研究生: |
詹艾庭 Chan, Ai-Ting |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
美粧保養品之新創品牌策略-以燕皙水嫩保濕面膜為例 New Brand Strategy of Beauty Cosmetics-A Case Study of Swallow Hydrating Facial Mask |
指導教授: |
董澤平
Dong, Tse-Ping 吳彥濬 Wu, Yen-Chun |
口試委員: |
林志斌
Lin, Chih-Pin 黃啟瑞 Huang, Chi-Jui 董澤平 Dong, Tse-Ping 吳彥濬 Wu, Yen-Chun |
口試日期: | 2021/09/17 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
全球經營與策略研究所 Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 101 |
中文關鍵詞: | 美粧保養品 、面膜 、品牌策略 、品牌個性 |
英文關鍵詞: | beauty cosmetics, facial masks, brand strategy, brand personality |
研究方法: | 調查研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101420 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:156 下載:22 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
不論是從全球、臺灣甚至是天然美粧保養品市場數據都可以得知市場規模、銷售額和市場價值都是處於穩定的狀態。在這龐大的商機中面膜產品由於擁有低成本高利潤,且進入門檻低,導致競爭品牌眾多且產品間差異性小,除帶動原有廠商積極行銷以鞏固市場外,也吸引了異業廠商憑藉自身優勢研發自創品牌,本研究個案亦是如此,母品牌勝昌製藥延續自身數十年的漢方製藥實力,推出了進入美粧保養市場的「燕皙系列」,和旗下萃取自燕窩、鹿角靈芝等珍稀藥材的「水嫩保濕面膜」。為使其能在競爭激烈的市場環境中永續發展,本研究採用Aaker提出之品牌策略分析的架構並結合品牌個性的概念,以問卷調查法透過消費者的反饋,檢視目前消費市場動態、評估競爭者情勢及審視自我品牌,並以此結論全面性地完善目前品牌策略性的決定,區隔出競爭激烈的市場,創造企業和消費者之間的共鳴。
根據消費者分析研究結果發現,雖然消費者在燕皙美粧產品購買頻率的題項是以未曾購買為主,但是對於漢方草本面膜產品也大多表示雖然未曾購買,但是有意願選購,因此推論燕皙水嫩保濕面膜具有潛在客群。而在消費者動機和行為分析研究結果發現消費者重視功能性需求、產品功效,與仰賴口碑和官方網站的資訊來源,且較為偏好不織布片狀面膜、滋潤保濕、植物原料、開架與網路通路,以及中低定價;根據競爭者分析研究結果發現,消費者以無品牌忠誠度的最為居多,且選購的主要因素為有效使用經驗與功能性需求;而在自我研究結果發現,品牌個性對品牌形象和品牌核心價值具正向關係,且「體貼的」品牌個性對品牌形象和品牌核心價值影響力大於其他的品牌個性特徵。若將水嫩保濕面膜視為一個人時,「溫和的」品牌個性描述這個人最為合適,並且認為此特徵能更有效的傳達燕皙品牌的品牌形象、加強品牌核心價值,和提升品牌資產價值。
Whether it is from the global, Taiwan, or even natural beauty cosmetics market data, it can be known that the market size, sales and market value are in a stable state. In this huge business opportunity, the facial masks have low cost, high profit, and low entry barriers, resulting in a large number of competing brands and small differences between products, in addition to driving the original manufacturers to actively market to consolidate the market, they also attract foreign manufacturers to develop their own brands with their own advantages. The case of this study is also true. The parent brand Sheng Chang Herb continues its decades of Kampo pharmaceutical strength by launching the "Swallow series" that enters the beauty cosmetics market, and its " Swallow Hydrating Facial Mask" which is extracted from bird's nest, antler Ganoderma lucidum and other rare medicinal materials. In order to make it sustainable in a highly competitive environment, this research adopts the structure of Aaker's brand strategy analysis combined with the concept of brand personality, and uses a questionnaire survey, through consumer feedback, review the current consumer market dynamics, evaluate the situation of competitors, and examine self-brands, so as to comprehensively improve the current brand's strategic decisions, isolate the fiercely competitive market, and create resonance between enterprises and consumers.
According to the research results of customer analysis, although consumers have never purchased Swallow beauty products, most consumers said that although they have never purchased any herbal facial mask, they are willing to buy it. Therefore, it is inferred that Swallow Hydrating Facial Mask has potential customers. The results of consumer motivation and behavior analysis found that consumers value functional needs, product efficacy, and rely on word of mouth and official website information sources, and prefer nonwoven fabric facial masks, moisturizing effects, plant raw materials, drugstores, online stores, and low-to-medium pricing ; According to the research results of competitor analysis, it is found that most consumers have no brand loyalty, and the main factors of purchase are effective use experience and functional needs ; According to the research results of self-analysis, it is found that brand personality has a positive relationship with brand image and brand core values, and the "considerate" brand personality has greater influence on brand image and brand core value than other brand personality traits. If you regard the Swallow Hydrating Facial Mask as a person, the "gentle" brand personality description is the most suitable, and this trait can more effectively convey the Swallow brand's brand image, strengthen the brand's core value, and enhance the value of brand equity.
一、 中文文獻
王玉珍, 李宜玫, & 吳清麟. (2019). 青少年優勢力量表之發展研究. 教育心理學報, 50(3), 503-528.
王旭. (2006). 品牌核心價值與品牌延伸的關係分析及啟示. 商場現代化, 34.
史曉飛. (2007). 論以品牌核心價值為中心的品牌定位系統模型. 福建行政學院福建經濟管理幹部學院學報, (4), 81-84.
吳宜靜. (2020). 台灣面膜廠商策略分析—以「提提研」與「我的美麗日記」為例. 國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所學位論文, 1-63.
吳振輝, & 劉聯芳. (2008). 產品品質, 品牌形象與自我概念連結對顧客關係之影響. 弘光人文社會學報, (8), 45-68.
吳陽林. (2019). 探討品牌信任與消費者認知道德對品牌資產的影響-以汽車產業為例. 中華大學企業管理研究所學位論文, 1-62.
吳萬益. (2015). 企業研究方法(5版), 華泰文化出版,臺北市.
呂智. (2019). 中藥化妝品面臨的機遇和挑戰. 日用化學品科學. 6期
李招冠. (2013). 面膜材質對肌膚保養之有效性評估研究. 嘉南藥理科技大學化粧品科技研究所學位論文, 1-104.
沈雲驄、湯宗勳. (1998). 品牌行銷法則:如何打造強勢品牌. 臺北:商業週刊. 22期(原書譯自Aaker, DA, Building strong brands), 141-179.
林奐廷. (2019). 城市品牌形象與品牌個性對行為意向影響之研究:以台南市為例. 南臺科技大學休閒事業管理研究所學位論文, 1-92.
林美慧. (2002). 品牌個性之建立與其對品牌資產的影響-以ING安泰壽險為例. 國立臺灣科技大學企業管理研究所學位論文, 1-45.
林耿毅. (2011). 消費者個性, 品牌個性與口碑關聯性之研究-以世代為調節變項. 淡江大學管理科學研究所學位論文, 1-105.
林盛文. (2014). 臺灣卓越產業在中國建立品牌策略之研究. 臺灣大學國際企業管理研究所學位論文, 1-45.
林雅琪. (2012). 社會網絡, 名譽管理程度與社會評價之研究. 元智大學資訊社會學研究所學位論文, 1-69.
孫宇萱. (2016). 品牌個性與自我概念一致性對於品牌態度之影響—以台灣購物網站為例. 資訊社會研究, (30), 25-60.
高橋花果. (2019). 品牌個性與旅遊紀念品購買意願間關係之研究. 中興大學企業管理研究所學位論文, 1-55.
張元馨. (2011). 品牌創新對消費者購買態度及意圖之影響—以品牌涉入為幹擾變數. 銘傳大學企業管理研究所學位論文, 1-96.
許文寶. (2009). 自我概念與品牌個性對品牌聯想及購買意願影響之研究. 長榮大學企業管理研究所學位論文, 1-174.
陳正男. (1992). 行銷學原理. 台北市, 東華書局.
陳怡璇. (2020). 由品牌定位發展品牌元素之研究-以臺灣果乾為例. 臺灣師範大學設計研究所學位論文, 1-142.
陶雲彪. (2002). 品牌個性: 品牌的核心價值.
傅健豪, 王佳鴻, &黃奕齊. (2013). 探討年輕女孩與輕熟女對化妝品的品牌偏好和購買動機. 陽明工商資料處理科小論文, 1-10.
楊望成. (1999). 多品牌戰略與品牌組合. 佛山科學技術學院學報: 社會科學版, (1), 56-60.
廖宗賢. (2016). 化學材料貿易公司之產品定位與品牌策略. 逢甲大學經營管理研究所學位論文, 1-73.
劉俞青、陳虹宇. (2019). 台灣面膜奇蹟. 今週刊. 1157期, 64-73.
鄭英輝. (1998). 品牌人格與產品類別對品牌延伸評價的影響. 中央大學企業管理研究所學位論文, 1-90.
謝文雀. (2011). 消費者行為(2版). 臺北市:華泰文化事業股份有限公司.
魏筱軒. (2020). 影響女性消費者面膜購買意願的因素研究. 中國科技大學企業管理研究所學位論文, 1-69.
嚴麗婷. (2019). 台灣面膜業關鍵時刻要如何打國際盃?今週刊. 1157期, 82-84.
二、 英文文獻
Aaker, D. A. (1991). Brand equity. La gestione del valore della marca, 347-356.
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California management review, 38(3).
Aaker, D. A. (2012). Building strong brands. Simon and Schuster.
Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of marketing research, 34(3), 347-356.
Alt, M., & Griggs, S. (1988). Can a brand be cheeky?. Marketing Intelligence & Planning.
Babbie, E. (1998). The practice of. Social Research.
Batra, R., Lehmann, D. R., & Singh, D. (1993). The brand personality component of brand goodwill: some antecedents and consequences: In Asker, David A & Biel Alexander L.(Eds.), Brand equity and advertising.
Biel, A. L. (1992). How brand image drives brand equity. Journal of advertising research, 32(6), RC6-RC12.
Chip, W. (1997). The perils of popularity. Marketing Tools, 7, 21-22.
Davis, R., Buchanan-Oliver, M., & Brodie, R. J. (2000). Retail service branding in electronic-commerce environments. Journal of Service research, 3(2), 178-186.
De Chernatony, L. (1991). Formulating brand strategy. European Management Journal, 9(2), 194-200.
DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Sage publications.
DiMingo, E. (1988). The fine art of positioning. The journal of business strategy, 9(2), 34.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 28(3), 307-319.
Engel, B., & Blackwell, R. (1988). Miniard (1990), Consumer Behavior. Marketing research. Harcourt Australia. International, 8.
Farquhar, P. H. (1990). Managing brand equity. Journal of advertising research, 30(4), RC-7.
Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of consumer research, 24(4), 343-373.
Gardner, B. B., & Levy, S. J. (1955). The product and the brand. Harvard business review, 33(2), 33-39.
Haigood, T. L. (2001). Deconstructing brand personality. In American Marketing Association. Conference Proceedings (Vol. 12, p. 327). American Marketing Association.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago press.
Hasslinger, A., Hodzic, S., & Opazo, C. (2007). Consumer Behaviour in Shopping (No. 11, p. 26). Working Paper.
Herzog, H. (1963). Behavioral science concepts for analyzing the consumer. Marketing and the behavioral sciences, 3(2), 76-86.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
Keller, K. L. (1998). Branding perspectives on social marketing. ACR North American Advances.
Kelley, T. L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of educational psychology, 30(1), 17.
Kotler, P, (2000),” Marketing Management.” NY:The Free Press. Latour.
Li, X., & Sun, C. (2015). A study on the core values of the brand. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8(06), 868.
Lim, K., & O’Cass, A. (2001). Consumer brand classifications: an assessment of culture‐of‐origin versus country‐of‐origin. Journal of product & brand management.
Mengxia, Z. (2007). Impact of brand personality on PALI: a comparative research between two different brands. International Management Review, 3(3), 36.
Mullet, G. M., & Karson, M. J. (1985). Analysis of purchase intent scales weighted by probability of actual purchase. Journal of marketing research, 22(1), 93-96.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill
Pettis, C. (1997). Challenge: Try branding unix. Marketing Computers, 17(4), 68-70.
Ries, A., & Trout, J. (1986). Marketing warfare. Journal of Consumer Marketing.
Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2000). Consumer behavior.
Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. The quarterly journal of economics, 98(4), 659-679.
Verlegh, P. W., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (1999). A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of economic psychology, 20(5), 521-546.
Weng, X.D. (2002) Local Brand Strategy. Zhejiang People’s Publishing House, Hangzhou.
Wong, H. Y., & Merrilees, B. (2005). A brand orientation typology for SMEs: a case research approach. Journal of Product & Brand Management.
Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of business research, 52(1), 1-14.
Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lee, S. (2000). An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 28(2), 195-211.
Zaltman, G., & Burger, P. (1975). Marketing research: Fundamentals and dynamics. Dryden Press.
