研究生: |
黃念瑜 Huang, Fiona Nienyu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
收藏的詩學:奧爾罕·帕慕克《純真博物館》 Collecting as Poetics: Orhan Pamuk’s The Museum of Innocence |
指導教授: |
高瑪麗
Goodwin, Mary |
口試委員: |
曾思旭
Prystash, Justin 黃裕惠 Huang, Yu-hui 高瑪麗 Goodwin, Mary |
口試日期: | 2024/01/31 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
英語學系 Department of English |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 60 |
中文關鍵詞: | 純真博物館 、奧爾罕·帕慕克 、土耳其 、博物館 、收集 |
英文關鍵詞: | The Museum of Innocence, Orhan Pamuk, Türkiye, museum, collecting |
研究方法: | 敘事分析 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400405 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:101 下載:11 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文深入探討了奧爾罕・帕慕克的小說《純真博物館》中小說和博物館在迷人愛情故事中扮演的角色。這項探索深入探討了小說、博物館和土耳其這個國家之間錯綜複雜的關係。
第一章揭示了小說的精心敘事。在這個框架內,讀者將沉浸在對「情人凱末爾」的生動描繪中,並透過物品所揭示的依戀看見其深刻的情感糾葛。此外,私人的敘事隨後更廣泛地演變成土耳其的文化記憶。
第二章的重點從小說轉向純真博物館的實體,展示了從小說中描繪的「情人凱末爾」到博物館敘事中「收藏家凱末爾」的敘事演變。這種轉變提供了對凱末爾收集行為的動機、痴迷和微妙之處的細緻入微的理解,揭示了這種實踐所固有的心理和文化維度。在本章的最後,我亦比較了純真博物館與羅浮宮、或大都會博物館等著名機構的具體差異。在探索日常物品和神聖化的展品之間錯綜複雜的關聯時,帶出了博物館作為敘事形式的深刻意義。
第三章剖析了小說、博物館和更廣泛的土耳其社會文化景觀之間錯綜複雜的相互作用。本章揭示了土耳其作為一個國家如何佔據帕慕克作品的中心位置。此一關心也使帕慕克及其作品成為土耳其集體意識中精心保存的文化記憶。最後,我揭示了帕慕克作為一位全球知名的作家,對土耳其風景的描繪以及全球背景下國家的實際狀況。
This thesis has unearthed the apparatus of the novel and the museum in The Museum of Innocence, revealing their role behind the captivating love story that unfolds in this city. This exploration delves into the intricate relationship between the novel, the museum, and Türkiye as a nation.
In Chapter One, “Unvelling the Relics: Telling a Love Story through Objects,” I delve into the crafted narrative of The Museum of Innocence. Within this framework, readers are beckoned to immerse themselves in a vivid portrayal of “the lover Kemal” and the profound emotional entanglement he shares with Füsun through his sentimental attachment to these objects. Moreover, the potency of personal narrative transcends its mere capacity to comprehend and interpret reality, evolving into a cultural memory of Türkiye that is subsequently shared among the wider audience.
In Chapter Two, titled “From Novel to Museum: Scrutinizing Kemal's Collection and its Textual Space,” the focus pivots from the literary realm to the physical entity of The Museum of Innocence. This journey unfolds the narrative evolution from “the lover Kemal” depicted in the novel to the role of “the curator Kemal” within the museum's narrative. Within the museum's confines, the objects on exhibition undergo a metamorphosis, assuming a new identity as representations of “the curator Kemal's” personal collection. This shift provides a nuanced understanding of the motivations, obsessions, and subtleties that underscore Kemal's act of collecting, shedding light on the psychological and cultural dimensions inherent in this practice. As this chapter culminates, attention will be directed toward the exploration of how a museum that preserves ordinary objects distinguishes itself from illustrious institutions like the Louvre or the Metropolitan. In navigating the intricate dynamics between everyday items and revered exhibits, the aim is to unravel the profound significance of the museum as a narrative form. This exploration invites contemplation on the nature of collecting and the narratives it generates.
In Chapter Three, entitled “Where the Novel and the Museum Meet: Revisiting Modern Turkish Identity,” I examine the intricate interplay between the novel, the museum, and the broader Turkish socio-cultural landscape. This chapter unveils the profound focal point of Pamuk's writing—the essence of Türkiye itself. It is from this core that all narratives emanate and converge. Within these pages, I delve into Pamuk's ambitious endeavor to firmly anchor himself within Türkiye's cultural heritage, seeking to revive a past erased by the disruptive forces of modernization and Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's reforms. Pamuk's artistic creations, spanning various mediums, emerge as cultural memories meticulously preserved within the collective consciousness of Türkiye. Simultaneously, the cultural memory of Türkiye serves as the rich tapestry against which the love story and the act of collecting unfold. Furthermore, I embark on an exploration of Orhan Pamuk's role as a globally acclaimed writer, dissecting his portrayal of the Turkish landscape regarding the actual state of the nation within the global context.
Adonis. Introduction to Arab Poetics. Trans. by Catherine Cobham, Saqi Books, 1990.
Allmer, Açalya. “Orhan Pamuk’s ‘Museum of Innocence’: On Architecture, Narrative and the Art of Collecting.” Architectural Research Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 2, 2009, pp. 163–172, doi:10.1017/s135913550999025x.
Assmann, Aleida. “Canon and Archive.” Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Walter De Gruyter, 2008, pp. 97–108.
American Association of Museums. Museum Accreditation: Professional Standards. American Association of Museums, 1973.
Cassirer, Ernst. An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture. Yale University Press, 2021.
Conway, Martin A., and Christopher W. Pleydell-Pearce. “The Construction of Autobiographical Memories in the Self-Memory System.” Psychological Review, vol. 107, no. 2, 2000, pp. 261–288, doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261.
Durost, Walter Nelson. Children’s Collecting Activity Related to Social Factors. Columbia University, 1932.
Erll, Astrid. “Literature as a Medium of Cultural Memory.” Memory in Culture, translated by Sara B. Young, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, pp. 144–171.
Erol, Sibel. “The Chronotope of Istanbul in Orhan Pamuk’s Memoir Istanbul.” International Journal of Middle East Studies, vol. 43, no. 4, 2011, pp. 655–676, doi:10.1017/s0020743811000894.
Gardels, Nathan. “A Talk with Orhan Pamuk: Caressing the World with Words.” HuffPost, 25 May 2011, www.huffpost.com/entry/a-talk-with-orhan-pamuk-c_b_353799. Accessed 16 Feb. 2024.
---. “Orhan Pamuk: A Museum for the Person, Not for Power.” HuffPost, The World Post, 25 Dec. 2014, www.huffpost.com/entry/orhan-pamuk-museum_n_4662010. Accessed 15 June 2023.
Gurses, Hande. “Mirroring Istanbul.” Global Perspectives on Orhan Pamuk: Existentialism and Politics, edited by Mehnaz M. Afridi and David M. Buyze, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, pp. 47–62.
Hoffmann, Eva. “‘Innocent Objects:’ Fetishism and Melancholia in Orhan Pamuk’s The Museum of Innocence.” Konturen, vol. 8, 24 Oct. 2015, p. 155, doi:10.5399/uo/konturen.8.0.3715.
Holbrook, Victoria Rowe. The Unreadable Shores of Love: Turkish Modernity and Mystic Romance. University of Texas Press, 1994.
Shayegan, Daryus. Cultural Schizophrenia: Islamic Societies Confronting the West. Trans. by John Howe, Syracuse University Press, 1997.
Huyssen, Andreas. Other Cities, Other Worlds: Urban Imaginaries in a Globalizing Age. Duke University Press, 2009.
Karabulut, Demet. “Different Aspects of Melancholy in the Museum of Innocence.” International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, vol. 2, no. 1, 2016, pp. 87–91, doi:10.24289/ijsser.279087.
Malpas, Simon. The Postmodern. Routledge, 2005.
Marstine, Janet, editor. New Museum Theory and Practice: An Introduction. Blackwell, 2006.
Morris, Jan. “Review: Istanbul by Orhan Pamuk.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 2 Apr. 2005, www.theguardian.com/books/2005/apr/02/biography.highereducation.
“Museum.” Masumiyet Müzesi, www.masumiyetmuzesi.org/en/m%C3%BCze. Accessed 14 May 2023.
Özgül, Gönül Eda. “The Quest for Home and Identity: Modernity and Innocence in Pamuk’s The Museum of Innocence.” Orhan Pamuk: Critical Essays on a Novelist Between Worlds, edited by Taner Can et al., Ibidem Press, 2017, pp. 203–230.
Pamuk, Orhan. Istanbul: Memories of a City. Translated by Maureen Freely, Faber and Faber, 2014.
---. Other Colors: Essays and a Story. Translated by Maureen Freely, Vintage International, 2008.
---. “Small Museums.” The New York Times, 20 Mar. 2014, www.nytimes.com/2014/03/20/t-magazine/small-museums.html?_r=1. Accessed 16 Feb. 2024.
---. The Innocence of Objects: the Museum of Innocence, Istanbul. Abrams, 2012.
---. The Museum of Innocence. Translated by Maureen Freely, Faber and Faber, 2009.
---. The Naive and the Sentimental Novelist: Understanding What Happens When We Write and Read Novels. Vintage, 2011.
Pearce, Susan M. Interpreting Objects and Collections. Routledge, 2006.
---. On Collecting: An Investigation into Collecting in the European Tradition. Routledge, 1995.
Richard Falk. “A meditative comment on European doors”, Where Does Europe End?, Helsinki Citizens' Assembly-Turkey, 1993, p. 63.
Robins, Kevin. “Interrupting Identities: Turkey/Europe.” Questions of Cultural Identity, edited by Paul Du Gay and Stuart Hall, Sage, 1996, pp. 61–86.
Robins, Philip. Turkey and the Middle East. Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1991.
Seamon, David, and Jacob Sowers. “Place and Placelessness (1976): Edward Relph.” Key Texts in Human Geography, 2008, pp. 43–52.
Şenocak, Zafer. Atlas of a Tropical Germany: Essays on Politics and Culture, 1990-1998. Ed. & trans. by Leslie A. Adelson, University of Nebraska Press, 2000.
Seyhan, Azade. Tales of Crossed Destinies: The Modern Turkish Novel in a Comparative Context. The Modern Language Association of America, 2008.
Shivani, Anis, and Orhan Pamuk. “A Day with Orhan Pamuk.” Southwest Review, vol. 96, no. 1, 2011, pp. 11–32.
Soganci, Ismail Ozgur. “The Museum of Innocence: Five concepts for challenging the status quo in art education.” International Journal of Education Through Art 13 (2017): 77–93.
Sullivan, Scott. “The Turks want in.” Newsweek, 21 May 1991, pp. 16.
Thasneem, Umer O. Orhan Pamuk and the Poetics of Fiction. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2019.
Toynbee, Arnold J. “The Turkish state of mind.” Atlantic Monthly, 136, October 1925, p. 556, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1925/10/the-turkish-state-of-mind/648673/
Xing, Yin. “The Novel as Museum: Curating Memory in Orhan Pamuk’s The Museum of Innocence.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol. 54, no. 2, Apr. 2013, pp. 198–210, doi:10.1080/00111619.2011.555798.
Yağcıoğlu, Hülya. “Collecting in Pamuk’s The Museum of Innocence.” Orhan Pamuk: Critical Essays on a Novelist Between Worlds, edited by Taner Can et al., Ibidem Press, 2017, pp. 185–201.
Žižek, Slavoj. “Melancholy and the Act.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 26, no. 4, 2000, pp. 657–81. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1344326. Accessed 16 June 2023.