低視力兒童由於先天視力不足，感知覺統合並不如一般明眼兒童，嚴重的影響了他們日常生活中所有活動，包括與認知、社交、情緒相關的發展。由於視力不佳，低視力兒童大多缺乏主動探索物品的動機，也很少參與繪畫活動。然而，現存視障藝術教育資源的缺乏，導致低視力兒童從小便失去適當的學習機會。本研究針對臺灣國內低視力兒童的繪畫作品進行分析，探討其繪畫的形式與表現特徵，並進一步提出低視力兒童藝術教育的相關建議。本研究一共蒐集來自臺灣6-15歲低視力兒童，共103份樣本，分別以年級與性別進行分組，並以圖像分析法與描述型統計歸納。研究結果顯示：低視力兒童對物件有遮蔽概念，但整體空間停留在飄浮階段；他們容易缺乏整體構圖、空間安排和物件群組與比例關係，在物件投射系統傾向使用直角投射，而使用線條大多為連續與一筆勾邊上色筆觸表現細膩；用色大多可使用三色以上；低視力兒童的繪畫表現隨著年齡發展更為成熟，但到了高年級反而退步在本研究中尚無出現明顯的陰影；表現，男生普遍在空間相關發展較成熟，女生在生物與關係表現較成熟。經研究結果分析，本研究針對低視力兒童繪畫表現與特徵歸納以下結論：（1）近距離觀察與繪畫並傾向以組合方式完成畫作、（2）可理解物件內空間概念但對大空間掌握不足、（3）部分遮蔽較群組與比例表現理想、（4）物件投射大多與全盲者表現同樣使用直角投射、（5）傾向一筆完成輪廓線並不排斥用色、（6）提早出現退步和瓶頸狀況、（7）視覺經驗是能夠表現斜角投射的關鍵、（8）視力受限但不影響進入視覺寫實階段。

With congenital visual impairment, low vision children are lack of optimate perceptual integration as the normal children. This affects their daily living activities, including development in cognitive, social and emotion aspects. In lack of good vision, low vision children tend to be lack of motivation in active exploration, including drawing activities. As there is not enough resources of art education for the visually impaired, low vision children do not have enough stimulation in art. This research is based on the drawings by low vision children in Taiwan, to analysis their drawings and find out the features and development in them. For such, it could provide further resources of the low vision children, and the suggestions to art education for the visually impaired. In this research, an amount of 103 drawings were being collected and analyzed. This is completed under graphic analysis and descriptive statistics to show the relative results. It is firstly divided into 3 age groups, and next into 2 gender groups to see the relation between different drawing features. Among all age groups, we found that low vision children can develop occlusion, but spatial representation are mainly floating, without any baseline or background. Also, there is a lack of picture composition, grouping and proportion. As in the projective system, vertical oblique projection is mainly used among all age groups. Contour lines are usually completed in one consecutive line, while colorings are in detailed with more than 3 different colors. Drawing development in low vision children improves with age, but not improving in the eldest age group. Not much shadows are seen in the majority, boys tend to draw spatial related objects better than girls, and girls develop better in life and relationships related things. In this research we conclude low vision children: 1. Draw and observe in very close distance, finish the drawing by assembling and combination. 2. Can understand spatial relation within object, but not between objects. 3. Partial occlusion presentation is better than proportion presentation, but lack of grouping presentation. 4. Tend to use vertical oblique drawing system. 5. Use one consecutive line to draw the contour, with detailed coloring but not rejecting in using colors. 6. Stop improving earlier than normal children. 7. Visual experiences is the key for oblique drawing development. 8. Visual impairment does not affect visual realism development in low vision children.

英文文獻：
Arnheim, R. (1954). Art and Visual Perception. California, United States: University of California Press.
Amedi, A., Raz, N., Pianka, P., Malach, R., & Zohary, E. (2003). Early visual cortex activation correlates with superior verbal memory performance in the blind. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 758–766.
Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., & Motes, M. A. (2006). Object-spatial imagery: a new self-report imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 239–263.
Cohn, N. (2012). Explaining I can’t draw: Parallels between the structure and development of language and drawing. Human Development, 55(4), 167–192.
Connellan, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Batki, A., & Ahluwalia, J. (2000). Sex differences in human neonatal social perception. Infant Behavior & Development, 23(1), 113–118.
Cox, M. V., & Hodsoll, J. (2000). Children’s diachronic thinking in relation to developmental changes in their drawings of the human figure. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(1), 13–24.
D’Angiulli, A., Kennedy, J. M., & Heller, M. A. (1998). Blind children recognizing tactile pictures respond like sighted children given guidance in exploration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 187-90.
D’Angiulli, A., Kennedy, J. M., & Helle, M. A. (1998). Blind children recognizing tactile pictures respond like sighted children given guidance in exploration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 187 – 190.
Del Giudice, E., Grossi, D., Angelini, R., Crisanti, A. F., Latte, F., Fragassi, N. A., & Trojano, L. (2000). Spatial cognition in children, development of drawing-related (visuospatial and constructional) abilities in preschool and early school years. Brain and Development, 22(6), 362–367.
Eisner, E. W. (1972). Educating artistic vision. London, United Kingdom: Macmillian.
Eisner, E. W. (1969). The drawings of the disadvantaged: A comparative study. Studies in Art Education, 11(1), 5.
Freeman, N. H., & Cox, M. V. (1985). Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Golomb, C. (2004). The child’s creation of a pictorial world. London, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
Heller, M. A., McCarthy, M., & Clark, A. (2005). Pattern perception and pictures for the blind. International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 26(1), 161–171.
Heller, M. A. (2002). Tactile picture perception in sighted and blind people. Behavioural Brain Research, 135(1–2), 65–68.
Huttenlocher, P. R. (1990). Morphometric study of human cerebral cortex development. Neuropsychologia, 28(6), 517–527.
Jolley, R. P. (2000). Children and pictures: drawing and understanding. New Jersey, United States: Wiley-Blackwell.
Jolley, R. P., Knox, E. L., & Foster, S. G. (2000). The relationship between children’s production and comprehension of realism in drawing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557–582.
Kamel, H. M., & Landay, J. A. (2000). A Study of Blind Drawing Practice: Creating Graphical Information Without the Visual Channel. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(11), 13-15.
Kennedy J. M. (1974). A psychology of picture perception. San Francisco, United States: Jossey-Bass, Inc., Publishers
Kennedy, J. M. (1993). Drawing & the blind: Pictures to touch. New Haven, Connecticut, United States: Yale University Press.
Kennedy, J. M. (2003). Drawings from Gaia, a blind girl. Perception, 32, 321-340.
Kirby, M., & D’Angiulli, A. (2011). From inclusion to Creativity Through Haptic Drawing: Unleashing the” Untouched “in Educational Contexts. The Open Education Journal, 4(1), 67-69.
Laws, G., & Lawrence, L. (2001). Spatial representation in the drawings of children with Down’s syndrome and its relationship to language and motor development: A preliminary investigation. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19(3), 453–473.
Legge, G. E., & Chung, S. T. (2016). Low vision and plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation. Annual Review of Vision Science, 2, 321–343.
Lev-Wiesel, R., Aharoni, S., & Bar-David, K. (2002). Self-figure drawings of born-blind adults: stages of artistic development and the expression of the senses. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 29(5), 253–259.
Lewis, H. P. (1963). Spatial representation in drawing as a correlate of development and a basis for picture preference. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 102(1), 95–107.
Lev-Wiesel, R., Aharoni, S., & Bar-David, K. (2002). Self-figure drawings of born-blind adults: stages of artistic development and the expression of the senses. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 29(5), 253–259.
Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. L. (1947). Creative and mental growth. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Malchiodi, C. A. (Ed.). (2003). Handbook of art therapy. New York: Guilford Press.
McGraw, T. M. (1997). The effects of two-dimensional and three-dimensional stimuli on spatial representation in drawings. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, United States.
Millar, S. (1975). Spatial memory by blind and sighted children. British Journal of Psychology, 66(4), 449–459.
Ortiz-Terán, L., Ortiz, T., Perez, D. L., Aragón, J. I., Diez, I., Pascual-Leone, A., & Sepulcre, J. (2016). Brain plasticity in blind subjects centralizes beyond the modal cortices. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 10(61), 1-15.
Park, E., & I, B. (1995). Children’s representation systems in drawing three-dimensional objects: A review of empirical studies. Visual Arts Research, 21(2), 42–56.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1967). The child’s conception of space. New York: W. W. Norton.
Reifel, S., & Freeman, N. H. (1985). Strategies of representation in young children. Studies in Art Education, 26(3), 185.
Reimer, A. M., Cox, R. F. A., Nijhuis-Van der Sanden, M. W. G., & Boonstra, F. N. (2011). Improvement of fine motor skills in children with visual impairment: An explorative study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(5), 1924–33.
Rooks D. L. (2009). Science for all Experiences and outcomes of students with visual impairment in a guided inquiry-based classroom. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Arizona, Tucson, United States.
Sutton, P. J., & Rose, D. H. (1998). The Role of strategic visual attention in children’s drawing development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68(2), 87–107.
Toku, M. (1997). Spatial treatment in children’s drawings: Why do Japanese children draw in particular ways? Marilyn Zurmuehlen Working Papers in Art Education, 14(1), 165–184.
Vinter, A., Fernandes, V., Orlandi, O., & Morgan, P. (2012). Exploratory procedures of tactile images in visually impaired and blindfolded sighted children: How they relate to their consequent performance in drawing. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(6), 1819–1831.

中文文獻：
特殊教育身心障礙類學生人數統計（2018）。特殊教育通報網。搜尋於2017年12月20日，檢索自https://www.set.edu.tw/Stastic_WEB/sta2/stuA_city_spckind_sex.asp
教育部（2000）。學前特殊教育學校（班）國民教育階段視覺障礙類課程綱要。臺北市：教育部。
香川邦生（主編）、豬平真理、大內進、牟田口辰己(2013)。視覺障礙教育導論〔視覚障害教育に携わる方のために〕（賀夏梅、吳純惠合譯）。臺北：華騰文化。（原著出版於2010）。
賀夏梅、吳純慧（譯）（2013）。視覺障礙教育導（原作者：香川邦生）。臺北市：華騰文化。
伊彬、徐春江（2001）。全盲兒童與青少年對單一模型與部份遮蓋模型的描繪-視覺在空間表現發展之角色。視覺藝術，4，127-164。
伊彬、徐春江（2008）。從不同形式的描繪對象來看全盲者的空間表現發展末階。藝術教育研究，15，71-100。
伊彬、鄭素靜（2010）。視障者空間表現繪圖教學初探（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學設計系研究所，台北市。
伊彬、張婉琪（2013）。先天全盲者觸知圖形發展探討。藝術教育研究，22，1-36。
伊彬、張婉琪、張文智（2013）。從既有文獻中比較視障者繪畫材料的特性。特殊教育季刊，129，35–43。
伊彬、林美倩（2016）。幾何圖形繪畫教學對全盲兒童創造力之啓發：一個10歲男童的個案研究。特殊教育發展期刊，61，1-16。
伊彬、陳亭伃（2017）。國小高年級全盲兒童人物繪畫表現教學策略初探。特殊教育季刊，144，11-22。
伊彬、蘇育萱（2017）。教導青春期前期全盲兒童學習自然寫實繪畫之限制與取代策略。國際藝術教育學刊，15（1），151-172。
佐藤泰正（1983）。視覺障礙兒童心理學（陳英三譯）。台南市：台灣省視覺障礙兒童混合教育計畫師資訓練教育計畫。（原著出版時間不詳）
林思騏、魏美惠（2012）。不同文化中幼兒創造力、人物畫與自由繪畫表現之探討。屏東教育大學學報，40，35-74。
范瓊方（1996）。幼兒繪畫心理分析與輔導: 家庭動力繪畫的探討。新北市：心理出版社。
徐鉅昌（1987）。空中教學的根源-視聽教育。視聽教育雙月刊， 29(2)，1-19。
侯禎塘（2002）。藝術治療法對國小啟智班兒童情緒與 行為問題輔導效果研究。屏東師院學報，17，329-366。
侯禎塘（2002）。兒童美術發展與特殊兒童美術教育。特殊教育叢書，34（4），67-117。
徐詩媛（2003）。低視力兒童美術造形之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立花蓮師範學院幼兒教育學系碩士班，花蓮縣。
沈佳靜（2003）。幼兒繪畫表現分析與探討。幼兒保育學刊，1，64 – 81。
趙雅麗（2004）。視障者的心像：從觸覺到視覺之記憶光譜的初探（未出版碩士論文）。淡江大學大眾傳播研究所，新北市。
蕭嘉銘（2005）。臺灣全盲生圖像資訊應用之現況（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣科技大學設計系研究所，台北市。
陳一平、黃詩婷（2008）。心像認知能力與繪畫手法之間的相關性（未出版碩士論文）。國立交通大學應用藝術研究所，新竹市。
陸雅青（2009）。從塗鴉看治療中的危機與轉化。臺灣藝術治療學會，1(1)，1-13。
黃國晏（2010）。臺北市視障學生生涯教育與融合教育之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報，27(2)，75-101。
吳木崑（2009）。杜威經驗哲學對課程與教學之啟示。臺北市立教育大學學報：教育類 (40)，35-54。