研究生: |
戴宇核 Tai, Yu-Ho |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
字本位教材認讀與書寫成效研究 The Effect of Character-Based Teaching Materials on Chinese Characters’ Recognition and Writing |
指導教授: |
林振興
Lin, Jen-Shing |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
華語文教學系 Department of Chinese as a Second Language |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 85 |
中文關鍵詞: | 漢字教學 、序列位置效果 、初始效應 、菲律賓華語學習者 |
英文關鍵詞: | Chinese Character teaching, Serial position effect, Primary effect, Philippines learners of Chinese as a foreign language (CFL) |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.DCSL.001.2018.A07 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:291 下載:28 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來,華語教學中的漢字教學愈來愈受到重視,不同的教學法與教學策略成為炙手可熱的研究議題,如何從初級開始培養學習者漢字之認讀與書寫能力,更是教師與研究者頗費思量的課題。
研究者以序列位置效果理論為基礎,導入漢字輸入與輸出途徑之模型,設計了兩種漢字教學策略──「讀音優先教學策略」與「書寫優先教學策略」。正因過去研究中未見探究漢字形音義教學時,應該先行「讀音」輸入亦或是先行「書寫」輸入,對於漢字的認讀或書寫能力能起到較大的助益,研究者隨將上述兩種於字本位模式框架下發展出的教學策略與傳統詞本位模式之教學方法導入研究設計,進行教學實徵研究。
本研究之實驗以菲律賓基督教靈惠學院177位八年級華裔與非華裔之初級華語學習者為對象,進行了教學與施測,統計分析了測驗數據後得到如下三個結論:
一、接受字本位教學模式的學習者,其漢字認讀與書寫能力之提升幅度皆大於詞本位教學模式的學習者。
二、施測結果與序列位置效果之初始效應理論相符,即「讀音優先組」之漢字認讀能力顯著優於其他組別;「書寫優先組」之漢字書寫能力顯著優於其他組別。
三、整體而言,菲律賓華裔學習者的漢字認讀與書寫能力顯著高於菲律賓裔學習者。
本研究成果能作為華語教師及研究人員於漢字實務教學上之參考。
Recently, the method of teaching Chinese Characters has drawn great attention in the field of Chinese Teaching. Studies on different teaching methods and strategies have become hot research issues. How to improve the reading(recognition) and writing ability of students at primary level is considered greatly by teachers and researchers.
Referring to the theory of serial position effect, this study introduced Chinese Characters input and output path models. At the same time, the teaching strategies were divided into two groups, that is, Pronunciation as priority group and Writing as priority group. There is no previous exploration on whether teaching pronunciation first or writing first can mostly benefit Chinese Characters’ reading(recognition) ability and(or) writing ability. Therefore, the researcher used the teaching strategies based on the two models as mentioned before as well as the traditional teaching method of sentence-based teaching to design the research and conduct the empirical research.
The participants of this research were 177 beginning level learners of Chinese language, including Filipino-Chinese and non-Filipino-Chinese, in 8th grade at Grace Christian College, Philippines. After analyzing the data, three conclusions were obtained as follows:
1.The learners who accepted the character-based approach improved their ability of reading(recognition) and writing Chinese Characters more than those accepted sentence-based approach learners.
2.The results of this research consisted with the primary effect theory of serial position effect. The ability of Chinese Characters’ reading(recognition) of students in the Pronunciation as priority group was significantly higher than that of students in other groups. While the ability of Chinese Characters’ writing of students in Writing as priority group was significantly higher than that of students in other groups.
3.In general, the Filipino-Chinese students’ ability of reading(recognition) and writing was significantly higher than that of non-Filipino-Chinese students.
This study may provide a reference for teachers and researchers in Chinese teaching practice.
中文部分
丁安琪(2015)。目的語環境下漢語學習動機增強者動機變化分析。語言文字應用,2,116-124。
王仁甫(2004)。教學體驗探路。北京:中國工人出版社。
王紅君(2007)。「字本位」理論與對外漢語文教學模式研究。北京語言大學碩士研究生學位論文(未出版碩士學位論文)。
王若江(2013)。漢語「字本位」教學法分析。山梨国際研究山梨県立大学国際政策学部紀要,8,76-81。
王碧霞、李寧、種國勝、徐葉菁(1994)。從留學生識記漢字的心理過程探討基礎階段漢字教學。語言教學研究,3,21-33。
王際平(2005)。淺談對拼音文字為母語的漢語求學者的漢字教學。西方學習者漢字認知國際研討會論文。德國美茵茨大學。
王駿(2006)。字本位與認知法的對外漢語教學。華東師範大學博士學位論文(未出版博士學位論文)。
王儷君(2013)。圖文聯想對以中文為第二語言者的漢字學習成效:以創造力為調節變項。國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文(未出版碩士學位論文)。
史方園(2013)。從詞本位到字本位─對外漢語教學思路的一場變革。高教研究,356,211-212。
白樂桑、張朋朋(1989)。漢語語言文字啟蒙(A Key to Chinese Speech and Writing)。北京:華語教學出版社。
白樂桑(1996)。漢語教材中的文、語領土之爭:是合併,還是自主,抑或分離?。世界漢語教學,4,100-102。
石定果、萬業馨(1998)。關於對外漢字教學的調查報告。語言教學與研究,1,36-48。
匡臘英、張娜(2010)。菲律賓華裔青少年語言使用調查研究及華文教育對策。經濟與社會發展,8(12),133-136。
江新、趙果(2001)。初級階段外國留學生漢字學習策略的調查研究。語言教學與研究,4,10-17。
江新(2002)。「認寫分流、多認少寫」漢字教學方法的實驗研究。世界漢語教學,2,123-126。
江新(2007)。「認寫分流,多認少寫」漢字教學方法的實驗研究。世界漢語教學,2,91-98。
余江英(2010)。菲律賓華裔與非華裔青少年學生的漢語語言環境與短期漢語學習動機之比較——從對近兩百名菲律賓華裔與非華裔青少年學生的調查談起。「國際漢語教學理念與模式創新」國際學術研討會論文摘要集。
吳恩錫(2009)。基於字本位理論的漢語詞彙教學-韓國語「漢字詞」與針對韓國學生的漢語詞彙教學。華東師範大學碩士學位論文(未出版碩士學位論文)。
吳艷紅、朱瀅(1997)。自由回憶和線索回憶測驗中的系列位置效應。心理科學,20(3),217-221。
吳艷紅、朱瀅(1999)。非常短暫呈現時間過程中的系列位置效應。心理科學,22(4),298-301。
呂必松(1999)。對外漢語教學學科理論建設的現狀和面臨的問題。語言文字應用,4,3-11。
呂必松(2003)。漢語教學路子研究芻議。暨南大學華文學院學報,1。
呂必松(2007)。組合漢語知識綱要。北京:北京語言大學出版社。
李大遂(2011)。中高級漢字課教學新模式實驗報告。語言文字應用,3,118-125。
李宜蓓、張葶葶、洪蘭、曾志朗、李俊仁(2006)。語文記憶中項目與項目位置訊息的單一運作系統。中華心理學刊,40,315-327。
步延新、孫紅娟(2015)。美國華裔非華裔漢語學習者詞彙使用情況對比分析。國際漢語學報,6(2),11-18。
周士勤(2007)。系列位置效應對課堂教學的啟示。教育與管理,361(36),50-52。
周明朗(2014)。語言認同與華語傳承語教育。華文教學與研究,1,15-20。
周健(1998)。「漢字難學」的分析與對策。漢字文化,2,57-60。
孟華(2001)。「字本位」理論與漢語的能指投射原則。語言教學與研究,6。
林建杰(2014)。淺析印尼華裔高中生的語言文化保留及漢語學習動機。HUMANIORA,5(1),275-280。
林振興、陳學志(2015)。漢字積木 I ──字本位學習法。台北:中正書局。
施正宇(2010)。從漢字教學看對外漢語教學中的本位問題。漢語國際教育研究,6,104-109。
施正宇、呂文杰、范佳燕、房磊(2015)。60年對外漢字教學研究之研究(上)。雲南師範大學學報,13(1),12-22。
洪慧燕(2005)。以圖象有效地學習漢字。華語文教學研討會論文集,4,197-206。
徐偉容(2012)。從圖像看再認記憶的序列位置效果。高雄:高雄師範大學碩士論文(未出版碩士學位論文)。
徐通鏘(1994)。「字」和漢語的句法結構。世界漢語教學,2,1-9。
徐通鏘(1994)。「字」和漢語研究的方法論-兼評漢語研究中的「印歐語的眼光」。世界漢語教學,3,1-14。
秦婉甄(2014)。漢字形似字之相似度評定暨創意精緻化策略對其區辨成效之研究。國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文(未出版碩士學位論文)。
馬廣毅、林建漢(2006)。從雙符碼理論對數位課程設計之研究。第一屆知識社群國際研討會線上論文集。
尉萬傳(2004)。東南亞華裔留學生漢語學習背景淺探。東南亞縱橫,4,56-59。
張朋朋(1992)。詞本位教學法和字本位教學法的比較。世界漢語教學,3,222-223。
張朋朋(2005)。談「字本位」的內涵。漢字文化,4,7-10。
張金蘭(2012)。以華語為第二語言學習者之漢字習得研究。國立政治大學博士論文。
張德鑫(2006)。從「詞本位」到「字中心」-對外漢語教學的戰略轉移。漢語學報,2,33-39。
張靜賢(1991)。現代漢字筆順論。第三屆國際漢語教學討論會論文選,598-609。北京:北京語言學院出版社。
盛炎(1990)。語言教學原理。重慶:重慶出版社。
盛致妤(2014)。漢字創意精緻化教材之發展評定及對以華語文為第二語言學習者之學習成效研究。國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文(未出版碩士學位論文)。
章石芳、范啟華(2011)。菲律賓華裔中學生中文學習態度調查分析。佳木斯教育學院學報,3,265-269。
符碧真/國立臺灣大學教務處教學發展中心(2010)。椰林講堂:大學老師的教學秘笈。台北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。
莊國土(2009)。東南亞華僑華人數量的新估算。廈門大學學報哲學社會科學版,3,62-69。
莫丹(2015)。華裔與非華裔漢語學習者產出性詞彙知識差異及其對寫作品質的影響。雲南師範大學學報對外漢語教學與研究版,13(5),33-41。
郭紹虞(1938)。中國語詞之彈性作用。燕京學報,24,1-34。
陳萍(2006)。關於「字本位」理論的思考。重慶廣播大學學報,18(1)。
陳學志、張瓅勻、邱郁秀、宋曜廷、張國恩(2011)。華語文部件組字與形構資料庫之建立及其在識字教學的應用。教育心理學報,43,66-86。
陳燕玲(2016)。認知視野下漢語學習動機類型研究──以菲律賓華裔青少年為例。泉州師範學院學報,34(1),80-85。
陸儉明(2011)。我關於「字本位」的基本觀點。語言科學,3,225-230。
單韻鳴(2006)。國際學校學生特點及漢語教學策略。海外華文教育,1,32-36。
曾志朗、洪蘭(1985)。從神經語言學觀點探討中文閱讀之視覺歷程。世界華文研討會論文集,515-529。
程灶火、王力、李歡歡、鄭虹(2003)。圖、詞回憶中的序列位置效應及其年齡變化規律。中國心理衛生雜誌,17(8),557-562。
舒兆民(2010)。華語文教學講義。台北:新學林。
黃玉英(2013)。運用時間價值曲線規律,創設地理高效課堂。2016年5月1日,取自:新會華僑中學網站:
http://www.xhhqzx.cn/wygkcn_ShowArticle.asp?EC_ArticleID=3885
黃端銘(2009)。井蛙說大海──菲律賓華文教育面面談。馬尼拉:菲律賓華教中心。
楊自儉(主編)(2008)。字本位理論與應用研究。山東:山東教育出版社。
葉德明(1990)。漢字認知基礎──從心理語言學看漢字認知過程。台北:師大書苑。
葉德明(2000)。外籍生漢字書寫策略探討。華語文教學研討會論文集第三冊教學應用組。
葉德明(2005)。華語語音學──語音理論(上篇)。台北:師大書苑。
鄒愛琴(2008)。徐通鏘字本位理論述評。中國海洋大學碩士學位論文(未出版碩士學位論文)。
劉丹(2014)。多元語言環境對菲律賓華裔中學生學習漢語的影響調查與分析
──以菲律賓義德中學為例。廣西師範大學碩士學位論文(未出版碩士學位論文)。
劉珣(2000)。對外漢語教育學引論。北京:北京語言文化大學出版社。
劉曉梅(2004)。「字」本位理論與對外漢語詞彙教學。廣東外語外貿大學學報,15(4),5-8。
潘文國(2002)。字本位與漢語研究。上海:華東師範大學出版社。
蔡佩蓉(2014)。以部件鍵接圖及創意精緻化策略提升以華語文為第二語言學習者之學習興趣及成效研究。國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文。
蔡燦龍、陳秋斌(2015)。菲律賓華裔青少年中華文化認同的困惑與策略。2015-21半月刊思想前沿,15-19。
鄭全全(2008)。社會認知心理學。杭州:浙江教育出版社。
盧紹昌(1987)。對外漢語教學中漢字教學的新嘗試。第二屆國際漢語教學討論會論文選。世界漢語教學學會,461-465。
賴明德、何淑貞、張孝裕、陳立芬、舒兆民、蔡雅薰(2008)。華語文教學導論。台北:三民書局。
謝佩珊(2013)。創意漢字學習教材、圖文聯想類別、圖文聯想性對以中文為第二語言者漢字學習成效之影響。國立臺灣師範大學碩士論(未出版碩士學位論文)文。
簡月娟(2012)。「字本位」理論與對外華語文教學。臺東大學人文學報,2(1),251-275。
嚴辰松(2002)。論「字」對漢語詞彙和語法的影響。現代外語,3,11-12。
權朝魯(2003)。效果量的意義及測定方法。心理學探新,23(2),39-44。
日文部分
カッケンブッシュ寛子.中條和光.長友和彦.多和田真一郎(1989)。50分ひらがな導入法-「連想法」と「色つきカード」の比較-。日本語教育,69,147-162。
加納千恵子(1997)。外国人のための漢字学習項目。情報処理学会研究報告人文科学とコンピュータ(CH),80,1-6。
縫部義憲(1991)。日本語教育学入門・改訂版。歴々社。
蘇志良(2005)。用圖像提升日語學習效果教材之研究-以平假名和片假名為主-。國立高雄第一科技大學碩士論文(未出版碩士學位論文)。
藤金倫德、鈴村健治(1988)。漢字の読みの獲得における絵刺激の利用に関する研究─漢字刺激と絵刺激の同時提示,継時提示の比較─。横浜国立大学教育紀要,28,217-222。
英文部分
Allen, J. R. (2008). Why learning to write Chinese is a waste of time: A modest proposal. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 237-251.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Psychology of learning and motivation, 2, 89-195.Avons, S. E. (1998). Serial report and item recognition of novel visual patterns. British Journal of Psychology, 89(2), 285-308.
Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. American Psychologist, 30, 821-828.
Baddeley, A. D. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice (2 Edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bell, J. S. (1995). Relationship between L1 and L2 literacy: Some complicating factors. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 687-704.
Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students'' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5-26.
Catarina, C., Manuela, G., Alexandre, M., Paulo Eduardo, O., & Isabel, S. (2012). Serial position effects in Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and normal aging: Predictive value for conversion to dementia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34(8), 841-852.
Chuang, H., & Ku, H. (2011). The effect of computer-based multimedia instruction with Chinese character recognition. Educational Media International, 48(1), 27-4.
Clark, R. C., & Lyons, C. (2004). Graphics for learning: Proven guidelines for planning, designing, and evaluating visuals in training materials. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Cohen, A. D. (1987). The use of verbal and imagery mnemonics in second language vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 43-62.
Cohen, Jacob. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (second ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Curtain, H. A., & Dahlberg, C. A. (2004). Languages and children, making the match: New languages for young learners. Boston: Pearson/A and B.
DeFrancis, J. (1984). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Devellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). On memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Teachers College.
Everson, M. E. (1988). Speed and comprehension in reading Chinese: Romanization vs. characters revisited. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 23,1-15.
Everson, M. E. (2011). Best practices in teaching logographic and non‐Roman writing systems to L2 learners. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 249-274.
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2013). An introduction to language. UK: Cengage Learning.
Gibson, E. J., Pick, A., Osser, H., & Hammond, M. (1962). The role of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in the perception of words. The American journal of psychology, 554-570.
Glanzer, M., & Cunitz, A. R. (1966). Two storage mechanisms in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 351-360.
Guder, A. (2005, August). Struggling with Chinese: New dimensions in foreign language teaching. Paper presented at the International and Interdisciplinary Conference, University of Mainz, Germersheim, Germany.
Helgesen, M . (1987). False Beginners: Activating Language for Accuracy and Fluency. The Language Teacher, 11(14), 23-29.
HR, M. P., & Jarrold, C. (2005). Impaired verbal short-term memory in Down syndrome reflects a capacity limitation rather than atypically rapid forgetting. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91(1), 1.
Huang H., & Hanley, R. (1994). Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English. Cognition, 54, 73-98.
Jahnke, J. C. (1968). Presentation rate and the serial-position effect of immediate serial recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7(3), 608-612.
Ke, C. (1998). Effects of strategies on the learning of Chinese characters among foreign language students. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 33(2), 93-112.
Kuo, L. J., Li, Y., Sadoski, M., & Kim, T. J. (2014). Acquisition of Chinese characters: the effects of character properties and individual differences among learners. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 287-300.
Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria what did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202-220.
Leck, K. J., Weekes, B. S., & Chen, M. J. (1995). Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: Evidence from Chinese readers. Memory and Cognition, 23, 468-476.
Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J., & Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In D. M. Willows, & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of Illustration: volume I: Basic Research (chap. 2, pp.51-85). NY: Springer Verlag.
Lu, M., Webb, J., Krus, D. J., & Fox, L. S. (1999). Using order analytic instructional hierarchies of mnemonics to facilitate learning Chinese and Japanese kanji characters. Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 293–311.
Marta B., Demis B., Marcella F., Paola P. (2014). When working memory updating requires updating: Analysis of serial position in a running memory task. Acta Psychologica, 148, 123-129.
McFarland, D. J., Cacale, A. T. (1995). Comparisons of memory for nonverball auditory and visual sequential stimuli. Psychol Res, 57(2), 80-87.
McGinnis, S. (1995). Student attitudes and approaches in the learning of written Chinese. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Long Beach, CA.1.
McGinnis, S. (1999). Students’goals and approaches. In M. Chu (Ed.), Chinese Language Teachers Association monograph series: Vol. III. Mapping the course of the Chinese language field. Kalamazoo, MI: Chinese Language Teachers Association.
Murdock, B. (1962). Serial Position Effect of Free Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(2), 482–488.
Myriam C., Jonathan G. (2012). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, symbols, and shapes in peripheral vision. Acta Psychologica, 141(2), 149-158.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. ( 2000 ). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. ( 2006 ). The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching . In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins .
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Purser, H., & Jarrold, C. (2010). Short-and long-term memory contributions to immediate serial recognition: Evidence from serial position effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 679-693.
Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31-74.
Richards, J., Platt, J. & Weber, H. (1985). Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.
Robert W. H., Cindy C., Sébastien T., Dylan M. J. (2016). Perceptual-motor determinants of auditory-verbal serial short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 90, 126-146.
Saalbach, H., & Stern, E. (2004). Differences between chinese morphosyllabic and german alphabetic readers in the stroop interference effect. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 11(4), 709-715.
Sampson, G. (1990). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Shen, H. H. (2004). Level of cognitive processing: Effects on character learning among non‐native learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Language and Education, 18, 167-182.
Shen, H. H. (2005). An investigation of Chinese-character learning strategies among non‐native speakers of Chinese. System, 33, 49-68.
Shen, H. H. (2010). Imagery and Verbal Coding Approaches in Chinese Vocabulary Instruction. Language Teaching Research, 14, 485–500.
Shi, D. G., & Wan, Y. X. (1998). Report on teaching Chinese as a second language. Research and Language Instruction, 1, 37-48.
Simone C. E., Irene R. B., Manfred B., Nancy S. F., Andreas U. M., Marc S. (2014). Serial position effects are sensitive predictors of conversion from MCI to Alzheimer's disease dementia. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 10(5), 420-424.
Sternberg, R. J., & Mio, J. S. (2009). Cognitive psychology: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. A., Eden, G. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Siok, W. T. (2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(24), 8781-8785.
Walton, A. R. (1996). Reinventing language fields: The Chinese case. Chinese Pedagogy: An Emerging Field. Columbus: Ohio State University Foreign Language Publications.
Wang, M., Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2003). Alphabetic readers quickly acquire orthographic structure in learning to read Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 183-208.
Xu, Y., Chang, L., Zhang, J., & Perfetti, C. A. (2013). Reading, Writing, and Animation in Character Learning in Chinese as a Foreign Language, Foreign Language Annals, 46(3), 423–444.
Yan, X., Fan, Y., Di, Z., Havlin, S., & Wu, J. (2013). Efficient Learning Strategy of Chinese Characters Based on Network Approach. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e69745.
Ye, L. (2013). Shall we delay teaching characters in teaching Chinese as a foreign language?. Foreign Language Annals, 46(4), 610-627.
Zhu, Y., Shum, M. S. K., Tse, S. K. & Liu, J. H. J. (2015). Word-processor or pencil-and-paper? A comparison of students' writing in Chinese as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-22.