本研究旨在探討國小一般智能資優班教師之「人格特質」、「組織氣氛」與「教師效能」之關聯，並進一步探討三者間的預測力。研究對象為110學年度宜蘭、基隆、台北、新北、桃園、竹市與竹縣七個地區共計120位國小一般智能資優班教師，採問卷調查法，研究工具為「人格特質量表」、「組織氣氛量表」與「教師效能量表」，所蒐集之數據以SPSS處理系統進行平均數、標準差、獨立樣本t檢定、皮爾森績差相關、典型回歸與逐步回歸等統計分析。本研究之研究結果如下：
一、教師人格特質之現況
整體人格與五大分向度得分均在中高程度以上，「友善性」為得分最高之特質，「開放性」與「嚴謹性」以極小的差距緊追在後，其後為「外向性」與「神經質」。
二、教師組織氣氛之現況
以組織氣氛開放程度作為計算指標。組織氣氛開放指數為校長行為開放指數＋教師行為開放指數，得到4.14的高分，由此可知，國小一般智能資優班教師知覺學校組織氣氛之開放程度為高程度。各分項度得分由高到低分別為：「同事親和」、「同事專業」、「校長支持」、「校長指示」、「同事疏離」、「校長干擾」。
三、教師教師效能之現況
整體教師效能與六大分向度得分均在中高程度以上。得分最高者為「親師溝通」，其次為「教學執行」、「學習評量」，其後依序為「班級管理」、「教學革新」與「環境轉換」。
四、人格特質、組織氣氛與教師效能之相關
三個變項兩兩之間均保持中度正相關。以人格特質與教師效能之相關最高，組織氣氛與教師效能相關次之，人格特質與組織氣氛相關最低。
五、人格特質、組織氣氛與教師效能之預測力
人格特質與組織氣氛能有效預測教師效能。其中人格特質中的「嚴謹性」與「外相性」對教師效能有更大的預測力，組織氣氛中的「同事疏離」亦能有效預測教師效能。
六、不同背景變項之教師在三大變項上的表現差異
背景變項共七個，分別為性別、年齡、年資、婚姻狀態、教育背景、擔任職務與學校規模。在「人格特質」上產生差異的變項為「性別」，女性的人格特質顯著大於男性；在「教師效能」變項上產生差異的為「年齡」、「年資」與「婚姻狀況」，年齡與年資高者之教師效能大於年齡與年資低者，有婚姻狀況者教師效能大於無婚姻狀況者；「組織氣氛」在七個背景變項中均無差異。

The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between "personality traits", "organizational climate" and "teacher efficacy" of teachers in gifted classes in elementary schools, and explore the predictive power of the three. We have searched 120 teachers of gifted classes in elementary schools in seven districts including Yilan, Keelung, Taipei, New Taipei, Taoyuan, Hsinchu City, and Hsinchu County, then used the data from study tools, " Personality Traits Scale ", "Organizational Atmosphere Scale" and "Teacher Efficacy Scale" to process. The findings of this study are as follows:
1. The current situation of teachers' personality traits
　　The overall personality trait scores are above the medium to a high level. "Friendliness" is the highest scoring trait, and "openness" and "rigorousness" are closely followed by a very small gap, followed by "extroversion" and "nervousness".
2. Current Situation of Teacher Organizational Atmosphere
　　The openness of the organizational atmosphere is used as the calculation index. The organizational climate openness index is the principal behavioral openness index + teacher behavioral openness index, and it gets a high score of 4.14. It can be seen that the teachers of the general intelligent gifted class in elementary schools perceive the school's organizational climate as a high degree of openness.
3. Current Situation of Teacher Teacher Efficacy
　　The overall teacher efficacy and the scores of the six major sub-dimensions are above the middle-high level. The highest score is "parent-teacher communication", followed by "teaching implementation", "learning assessment", followed by "class management", "teaching innovation" and "environmental transformation".
4. The relationship between personality traits, organizational climate and teacher efficacy
　　There is a moderate positive correlation between the three variables. The correlation between personality traits and teacher efficacy is the highest, organizational climate and teacher efficacy is the second, and personality traits are the least related to organizational climate.
5. Predictive power of personality traits, organizational climate and teacher efficacy
　　Personality traits and organizational climate can effectively predict teacher effectiveness. Among them, "rigorousness" and "externality" in personality traits have greater predictive power on teacher efficacy, and "colleague alienation" in an organizational atmosphere can also effectively predict teacher efficacy.
6. Differences in the performance of teachers with different background variables on the three variables
　　There are seven background variables, namely gender, age, seniority, marital status, educational background, job title, and school size. The variables that produce differences in "personality traits" are "gender", and women's personality traits are significantly greater than those of males; the variables that produce differences in "teacher efficacy " are "age", "seniority" and "marital status". Teachers with higher experience are more effective than those with younger and older age, and those with marital status are more effective than those without marital status; there is no difference in "organizational climate" in any of the seven background variables.