三、 網路文獻
中華人民共和國商務部. (2020). 中國面膜發展現狀及競爭格局. 取自https://www.chyxx.com/industry/202001/827642.html
我的美麗日記. (2021). 品牌介紹. 取自https://www.beautydiary.com.tw/about/
林菁樺. (2018). 台灣面膜夯/有創意有CP值 外銷年年創新高. 自由財經. 取自https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/1238568
知乎. (2020). 面膜的種類及功效. 取自https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/128951439
前瞻產業研究院. (2020). 2020年全球化妝品行業市場分析:市場規模已突破5000億美元 中小品牌融資數量占3成. 取自https://bg.qianzhan.com/report/detail/300/200805-0d71de6c.html
前瞻產業研究院. (2021). 預見2021:《2021年中國面膜行業全景圖譜》市場規模或突破600億. 取自https://www.gushiciku.cn/dl/0gXaT/zh-tw
洪菱鞠. (2018). 台灣化妝品千億市場規模「美」力激出隱形冠軍. ETtoday新聞雲. 取自https://www.ettoday.net/news/20180711/1210688.htm#ixzz73JWgifAo
產業經濟統計簡訊. (2018). 106年製造業之隱形冠軍-連年成長表現突出. 經濟部統計處. 取自https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/bulletin/Bulletin.aspx?kind=9&html=1&menu_id=18808&bull_id=5047
產業經濟統計簡訊. (2018). 化粧品產業亮光彩. 106年出口創新高. 經濟部統計處. 取自https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/dos/bulletin/Bulletin.aspx?kind=9&html=1&menu_id=18808&bull_id=4916
粘瑩芝. (2015). 【行銷實戰+】長銷品牌的不敗法則!不斷問顧客:這麼說能打動你嗎. 經理人月刊. 取自https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/50603
陳宥任. (2021). 台灣美妝產業觀點分析. 集客數據行銷. 取自https://inboundmarketing.com.tw/%E7%94%A2%E6%A5%AD%E5%B0%88%E6%AC%84/%E7%BE%8E%E5%A6%9D%E7%94%A2%E6%A5%AD%E8%A7%80%E9%BB%9E.html
崴爺. (2015). 我想創業-自創保養品品牌. 難不難?取自https://m.facebook.com/iamtheapprentice/photos/a.1693850264180734/1698966543669106/?type=3&locale2=it_IT
提提研. (2019). 抵抗換季危「肌」 提提研「極奢活膚璀璨組」讓你臨危不亂! 英國美容奧斯卡Pure Beauty Awards入圍及獲獎明星商品一字排開 全方位延緩老化 啟動肌膚強韌美「力」 - Timeless Truth Mask 提提研(TTM). @cosme. 取自https://www.cosme.net.tw/beautynews/17842
森田藥粧. (2021). 品牌精神. 取自https://www.drmorita.com.tw/Notes/Spirit
程倚華. (2021). 【圖解】「黑面膜始祖」軒郁將掛牌. 14日抽籤!面膜如何賣到年營收破10億. 數位時代. 取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/59557/shinybrands-ipo
黃台中. (2019). 勝昌漢方人氣禮物. 工商時報. 取自https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20191224000311-260210?chdtv
黃台中. (2020). 勝昌製藥跨足戲劇 振興中藥業. 工商時報. 取自https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20200627000191-260204?chdtv
衛生福利部. (2011). 化粧品管理規範及使用安全宣導. 取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-3160-25747-1.html
衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. (2019). 化粧品範圍及種類表. 取自https://www.fda.gov.tw/tc/newsContent.aspx?cid=3&id=25239
鄧文芳. (2020). 2019年中國面膜行業概覽. 頭豹研究院研究報告. 取自https://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP202010191422327545_1.pdf?1603125861000.pdf
Beroe(2020). Cosmetic Face Mask Market to reach $10 billion by 2022. Retrieved from https://www.beroeinc.com/blog/cosmetic-face-mask-market-to-reach-10-billion-by-2022/
Euromonitor(2020). Skin Care in Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.euromonitor.com/skin-care-in-taiwan/report
Fashion Guide(2019)。報告編號201905MIT面膜全方位大調查。取自https://www.fashionguide.com.tw/event/201905_mitfacialmask/index.html
Future Market Insights(2020). Natural Cosmetics Market. Retrieved from https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/natural-cosmetics-market
i-Buzz網路口碑研究中心. (2020). 2020美力經濟產業數據報告 - 美妝產業|產業白皮書. 取自https://www.i-buzz.com.tw/industry/article_page/?id=Mjcx
Kantar凱度洞察. (2020). 台灣美妝保養品牌年達8800萬次消費選擇 三要勝出. 取自https://www.kantarworldpanel.com/tw/news/20200915beauty-rank
PPAPER. (2020). 無水科技改變美妝產業WATERLESS BEAUTY展望未來十年美妝市場新趨勢. 取自https://www.ppaper.net/page/1244
Statista(2020). Global market value for natural and organic cosmetics and personal care from 2018 to 2027. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/673641/global-market-value-for-natural-cosmetics/
Statista(2021). Domestic sales value of cosmetics in Taiwan from 2010 to 2020. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/817399/taiwan-cosmetics-domestic-consumption/
Transparency Market Research(2018). GLOBAL SHEET FACE MASKS SUBSTRATE MARKET EXPECTED TO REACH US$ 1585.4 MN. Retrieved from https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/pressrelease/sheet-face-mask-substrate-market.htm