研究生: |
曾義強 Yi-Chiang Tseng |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
表現與結果獲知回饋策略對輕度智障學生動作技能學習成效之影響 The Effects of Knowledge of Performance and Knowledge of Result on the Movement Skills Learning of Student with Mild Mental Retardation |
指導教授: |
杜正治
Duh, Jeng-Jyh |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
體育學系 Department of Physical Education |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 87 |
中文關鍵詞: | 表現獲知 、結果獲知 、智能障礙學生 、交替處理設計 、動作技能 |
英文關鍵詞: | Knowledge of Performance, Knowledge of Result, student with mental retardation, Alternating Treatment Designs, movement skill |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:172 下載:6 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘要
本研究目的在比較表現獲知和結果獲知對輕度智能障礙者壘球高手投擲及低手滾球動作技能學習成效。研究方法採用單一受試實驗設計方法,以交替處理設計進行研究。研究對象為兩位七和八年級輕度智能障礙學生,受試者在介入階段實施十二堂回饋教學,維持階段實施八堂測驗,以及類化階段八堂測驗,測驗結果以視覺分析法和C統計,比較不同教學回饋策略對動作技能學習在學習立即成效、保留成效及類化成效的差異。實驗結果得到的結論:(一)表現獲知和結果獲知對輕度智能障礙學生動作技能學習能產生顯著的學習立即成效,且表現獲知優於結果獲知;(二)表現獲知和結果獲知對輕度智能障礙學生動作技能學習能產生顯著的保留成效,且表現獲知優於結果獲知;(三)表現獲知和結果獲知對輕度智能障礙學生動作技能學習能產生顯著的類化成效,且表現獲知優於結果獲知。最後基於上述發現,本研究進行更深入的討論,同時也為實務工作者和未來研究者提供建議。
Abstract
The primary purpose of this study was to compare the learning effects of KP and KR on the softball pitching and ball-rolling skills by students with mild mental retardation . The study employed the alternative treatment design of the single subject research. Participants consisted of two students with mild mental retardation in seventh and eighth grades, and received KP and KR teaching feedback test by this study for twelve sessions at the comparison phase, eight sessions at retention phase, and another eight sessions at generalization phase. The test results were processed by visual analysis and C statistics to compare the differences between KP and KR teaching feedback strategies on the learning effects in the immediate, retained, and generalized settings. The results were as follows: 1. Both the KP and KR teaching feedback could help participants obtain good and immediate learning effect in the movement skill, and KP outperformed KR. 2. Both the KP and KR teaching feedbacks could help participants obtain good and maintain learning effect in the movement skill, and KP was better than KR. 3. Both the KP and KR teaching feedback methods could help participants obtain good and generalized learning effect in the movement skill, and KP was again a better choice than KR. Based on the above findings further discussion was addressed and suggestions made for practitioners and future researchers.
參考文獻
中文部份
王秋容(1995)。結果獲知與表現獲知對運動技能學習的影響。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
王文科(1999)。特殊教育導論。台北市:心理。
王文科(1989)。教育心理學。台北市:五南。
內政部(1997)。身心障礙保護法。2007年7月30日,取自內政部,身心障礙保護法網址http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/05/b2/身心障礙等級.htm
內政部(2008)。內政部統計資訊網。2009年7月7日,取自內政部,統計年報網址http://www.moi.gov. tw/stat/index.asp
杜正治(2006)。單一受試研究法。台北市:心理。
何華國(1999)。特殊兒童心理與教育。台北市:五南。
何華國(1995)。特殊兒童心理與教育。台北市:五南。
林美和(1992)。智能不足研究:學習問題與行為輔導。台北市:師大師苑。
林秋坪(2004)。台北市身心障礙國中體育課學習滿意態度調查研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
林逸松(2002)。體育專家教師回饋。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
林韓司(2004)。影像回饋對低運動能力學童技能表現之影響。未出版碩士論文,國立台東大學。台東縣。
林耀豐(2003)。工作限制下技能表水準差異和訓練對網球正拍技能表現的影響。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
林惠芬(2001)。功能性評量對智能障礙學生問題行為介入處理成效之研究。特殊教育學報,15,85-105。
林寶山(1993)。特殊教育導論。台北市:五南。
林清和(1996)。運動學習程式學。台北市:文史哲。
吳棨舜(2005)。不同回饋教學法及自我口語提示法對桌球正手殺球教學效果之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
胡名霞(2001)。動作控制與動作學習。台北市:金名。
姚 璠(2001)。目標難度、工作難度與回饋方式對國小學童排球發球表現與內在動機之影響。體育學報。31,137-148。
許義雄(2001)。兒童發展與身體教育。台北市:美商麥格羅。
陳素勤、尚憶薇(譯)(2001)。適應體育。台北市:麥格羅希爾。(Sherrill, C., 1976)。
陳玉芬、卓俊伶(1997)。感覺回饋訊息對簡單動作表現與學習的影響。體育學報,23,323-334。
陳定國(2002)。不同技能表現獲對體操技能學習之影響。未出版碩士論文,國立台東師範大學研究所,台東縣。
陳榮華(1992)。智能障礙研究。台北市:師大師苑。
陳榮華(1992)。智能不足研究 : 理論與應用。台北市:師大書苑。
陳榮華(1992)。智能不足研究。台北市:師大師苑。
郭為藩、陳榮華(1985)。特殊兒童心理與教育。台北市:心理。
孫國慶(2007)。高雄縣國中輕度智能障礙學生休閒運動參與現況及阻礙因素之調查研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
國立臺灣師範大學體育與研究發展中心(1998)。適應體育導論。台北市:教育部。
黃文盛(2005)。長期游泳訓練對智能障礙者生活適應能力之影響。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
國立編譯館(1984)。體育科教學研究。台北市:正中。
張春興(1991)。張氏心理辭典。台北市:東華。
張春興(1991)。心理學。台北市:東華。
蔡貴枝(2004)。不同回饋型態與不同帶狀回饋情境對動作技能學習與表現的影響。未出版碩士論文,國立中正大學,嘉義市。
賴英傑(1999)。三種回饋方式對國術五路查拳偷步鷂子搭肩式之教學成效。未出版碩士論文,中國文化大學,台北市。
廖邦伶(2004)。結果獲知對羽球技能學習之影響。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣體育學院,桃園縣。
簡桂彬(2000)。不同技能表現獲知對足球內側傳球技能表現的影響。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
闕月清(1996a)。特殊體育專業師資培育與在職進修。國民體育季刊,2,38-42。
闕月清(1998b)。教師回饋與體育教學:運動心理學研究委員會87學年年度專書。台北:中華民國體育學會。
鐘敏華(1994)。國中體育教師回饋與學生學習成就之相關研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
蕭松霖(1993)。智能障礙學童的體育。台北:商鼎文化。
顧毓群(1990)。練習期間提供訊息方式與練習情境變化對運動技能學習的
影響。彰化師範大學學報,1,167-210。
英文部份
AAMR (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and
systems of supports (9th ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Retardation.
Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-149.
Boyce, B. A. (1991). The effects of an instructional strategy with two schedules of augmented KP feedback upon skill acquisition of a selected shooting task. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 47-58.
Burton, A. W. & Rodgerson. R. W. (2001). New Perspectives on the Assessment of Movement Skills and Motor Abilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 347-365.
Eghan, T. (1988). The relation of teacher feedback to student achievement in learning selected tennis skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
Fait, H. F. (1978). Special physical education: Adapted corrective developmental (pp.209-227). W. B. Saunders.
Gallahue, D., L., & Ozmun, J. C. (2002). Motor development infants, children, adolescents, adults. New York McGraw-Hull.
Hand, M. J., & Sidaway, N. H. B. (1994). The role of pre-response and
post-response augmented learning variables in motor skill acquisition. Abstracts of Completed Research, A-64.
Hartman, M. D. (1990). The effects of an observational training program on feedback behaviors of preservice physical educators in a clinical adapted physical education setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
Judd, D. H. (1908). The relation of special training to general intelligence. Educational Review, 36, 28-42.
Kernodle, M. W., & Carlton, L. G. (1992). Information feedback and the learning of multiple-degree-of-freedom activities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 187-195.
Logan, D. R., & Rose, R. (1982). Characteristics of the mildly mentally retarded. In P. T. Cegelka, & H. J. Prehm (Eds), Mental retardation: Form categories to people (pp.149-185). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Lee, A. M., Keh, N. C., & Magill, R. A. (1989). The effect of teacher feedback in
the acquisition of badminton skill. Paper presented at the Kistler
Conference, LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Lee, A. M., Keh, N. C., & Magill, R. A. (1993). Instructional effects of teacher feedback in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 12, 228-243.
Merrill, E. C., & Peacock, M. (1993). Allocation of attention and task
difficulty. American Journal on Mental Retardation,98 (5), 588-593.
Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (1994). Teaching physical education(4th).
OH: Merrill.
Magill, R. A., & Schoenfelder- Zohid, B. (1996). A visual model and knowledge of performance as source of information for learning a rhythmic gymnastic skill. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 27, 7-22.
Newell, K. M. (1976). Knowledge of results and motor learning. In J. Keogh and R. S. Hutton (Eds.), Exercise and sport sciences Publish reviews (Vol. 4, pp.126-228). Santa Barbara, CA: Journal Publishing Affiliates.
Newell, K. M. & Walter, C. B. (1981). Kinematic and kinetic parameters as information feedback in motor skill acquisition. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 7 , 235-254.
Patton, J. R., Beirne-Smith, M. & Payne, J. S. (1990). Mental retardation, 3rd Ed. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Pitetti, K. H., Yarmer, D. A. & Fernhall, B. (2001). Cardiovascular fitness and body composition of youth with and without mental retardation. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 127-141.
Reschly, D., Robinson, G., Volmer, L. & Wilson, L. (1988). Lowa mental disabilities research project: Final report and executive summary. Des Monines, IA: State of lowa, Department of Education.
Schmidt. R. A. (1991). Motor learning and performance : from principle to practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt. R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In G. E. Stelmach & J, Requnce (Eds). Tutorials in motor neuroscience (pp.59-75). Dordrech, Netherlands: Klyuwer.
Schmidt. R. A. (1988b). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2000). Motor learning and performance (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Suomi, R., Surburg, P. R., & Lecius, P. (1995). Effects of hydraulic resistance strength training on isokinetic measures of leg strength in men with mental retardation. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12 (4), 377-387.
Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A. & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor leaning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95 (3), 355-386.
Spitz, H. H. (1979). Beyond field theory in the study of mental deficiency. In N. R. Ellis(ed), Handbook of mental deficiency. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
Schmidt, R.A. & Lee, T.D. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Yerg, B. J. (1981). The impact of selected presage and process behaviors on the refinement of a motor skill. Journal of Teaching in physical Education, 1 (1), 38-46.
Wright, D. L., Snowden, S., & Willoughby, D. (1990). Summary KR:How much information is used form the summary? Journal of Movement Studies, 19, 119-128.
Wallace, S. A., & Hagler, R. W. (1979). Knowledge of performance and the learning of a closed motor skill. Research Quarterly, 50, 265-271.
Ulrich, D. A. (2000). Test of Gross Motor Development (2nded), Austin, Texas: PRO-ED.
Young, D. E., Magill, R. A., & Shipiro, D. C. (1998). Motor programs as control structures for reversal movement:An examination of rapid movements and unexpected perturbations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Society of the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Zigler, E. (1973). The retarded child as a whole person. In D. K. Routh (ED.), The experimental psychology of mental retardation (pp. 231-322). Chicago: Aldine.