本研究目的主要在瞭解學生核能、綠能的知識與態度之現況，同時評估能源知識與態度之間是否有關聯性。此外，也分析性別與態度是否與其對於核能、綠能電廠支持/決策之間具有影響性。本研究以問卷調查法為主要研究工具。除此之外，為了避免社會期望反應之影響，在態度測量方面，應用內隱聯結測驗來測量學生對於核能、綠能的內隱態度。本研究結果發現：

一、學生擁有較多的綠能優點概念與核能缺點概念。
二、在態度方面，無論是內隱態度或是外顯態度，學生對於綠能皆持有較正 向的態度。部分學生在內隱與外顯態度的支持立場上有差異。
三、能源概念與態度之間並無顯著相關性，僅「核能優點概念數」與外顯能源態度之間具有顯著相關性。
四、學生能源內隱態度與核能電廠支持度之間具有顯著相關性。且相關係數高於外顯態度與核能電廠支持度間的相關，顯示能源內隱態度較能預測學生的能源決策。
五、在學生性別上，男性較支持興建核能電廠。

一、中文部分
再生能源發展條例 (民國98年7月8日)。
余伯泉、陳舜文、危芷芬、李茂興 (譯) (2011)。社會心理學 (原作者：Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., Akert, R. M. )。台北：楊智文化 (原著出版年：2010)
李權晃 (2007)。疾病內隱接受度、藥物內隱態度與服藥順從性之關聯性分析-以精神分裂症患者為例。私立輔仁大學臨床心理學研究所碩士論文。未出版，臺北市。
周子宇 (2009)。初探內隱聯結測驗在測量環境態度之應用。國立臺灣師範大學地球科學研究所碩士論文。未出版，臺北市。
周泰安、邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君、卓淑玲 (2009)。害羞的內隱與外顯測量。教育心理學報，41，453-474。
林永在 (2013)。探討高中生內隱態度與知識吸收之關係－以核能與綠能為例。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版，臺北市。
邱發忠、徐芝君、陳學志、卓淑玲 (2004)。以內隱聯結測驗(IAT)測量軍事服從態度之研究。測驗學刊，51(2)，209-232。
國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所 (1992)。探索能源世界─高中職能源教育教材。台北︰經濟部能源委員會。
陳學志、李威震、周泰安、卓淑玲 (2002)。以內隱聯結測驗(IAT)測量國人自尊的可行性研究。測驗年刊，49(2)，217-234。
陳學志、黃宏宇、邱發忠、楊立行、卓淑玲 (2011)。態度的表象與真實: 內隱測量典範的現況與發展。αβγ量化研究學刊，3(1)，54-77。
黃文良 (譯) (2003)。能源運用及環境 (原作者：Roger A. Hinrichs & Merlin Kleinbach )。臺北市：湯姆生。

二、 英文部分
Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 22(3), 261-295.
Ansolabehere, S., & Konisky, D. M. (2009). Public attitudes toward construction of new power plants. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(3), 566-577.
Andrews, J. A., Hampson, S. E., Greenwald, A. G., Gordon, J., & Widdop, C. (2010). Using the Implicit Association Test to assess children's implicit attitudes toward smoking. Journal of applied social psychology, 40(9), 2387-2406.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological review, 82(6), 407.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Costa‐Font, J., Rudisill, C., & Mossialos, E. (2008). Attitudes as an expression of knowledge and “political anchoring”: The case of nuclear power in the United Kingdom. Risk Analysis, 28(5), 1273-1288.
Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math–gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child development, 82(3), 766-779.
Dohle, S., Keller, C., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Examining the relationship between affect and implicit associations: Implications for risk perception. Risk Analysis, 30, 1116-1128.
Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual review of psychology, 54(1), 297-327.
Guttman, L . (1950).The basis for Scalogram Analysis.In Stouffer et al. Measurement and Prediction.The American Soldier Vol. IV. New York:Wiley.
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.Psychological review,102(1), 4.
Greenwald, A. G., et al. (1998). "Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(6): 1464.
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological review,109(1), 3.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of personality and social psychology,85(2), 197.
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological bulletin, 132(5), 692.
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The journal of environmental education, 21(3), 8-21.
Houben, K., Havermans, R. C., & Wiers, R. W. (2010). Learning to dislike alcohol: conditioning negative implicit attitudes toward alcohol and its effect on drinking behavior. Psychopharmacology, 211(1), 79-86.
Truelove, H. B., Greenberg, M. R., & Powers, C. W. (2013). Are Implicit Associations With Nuclear Energy Related to Policy Support? Evidence From the Brief Implicit Association Test. Environment and Behavior, 0013916513480861.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology.
Lee, C. C., & Chang, C. P. (2005). Structural breaks, energy consumption, and economic growth revisited: evidence from Taiwan. Energy Economics, 27(6), 857-872.
Liarakou, G., Gavrilakis, C., & Flouri, E. (2009). Secondary school teachers’ knowledge and attitudes towards renewable energy sources. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 120-129.
Manley, D. K., Hines, V. A., Jordan, M. W., & Stoltz, R. E. (2013). A survey of energy policy priorities in the United States: Energy supply security, economics, and the environment. Energy Policy, 60, 687-696.
Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes, 265-292.
Paulhus, D.L. (2001). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. Braun, D.N. Jackson, & D. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement. New York.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological review, 95(3), 385.
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological review, 107(1), 101.
Whitfield, S. C., Rosa, E. A., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2009). The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perception. Risk Analysis, 29(3), 425-437.
Zyadin, A., Puhakka, A., Ahponen, P., Cronberg, T., & Pelkonen, P. (2012). School students' knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes toward renewable energy in Jordan. Renewable energy, 45, 78-85.