王受榮（1992）。我國國民中小學教師教師效能感及其影響因素之研究[未發表之碩士論文]。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
余季容（2002）。國中一般智能優異班教師教師效能之研究[未發表之碩士論文]。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所。
吳淨宜（2012）。學校組織氣氛與教師性教育進修需求之相關研究── 以高雄市國小為例[未發表之碩士論文]。樹德科技大學人類性學研究所。
吳清山（1992）。學校行政，心理。
吳璧如（2004）。幼稚園職前教師的教師效能感與任教承諾之關係。教育學刊（23），207-229。
周新富（1991）。國民小學教師專業承諾、教師效能信念與學生學業成就關係之研究[未發表之碩士論文]，國立高雄師範大學。
林秀卿、郭丁豪、馬上閔（2014）。休閒運動參與、工作壓力與教師效能關係之研究—以屏東縣國小教師為例。屏東教大運動科學學刊，9。
康惠雅（2015）。國民小學校長創新領導與組織氣氛關係之研究──以桃園市為例。臺灣教育評論月刊，11，194-220。
林雪慧、潘靖瑛（2012）。教師人格特質、情緒管理、領導行為與班級經營效能相關性之統合分析。教育與多元文化研究`，6，23-59。
林新發（1990）。我國工業專科學校校長領導行為、組織氣氛與組織績效關係之研究[未發表之博士論文]，國立臺灣師範大學。
林蕓紅（2014）。教師人格特質、領導風格與教師效能關係之研究—以台南市安平區國小為例[未發表之碩士論文]。長榮大學高階管理碩士學位。
邱從益（2005）。組織氣氛與學校經營。學校行政，36，71-86。
柯安南（2004）。國小教師專業能力知覺與自我效能感之研究-教師資格檢定觀點[未發表之碩士論文]。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文。
孫志麟（1991）。國民小學教師自我效能及其相關因素之研究[未發表之碩士論文]，國立政治大學教育研究所。
孫志麟（2003）。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報，34（2），139-156。
秦夢群、吳勁甫（2006）。國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與教師組織承諾關係之研究[未發表之碩士論文]。教育研究集刊。
張春興（1991）。現代心理學，東華書局。
許惠英、蔡慧敏（2013）。新北市國小健康與體育教師社會支持、自我效能與學校效能之關係。中原體育學報，3，68-75。DOI：10.6646/cypej.2013.3.68
許怡婷（2004）。資優班教師教師效能與工作士氣關係之研究[未發表之碩士論文]。臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系在職進修碩士班學位論文。
陳秀如（2018）。臺中市國民小學學校組織氣氛與教師兼任行政工作意願之關係[未發表之碩士論文]。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系學位論文。
陳秀美（2011）。國小教師人格特質與教學績效之關聯性研究[未發表之碩士論文]。臺北科技大學管理學院工業工程與管理EMBA專班學位論文。
陳俊瑋（2010）。國中教師集體效能感、教師自我效能感及教師組織公民行為關聯之研究:多層次中介效果之分析。當代教育研究季刊，18（2），29-69。
陳政德（2018）。南投縣信義鄉國小教師人格特質、組織氣候對留任意願之研究[未發表之碩士論文]。朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系。
陳家雯（2016）。國小一般智能資優教育教師人格特質與教師效能之相關研究[未發表之碩士論文]。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系。
陳棟樑、陳俐文、郭育伶（2020）。宜蘭縣國民小學教師職務分配公平知覺、學校組織氣氛與工作滿意度關係之研究。兩岸職業教育論叢，4（1），21-31。DOI：10.6685/asvej.202010_4(1).0003
鈕文英（2019）。APA和在論文寫作格式之改變沿革。南屏特殊教育，10，1-16。
黃政傑、李隆盛（1993）。班級經營—理念與策略。師大書苑。
黃薏蒨、賴志峰（2015）。老師，你幸福嗎？－國民小學教師幸福感之個案研究。學校行政，95，82-204。DOI：10.3966/160683002015010095010
黃識勳（2013）。國民小學教師人格特質、學校組織氣氛與專業學習社群關係之研究[未發表之碩士論文]。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所。
楊川德（2011）。臺東縣國小教師人格特質、專業承諾與職涯滿足關係之研究[未發表之碩士論文]。臺東大學進修部教育行政碩士班(夜間)。
葉子明、謝佩伶、巫錦秀（2013）。教師工作壓力與工作投入對教學品質之影響－以人格特質為干擾變項[未發表之碩士論文]。管理科學研究。
劉宗明、黃德祥（2008）。國中教師人格特質與教師效能之研究[未發表之碩士論文]。臺北市立教育大學學報。
蔡毓玲（2009）。台灣地區特殊教育學校組織氣氛與教師效能之研究[未發表之碩士論文]。臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系在職進修碩士班學位論文。
蕭至亨（2013）。嘉義市國民小學教師知覺學校組織氣氛與終身學習態度之關係[未發表之碩士論文]。中正大學教學專業發展數位學習。
戴志璁、洪惠娟、張美瑤、陳信宏（2019）。學校組織氣氛與教師自我效能關係之研究-以高雄市立國民中學為例。Journal of Data Analysis，14（1），49-72。
謝文全（2003）。教育行政學。高等教育。
鍾榮進（2015）。國小教師教師效能自評之研究[未發表之碩士論文]。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊。DOI：10.6338/JDA.201902_14(1).0004
顏銘志（1996）。國民小學教師教學信念, 教師效能與教學行為之相關研究[未發表之碩士論文]，國立屏東師範學院。
Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher education and special education, 17(2), 86-95.
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation.
Armor, D. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading program in selected Los Angeles minority schools.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura, A. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and health, 13(4), 623-649.
Berman, P. (1977). Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. VII: Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation.
Berman, P., McLaughlin, M., Bass, G., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol VII. Factors affecting implementation and continuation.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard university press.
Cattell, R. B. (1949). The dimensions of culture patterns by factorization of national characters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(4), 443.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 5.
Dallal, R. M., & Trang, A. (2012). Analysis of perioperative outcomes, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate after gastric bypass. Surgical endoscopy, 26(3), 754-758.
Decker, C., Viet, T. N. T., Decker, D., & Weber-Koehl, E. (2001). UV-radiation curing of acrylate/epoxide systems. Polymer, 42(13), 5531-5541.
Eysenck, H. (1947). Student selection by means of psychological tests—a critical survey. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 17(1), 20-39.
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(3), 329.
Forte, A. (2011). How Does Organizational Climate Influence The Ethical Behavior Of People In An Organization? International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 2. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v2i10.3852
Freud, S. (1923). Certain neurotic mechanisms in jealousy, paranoia and homosexuality. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 4, 1-10.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of educational psychology, 76(4), 569.
Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and teacher education, 4(1), 63-69.
Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American educational research journal, 31(3), 627-643.
Halpin, A. W. (1966). Theory and research in administration. Macmillan.
Halpin, A. W., & Croft, D. B. (1962). The organizational climate of schools (Vol. 11). Midewest Administration Center, University of Chicago.
Hollier, L. H., Money, S. R., Naslund, T. C., Procter Sr, C. D., Buhrman, W. C., Marino, R. J., Harmon, D. E., & Kazmier, F. J. (1992). Risk of spinal cord dysfunction in patientsundergoing thoracoabdominal aortic replacement. The American journal of surgery, 164(3), 210-214.
Hoy, W. K., & Clover, S. I. (1986). Elementary school climate: A revision of the OCDQ. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(1), 93-110.
Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Bliss, J. R. (1990). Organizational Climate, School Health, and Effectiveness: A Comparative Analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 260-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x90026003004
Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Kottkamp, R. (1991). Open schools/healthy schools: Measuring organizational climate. Corwin.
Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1990). Socialization of student teachers. American educational research journal, 27(2), 279-300.
Jung, C. G. (1921). Psychologische typen. Rascher.
Jung, C. G., Campbell, J., & Hull, R. F. C. (1971). The portable jung. Penguin Books New York.
Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. C. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001
Lewin, K. (1930). Der Übergang von der aristotelischen zur galileischen Denkweise in Biologie und Psychologie. Erkenntnis, 1(1), 421-466.
Litwin, G. H., & Stringer, R. A. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate.
Marsh, H. W. (1991). A multidimensional perspective on students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: Reply to Abrami and D'Apollonia (1991).
Maslow, A. H. (1967). A theory of metamotivation: The biological rooting of the value-life. Journal of humanistic psychology, 7(2), 93-127.
McHaney, J. H., & Impey, W. D. (1992). Strategies for Analyzing and Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness Using a Clinical Supervision Model.
Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962).
Newmann, F. M., Rutter, R. A., & Smith, M. S. (1989). Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community, and expectations. Sociology of education, 221-238.
Parsons, T. S. (1967). Evolution of the nasal structure in the lower tetrapods. American Zoologist, 7(3), 397-413.
Pink, W. T., & Hyde, A. A. (1992). Effective staff development for school change. Ablex Pub.
Poole, M., Seibold, D., & McPhee, R. (1985). Group Decision-Making as a Structurational Process
Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of management review, 14(4), 562-578.
Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. Journal of statistical modeling and analytics, 2(1), 21-33.
Skinner, B. F. (1987). Whatever happened to psychology as the science of behavior? American psychologist, 42(8), 780.
Stein, M. K., & Wang, M. C. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and teacher education, 4(2), 171-187.
Stern, G. G., Steinhoff, C., & Richman, J. (1963). Organizational climate index. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
Taiguri, R., Litwin, G., & Barnes, L. (1968). Organizational Climate. Exploration of a Concept. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Graduate School of Business.
Thornton, B., Peltier, G., & Hill, G. (2005). Do future teachers choose wisely: A study of pre-service teachers' personality preference profiles. College Student Journal, 39(3), 489-497.
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of personality, 60(2), 225-251.