簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 馬莉莎
Melissa Dilieth Mendez Valladares
論文名稱: 影響宏都拉斯高中教師激勵因素之研究
Factors Affecting High School Teachers’ Motivation in Honduras
指導教授: 蔡錫濤
Tsai, Shir-Tau
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 國際人力資源發展研究所
Graduate Institute of International Human Resource Developmemt
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 93
中文關鍵詞: 激勵因素非激勵因素宏都拉斯
英文關鍵詞: Teachers’ motivation, teachers’ demotivation, motivational factors, demographic data, Honduras
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:232下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Motivation is a natural state of mind that comes from the need of something. Unfortunately, not everybody is motivated; it is here when people need something or someone to help them in this aspect. Teachers in Honduras have this problem, but no one see what is really happening and why educators behave the way they do. Many studies have been made about motivation in different areas, and even in education in general, but not too many focused on teachers’ motivation; this is the reason why this research tends to explore the factors that affect educators’ motivation. A non-experimental quantitative study was conducted through questionnaire survey as data collection technique. The sample for this study includes 364 high school teachers from public schools in Tegucigalpa, capital city of Honduras, getting a response rate of 86.6%. The research used the purposive or judgmental sampling technique of nonrandom or non-probability sampling procedure. The interpretation of the data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-Test and one-way ANOVA test.
    The findings showed that School Environment and Administration are the two factors that affect teachers’ motivation the most. It also confirms that high school teachers in Honduras are in a neutral point of their motivation. The ANOVA explains that gender and age and the motivational factors are not statistically significant. It also shows that teachers’ salary, years of service, and contract type are statistically significant with some of the motivational factors. In addition, comments about their motivation were provided by some educators, stating that for them the most frustrating aspect in their work life is the Administration followed by School Environment. It is important to note that the findings were limited to public high school teachers and cannot be generalized to teachers of other levels. At the end of the study the researcher concluded that The Ministry of Education in Honduras and high school principals need to work harder in order to improve their teachers’ motivation. Finally, the study also offers some recommendations for the schools and principals, so they can have a view of the situation of their teachers; for the educators, because they also need to help themselves, and future researchers in the area of motivation in Education.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ………………………………………………………………………… I Table of Contents ……………………………………………… III List of Figures ……………………………………………………… VII List of Tables ………………………………………………………………… IX CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………… 1 Background of the study …………………………………………… 1 Statement Problem ……………………………………………………… 4 Purposes of the Study …………………………………………… 4 Questions of the Study…………………………………………… 5 Research Hypothesis ………………………………………… 5 Significance of the Study ………………………………… 7 Delimitations and Limitations of the Study………………………… 8 Definitions of Terms ………………………………… 10 CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW …………………………………… 11 Overview of Honduras ………………………………11 Brief Geography of Honduras …………………………………………… 11 Education in Hondura………………………………………… 12 Teachers in Honduras ……………………………………………………… 14 Motivational Theories ……………………………………………15 Early Theories of Motivation ………………………………………… 16 Hierarchy Needs of Theory ……………………………………… 16 Theory X and Theory Y ………………………………17 Two Factor Theory ……………………………………………… 18 Contemporary Theories of Motivation 21 ERG Theory …………………………………………………21 Reinforcement Theory …………………………………… 22 Equity Theory ………………………………………………… 23 Expectancy Theory ………………………………… 24 Cognitive Evaluation Theory, Goal Setting Theory, and Flow and Intrinsic Motivation Theory ………………………… 25 Summary: Comparison of the Motivational Theories with the Research Framework. 26 Teachers’ Motivation 27 CHAPTER III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 33 Research Framework ……………………………………………………………… 33 Research Procedure ………………………………………………………………35 Research Methods ………………………………………………………………… 37 Target Population and Sample Size ……………………………………38 Instrumentation …………………………………………………………… 39 Validity and Reliability ………………………………………………… 40 Data Analysis ……………………………………………………………41 CHAPTER IV. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION ……………………………………43 Motivational Factors ……………………………………………………………… 43 School Environment ………………………………………………………… 43 Administration …………………………………………………………… 45 Parents’ Attitude ………………………………………………………… 46 Career Development ……………………………………………………… 47 Relationship with Coworkers ……………………………………………… 48 Students’ Attitude …………………………………………48 Teachers’ Level of Motivation...…………………………………………………… 49 Hypothesis 1: Level of Motivation …49 Relationship between the Demographic Variables and the Motivational Factors … 51 Hypothesis 2: Motivation between Male and Female …… 51 Hypothesis 3: Motivation among Teachers’ Age Range 52 Hypothesis 4: Motivation among Teachers’ Salary Range ………………….53 Hypothesis 5: Motivation among Teachers’ Years of Service …… 55 Hypothesis 6: Motivation among Teachers’ Contract Type ………………56 Comments of the Teachers …………………………………………58 Positive Comments ……………………………………………………58 Negative Comments …………………………………………………… 59 Interpretation of the Results ………………………………………………………62 Comments ………………………………………………………………… 64 CHAPTER V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ………………… 67 Conclusions …………………………………………………67 Conclusion for the factors that affect teachers’ motivation.…………… 68 Conclusion for the identification of the factors that affect teachers’ Motivation ………………………………………………………………… 68 Conclusion for the difference that exist between the demographic items in relation to the motivational factors ………… 69 Suggestions …………………………………………………… 70 Suggestions for Schools and the Ministry of Education...………70 Suggestions for Teachers ………………………………………… 71 Suggestions for Future Researchers ………………………………… 71 REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………… 73 APPENDIX A: Authorization Letter for the Principals (Spanish) ……………… 77 APPENDIX B: Authorization Letter for the Principals (English)...................................... 79 APPENDIX C: Consent Letter for the Participants (Spanish) 81 APPENDIX D: Instrument (Spanish) …………………………………………83 APPENDIX E: Instrument (English) …………………………………………87 APPENDIX F: Multiple Comparison Tables …………………………………………91

    REFERENCES

    Accel-Team (2007). “Human Relations Contributors”. Retrieved September 15th, 2007 from URL: http://www.accel-team.com/human_relations/hrels_03_mcgregor.html.

    Adams, J.S. (1963). Towards understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67,422-436.

    Barrett, J. (1998). Total leadership: How to inspire and motivate for personal and team effectiveness. London, UK: Kogan Page.

    Bishay, A. (1996). Teacher motivation and job satisfaction: a study employing the experience sampling method. Psychology Junior Undergraduate Science, 3,147-154.

    Clark, D. (2005). “Motivation and Leadership.” Retrieved from September 28th, 2007 from URL:
    http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/leadmot.html.

    Comrey, A.L. & Lee, H.B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Cullen, J. B. & Paroteeah K. P (2005). Multinational manegement: strategic approach (3rd ed.). Mason, Ohio, U.S: South Western, a division of Thomson Learning.

    Di Cesare, J. & Sadri, G. (2003). Do all carrots look the same? Examining the impact of culture on employee motivation. Management Research News, 26(1), 29-40.
    .
    Di Gropello, E. (2005). Impedimentos para mejorar la calidad de la educación en América Central [Impediments to improve the quality of education in Central America]. Banco Mundial: En Breve 64.

    Dörnyey, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreing language. Language Learning, 40(1), 45-78.

    Estatuto del Docente Hondureño (2001). Retrieved September 21st, 2007 from URL: http://www.fecode.edu.co/descargas/estatutos/estatuto_docente_Honduras.pdf.

    Finnigan, K. S. (2005). Principal leadership and teacher expectancy in low-performing schools. Paper presented at the national conference of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

    Global Exchange (2005). “Education in Honduras”. Retrieved August 26th, 2007 from URL:
    http://www.globalexchange.org/countries/americas/honduras/Education.html.

    Hayes, S. A. (2006). Exploring the theoretical base for teacher performance pay: A micropolitical perspective. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.

    IUP-Faculty Professional Development Committee (1998). “Defiining the Teacher Scholar”. Retrieved October 1st, 2007 from URL:
    http://www.iup.edu/teachingexcellence/carntch/tch-sch.shtm.

    Jesus S. N. (1993). Teachers and preservice teachers’ professional goals and motivation. Paper presented at the 18th annual conference of the Association for Teachers Education in Europe, Lisbon, Portugal.

    John, M. C. & Taylor, J. W. (n.d.). “Leadership style, school climate,
    and the institutional commitment of teachers” Retrieved November 17th, 2007 from URL: http://www.aiias.edu/academics/sgs/info/v2n1/john_institutional_commitment.html.

    Jonhson, B. & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches (2nd ed.). Boston, U.S: Pearson.

    Kass, R. A. & Tinsley, H. E. A. (1979). Factor analysis. Journal of Leisure Research, 11,120-138.

    Kerfoot, K. (2002). On Leadership: From motivation to inspiration. Dermatology Nursing, 14(2), 126-127.

    Kohn, A. (1999). Punished by rewards: The troubles with gold stars, incentive plans as price and other bribes. New York, U.S: Houghton Mifflin.

    Kouzes, J. M & Posner, B. Z. (2002). The leadership challenge (3rd ed). U.S: Jossey-Bass.

    López, F. J., Casique, A. & Ferrer, J. (2007). Job satisfaction. An expectancy and equity theories based analysis. Entelequia Revista Interdisciplinar, 3;219-234

    Mangrum, D. (2003). Mantaining motivation with the aid of collective wisdom. Abu, UAE: Military Language Institute.

    NetMBA (2007). “Theory X and Theory Y”. Retrieved September 15th,2007 from URL:
    http://www.netmba.com/mgmt/ob/motivation/mcgregor/.

    Ololube, N. P. (n.d). Teachers job satisfaction and motivation for school effectiveness: An assesment. University of Helsinki Finland.

    Oregon School Boards Association (2007). “Motivating Teachers to Improve Instruction”. Retrieved October 12th, 2007 from URL:
    http://www.osba.org/lrelatns/teacherq/motivate.htm.

    Padgett, R. (2006). Best ways to involve parents. Communicator, 30,44-45.

    Peck, W. F. (1993). Motivating technical employees. Civil Engineering, 63(4), 68-69.

    Perie, M. & Baker, D.P. (1997). Job satisfaction among America’s teachers: Effects of workplace conditions, background characteristics, and teacher compensation (National Center for Education Statistics Rep. 97-XXX). Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Perisco, J. (1990). Employee motivation: beliefs vr. reality. Quality, 29(3), 51-53.

    Ramlall, S. (2004). A review of employee motivation theories and their implications for employee retention within organizations. Journal of American or business, Cambridge, 5(1/2), 52-63.

    Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational Behavior (10th ed.). New Jersey, U.S: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T. A. (2007). Organizational Behavior (12th ed). New Jersey, U.S: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Ruthankoon R. & Ogunlana S. O. (2003). Testing Herzberg’s two-factor theory in the Thai construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10(5), 333-341.

    Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (4th ed.). London, U.K: Pearson Education.

    Secretaría de Educación de Honduras. Retrieved November 10th, 2007 from URL: http://www.se.gob.hn/.

    Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidel, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, U.S: Allyn & Bacon.
    Thomas, G. (2005). “Persistent leadership: the five keys to successful and sustained leadership are principles, passion, people, performance and perseverance”. Retrieved November 28th, 2007 from URL: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HUL/is_1_35/ai_n15966278.

    Thornton, B. & Mattocks, C. (1999). Empowerment of teachers fosters school improvement. Paper presented at national Council of Professors of Educational Administration 53th annual summer conference, Jackson Hole, WY.

    Tosti, D. T. & Amarant, J. (2005). Energy investment beyond competence. Performance Improvement, 44(1), 17-22.

    Ubom, I. U. & Joshua, M. T. (2004). Needs satisfaction variables as predictros of job satisfaction of employees: implication for gidance and counseling. Educational Research Journal, 4 (3),1-7.

    USAID. Retrieved October 10th,2007 from URL: http://www.usaid.gov/press/.

    Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D. & Sechrest, L. (2000). Unobtrusive measures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Whitener, S. D., Gruber, K.J., Lynch, H., Tingos, K., Perona, M. (1997). Characteristics of stayers, movers, and leavers: Results from the teacher follow up survey 1994-95 (National Center for Education Statistics 97-450). Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2007). “David McClelland”. Retrieved August 30th, 2007 from URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_McClelland.

    Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2007). “Honduras”. Retrieved October 1st, 2007 from URL:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honduras.

    Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2007). “Motivation”. Retrieved August 30th, 2007 from URL:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivational.

    Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2007). “Operant Conditioning “. Retrieved August 30th, 2007 from URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operant_Conditioning.

    Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2008). “Cross Sectional Study”. Retrieved May 8th, 2008 from URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-sectional_study.

    Wright, M. & Custer, R. (1998). Why they enjoy teaching: The motivation of outstanding technology teachers. Journal of Technology Education, 9(2); 60-77.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE