簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李金玲
Chin-Ling Lee
論文名稱: 分組方式在技專校院合作學習外語教學成效之研究
A Study of the Effects of Group Formation on Cooperative Learning in the EFL Classroom
指導教授: 田振榮
Tien, Chen-Jung
洪銓修
Hung, Chuan-Hsiu
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工業教育學系
Department of Industrial Education
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 230
中文關鍵詞: 合作學習英語教學象徵互動論類神經網路模糊理論
英文關鍵詞: Cooperative learning, English teaching, symbolic interactionism, neural networks, fuzzy sets
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:244下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 技職體系學生英文基礎能力普遍不紮實、學習意願不高且學習效果不理想,亟需提升改進;再加上國內英語教學起始學齡層不一,學生同儕、同班之間的英語能力將愈形懸殊,以及大班教學不易,導致台灣英語教學成效不彰。本研究旨在應用智慧型語言專長能力分組教學策略,藉以強化英語合作學習之教學成效,提升技專校院英語教學成果。
    主要研究方法為不等組前後測設計之準實驗研究,以傳統分組法和智慧型分組法進行控制組和實驗組之分組工作,進而分析不同分組方式對學生在英語合作學習的學習成就、學習動機、外語教室學習焦慮和學習型態偏好認知上的差異,並探討分組方法對英語合作學習的影響以及合作學習對國內技專校院的英語教學成效。再則輔以質性研究的俗民誌研究方法,來探討台灣技專校院學生,對英語合作學習及其分組方式的看法及觀點。研究結果發現進一步建構成一個觀點理論模式作為研究不同分組方式之英語合作學習團隊互動行為的基礎,此一理論模式(theoretical model),稱為「技專校院外語學生對英語合作學習的誘因觀點」。
    本研究主要發現茲陳述如下:
    一、「同質英語能力分組」學生的英語學習成就顯著高於「異質英語能力分組」學生。
    二、「同質英語能力分組」學生在「外語教室焦慮量表」之「一般焦慮感」分量表和「口說英語焦慮」分量表分數之平均數上,顯著低於「異質英語能力分組」學生。
    三、「同質英語能力分組」學生的英語學習動機並未顯著高於「異質英語能力分組」的學生。
    四、「異質英語能力分組」學生在「學習型態喜好認知量表」之「觸覺學習型態偏好」分量表、「團體學習型態偏好」分量表和「動覺學習型態偏好」分量表分數之平均數上,顯著高於「同質英語能力分組」學生。
    五、參與者於訪談中透露對「學生特質變數」、「教師角色」和「輔助學習教具」三個層面,在英語合作學習課中,依同心圓學習理論達到共生共存、交互關係的一種「誘因觀點」的綜合觀點。
    六、影響參與者對英語合作學習觀點的主要因素則有:(一)動機乃英語學習的重要信念,(二)對教師協助依賴和(三) 對學習輔具之需求,乃源自傳統教室學習習慣。
    七、參與者皆同意英語合作學習課提供互動式和有意義的學習環境,使他們獲益良多,但卻不能全程以英文進行溝通討論,雖達到互動學習效果,但與以英語為溝通學習的英語合作學習之教學目標明顯有落差(discrepancy)。此亦突顯國內英語教學在學生英語文溝通訓練的不足。
    最後,研究者針對本研究所使用的智慧型語言專長特色分組的教學策略,在國內技專校院英語教學的應用及未來進一步研究上,提出具體建議。

    The existing problems about students’ apathetic attitudes to learning and unsatisfactory achievement in the EFL instruction in Vocational and Technological Education (VTE) in Taiwan have been cause for concern and widely discussed. Therefore, the research aimed to apply the intelligent English characteristics grouping strategies to reinforce the effectiveness of the cooperative English learning (CEL) and improve the English learning and teaching in the VTE.
    The methodology of the study utilized quasi-experimental and ethnographic approaches to conduct a four-month experimental teaching at a technological institute, separately for the collection of quantitative and qualitative data. The ethnographic interview of qualitative method was used to explore and analyze the students’ perspectives of cooperative English learning in different grouping formations.
    The major findings are in the following:
    1. The English learning performance of the experimental class (homogeneous
    ability group) was significantly higher than that of the control class (heterogeneous ability group).
    2. The experimental class showed significantly better effects on learning
    anxiety of the EFL learners in the Subscale of General Felling of Anxiety and Subscale of Fear of Potential Evaluation of Speaking in English than the control class did.
    3. The experimental class showed no significantly better effects on increasing
    the learning motivation compared with the control class.
    4. The control class showed significant effects on the conceptual learning style
    preferences in the subscales in terms of Tactile, Group, and Kinesthetic Learning Style Preference, compared with the experimental class.
    5. According to the participants’ expression in the interview, they revealed an
    “incentive perspective.” This perspective contained three issues: learner trait variables, teacher role, and supportive learning aids. The coexisting interaction of these three dimensions operated in the CEL class to form a concentric ring model of learning.
    6. Factors affecting the learner’s perspective of the CEL class including as
    follows, (1) motivation, a priori belief about English learning, (2) dependence on teacher’s help, and (3) supportive learning aids, resulted from past classroom learning habits.
    7. Participants all agreed with the benefits obtained from interactive and meaningful learning in the CEL class. However, they also confessed to the failure of using English for thorough communication due to their lower English proficiency. There seems to be a conflict and discrepancy between the perception of the CEL class and its practical use. From this we may logically infer to a lack of training during learners’ English education background and experience in the past.
    Consequently, the research presented viable suggestions on the application of intelligent language characteristics grouping strategies for English instruction in technological institutes in Taiwan.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i ABSTRACT ii ABSTRACT (CHINESE) vi LIST OF FIGURES xi LIST OF TABLES xii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1  Research Background and Motivation 5   Dilemma of EFL Instruction in Technological and Vocational Education (TVE) in Taiwan 5   Studies on Intelligent Language Characteristics Classification Strategies 7   Significant Effects of Cooperative Learning in Language Teaching 7  Research Purposes 8  Research Questions 10   The Quantitative Research 10   The Qualitative Inquiry 13  Significance of the Study 13  Research Limitation 14  Definition of Terms 16 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 23  Studies of Teaching English as a Foreign Language in TVE in Taiwan 24   Curriculum Guidelines of English Instruction in New Grade 1-9 Consistency Curriculum at the Primary and Secondary Levels 24   The Current State of EFL Teaching in Vocational High Education: Factors of Curriculum Development and Design for English Instruction 26   The Promotion of Proficiency-level Grouping for English Teaching 28   Employing Cooperative English Learning to Elevate the Effectiveness of English Instruction in Institutes and Universities of Technology 30  Relevant Factors Affecting English Learning 32   Learning Motivation in EFL Context 33   English Learning Anxiety 35   English Learning Style Preferences 36  Interactive Approach to English Teaching and Learning 37 Cooperative Learning 39   Cooperative Learning and Collaborative Learning 40   Rationale and Philosophy of Cooperative Learning 41   Features of Cooperative Learning and Its Disadvantages 42  Methods of Group Formation 43   Fuzzy Systems and Neural Networks 43   Fuzzy Systems 45   Neural Networks 49   Clustering Method 52  Using Fuzzy Competitive Learning Techniques to Provide an Ideal Classification 54   Educational Ethnography 58   Participant Observation 58   Ethnographic Interview 60   Symbolic Interactionist Theory 64 CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 65  Research Design 65  Preliminary Study 67   Research Framework and Methods 67   Research Design and Procedure 68   Findings and Discussion 69  The Main Study 73  The Quantitative Research 74   Research Design 74   Participants 75   Procedures 76   Instruments and Measures 77  Construction of the Scale 79  Construction of Questionnaire on Learning Anxiety 79   Construction of Questionnaire on Learning Motivation 84   Construction of Questionnaire of Conceptual Learning Style Preference 89   Qualitative Inquiry 94   Research Design 94  Selection of Participants 98   Data Collection 99   Interview Protocols 100   Interview Procedure 102  Descriptive Validity 102   Analysis of Data 103   Constant Comparative Analysis 103 CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH FINDINGS AND EXPLANATION 105 Introduction 105  The Qualitative Research 106  Results of Homogeneous/Heterogeneous Grouping Methods 106  Results of Effect Analysis of the Participants’ EFL Learning Anxiety in Different Group Formations 109  Results of Effect Analysis of the Participants’ EFL Learning Motivation in Different Group Formations 114 Results of Effect Analysis of the Participants’ Conceptual  Learning Style Preferences in Different Group Formation 118  The Qualitative Inquiry 126  Presentation of Interview Data 126   Introduction 126   Description of Participants Selected for the Study 128  Summary and Analysis of Data 131   The Teacher Role in the CEL Class 137   Interactive Learning experience and situations in the CEL class 143   Influence Resulted from Group Formation 154   Role of an Ideal Learner in the CEL Class 156   Assumptions of a Successful CEL class 161  Development of a Model 165 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 171  Overview of the Study 173  Conclusions 181  Suggestions to Future Research 182 REFERENCE 186 APPENDICES 200  A Informed Consent Form 200  B Inventories & Questionnaires 201    Original Script of Questionnaire Used for Pilot Test 201    English edition of Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS)  201    Chinese Edition of Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS)  203    English Edition of the Questionnaire of Learning Motivation 205    Chinese Edition of the Questionnaire of Learning Motivation 207    English Edition of Questionnaire of Perceptual Learning Style Preference 209    Chinese Edition of Questionnaire of Perceptual Learning Style Preference 211  Transcripts of Questionnaire Used for Pretest & Posttest 213    English edition of Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS) 213    Chinese Edition of Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS) 215    English Edition of the Questionnaire of Learning Motivation 216 Chinese Edition of the Questionnaire of Learning Motivation 218 English Edition of Questionnaire of Perceptual Learning Style Preference 220 Chinese Edition of Questionnaire of Perceptual Learning Style Preference 222  C Observer Worksheet 224    Cooperative Learning Classroom Observation 224  D Worksheet 226    Worksheet (1) 226    Worksheet (2) 227  E Interview Protocol 229

    Allen, J. B. & Widdowson, H. B. (1987). Teaching the communicative use of English. In R. Mackay & A. J. Mounford (Eds.), English for Specific Purposes. London: Longman.
    Babbie, E. (1986). The practice of social research (4th ed.). California: Wadsworth.
    Bandemer, H. & Gottwald, S. (1995). Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, fuzzy methods with applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Blumer, H. (1998). Symbolic interactionism—Perspective and method. California: University of California Press.
    Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education—An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Brice, A. & Roseberry-McKibbin, C. (1999). Turning frustration into success for English language learners. Educational Leadership, 56(7), 53-55.
    Brown, A. L., Bransford, F. D., Ferrara, R., & Campione, J.C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. N. Flavell & E. M. Markham (Eds.), Carmichael’s Manual of Child Psychology. New York: Wiley
    Brown, H. D. (1973). Affective variables in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 23, 231-244.
    Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
    Brown, H. D. (2002). Principles of language and teaching. New Jersey: Pentice-Hall.
    Brown, J. & Cilmartin, B. G. (1969). Sociology today: Lacunae, Emphases, and Surfiets. American Sociologist, 4, 288-291.
    Burgess, P. (2003). Macmillan essential dictionary—for learners of American English. Oxford: Macmillan.
    Carbone, E. & Greenberg, J. (1998). Teaching large classes: Unpacking the problem and responding creatively. In M. Kaplan (Ed.), To Improve the Academy, 17. Stillwater, Okla.: New Forums Press and Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education.
    Carter, R. & Nunan, D. (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. London: Cambridge University Press.
    Chan, T. Y. (2002). Grouping method for cooperative learning based on immersive virtual reality. Unpublished master’s thesis, Chung Yuan University, Taiwan.
    Chang, H. M. (張秀梅) (2003). 不同能力分組方式在合作學習應用中對學習態度和學習成就的影響。淡江大學英文系碩士論文,未出版。
    Chang, J. H. (2003). The effects of various ability groupings on learning attitude and academic achievement of cooperative learning groups. Unpublished master’s thesis, Tamkang University, Taipei.
    Chang, S. (2001). Conceptualizing Taiwanese colleges students’ English learning motivation. (Report No. NSC90-2411-H-009-014). Taipei, Taiwan: National Science Council.
    Chang, Y. L. (2001). A study on optimal grouping of cooperative learning by using genetic algorithm. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Tainan Normal College, Taiwan.
    Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning and Technology, 2 (1), 22–34. Retrieved September 12, 2000, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article1/index.html.
    Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundation for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Chen, M. F. (2003). The role of motivation on EFL students’ listening comprehension in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
    Chen, Z. M. (2003). Dynamic grouping strategies based on conceptual graph for cooperative learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, Chung Yuan University, Taiwan.
