊手貢獻
度的有效評量方法,球隊倚重的主攻與副攻位置有所不同,但快攻在一個球隊中貢獻
度很高的位置。從攻擊效益的角度來看大會所公布的最佳選手評定的結果也些微落
差。建議未來對不同層級賽事將攻擊效益做進一步分析,適當地納入攻擊效益係數做
為攻擊表現的評量參考指標。
關鍵詞:運動表現分析、攻擊、效益、不同位置
Introduction:. The attack is the action that has the highest correlation with the success of
volleyball team. The purpose of this study was to find out the common tendencies of efficacy
of attack between attack-positions among different ranking teams. Methods: The sample was
1582 attack actions played by 6 1st
-level of collegiate female volleyball matches, 22 sets, 906
points, which released by Chinese Taipei University Sports Federation website was collected
and analysed. A descriptive analysis (occurrence, occurrence percentage and coefficient of
attack efficacy), and an inferential analysis were made. Chi-square goodness of fit test was used
to examine the difference of distribution of percentages among the efficacy variables between
different positions and different ranking teams. The level of significance was established at p<
0.05. Results: 1. The proportion of the overall attack efficacy shown by the attackers in
different positions is similar ( = 1.48, df = 8, p = 0.99 > .05, φ = 0.03), 2. There were significant
differences in attack efficacy from all positions of the ranked teams ( = 39.99, df=20, p < .05,
φ =0.15) and between teams ( = 128.67, df=10, p < .05, φ =0.29), 3. There is no significant
difference in the attack efficacy of the leading attackers at different attack positions.
Conclusions: These 5 levels of attack efficacy are a valid measure of the attacker's contribution,
and teams rely on different positions in side-attacker and opposite-attacker, but the middle-
block attacker has a high contribution in a team. From the point of view of the effectiveness of
the attack, the results of the evaluation of the best attackers of each positions announced by
official report is controversial. It is suggested that in the future, efficacy of the attack in
competition of different levels should be further studied, and then the evaluation method of
efficacy of attack should be appropriately applied in the evaluation of attack performance.
Key words: Performance analysis, Attack, Efficacy, Different positions
李建平、鄭金昌、莊清泉、王夢英(2007)。影響排球攻擊積效因素之探討。
林竹茂(1995)。排球攻擊技術運動生理學暨訓練策略研析。台灣師大體育研究,1期,123-137。
陳志成、葉芓伶、柯彥惠、楊總成 (2013)。以簡易多屬性評等技術建構排球運動最佳攻擊球員評選模式。
張峻豪(2019)。2017 世界大冠軍杯男子排球賽二波結構性攻擊效益分析。
黃晉揚(2001)。排球資訊系統之演進與探討。
鄭世賢(2001)。排球資訊系統(VIS)應用於比賽上的探討。大專體育,(54),144-148。
劉彥碩、方婉真、林宗翰、黃瑞臻(2021)。臺灣排球發展之歷史沿革。
Bergeles N, Nikolaidou M.E. (2011). Setter’s performance and attack tempo as determinants of attack efficacy in Olympic-level male volleyball teams. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport,11(3):535-544.
Castro H, Cavalli I, Da Silva CJ, Grecco PJ. (2014). Interação no curso das ações de saque e bloqueio no voleibol juvenil. [Interaction in the course of the shares of serve and lock in juvenile volleyball]. Revista da Faculdade de Educação Física da UNICAMP,12(3):1-17.
Castro J, Souza A, Mesquita I.(2011). Attack efficacy in volleyball: elite male teams.
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 113(2):395-408.
Drikos S, Vagenas G.( 2011). Multivariate assessment of selected performance indicators in relation to the type and result of a typical set in men’s elite volleyball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 11(1):85-95.
Echeverria C, Ortega E, & Palao JM. Evolution of attack efficacy and execution in women’s volleyball according to age group and level of competition. J Sport Human Perf 2024;12(1):44-55.
Guidetti, G. (1998). Supposizioni opposte [Supposed opposite ]. Supervolley, VII (4), 76-79.
Giatsis, G., Lopez Martinez, A.B., & Gea García, G.M. (2015). The efficacy of the attack andblock in game phases on male fivb and cev beach volleyball. A review. J. Hum. Sport Exerc., 10(2), pp.537-549.
Giatsis, G. López-Martínez, A. B., & Palao, J. M. (2009). Effect of serve execution on serve efficacy in men’s and women’s beach volleyball. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 21(1), 1-16.
Lima, V., & Sousa, R. (2017). Communication and Cohesion between Setters and Attackers in Volleyball. Journal of Human Kinetics, 57(1), 223-230.
Laios, A., & Kountouris, P. (2011). Receiving and serving team efficiency in Volleyball in relation to team rotation. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 11(3),553–561.
Martínez, E. L., Martín, J. J. M., Bento, M. S. D., & Vega, I. D. (2023). Spike performance in K1: influence of rotation and reception area on high level men’s volleyball teams. Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación, (48), 213-220.
Molina-Martín, J. J., Diez-Vega, I., & López, E. (2022). Reception-Attack Transition in Volleyball: Analysis of Spike Effectiveness. Apunts Educación Física y Deportes, 149,53-62.
Molina-Martín, J. J., Díez-Vega, I., & López, E. (2022). Reception-Attack Transition in Volleyball: Analysis of Spike Effectiveness.
Palao, J. M., Lopez-Martinez, A., Valades, D., & Hernandez, E. (2019). Manner of Execution and Efficacy of Reception in Men’s Beach Volleyball. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 8(2), 21.
Palao, J. M., Santos, J. A., & Ureña, A. (2007). Effect of the manner of spike execution on spike performance in volleyball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 7(2), 126-138.
Palao, J. M., Manzanares, P., & Ortega, E. (2009). Techniques used and efficacy of volleyball skills in relation to gender. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 9, 281–293.
Palao JM, Echeverría C.(2008). Evolución de la utilización colocación en salto en el voleibol femenino y su efecto sobre el juego. [Evolution of the use of jump set in female volleyball and its effect on the game]. Kronos, 7(13):35-44.
Rodríguez-Ruiz D, Quiroga M, Mirsalles, JA, Sarmiento S, de Saa Y, García-Manso JM.(2011). Study of the technical and tactical variables determining set win or loss in top-level european men’s volleyball. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports,7(1):1-15.
Silva, M., & Lacerda, D. (2015). Tactical Approaches in Volleyball: The Importance of Setter-Attacker Interaction. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 10(5),789-797
Tillman, M. D., Hass, C. J., Brunt, D., and Bennett, G. R. (2004). Jumping and landing techniques in elite women's volleyball. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine,3,30-36.
Zhu, Q., & Wang, X. (2014). "Analysis of Attacker Speed and Effectiveness in Women's Volleyball." Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 228(2), 145-157.
Zimmerman, B. (1995). Selected aspects of the development of men's volleyball. 1994 men's world championship in Greece. International Volley Tech, 1, 4-11.
Zimmermann, B. (1999). Changes and possibilities with the introduction of liberos in men's world class volleyball. The Coach, 1, 2-12.