簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 曾德倫
Deh-Lun Tzeng
論文名稱: Evaluate Innovation Competency Factors on Microsoft Taiwan-Innovation in Process, Organization and Technology (IPOT)
指導教授: 施正屏
Shih, Cheng-Ping
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 國際人力資源發展研究所
Graduate Institute of International Human Resource Developmemt
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 77
中文關鍵詞: 人力資源管理創新能力創新策略
英文關鍵詞: human resource management, innovation competency, innovation strategy
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:167下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Innovative human resources (HR) have already become the most precious asset in the era of knowledge economy and the major sources of competitive advantage for maximizing profits. Meanwhile, in the era of globalization, recruiting the best human resources capital worldwide has already become the essential mean for enhancing firm’s innovation competency and profit maximization. However, how firms’ innovation competency can be impact by human resources has seldom been studied. Based on van der Panne’s framework, this study replaced the product-related factors with human-related factors. The IPOT model was developed by Shih & Tzeng.
    The empirical results showed three major important findings. First, most of the factors in the framework had positive influential power over a firm’s innovation competency to produce successful products or services. Major findings showed that, first, in order to improve the innovation competency, Microsoft Taiwan should recruit young and local employees to avoid from the group thinking problem. Good internal communication was very important for improving Microsoft Taiwan’s innovation competency. Second, Microsoft Taiwan should provide good internal communication channels and opportunities for its department managers. Third, compared with other companies, Microsoft Taiwan went through rigorous risk management; hence, it reduced the cost of project failure and achieved its innovation competency. Forth, the human resource department should emphasize more on the job content and profession fitness for employees. By fulfilling employees’ expectation for the job content, their willingness to cooperate in team was also improved. Fifth, factors that reinforce the market leadership of Microsoft Taiwan and to its successful innovation competency were: market research, quick response to the market change, and on time services.

    ABSTRACT I TABLE OF CONTENTS III LIST OF FIGURES V LSIT OF TABLES VII CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 Background of the Study 1 Purpose of the Study 2 Questions of the Study 3 Significance of the Study 4 Definition of Terms 5 Limitations of the Study 5 CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW 7 Innovation 7 Innovation Competencies 10 International Human Capital 19 Summary 24 CHAPTER III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 25 Research Framework for IPOT Model 25 Research Hypotheses 27 Research Procedure 29 Research Methods 31 CHAPTER IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 35 Descriptive Results 35 Empirical Results for IPOT Model 43 Discussions 57 CHAPTER V. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 61 Conclusions 61 Suggestions 66 REFERRENCES 69 APPENDIX: QUESTIONNAIRE 73 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 Factors of Successful Marketable Products 10 Figure 2.2 Factors Influencing Innovation Capability 16 Figure 3.1 Research Framework for IPOT Model 26 Figure 3.2 Research Procedure 30 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Innovation Competency Theories 10 Table 2.2 Critical Factors for Innovation Success 13 Table 3.1 Cronbach Alpha Value of Survey Instrument 32 Table 4.1 Data of Variables 35 Table 4.2 Descriptive Results for Demographic Variables 36 Table 4.3 Descriptive Results of Organization-Related Factors 37 Table 4.4 Descriptive Results of Project-Related Factors 38 Table 4.5 Descriptive Results of Human-Related Factors 39 Table 4.6 Descriptive Results of Market-Related Factors 40 Table 4.7 Descriptive Results of Innovation Performance Factors 41 Table 4.8 Multiple Regression for Process Innovation Competency 43 Table 4.9 Multiple Regression for Organization Innovation Competency 48 Table 4.10 Multiple Regression for Technical Innovation Competency 52