    Chen, T. Y. & Gao, S. F. (陳采玉、高淑芳) (1998). 技職大專生英語文學習困難篩選量表之發展研究。行政院國科會專題研究計劃成果報告。(Report No. NSC-88-2411-159-001). Taipei, Taiwan: National Science Council.
    Cheng, S. H. (2000). Study on student team forming in a collaborative learning environment. Unpublished mater’s thesis, National ChiaoTung University, Taiwan.
    Cheng, Y, S. (1998). A qualitative inquiry of second language anxiety: Interviews with Taiwanese EFL students. In J. Katchen & Y. Liung (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching, 309-320. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
    Cheng, Y, S. (1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49 (3), 417-446.
    Chiang, S. C. (1998). The effects of cooperative learning on English teaching in high schools. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
    Chien, M. C. (簡妙娟) (2000)。 高中公民科合作學習教學實驗之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版。
    Chueng, S. C. (鐘樹椽) (1996)。 性別和能力混合分組在電腦合作學習成就和態度上之研究。國民教育研究學報,2, 頁81-105。
    Cifuentes, L. & Shih, Y. D. (2001). Teaching and learning online: A collaboration between U. S. and Taiwanese students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 456-474.
    Clement, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1994). Motivation, self-confidence and group cohesion in the foreign language classroom. Language Learning, 44, 417-418.
    Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Cooper, J. L. & Robinson, P. (2000). The argument for making large classes seem small. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 81, 5-16.
    Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. IRAL, 5, 161-170.
    Cortazzi, M. (1990). Cultural and educational expectations in the language classroom. In B. Harrison (Ed.), Culture and the Language Classroom. ELT Documents (p. 132). London: The British council.
    Curran, C. A. (1976). Counselling-leaning in second languages. Apple River, IL: Apple River Press.
    Daly, J. A., & Wilson, D. A. (1983). Writing apprehension, self-esteem, and personality. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 327-341.
    Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. California: Sage.
    Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). (Eds.) Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. California: Sage.
    Dornyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language learning. Language Learning, 40, 46-78.
    Dornyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 78, 273-284.
    Dornyei, Z. (1997). Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: Group dynamics and motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 483-493.
    Dornyei, Z. (1999). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching a researching motivation. New York: Pearson Education.
    Dornyei, Z. & Csizer, K. (2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23, 4, 421-462.
    Dornyei, Z. & Nurphey, T. (2003). Group dynamics in the language classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Dubin, F. & Oshtain, E. (1986). Course design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Duran, R. P. & Szymanski, M. H. (1995). Cooperative learning interaction and construction of activity. Discourse Processes, 19, 149-164.
    Feng, C. C. (2001). The effectiveness of grouping in an EFL cooperative learning classroom. Unpublished master’s thesis, Tamkang University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Foddy, W. (1993). Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaires -- Theory and practice in social research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Fowler, F. J. & Mangione, T. W. (1990). Standardized survey interviewing: Minimizing interviewer-related error. London: Sage.
    Fung, C. C. (馮景照)(2001)。分組方式在合作學習應用中的影響與成效。淡江大學西洋語文研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
    Gardner, R.C. (1973). Attitudes and Motivation: Their Role in Second Language Acquisition. Focus on the Learner. In J. W. Oller & J. C. Richards, Focus on the Learner. Rowley: Newbury House.
    Gardner, R. C. & MacIntyre, P. D. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study: Who says it isn’t effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(1), 57-72.
    Gardner, R.C., Masgoret, A.-M., Tennant, J. & Mihic, L. (2004). Integrative motivation: Changes during a year-long intermediate-level language course. Language Learning, 54 (1), 1-34.
    Gardner, D. & Miller, L. (1997). A study of tertiary level self-access facilities in Hong Kong. City University of Hong Kong.

    Giles, H. & Byrne, J. L. (1982). An intergroup approach to second language acquisition. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 3, 1.
    Gonzalez, V., Schallert, D. L., De Rivera, S., Flores, M., & Perrodin, L. M. (1999). Why is it una persona and not un persona? In V. Gonzalez (Ed.), Language and cognitive development in second language learning (pp. 104-155). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Hagan, M. T., Demuth, H. B., & Beale, M. (1996). Neural network design. Singapore: Thomson Learning.
    Harmer, J. (1998). How to teach English. England: Addison Wesley Longman.
    Haykin, S. (1999). Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Henry, G. T. (1990). Practical sampling. London: Sage.
    Herndon, J. N. (1987). Learner interests, achievement, and continuing motivation in instruction. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 11-14.
    Holt, D. D. (1993). Cooperative Learning for Students from Diverse Language Backgrounds: An Introduction. In D. D. Holt (Ed.), Cooperative Learning: A Response to Linguistic and Cultural Diversity (pp. 1-8). Ill. and Washington, D.C.: Delta Systems and Center for Applied Linguistics. (Note: As this publication was developed with public funds, authors receive no compensation from sales.)
    Hoppner, F., Klawonn, F., Kruse, R., & Runkler, T. (1999). Fuzzy cluster analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Horwitz, E. K. (1986). Preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of a foreign language anxiety scale. TESOL Quarterly, 20 (3), 559-562.
    Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. A. (1991). Foreign language classroom anxiety. In E. K. Horwitz & D. J. Young (Eds.), Language anxiety -- From theory and research to classroom implications (pp. 27-36). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Horwitz, E. K. & Young, D. J. (1991). Language anxiety: From theory and research to classroom implications. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Hu, F.Y. (1999). Effects of group norms and cohesiveness on group cooperative learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chung Shan University, Taiwan.
    Huang, C. C. (黃朝琴) (1991). 質的教育研究方法。台北:心理出版社。
    Huang, C. G. & Lin, P. H. (1996). 合作學習。台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。

    Huang, Y. C. (2000). Grouping strategies based on conceptual graph for cooperative learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, Chung Yuan University, Taiwan.
    Huberman, A. M. & Miles, M. B. (1998). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 179-210). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
    Hung, C. H. (1992). An interview study of perspectives of learners of English as a foreign language in the Republic of China. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Kansas.
    Hung, C. H. & Luou, B. C. (洪銓修、羅寶珠) (1995)。 高職英文教師對英語文教育之觀點研究。《全國技職體系英語教學學術研討會論文集》。頁121-145。
    Hung, C. H. (洪銓修) (1996)。 高職英文教師和其英語教學環境之社會互動探討。中華民國第十三屆英語文教學研討會論文集。頁41-50。台北:文鶴。
    Hung, C. H. (洪銓修) (1998a )。 教師及學生對通事教育觀點之探討──以技術學院為例。台北:東華書局。
    Hung, C. H. (洪銓修) (1998b)。 技職英文教師教學策略之探討。中華民國第七屆英語文教學國際研討會論文集。頁547-557。台北:文鶴。
    Hung, C. H. & Luou, B. C. (洪銓修、羅寶珠) (1998)。 從技術學院英文教師的 觀點探討我國技術體系之英語教學。第十三屆全國技術及職業教育研討會論文集。第243-252頁。台北:文鶴書局。
    Hung, C. H. (1999). An ethnographic study of teachers’ and students’ perspectives of EFL classroom interaction in technological institutes in Taiwan. Taipei: Crane.
    Hsieh, Y. T. (2002). A study on the adults’ motivation toward the participation in English learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chung-Cheng University, Taiwan.
    Janesick, V. J. (1991). Ethnographic inquiry: understanding culture and experience. In E. C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    Janesick, V. J. (2004). “Stretching” EXERCISES for qualitative researchers. California: University of South Florida.
    Jang, J. S. R., Sun, C. T., & Mizutani, E. (1997). Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Jin, L. & Cortazzi, M. (1998). Dimensions of dialogue: large classes in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 739-761.
    Johnson, D. W. & Roger, T. J. (1989). Social skills for successful group work. Educational Leadership, 47 (4), December, 1989/January, 1990, 29-33. (Publication of the Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.)
    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone- -Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Edina, Minnesota.: Interaction Book.
    Johnson, Johnson, & Holubec (1992). Advanced cooperative learning. Minnesota: Interaction Book.
    Jou, C. C. (1992). Fuzzy clustering using fuzzy competitive learning networks. The Proceeding of International Joint Conference Neural Networks, 2, 714-719.
    Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. CA: San Juan Capistrano.
    Kagan, S. (1994). The structural approach to cooperative learning. In D. D. Holt (Ed.), Cooperative learning: A response to linguistic and cultural diversity (pp. 9-19). McHenry, Ill. and Washington, D.C.: Delta Systems and Center for Applied Linguistics.
    Kagan, S. (1995). We can talk: cooperative learning in the elementary ESL classroom. Elementary Education Newsletter, 17 (2), 1-12.
    Katz, J. (1983). A theory of qualitative methodology: The social system of analytic fieldwork. In R.M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research, Illinois: Waveland Press.
    Klir, G. J., Clair, U. H. S., & Yuan, B. (1997). Fuzzy set theory—Foundations and applications. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Knight-Giuliani, L. F. (2002). The benefits of student-student interaction among adult students in the English as a second language classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers State University, New Jersey.
    Kohonen, T. K. (1989). Self-organization and associative memory (3rd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Kosko, B. (1992). Neural networks and fuzzy systems. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Krashen, S. ( 1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Wheaton.
    Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon.
    Krashen, S. D. & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.
    Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: issues and implications. London: Longman.
    Larsen-Freeman, D. (1991). Teaching grammar. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd ed.). New York: Newbury House.
    Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman
    Larsen-Freeman, D. (1986). Techniques and principles in language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Lee, C. L. (1997). Using neural network to create an ideal classification of students’ language skills. Journal of Nankai, 2, 42-50.
    Lee, C. L. & Lin, C. J. (1998). A new classification of college students’ characteristic English skills by neural networks. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Multimedia Language Education, 166-175.
    Lee, C. L. & Lin, C. J. (1998). A study of applying grey theory for the classification of students’ English characteristics. The Third National Conf. On Grey Theory and Applications, 199-204.
    Lee, C. L. (1999). Some suggestions for teaching culture in EFL classroom. Journal of Nankai, 4, 1-10.
    Lee, C. L. & Hung, Y. J. (2000). A new method for innovative curricula in the EFL. Journal of Nankai, 5, 355-363.
    Lee, C. L., Lin, C. J., & Ho, W. H. (2001). A new students’ evaluation method using fuzzy sets, The Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 9, 145-149.
    Lee, C. L. (2002). Implementation of remedial instruction to elevate the English abilities of low-achievers in postsecondary vocational schools. The Second International Forum on Education Reform: Key Factors in Effective Implementation, Thailand. Disk.
    Lee, C. L. (2004). A study on effects of applying intelligent clustering to cooperative learning on students’ academic achievement and attitudes in junior college English class. The Handbook of 2004 International Symposium on English Teaching and Curriculum Planning in Taiwan, 137-152.
    Lee, H. H. (李輝華) (1998)。有效英語教學的基本條件。中華民國第七屆英語文教學國際研討會論文集。頁659-670。台北:文鶴。
    Lee, H. H. (李輝華) (2000)。有利英語教學的學校措施。中華民國第九屆英語文教學國際研討會論文集。頁574-585。台北:文鶴。
    Lee, Y. Y. & Lee, C. L. (李彥儀、李金玲) (2002)。如何活化教學活動。2002創意教學與研究研討會論文集。國立聯合技術學院。頁2-60-2-63。
    Lee, Z. S. (李日順) (2001)。國中地理科合作學習教學法實驗成效之研究 –以台中縣立順天國中為例。國立彰化大學地理學系碩士論文,未出版。
    Leon, L. A. & Tai, L. S. (2004). Implementing cooperative learning in a team-teaching environment. Journal of Education for Bussiness, 31, 287-293.
    Liang, T. L. (2002). The seven myths on English teaching. Taipei: Classic Communication.
    Lier, L. V. (1988). The classroom and the language learner: Ethnography and second-language classroom research. London: Longman.
    Lin, C. T. & Lee, C. S. G. (1996). Neural fuzzy systems: A neuro-fuzzy synergism to intelligent systems. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Lin, N. (1976). Foundations of social research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Lin, M. S. (林茂松) (1996)。中華民國高中高職英文教學現況比較研究。中華民國第十二屆英語文教學研討會論文集。頁59-79。台北:文鶴。
    Lin, C. C. (1992) (林清江)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華書局。
    Lozanov, G. (1979). Suggestology and outline of suggestopedia. New York: Gordon & Breach.
    MacIntyre, P. D., Noels, K. A., & Clement, R. (1997). Biases in self-ratings of second language proficiency: The role of language anxiety. Language Learning, 47, 265-287.
    Mangubhai, F., Marland,P., Dashwood, A. & Son, J. (2004). Teaching a foreign language: One teacher’s practical theory. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 291–311.
    Matsuda, A. (2000). Japanese attitudes towards English: A case study of high school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, Indiana.
    Medgyes, P. & Malderez, A. (1996). Changing perspectives in teacher education. Great British: Bath Press.
    McGroarty, M. (1993). Cooperative learning and second language acquisition. In D. D. Holt (Ed.), Cooperative learning: A response to linguistic and cultural diversity (pp. 19-46). McHenry, Ill. and Washington, D. C.: Delta Systems and Center for Applied Linguistics.
    Milroy, L. (1987). Observing and analyzing natural language: A critical account of sociolinguistic method. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Ministry of Education (2000). National education development and reform for the new millenium. Retrieved January 4, 2004, from http://www.eje.edu.tw/l-english/ejeEnglish.asp.
    Munakata, T. & Jani, Y. (1994). Fuzzy systems: An overview. Communication ACM, 37 (3), 69-76.
    Munakata, T. (1994). Commercial and industrial AI. Communication ACM, 37 (3), 23-26.
    Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Nunan, D. (1997). Strategy training in the language classroom: An empirical investigation. RELC Journal, 28 (2), 56-81.
    Oh, U. S. (歐用生) (1999)。質的研究。台北:師大書苑。
    O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U.(1993). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Oxford, R. (1989). The role of styles and strategies in second language learning. ERIC Digest.
    Oxford, R. & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 78 (1), 12-28.
    Oxford, R. L. (1996). New pathways of language learning motivation. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning motivation: Pathways to a new century. ( Technical Report No. 11, pp. 1-8). Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
    Oxford, R. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 81, 226-245.
    Pajares, M. F., & Johnson, M. J. (1993, April). Confidence and competence in writing: The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and apprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 358474)
    Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. California: Sage.
    Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (Ed.). (1980). Language and learning. USA: The President and Fellows of Harvard College and Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes and outcomes? Language Learning, 44 (3), 493–527.
    Reid, J. M. (1996). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. ERIC Digest, ES396587.
    Richards, J. C. (1999). Language teaching awareness—A guide to exploring beliefs and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Salaberry, M. R. (1997). The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53 (2), 422-451.
    Scheidecker, D. & Freeman, W. (1999). Bringing out the best in students: how legendary teachers motivate kids. CA: Corwin Press.
    Senge, P. M. (1994). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
    Shih, Y. H. (施玉惠) (1997)。高職英語教學問題之探討。中華民國第十三屆英語文教學研討會論文集。頁425-436。台北:文鶴。
    Shih, Y. H. (施玉惠) (1998)。國小英語教學的未來規劃方向。教育資料與研究,第二十三期,頁1-5。
    Shih, Y. H. (施玉惠) (1999)。技職校院外語教育改進規劃。教育部。
    Shih, Y. H. & Chen, C. Y. (施玉惠、陳純音) (2003)。溝通式教學活動設計。兒童英語教學面面觀。台北:書林。
    Short, E. C. (1991). Forms of curriculum inquiry. Albany: State University of New York.
    Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data—Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
    Slavin, R., Madden, N., & Stevens, R. (1989). Cooperative learning models for the 3R’s. Educational Leadership, 47, 22-28.
    Slavin, R. S. (1990). Research on cooperative learning: Consensus and controversy. Educational Leadership, 47 (4), 52-54. (Publication of the Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.)
    Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative learning (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.
    Smith, D. C. (1997). Middle education in the middle kingdom: The Chinese junior high school in modern Taiwan. Westport: Praeger.
    Sparks, R. L., Ganschow, L., Artzer, M.E., Siebenhar, D., & Plageman, M. (2004). Foreign language teachers’ perceptions of students’ academic skills, affective characteristics, and proficiency: Replication and follow-up studies. Foreign Language Annals, 37 (2), 263-278.
    Spielmann, G. & Radnofsky, M. L. (2001). Learning language under tension: New directions from a qualitative study. Modern Language Journal, 85, 259-278.
    Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt: Rinehart and Winston.
    Spradley, J. P. (1980). The ethnographic interview. Holt: Rinehart and Winston.
    Spratt, M., Humphreys, G., & Chan, V. (2002). Autonomy and motivation: Which comes first? Language Teaching Research, 6 (3), 245-266.
    Stern, H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(4), 304-318,
    Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Boston, Mass.: Heinle and Heinle.
    Tai, T. H. (蔡東鐘) (1999)。符號互動論在教育上的應用之探討。國教之聲,第32卷第4期,頁33-45。
    Tien, C. J., Lee, C. L., & Hung, G. F. (田振榮、李金玲、黃國峰) (2003)。技專校院應用外語科系建立教育夥伴關係之探討。技術與職業教育學報,第六期,頁29-38。
    Tudor, I. (1996). Larner-centredness as language education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Tyler, C. (1989). Ghosts behind the blackboard: an exercise in teacher self-awareness. The ELICOS ASSOCIATION News, 7, 1.
    Wajnryb, R. (1992). Classroom observation tasks. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Wan, W. P. (2000). Network-based learning strategies through collaborative design. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan.
    Wang, C. (2000). A sociolinguistic profile on English in Taiwan: Social context and learner needs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of the Liberal Arts, the Graduate School, the Pennsylvania State University
    Wang, D. Y. (2001). A study on strategies of collaborative learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan.
    Wang, Y. F. (2004). An investigation of teachers’ instructional problems with teaching English to non-English majors: A case study of Southern Taiwan University of Technology. Unpublished master’s thesis, Southern Taiwan University of Technology, Taiwan.
    Wang, W. K. (王文科) (1993)。 教育研究法。台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。
    Wang, W. K. (王文科) (2000)。 質的教育研究法。台北:師大書苑。
    Web, N. M. (1982a). Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small group. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74 (5), 642-655.
    Web, N. M. (1982b). Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74 (5), 642-655.
    Webb, N. M. & Cullian, L, K. (1983). Group interaction and achievement in small groups: Stability over time. American Educational Research Journal, 20 (3), 411-423.
    Webb, N. M. (1984). Stability of small group interaction and achievement over time. American Educational Research Journal, 76 (2), 211-224.
    Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22 (5), 366-389.
    Wei, C. L.(韋金龍)(1996)。國內大專學生對「合作學習」英語教學活動的看法。教育研究資訊雙月刊,第四期,第六卷,頁13-26。
    Wei, C. L. (1997a). Collaboration in EFL classroom: An investigation of DFLL learners’ perceptions of Jigsaw cooperative learning technique in Freshman English class. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 223-238). Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
    Wei, C. L. (1997b). Union is strength: Applications of cooperative learning to college EFL class in Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
    Wei, C. L. (韋金龍)(2003)。運用「合作學習」落實九年一貫溝通式英語教學。中等教育, 第五十四期,第六卷,頁38-47。
    Wright, T. (1987). Roles of teachers and learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Wu, C. Y & Lee, F. Z. (Trans.) (吳芝儀、李奉儒譯) (1995)。質的評鑑與研究。台北:桂冠。

    Wu, C. Y & Liao, M. H. (吳芝儀、廖梅花)(2004)。質性研究入門:紮根理論研究方法。台北:揚智文化事業。
    Wu, J. Y. (2001). A study of the effect on learning motivation by various groups based on learning achievement in project-based. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Tainan Normal College, Taiwan.
    Wu, W. P. (2001). The design effects of different group interactive styles and thinking styles in the internet collaborative designing environment. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan.
    Wulff, D. H., Nyquist, J. D. & Abbott, R. D. (1987). Students’ perceptions of large classes. In M. Weimer (Ed.), Teaching large classes well. New directions for teaching and learning: Vol. 32. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Yen, J. & Langari, R. (1999). Fuzzy logic—Intelligence, control, and information. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Yon, D. A. (2003). Highlights and overview of the history of educational ethnography. Annu. Rev. Anthropol, 32, 411-429.
    You, C. S. (1998). An ethnographic study on the effects of peer interaction in cooperative learning in situated learning environment. Unpublished master’s thesis, Tamkang University, Taiwan.
    Young, R. & Doughty, C. (1987). Negotiation in context: A review of research. In L. P. James & A. Angela (Eds.), Research in second language learning: Focus on the classroom. NJ: Ablex.
    Yu, G. (1995). Successful cooperation learning approach in an EFL class in Taiwan (Report No. NSC-83-0301-S-017-008). National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information Control, 8, 338-353.
    Zurada, J. M. (1992). Introduction to artificial neural systems. New York: Information Access Distribution.

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE