本研究旨在瞭解父母面對國小子女數位媒介使用時之家人互動過程、介入經驗之真實感受與體認以及主要照顧者在此過程中之因應與努力。為達上述目的本研究先進行5個月前驅研究，分別在三個都會區取得282份主要照顧者的家庭數位使用紀錄單，並對12位家長進行試訪，同時邀請5位記錄一周家中使用數位媒介之情形，且對家中至少使用數位媒介一年以上經驗之兩對夫妻進行對偶深度訪談之試訪，從前驅研究中修整訪談綱要與對象考量，最終邀請三個家庭之主要照顧者（低年級、中年級、高年級），進行半結構式的深度訪談，並以質性研究主題分析法來分析資料。
研究結果主要發現如下：
一、研究者參與者面對子女數位媒介使用之互動與介入經驗可分為（一）眼所見之數位時代，包含「時代潮流自然入家門，子女有樣學樣」、「興趣上男女有別，共玩有喜悅單獨生警覺」；（二）心所思之關心現象，包含「使父母可體會的安心」、「讓父母可看見的憂心」；（三）行所及之介入經驗，包含「混合之介入中卻見父母不一致」、「父母生活與數位背景牽動介入思維」等。
二、主要照顧者之因應與努力可以發現其親職角色的轉變，分指「由妻子成為母親後，對另一半看法不同」、「面對數位時代，為母則強，奮力因應」，同時此親職角色轉變反思的歷程有如「一條尋找平安的過程」。
最後根據研究結果，對家有國小子女之父母、親職教育者與相關研究者提出建議。

The main purpose of this research is to explore the parental mediation of children’s digital media use in Taiwan. To achieve the above objective of the present study were the pilot study of five months. In-depth qualitative interviews with semi-structured were conducted with primary caregivers within three families of grades 1-2, grades 3-4, grades 5-6.
Thematic analysis was use to analyze the data. Three major findings were identified about the parental mediation experience of children’s digital media use.
1. two significant themes were generated: "natural trend of the times into the home, children suit"; "the interest of boy and girl are different, if co-playing then joy but alone to vigilance ".
2. two significant themes were generated in care situation,, including" parents to appreciate the peace of mind "; " that parents can see the concern ".
3. three significant themes were generated in mediation experience,: "The mediation was mixed and parents inconsistent"; "Life and parents involved in digital background affects thinking," and so on.
The study also discovers that primary caregivers of possible discoveries into their parenting roles, that means "became the mother, view different", "in the digital age, the mother is strong, struggling to cope", at the same time this parenting to reflect the changing role like "a search of peace process."
Finally, according to study results, recommendations to parents, parenting education, and researchers of family issues.

參考文獻
中文部分
王以仁主編（2001）。婚姻與家庭生活的適應。台北：心理。
王以仁（2014）。親職教育。台北：心理。
王嵩音（2015）。父母介入子女網路使用行為之研究，中華傳播學刊，27，37-65。
王叢桂（2000）。促進參與父職因素的探討。應用心理學，6，131-171。
台灣網路資訊中心（2015）。2015年台灣無線網路使用調查。2015年1月30日，取自http://www.twnic.net.tw/NEWS4/140.pdf
台灣網路資訊中心（2015）。2015年台灣寬頻網路使用調查。2015年8月27日，取自ttp://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20150901a.pdf
台灣網路資訊中心（2015）。台灣網路發展大事記。2015年5月，取自http://www.myhome.net.tw/timeline/images/internet_timeline02.pdf
朱若柔譯。（2000）。社會研究方法：質化與量化的取向。台北：楊智。
朱惠瓊（2003）。從網路成癮症談青少年網路人際互動特質。諮商與輔導，206，35-40。
林倩如、王智弘（2012）。我國兒童網路成癮研究發展現況之探討。輔導季刊，48（4），1-9。
科技部傳播調查資料庫（2015）。2014年科技部傳播調查資料庫一期三次：無網不利～超過半數青少年透過網路找資訊、獲得娛樂並學習新事物。取自http://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/ResultsShow_detail.asp?RS_ID=29
胡幼慧主編（2004）。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北市：巨流。
政大數位文化行動研究室、白絲帶關懷協會（2014）。2014台灣青少兒網路社群、數位智財權與個人隱私調查報告。取自http://www.cyberangel.org.tw/tw/research/e-generation-research/2014-taiwan-e-generation-research
高淑清（2008）。質性研究的18堂課：揚帆再訪之旅。高雄：麗文。
教育部（2014）。聰明上網我不宅，幸福學習我最愛，103年中小學學生網路使用情形調查結果發表會。
張高賓（2009）。父母教養態度、家庭心理環境與青少年網路成癮之相關研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊，6，93-117。
張寶芳（2010）。資訊的社群力量。科學人，105，26-27。
張寶芳（2014）。網路世代的分心危機：網路與通訊科技正在影響我們大腦的運作方式。科學人，143，24-25。
黃葳威（1997）。青少年對益智節目的回饋：一個次文化的觀察。廣播與電視，3（1），45-69。
黃葳威（2012）。數位時代資訊素養。台北：威仕曼。
黃迺毓（1988）。家庭教育。台北：五南。
黃迺毓、林如萍、唐先梅、陳芳茹編著（2001）。家庭概論。新北市：空大。
黃瑞琴（2005）。質的教育研究方法。台北：心理。
資訊工業策進會（2013）。2013臺灣消費者科技應用生活型態研究分析報告。取自http://books.find.org.tw/newbook_disp.asp?book_id=244
資訊工業策進會（2014）。2014網路社群於電腦與行動使用時間分析。取自http://www.iii.org.tw/Service/3_1_4_c.aspx?id=808
甄曉蘭（1996）。從典範轉移的再思論質的研究崛起的意義。嘉義師範學報，10，119-146。
廖鳳瑞（1995）。收視行為與親子互動的關係研究報告。台北：文化總會電研會。
劉玉玲（2005）。青少年發展：危機與轉機。台北：揚智。
劉容襄、黃迺毓（2015）。數位時代下父母參與式學習之親職教育研究（付印中）。家庭教育與諮商學刊，19。
潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究：理論與應用。台北：心理。
聯合報（2015）。誰要當孩子的3C警察。2015年1月29日，取自http://udn.com/news/story/7339/673414-聯合筆記/誰要當孩子的3C警察。
蘇建文等（1998）。發展心理學。台北：桂冠。

英文部分
Alvarez, M., Torres, A., Rodriguez, E., Padilla, S., & Rodrigo, M.J. (2013). Attitudes and parenting dimensions in parents’ regulation of internet use by primary and secondary school children. Computer & Education, 67, 69-78.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Hayat, Z. (2011). The impact of the Internet on the social lives of users: A representative sample from 13 countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 585-589.
Appel, M., Stiglbauer, B., Batinic, B., & Holtz, P. (2014). Internet use and verbal aggression: The moderating role of parents and peers. Computer in Human Behavior, 33, 235-241.
Austin, E. W. (1990). Effects of family communication on children’s interpretation of television. In J. Bryant & J. A. Bryant(Eds.), Television and the American family(pp. 377-395). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Austin, E. W., Bolls, P., Fujioka, Y., & Engelbertson, J. (1999). How and why parents take on the tube. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 175-192.
Barcus, F. E. (1969). Parental influence on children’s television viewing. Television Quarterly, 4, 63–73.
Banks, S., & Gupta, R. (1980). Television as a dependent variable, for a change. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 327–330.
Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37(4), 887-907.
Baumrind, D. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75(1), 43-88.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Context of child rearing: Problem and prospects. American Psychologist, 34, 844-850.
Byrne, S., & Lee, T. (2011). Toward predicting youth resistance to internet risk prevention strategies. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(1), 90-113.
Caron, A., & Ward, S. (1974). Gift decisions by kids and parents. Journal of Advertising Research, 15(4), 15–20.
Chou, C., Condron, L., & Belland, J. C. (2005). A review of the research on internet addiction. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 363-388.
Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21, 323-343.
Coltrane, S. (2004). Fathering: Paradoxes, contradictions, and dilemmas. In M. Coleman & L. H. Ganong (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary families: Considering the Past, Contemplating the Future (pp. 224-243). Thousand Oaks, CA: sage.
Coyne,S. M., Bushman, B., & Nathanson, A. I. (2012). Media and the family: A note from the guest editors. Family Relations, 61, 359-362.
Davies, J., & Gentile, D. A. (2012). Responses to children’s media use in famillies with and without siblings: A family development perspective. Family Relations, 61, 410-425.
De Moor, S., Dock, M., Gallez, S., Lenaerts, S., Scholler, C., & Vleugels, C. (2008). Teens and ICT: Risks and opportunities. Retrieved July 6, 2010 from. http://www.belspo.be/belspo/fedra/TA/synTA08_nl.pdf.
Duvall, E. M., & Miller, B. C. (1985). Marriage and family development. New York: Harper & Row.
Eastin, M., Greenberg, B., & Hofschire, L. (2006). Parenting the internet. Journal of Communication, 56, 486–504.
Glynn, R. W., O’Duffy, F., O’Dwyer, T. P., Colreavy, M. P., & Rowley, H. M. (2013). Patterns of internet and smartphone use by parents of children attending a pediatric otolaryngology service. International Journal of Pediatric Otolaryngology, 77, 699-702.
Gentile, D. A., Nathanson, A. I., Rasmussen, E. E., Reimer, R. A., & Walsh, D.A. (2012). Do you see what I see? Parent and child reports of parental monitoring of media. Family Relations, 61, 470-487.
Hochmuth, M. (1947). Children’s radio diet. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 33(2), 249–257.
Huang, X. Q., Zhang, H. M., Li, M. C., Wang, J. A., Zhang, Y., & Tao, R. (2010). Mental health, personality, and parental rearing styles of adolescents with internet addiction disorder. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 13(4), 401-406.
Kabakci, I., Odabasi, H. F., & Coklar, A. N. (2008). Parents’ views about Internet use of their children. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 4(2), 248-255.
Kuipers, G. (2006). The social construction of digital danger: Debating, defusing and inflating the moral dangers of online humor and pornography in the Netherlands and the United States. New Media & Society, 8, 379-400.
LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. Boss, W. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. Schumm, & S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135-163). New York: Plenum.
Lee, S.J., &Chae, Y.G. (2007). Children's internet use in a family context: Influence on family relationships and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology &Behavior, 10(5), 640-644.
Lin, C., Lin, S., & Wu, C. (2009). The effects of parental monitoring and leisure boredom on adolescents’ internet addiction. Adolescence, 44(176), 993-1004.
Linder, J. R., & Werner, N. E. (2012). Relationally aggressive media exposure and children’s normative beliefs: Does parental mediation matter? Family Relations, 61, 488-500.
Livingstone, S. (2007). Strategies of parental regulation in the media-rich home. Computer in Human Behavior, 23, 920-941.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599.
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the Internet: The perspective of European children. Full Findings. LSE, London: EU Kids Online. Retrieved on February, 22, 2013 from: http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20II%20(2009-11)/EUKidsOnlineIIReports/D4FullFindings.pdf.
Lwin, M. O., Miyazaki, A. D., Stanaland, A. J.S., & Lee, E. (2012). Online usage motive and information disclosure for preteen children. Young Consumers, 13, 345-356.
Maccoby, E. (1954).Why do children watch television. Public Opinion Quarterly, 18(3), 239–244.
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parentechild interaction. In P. H. Mussen, Series Ed., & E. M. Hetherington, Vol. Ed. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed.).Socialization, personality, and social development, Vol. 4 (pp. 1-101) New York: Wiley.
Mendoza, K. (2009). Surveying parental mediation: Connections, challenges and questions for media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1, 28-41.
Mesch, G. S. (2003). The family and the internet: The Israeli case. Social Science Quarterly, 84(4), 1038-1050.
Nathanson, A. I. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children’s aggression. Communication Research, 26(2), 124-143.
Nathanson, A. I. (2001b). Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 210-220.
Nathanson, A.(2002). The unintended effects of parental mediation of television on adolescents. Mediapsychology, 4, 207-230.
Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2006). Parental mediation of children’s video game playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, Media & Technology, 31, 181-202.
Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2014). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children’s internet use. Learning, Media & Technology, 31(2), 250-266.
Padilla-Walker, L. A., Coyne, S. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2012). Getting a High-Speed Family Connection: Associations Between Family Media Use and Family Connection. Family Relations, 61, 426-440.
Popkin, H. A. S. (2011, September 12). British people prefer Facebook to toilets. msnbc.com Today. Retrieved from http://digitallife.today.com/_news/ 2011/09/12/7728080-british-people-prefer-facebook-to-toilets
Rideout, V., Foehr, U., & Roberts, D. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the live of 8-to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
Valcke, M., Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., & Gerarts, M. (2007). Primary school children's safe and unsafe use of Internet at home and at school: an exploratory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2838-2850.
Valcke, M., Bonte, S., De Wever, B., & Rots, I. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education, 55(2), 454-464.
Valcke, M., Wever, B. D., Keer, H. V., & Schellens, T. (2011). Long-term study of safe internet use of young children. Computer & Education, 57, 1292-1305.
Van den Eijnden, R., Spijkerman, R., Vermulst, A., van Rooij, T., & Engels, R. (2010). Compulsive Internet use among adolescents: Bidirectional parent–child relationships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(1), 77-89.
Warren, R. (2005). Parental mediation of children’s television viewing in low-income families. Journal of Communication, 55, 847-863.
Whitaker, J., & Bushman, B. (2009). Online dangers: keeping children and adolescents safe. Washington and Lee Law Review, 66(3), 1053-1063.
White, J. M., & Klein, D. M. (2007). Family theories (3nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.