研究生: |
陳倩雲 Chen, Qian-Yun |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
韻律線索對輕度自閉症兒童理解非字面語言之諷刺意涵的影響 The Effect of Prosody on the Comprehension of Irony in Non-literal Language in Children with Mild ASD |
指導教授: |
劉惠美
Liu, Huei-Mei |
口試委員: |
胡心慈
Hu, Xin-Ci 曹峰銘 Tsao, Feng-Ming 劉惠美 Liu, Huei-Mei |
口試日期: | 2022/08/15 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 130 |
中文關鍵詞: | 輕度自閉症 、韻律 、非字面語言 、諷刺 、溝通 |
英文關鍵詞: | mild Autism Spectrum Disorder, prosody, non-literal language, irony, communication |
研究方法: | 準實驗設計法 、 因果比較研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201260 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:121 下載:11 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探究韻律線索能否提高輕度自閉症(簡稱輕度ASD)兒童理解非字面語言之諷刺意涵的表現。採因果比較研究和準實驗研究的設計,研究對象為20名輕度ASD兒童與20名一般發展兒童,總計40名8-12歲的國小中高年級學童。評量內容主要是為以自編的「非字面語言之諷刺理解作業」測量輕度ASD兒童和一般發展兒童在聆聽中性韻律線索和諷刺韻律線索時,對5種不同類型諷刺言語(「語意倒置」、「誇張」、「輕描淡寫」、「與先前對話不相關的回答」和「讚美」)的理解情形,並探究兒童對諷刺言語的理解表現可能與哪些因素相關。以混合設計三因數變異數分析和皮爾森積差相關進行資料分析,結果發現:
一、輕度ASD兒童對諷刺言語的理解表現顯著落後於一般發展兒童。
二、在理解諷刺言語時,兒童聆聽諷刺韻律線索時的表現顯著優於聆聽中性韻律線索時的表現。
三、兒童在「誇張」和「與先前對話不相關的回答」之諷刺言語類型中的理解正確率較高,在「語意倒置」、「輕描淡寫」和「讚美」之類型諷刺言語中的理解正確率較低。
四、當檢驗不同組別與不同韻律線索對不同類型諷刺言語之理解表現的作用時,結果發現其之間並無相互的影響。
五、當檢驗不同組別與不同韻律線索對諷刺言語之理解表現的作用時,能發現其之間無相互的影響。
六、當檢驗不同組別對不同類型諷刺言語之理解表現的作用時,發現其之間無相互的影響。
七、不同韻律版本、諷刺類型在諷刺言語的理解表現上存在交互作用。在「語意倒置」、「輕描淡寫」和「讚美」類型中,兒童聆聽諷刺韻律線索時的表現顯著優於聆聽中性韻律線索時的表現;且無論聆聽中性韻律線索或諷刺韻律線索,兒童對不同類型的諷刺言語之理解正確率都會有顯著差異,但聆聽諷刺韻律線索時,各諷刺類型之間的正確率差異較兒童聆聽中性韻律線索時少。
八、在諷刺韻律版本中,兒童對諷刺言語的理解表現與其整體的溝通能力、語法能力、敘說凝聚性能力、開啟話題能力、刻板化的語言能力、情境能力、非口語溝通能力和興趣能力均呈中度的相關,表示以上能力越好,兒童聆聽諷刺韻律線索時理解諷刺言語的能力也越好。
綜此,本研究建議在輕度ASD兒童日常溝通訓練或教學中,加強其對口語韻律線索之覺知,並且可在對輕度ASD兒童使用諷刺言語時,加強並突顯諷刺之韻律線索,以助於其能正確理解說話者之諷刺意涵。
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether prosody could improve the performance of children with mild Autism Spectrum Disorder (mild ASD) in understanding irony in non-literal language. A causal comparative study and a quasi-experimental design were used, and the subjects were 20 children with mild ASD and 20 age-matched children with general development, a total of 40 middle and high grades of elementary school children aged 8-12 years old. A self-designed "irony comprehension task" were used to measure individual children’s listening comprehension of the 5 different types of ironic speech with two sets of prosodic cues, including the neutral prosodic cues and ironic prosodic cues. The five types of irony speech included of semantic inversion, hyperbole, understatement, meaning replacement and praise. In addition, children’s background information and social communication abilities were assessed to explore the potential correlations with their comprehension performance of irony. Through mixed design of three-way ANOVA and Pearson Product-Moment Correlation analysis, the results showed that:
1.The comprehension of irony in children with mild ASD is significantly poorer than that of children with general development.
2.In understanding ironic speech, the performance of children listening to ironic prosodic cues is significantly better than that of neutral prosodic cues.
3.The correct rate of children's ironic comprehension is higher in the types of "hyperbole" and "meaning replacement", and the correct rate is lower in the types of "semantic inversion", "understatement" and "praise".
4.The interaction effect of different groups and different prosodic cues on the comprehension performance of different types of ironic speech is not significant between them.
5.The interaction effect of different groups and different prosodic cues on the comprehension performance of ironic speech is not significant between them.
6.The interaction effect of different groups and different types of ironic speech on the comprehension performance is not significant between them.
7.Different prosodic cues and different types of ironic speech have interactive effects on the comprehension performance. In the "semantic inversion", "understatement" and "praise" types, children performed significantly better when listening to ironic prosodic cues than when listening to neutral prosodic cues. And regardless of listening to neutral prosodic cues or ironic prosodic cues, children's comprehension performance for different types of ironic speech vary significantly. Notably, when listening to ironic prosodic cues, the difference in comprehension performance between irony types was less than when children listened to neutral prosodic cues.
8.With the ironic prosody, children's comprehension performance and the holistic communication ability, grammatical ability, narrative cohesion ability, initiating conversation topics, stereotyped language skills, situational skills, non-verbal communication skills and interest ability were all moderately correlated with each other, indicating that the better the above skills, the better the children's ability to understand ironic speech by listening to ironic prosodic cues.
The present study suggests that in the daily communication training of children with mild ASD, the emphasis on the awareness of prosody cues should be strengthened; when using ironic words to children with mild ASD, using prosodic cues should be strengthened and highlighted to help them improve their understanding of the irony speech.
一、中文部分
王小潞、郭曉群(2016)。漢語非字面語言認知神經心理系統。浙江大
學學報(人文社會科學版),46(6),19-32。
何東墀(2002)。認識亞斯伯格症—另類自閉症?特教園丁,17(4),49-55。
宋維村(2000)。自閉症學生輔導手冊。國立臺南師範學院。
宋維村(2013)。DSM-5自閉症最新診斷準則及其影響。健康世界,(334),16-22。
林迺超(2002)。自閉症兒童非慣例性口語行為溝通功能之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,22,103-125。
林迺超、張正芬(2011)。輕症 ASD 兒童會話理解能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,36(2), 51-76。
林迺超、張正芬(2015)。輕症自閉症兒童故事重述能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,40(2),61-90。
林寶貴、曹純瓊(1996)。高雄市國小階段自閉症兒童語言能力調查研究。聽語會刊,(12),46-61。
姜忠信、宋維村(2001)。自閉症的精神病理學:回顧與前瞻。臺灣精神醫學,15(3),169-183。
莫少依、張正芬(2014)。不共脈絡性:輕症自閉症學生的人際互動特徵。特殊教育研究學刊,39(2),33-59。
馬利軍、張積家(2010)。比喻性語言加工的腦機制。心理科學進展,18(9),1394-1402。
張正芬(2002)。一位自閉症兒童的語言發展歷程—二年縱貫研究的發現。特殊教育研究學刊,22,27-47。
張正芬(2014)。自閉症學生鑑定辦法說明。http://teacher.mhups.tp.edu.tw/eweb/module/download/update/ew00000000104/file4737_11.pdf
張正芬、吳佑佑(2006)。亞斯伯格症與高功能自閉症早期發展與目前症狀之初探。特殊教育研究學刊,(31),139-164。
教育部(2013)。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=h0080065
陳心怡、花茂棽、張本聖、陳榮華(2011)。以 [魏氏兒童智力量表](第四版) 的四因素為基礎之簡式版本分析:臨床應用指引。測驗學刊,58(4),585-611。
陳香如、張鑑如(2014)。一般發展幼兒及輕度泛自閉症幼兒心智理論與母親心智言談。特殊教育研究學刊,39(3),1-27。
曹峰銘、劉惠美(2021)。兒童溝通能力檢核表第二版(CCC-2)中文版。http://www.mytest.com.tw/DS_CCC2.aspx
曹純瓊(1994)。自閉症兒與教育治療。心理。
梁雲霞(2012)。課文中的比喻語言與閱讀能力發展。國教新知,59(3),37-46。
鄒啟蓉、張顯達(2007)。高功能自閉症兒童說故事能力與相關影響因素研究。特殊教育研究學刊,32(3),87-109。
邱琬庭、李雅珍、林健禾、江岱蓉、陳承德、陳官琳(2016)。自閉症類群障礙症孩童與一般發展孩童心智理論能力與表現之比較。職能治療學會雜誌,34(2),198-213。
游蟬蔓、劉惠美(2018)。高功能自閉症兒童韻律之理解與表達。特殊教育研究學刊,43(1),79-104。
衛生福利部(2020)。衛生福利部身心障礙者人數統計表2020年第三季報表。https://www.fact.org.tw/contents/news_ct?c=2&id=85&page=
劉惠美、曹峰銘(2010)。華語嬰幼兒溝通發展量表之編製與應用。中華心理衛生學刊,23(4),503-534。
锜寶香(2002)。嬰幼兒溝通能力之發展:家長的長期追蹤記錄。特殊教育學報,(16),23-64。
錡寶香(2007)。國小閱讀理解困難學童的象徵性語言與口語類推能力。
特教論壇,3,26-41。
錡寶香(2009)。兒童語言與溝通發展。心理。
蘇以文(2010)。語用學的發展與展望【電子版】。人文與社會科學簡
訊,12(1),128-135。
二、英文部分
Aguert, M., Laval, V., Le Bigot, L., & Bernicot, J. (2010). Understanding expressive speech acts: The role of prosody and situational context in French-speaking 5- to 9-yearolds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(6), 1629-1641.
Allen, J. F., & Perrault, C. R. (1980). Analyzing intention in utterances. Artificial Intelligence, 15(3), 143-178.
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder-5.Author.
Au‐Yeung, S. K., Kaakinen, J. K., Liversedge, S. P., & Benson, V. (2015). Processing of written irony in Autism Spectrum Disorder: An eye‐movement study. Autism Research, 8(6), 749-760.
Baltaxe, C. A., & Guthrie, D. (1987). The use of primary sentence stress by normal, aphasic, and autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17(2), 255-271.
Banasik, N. (2013). Non literal speech comprehension in preschool children-an example from a study on verbal irony. Psychology of Language and Communication, 17(3), 309-324.
Barnhill, G. P. (2001). What is Asperger Sndrome? Intervention in School and Clinic, 36(3), 259-262.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child’s theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 30(2), 285–297.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1991). The development of a theory of mind in autism: Deviance and delay? Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14(1), 33–51.
Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., & Robertson, M. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psyhology and Psychiatry, 38(7), 813-822.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A fifteen year review. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen(Eds.), Understanding Other Minds (pp.3–20). Oxford University Press.
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–75.
Baron-Cohen S., & Belmonte M. K. (2005). Autism: a window onto the development of the social and the analytic brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 109–126.
Barrett, S., Prior, M., & Manjiviona, J. (2004). Children on the borderlands of autism: Differential characteristics in social, imaginative, communicative and repetitive behaviour domains. Autism, 8(1), 61-87.
Bates, E., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 21, 205-226.
Bishop, D. V. (1998). Development of the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC): A method for assessing qualitative aspects of communicative impairment in children. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39(6), 879-891.
Blaauw, E. (1994). The contribution of prosodic boundary markers to the perceptual difference between read and spontaneous speech. Speech Communication, 14(4), 359‐375.
Bolinger, D., & Bolinger, D. L. M. (1989). Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. Stanford University Press.
Booth, R., & Happé, F. (2010). “Hunting with a knife and… fork”: Examining central coherence in autism, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and typical development with a linguistic task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(4), 377-393.
Bromley, K. D. A. (1984). Teaching idioms. The Reading Teacher, 38(3), 272-276.
Brownell, H., & Martino, G. (1998). Deficits in inference and social cognition: The effects of right hemisphere brain damage on discourse. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience(pp. 309–328). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
Bryant, G. A. (2010). Prosodic contrasts in ironic speech. Discourse Processes, 47(7), 545-566.
Bryant, G. A. (2011). Verbal irony in the wild. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19(2), 291-309.
Bryant, G. A., & Fox Tree, J.E. (2002). Recognizing verbal irony in spontaneous speech. Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 99–119.
Bryant, G. A., & Fox Tree, J.E. (2005). Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language and Speech, 48(3), 257–277.
Carlson, K., Clifton, C. J., & Frazier, L. (2001). Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 58–81.
Cascia, J., & Barr, J. J. (2017). Associations among vocabulary, executive function skills and empathy in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30(4), 627-637.
Carter, S. (2009). Bullying of students with asperger syndrome. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 32(3), 145-154.
Cheang, H. S., & Pell, M. D. (2008). The sound of sarcasm. Speech Communication, 50(5), 366–381.
Cheang, H. S., & Pell, M. D. (2009). Acoustic markers of sarcasm in Cantonese and English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3), 1394–1405.
Chevallier, C., Noveck, I., Happé, F., & Wilson, D. (2009). From acoustics to grammar: Perceiving and interpreting grammatical prosody in adolescents with Asperger Syndrome. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3(2), 502-516.
Chevallier, C., Noveck, I., Happé, F. G. E., & Wilson, D. (2011). What’s in a voice? Prosody as a test case for the theory of mind account of autism. Neuropsychologia, 49(3), 507–517.
Cho, T., McQueen, J. M., & Cox, E. A. (2007). Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics, 35(2), 210-243.
Choi, S., Song, S., & Kim, Y. T. (2021). Irony Comprehension in High-Functioning ASD Children according to Question Types and Task Types and Relationships between ToM and Irony Ability. Communication Sciences and Disorders, 26(1), 96-107.
Clifton, C., Carlson, K., & Frazier, L. (2002). Informative prosodic boundaries. Language and Speech, 45, 87–114.
Colich, N. L., Wang, A. T., Rudie, J. D., Hernandez, L. M., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Dapretto, M. (2012). Atypical neural processing of ironic and sincere remarks in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(1), 70-92.
Cole, J. (2015). Prosody in context: a review. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(1-2), 1-31.
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & Van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech, 40(2), 141-201.
Dahan, D. (2015). Prosody and language comprehension. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(5), 441-452.
de Jong, K., & Zawaydeh, B. (2002). Comparing stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus: patterns of variation in Arabic vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 53‐75.
Dews, S., Winner, E., Kaplan, J., Rosenblatt, E., Hunt, M., Lim, K., ... & Smarsh, B. (1996). Children's understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development, 67(6), 3071-3085.
Diehl, J. J., Friedberg, C., Paul, R., & Snedeker, J. (2015). The use of prosody during syntactic processing in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Development and Psychopathology, 27(3), 867-884.
Ehlers, S., & Gillberg, C. (1993). The epidemiology of Asperger Syndrome:A total population study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 1327-1350.
Eigsti, I. M., de Marchena, A. B., Schuh, J. M., & Kelley, E. (2011). Language acquisition in autism spectrum disorders: A developmental review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(2), 681-691.
Erwin, R., Van Lancker, D., Guthrie, D., Schwafel, J., Tanguay, P., & Buchwald, J. S. (1991). P3 responses to prosodic stimuli in adult autistic subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 80(6), 561-571.
Fine, J., Bartolucci, G., Ginsberg, G., & Szatmari, P. (1991). The use of intonation to communicate in pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32(5), 771-782.
Fosnot, S. M., & Jun, S. (1999). Prosodic characteristics in children with stuttering or autism during reading and imitation. In Proceedings of The 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1925-1928).
Fox, E. (2000). An audit of inter-professional communication within a trauma and orthopaedic directorate. Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing, 4(4), 160-169.
Frith, U. (1989). Autism and Asperger syndrome. MRC Cognitive Development Unit.
Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Autism: Beyond “theory of mind”. Cognition, 50(1-3), 115-132.
Frith, U., Happé, F., & Siddons, F. (1994). Autism and theory of mind in everyday life. Social Development, 3(2), 108–124.
Gallagher, H. L., Happé, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 11-21.
Geurts, H. M., & Embrechts, M. (2008). Language profiles in ASD, SLI, and ADHD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(10), 1931.
Ghaziuddin, M., & Gerstein, L. (1996). Pedantic speaking style differentiates Asperger Syndrome from high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26(6), 585-595.
Gibbs, R. W. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 5–27.
Gillberg, C., & Ehlers, S.(1998). High-functioning people with autism and Asperger syndrome: A literature review. In E. Schopler, G. Mesibov, & L. J. Kunce. (Eds.). Asperger Syndrome or High-functioning Autism? (pp.79-106). Plenum Press.
Godde, E., Bosse, M. L., & Bailly, G. (2020). A review of reading prosody acquisition and development. Reading and Writing, 33(2), 399-426.
Grabe, E. (2004). Intonational variation in urban dialects of English spoken in the British Isles. Regional Variation in Intonation, 9-31.
Grandin, T. (1995). How people with autism think. In E., Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Learning and Cognition in Autism (pp. 137-156). Plenum.
Griswold, D. E., Barnhill, G. P., Myles, B. S., Hagiwara, T., & Simpson, R. L. (2002). Asperger Syndrome and academic achievement. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 94-102.
Grossman, R. B., Bemis, R. H., Skwerer, D. P., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2010). Lexical and affective prosody in children with high-functioning autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(3),778-793.
Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2019). 特殊教育導論(張正芬, 李姿瑩, 黃澤洋, 鄭臻貞, 詹孟琦, 洪雅惠, 林玟秀, 葛竹婷, 陳怡慧, 黃玉枝, 林慶仁, 李淑玲, 佘永吉譯; 二版). 華騰。(原著出版於2018)。
Happé, F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48(2), 101-119.
Happé, F. G. E. (1994a). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 129-154.
Happé, F. G. E. (1994b). Wechsler IQ profile and theory of mind in autism: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(8), 1461-1471.
Happé, F., & Frith, U. (1995). Theory of mind in autism. In Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Learning and cognition in autism. Current Issues in Autism(pp. 177–197). Plenum Press.
Herlin, I., & Visapää, L. (2016). Dimensions of empathy in relation to language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 39(2), 135-157.
Hirst, D., & Di Cristo, A. (1998). Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge University Press.
Howlin, P. (2003). Outcome in high-functioning adults with autism with and without early language delays: Implications for the differentiation between autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 3–13.
Howlin, P., & Moore, A. (1997).Diagnosis of autism: A survey of over 1200 patients in the UK. Autism, 1, 135-162.
Huang, S. F., Oi, M., & Taguchi, A. (2015). Comprehension of figurative language in Taiwanese children with autism: The role of theory of mind and receptive vocabulary. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29(8-10), 764-775.
Ingram, D. (1991). First Language Acquisition: Method, Description and Explanation. Cambridge University Press.
Kaakinen, J. K., Olkoniemi, H., Kinnari, T., & Hyönä, J. (2014). Processing of Written Irony: An Eye Movement Study. Discourse Processes, 51(4), 287-311.
Kalandadze, T., Norbury, C., Nærland, T., & Næss, K. A. B. (2018). Figurative language comprehension in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic review. Autism, 22(2), 99-117.
Kapogianni, E. (2014). Differences in use and function of verbal irony between real and fictional discourse: (mis) interpretation and irony blindness. Humor, 27(4), 597-618.
Kargas, N., López, B., Morris, P., & Reddy, V. (2016). Relations among detection of syllable stress, speech abnormalities, and communicative ability in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(2), 206-215.
Kelley, E., Paul, J. J., Fein, D., & Naigles, L. R. (2006). Residual language deficits in optimal outcome children with a history of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 807–828.
Klin, A., Pauls, D., & Schultz, R., & Volkmar, F. (2005). Three diagnostic approaches to Asperger Syndrome: Implications for research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 221-234.
Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 374-386.
Le Sourn-Bissaoui, S., Aguert, M., Girard, P., Chevreuil, C., & Laval, V. (2013). Emotional speech comprehension in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46(4), 309-320.
Li, J. P., Law, T., Lam, G. Y., & To, C. K. (2013). Role of sentence-final particles and prosody in irony comprehension in Cantonese-speaking children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27(1), 18-32.
MacKay, G., & Shaw, A. (2004). A comparative study of figurative language in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 20(1), 13-32.
Marans, W. D., Rubin, E., & Laurent, A. (2005). Addressing social communication skills in individuals with high-functioning autism and asperger syndrome: Critical priorities in educational programming. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of Autism and Development Disorder(3rd ed., pp. 977-1002). John Wiley & Sons.
Martin, I., & Mcdonald, S. (2004). Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain and Language, 85, 451–466.
Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2005). Evaluating the causes of impaired irony comprehension following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 19(8), 712-730.
Martzoukou, M., Papadopoulou, D., & Kosmidis, M. H. (2017). The comprehension of syntactic and affective prosody by adults with autism spectrum disorder without accompanying cognitive deficits. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(6), 1573-1595.
Mattys, S. L., & Melhorn, J. F. (2007). Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(1), 554-567.
Mattys, S. L., White, L., & Melhorn, J. F. (2005). Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: a hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 477.
Mauchand, M., Vergis, N., & Pell, M. D. (2020). Irony, prosody, and social impressions of affective stance. Discourse Processes, 57(2), 141-157.
McCann, J., & Peppé, S. (2003). Prosody in autism spectrum disorders: a critical review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 38(4), 325-350.
McCann, J., Peppé, S., Gibbon, F. E., O’ Hare, A., & Rutherford, M. (2007). Prosody and its relationship to language in school-aged children with high-functioning autism. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 42(6), 682-702.
McDonald, S., & Pearce, S. (1996). Clinical insights into pragmatic theory: Frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm. Brain and Language, 53(1), 81-104.
Nicholson, A., Whalen, J. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2013). Children's processing of emotion in ironic language. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 691.
Norbury, C. F. (2004). Factors supporting idiom comprehension in children with communication disorders. ASHA, 47(5),1179-1193.
Norbury, C. F. (2005). The relationship between theory of mind and metaphor: Evidence form children with language impairment and autistic spectrum disorder. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 383-399.
Norbury, C. F., Nash, M., Baird, G., & Bishop, D. (2004). Using a parental checklist to identify diagnostic groups in children with communication impairment: a validation of the Children’s Communication Checklist-2. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39(3), 345–364.
Nuske, H. J., & Bavin, E. L. (2011). Narrative comprehension in 4–7‐year‐old children with autism: testing the Weak Central Coherence account. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46(1), 108-119.
Owens, R. E. (1995). Language Disorders: A Functional Approach to Assessment and Intervention. Allyn & Bacon.
Paul, R., Augustyn, A., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. R. (2005). Perception and production of prosody by speakers with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(2), 205-220.
Paul, R., Oriovski, S. M., Marcinko, H. C., & Volkmar, F. (2009). Conversational behaviors in youth with high-function ASD and asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 115-125.
Pell, M., Paulmann, S., Dara, C., Alasseri, A., & Kotz, S. (2009). Factors in the recognition of vocally expressed emotions: A comparison of four languages. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 417–435.
Peppè, S., McCann, J., Gibbon, F., O’Hare, A., & Rutherford, M. (2007). Receptive and Expressive Prosodic Ability in Children With High-Functioning Autism. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1015-1028.
Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A.M., & Leekam, S. R. (1989). Exploration of the autistic child's theory of mind: Knowledge, belief, and communication. Child Development, 60, 689-700.
Pexman, P., Reggin, L., & Lee, K. (2019). Addressing the challenge of verbal irony: Getting serious about sarcasm training. Languages, 4(2), 23.
Pickles, A., Anderson, D. K., & Lord, C. (2014). Heterogeneity and plasticity in the development of language: A 17‐year follow‐up of children referred early for possible autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(12), 1354-1362.
Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self‐regulation. WW Norton.
Price, P. J., Ostendorf, M., Shattuck‐Hufnagel, S., & Fong, C. (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. the Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90(6), 2956-2970.
Prizant, B. M. (1996). Brief report: Communication, language, social, and emotional development. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 173–178.
Prutting, C. A. (1982).Pragmatics as social competence. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 47(2), 123–134.
Puhacheuskaya, V., & Järvikivi, J. (2021, Dec 8).Individual Differences in the Perception of Native and Foreign-Accented Irony. https://www.cuny2021.io/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/CUNY_2021_abstract_267.pdf
Rapin, I. (1991). Autistic children: Diagnosis and clinical features. Pediatrics, 87, 751–760.
Rapin, I., & Dunn, M. (2003). Update on the language disorders of individuals on the autistic spectrum. Brain and Development, 25(3), 166–172.
Rapp, A. M., & Wild, B. (2011). Nonliteral language in Alzheimer dementia: a review. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(2), 207-218.
Reich, P. (1986). Language Development. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why do people use figurative language?. Psychological science, 5(3), 159-163.
Roeckel, E. V., Scholte, R. H. J., & Didden, R. (2010). Bullying among adolscents with autism spectrum disorders: prevalence and perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 63-73.
Rumpf, A. L., Kamp-Becker, I., Becker, K., & Kauschke, C. (2012). Narrative competence and internal state language of children with Asperger Syndrome and ADHD. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(5), 1395-1407.
Rutherford, M. D., Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2002). Reading the mind in the voice: A study with normal adults and adults with Asperger syndrome and high functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(3), 189-194.
Saban-Bezalel, R., & Mashal, N. (2015). The effects of intervention on the comprehension of irony and on hemispheric processing of irony in adults with ASD. Neuropsychologia, 77, 233-241.
Saban-Bezalel, R., Dolfin, D., Laor, N., & Mashal, N. (2019). Irony comprehension and mentalizing ability in children with and without autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 58, 30-38.
Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2003). The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 90(1), 51-89.
Sakkalou, E., & Gattis, M. (2012). Infants infer intentions from prosody. Cognitive Development, 27(1), 1–16.
Schafer, A., Carlson, K., Clifton, H., & Frazier, L. (2000). Focus and the interpretation of pitch accent: Disambiguating embedded questions. Language and Speech, 43(1), 75-105.
Scheeren, A. M., Koot, H. M., Mundy, P. C., Mous, L., & Begeer, S. (2013). Empathic responsiveness of children and adolescents with high‐functioning autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 6(5), 362-371.
Scheerer, N. E., Shafai, F., Stevenson, R. A., & Iarocci, G. (2020). Affective prosody perception and the relation to social competence in autistic and typically developing children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 48(7), 965-975.
Scholten, I., Engelen, E., & Hendriks, P. (2015). Understanding irony in autism: The role of context and prosody. The Facts Matter Essays on Logic and Cognition in Honour of Rineke Verbrugge. College Publications, 121-32.
Shapiro, B. K., Menon, D. U., & Accardo, P. J. (2008). Clinical overview of the autism spectrum. In B. K. Shapiro & P. J. Accardo (Eds.), Autism Frontiers (pp. 1-20). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Shriberg, L. D., Paul, R., McSweeny, J. L., Klin, A., Cohen, D. J., & Volkmar, F. R. (2001). Speech and prosody characteristics of adolescents and adults with high-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1097–1115.
Smith, D. D., & Tyler, N. C. (2013). 特殊教育導論:創造不同的人生(陳明媚、黃裕惠、莊季靜譯; 一版). 學富。(原著出版於2010)。
Snedeker, J., & Truesell, J. (2003). Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 103‐130.
Snowling, M. J., Bishop, D. V., Stothard, S. E., Chipchase, B., & Kaplan, C. (2006). Psychosocial outcomes at 15 years of children with a preschool history of speech-language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(8), 759–765.
Speer, S. R., Crowder, R. G., & Thomas, L. M. (1993). Prosodic structure and sentence recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(3), 336-358.
Stephen, H. (2007). Being Bullied: Strategies and solutions for people with asperger's syndrome. Learning Disability Practices, 10(1),25.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1992).Autistic children’s talk about psychological states: Deficits in the early acquisition of a theory of mind. Child Development, 63(1), 161–172.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1996). Brief report: Current theory and research on language and communication in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 169-178.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1999). A psychological approach to understanding the social and language impairments in autism. International Review of Psychiatry, 11, 325–334.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (2000). The challenge of studying language development in children with autism. In L. Menn & N. B. Ratner (Eds.), Methods for studying language production. Erlbaum.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (2001). A re-examination of the theory of mind hypothesis of autism. In J. Burack, T. Charman, N. Yirmiya, & P. Zelazo (Eds.), The Development of Autism: Perspectives from Theory and Research (pp.173-193). Erlbaum.
Thurber, C. & Tager-Flusberg, H. (1993). Pauses in the narratives produced by autistic, mentally retarded, and normal children as an index of cognitive demand. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23(2), 309-322.
Van den Brink, D., Van Berkum, J. J., Bastiaansen, M. C., Tesink, C. M., Kos, M., Buitelaar, J. K., & Hagoort, P. (2012). Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 173-183.
Van der Hallen, R., Evers, K., Brewaeys, K., Van den Noortgate, W., & Wagemans, J. (2015). Global processing takes time: A meta-analysis on local–global visual processing in ASD. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 549.
van Zyl, M., & Hanekom, J. J. (2012). When “okay” is not okay: Acoustic characteristics of single‐word prosody conveying reluctance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(1), EL13‐EL19.
Volden, J., & Lord, C. (1991). Neologisms and idiosyncratic language in autistic speakers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 21, 109–130.
Vulchanova, M., Saldaña, D., Chahboun, S., & Vulchanov, V. (2015). Figurative language processing in atypical populations: The ASD perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 24.
Wagner, M. & Watson, D. G. (2010). Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7-9), 905-945.
Wang, A. T., Lee, S. S., Sigman, M., & Dapretto, M. (2006). Neural basis of irony comprehension in children with autism: the role of prosody and context. Brain, 129(4), 932-943.
Wang, A. T., Lee, S. S., Sigman, M., & Dapretto, M. (2007). Reading affect in the face and voice: neural correlates of interpreting communicative intent in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(6), 698-708.
Wang, J. E., & Tsao, F. M. (2015). Emotional prosody perception and its association with pragmatic language in school-aged children with high-function autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 37, 162-170.
Wennerstrom, A. (2001). The Music of Everyday Speech. Oxford University Press.
Wilson, D., & Wharton, T. (2006). Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1559-1579.
Wing, L. (1981). Asperger Syndrome: A clinical account. Psychological Medicine, 11, 115-130.