    Afuah, A. (2003). Innovation management: strategies, implementation, and profits (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Amabile, T. M., Conti R., Coon H., Lazenby J. & Herron M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.
    Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63-76.
    Calantonea R. J., Cavusgil S. T. & Zhaob Y. (2001). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515– 524.
    Chacke, G. K. (1988). Technology management: Application to corporate marketed and military missions. New York: Praeger.
    Chen, L. G. (2002). Research on international technical human capital mobility index. National Science Council Monthly, 28(7), 523-28.
    Cullen J. B. & Parboteeah K. P. (2007). Multinational management: a strategic approach. Baker & Taylor Books.
    Curtis, J. S. (1997). Human capital and metropolitan employment growth. Journal of Urban Econoomics, 43, 223-43.
    Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderates. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
    Damanpour, F. (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1) 45-65.
    Delmas, M. A. (2002). Innovating against European rigidities: Institutional environment and dynamic capabilities. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13(1), 19-43.
    Drucker, P. F. (1985). The discipline of innovation. In Innovation, edited by Harvard Business Review. MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Freeman, C. (1982). The economics of industrial innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Higgins, J. M. (1995). Innovation: the core competence. Planning Review, 23, 32-36.
    Hung, S. W., Yang C. & Lee, C.F. (2004). The vertical disintegration of Taiwan’s semiconductor industries: price and non-price factors. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 7(4), 547–69.
    Ingham, J. (2007). Strategic human capital management: creating value through people. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
    Kung, M. H. & Lee, H. P. (2004). Creating the value of entrepreneurial innovations. Proceedings of the International Conference on 2004 Industrial Technology Innovation, ROC, 7, 1-13.
    Lee, F. H. & Lee, T. Z. (2007). The Relationships between HRM Practices, Leadership Style, Competitive Strategy and Business Performance in Taiwanese Steel Industry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Chen Kung University, Taiwan.
    Li, W. M. (2002). A study on the interrelationship between horizontal structure, organizational learning, innovation capability and performance. Unpublished master dissertation, National Chen Kung University, Taiwan.
    Lin, C. C. (2005). The study of the government recruitment policy of information scientists and technologists in Taiwan (1955-2004). Taiwan: National Chi Nan University.
    Lukas B. A., Hult G. T. M. & Ferrell O. C. (1996). A theoretical perspective of the antecedents and consequences of organizational learning in marketing channels. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 233–44.
    Lund, R. & Gjerding, A. N. (1996). The flexible company: Innovation, work organization and human resource management. DRUID Working Paper, 96(17).
    Lundvall, B. A. (1985). Product innovation and user-producer interaction. Industrial Development Research Series, 31. Denmark: Aalborg University Press.
    Mahroum, S. (2000). Highly skilled globetrotters: mapping the international migration of human capital. R&D Management, 30(1), 23–32.
    Martin, P. L. (2003). Highly Skilled Labor Migration: Sharing the Benefit. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
    Miller, D. & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal (pre-1986), 3(1), 101-115.
    Moore, D. McCabe, G., Duckworth, W. & Alwan, L. (2009). The practice of business statistics: Using data for decisions. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
    Moorman C. & Miner A. S. (1996). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academic Management Review, 23(4), 698 –723.
    Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
    Porter, M. E. & Stern, S. (1999). The new challenge to America’s prosperity-findings from the innovation index. Washington: Council on Competitiveness.
    Prajogo, D. I. & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36(5), 499-515.
    Quinn J. B., Baruch J. J. & Zien K. A. (2000). Innovation explosion: Using intellect and software to revolutionize growth strategies. New York: Free Press
    Roberts, E. B. (1988). What we've learned: managing invention and innovation. Research Technology management, 31(1), 11-29.
    Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
    Romijn, H. & Albaladejo M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy, 31, 1053–1067.
    Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Santomero, A. M. & Trester, J. J. (1998). Financial innovation and bank risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 35(1), 25-37.
    Thomas, R. J. (1993). New product development: managing and forecasting for strategic success. New York: J. Wiley.
    Thompson V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5, 1–20.
    Trott, P. (2005). Innovation management and new product development (3rd ed.). Australia: FT Prentice Hall.
    van der Panne, G., van Beers, C. & Kleinknecht, A. (2003). Success and failure of innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 1-30.

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE