本研究旨在探討中學生幽默感與創造性潛能、幽默感與創造傾向之關係。本研究採便利抽樣，以臺北市、新北市、臺南市與高雄市七至九年級學生為研究對象，回收有效樣本數為939份。採用「多向度幽默感量表」、「新編創造思考測驗」、「中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」、「頓悟問題」、「威廉斯創造傾向測驗」為研究工具，以積差相關、迴歸分析與典型相關進行分析。研究結果發現：1.擴散性思考部分，除了語文流暢力與笑的傾向、語文變通力與笑的傾向、語文獨創力與對幽默的態度、圖形獨創力與笑的傾向、圖形精進力與社交情境的幽默能力未達顯著，其餘各向度呈現不同程度的顯著正相關。2.頓悟僅與幽默理解達顯著正相關。3.詞彙遠距聯想部分除了與笑的傾向無相關，其餘皆達顯著正相關。4.創造傾向之冒險、好奇、想像與挑戰，皆與幽默感各向度達顯著正相關。5.幽默創造能預測擴散性思考的表現。6.幽默理解能預測頓悟的表現。7.對幽默的態度、笑的傾向能聯合預測詞彙遠距聯想的表現。8.幽默創造、社交情境的幽默能力、笑的傾向與對幽默的態度能聯合預測冒險。9.幽默創造、社交情境的幽默能力能聯合預測好奇。10.幽默創造、社交情境的幽默能力與笑的傾向能聯合預測想像。11.社交情境的幽默能力、幽默創造與對幽默的態度能聯合預測挑戰。12.幽默理解、幽默創造、幽默因應、社交情境的幽默能力與對幽默的態度等幽默感越高時，在語文流暢力、語文變通力、圖形流暢力、圖形變通力、詞彙遠距聯想與頓悟等創造性潛能上的表現也越高。13.當整體的幽默感越高時，整體的創造傾向也越高。14.當社交情境的幽默能力越低且笑的傾向越高時，創造傾向之想像就會越高但挑戰力則越低。最後，本研究依據結論，針對未來研究與實務上提出建議。

The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between sense of humor and creative potential, sense of humor and creative tendency of junior high school students. Effective convenience samples of 939 junior high school students from Taipei City, New Taipei City, Tainan City and Kaohsiung City were selected as the participants. This study uses Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale, New Creativity Test, insight question, Chinese Word Remote Associates Test and Creativity Assessment Packet (Creative Tendency) as research tools. The data were analyzed by Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, regression analysis, and canonical correlation analysis.
Research Findings:
1.In the divergent thinking section, a positive correlation is a relationship between divergent thinking and the remaining parts of the sense of humor, except language fluency and laugh tendency, language flexibility and laugh tendency, language originality and the attitude towards humor, graphic originality and laugh tendency, graphic elaboration and social humor.
2.There is a significant positive correlation between insight and humor understanding.
3.There is no significant correlation between word remote association and laugh tendency, but word remote association is significantly positively related to the remaining parts of the sense of humor.
4.Creative tendencies of adventure, curiosity, imagination, and challenge are positively correlated with the sense of humor.
5.Humor creation can predict the performance of divergent thinking.
6.Humor understanding can predict the performance of insight.
7.The attitude towards humor and laugh tendency can predict the performance of word remote association.
8.Humor creation, social humor, laugh tendency and the attitude towards humor can predict the performance of adventure.
9.Humor creation and social humor can predict the performance of curiosity.
10.Humor creation, social humor, and laugh tendency can predict the performance of imagination.
11.Social humor, humor creation and the attitude towards humor can predict the performance of challenge.
12.When humor understanding, humor creation, humor in response, social humor and the attitude towards humor are higher, language fluency, language flexibility, graphic fluency, graphic flexibility, word remote association, and insight will be higher.
13.The higher overall sense of humor is, the higher the overall create tendency is.
14.When the ability of social humor decreases with a hearty laugh, the imagination will be higher with the low challenge.
Finally, based on the conclusions, the study presents future research and practical recommendations.

江宜珍、李蘭、吳文琪、邱玉蟬、鄭其嘉、盛慧珊（2011）。「台灣青少年幽默測量工具」之發展與編製。測驗學刊，58，179-205。
任純慧、陳學志、練竑初、卓淑玲（2004）。創造力測量的輔助工具：中文遠距聯想量表的發展。應用心理研究，21，195-217。
吳靜宜、陳學志、邱發忠、徐芝君（2007）。國中小學版幽默理解與幽默創造能力測驗之編製。應用心理研究， 35，185-210。
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺（1998）。新編創造思考測驗研究。教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告。
李孝儀（2014）。中學生中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗之心理計量特性。國立臺灣師範大學創造力碩士在職專班碩士論文，臺北市。
李嘉雯（1999）。幽默創造過程中後設認知與遠距連結歷程之研究。中原大學心理研究所碩士論文，桃園市。
林幸台、王木榮（1994）。威廉斯創造力測驗。臺北市：心理。
林幸台、王木榮（1994）。威廉斯創造力測驗指導手冊。臺北市：心理。
邱發忠（1999）。幽默創造訓練之課程設計及效果評估研究。輔仁大學應用心理研究所碩士論文，新北市。
邱發忠（2010）。幽默理解的多重語義激發好笑反應對創造力的影響：以右腦激發為中介變項。中華心理衛生學刊，23(2)，183-217。
邱發忠、陳學志（2005）。促發思考因素對創造表現之影響。載於國立臺灣師範大學教育學院舉辦之「學習、教學、與評量」國際研討會論文集（p. 250），臺北市。
邱發忠、陳學志、徐芝君、吳相儀、卓淑玲（2008）。內隱與外顯因素對創造作業表現的影響。中華心理學刊，50，125-145 。
姚玉鳳（2010）。國小高年級學生幽默感與創造力關係之研究。國立新竹教育大學人力資源發展研究所論文，新竹市。
孫聖和（2010）。遊戲理論及幽默感應用於設計教育之可行性初探。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文，臺北市。
陳淑蓉、陳學志（2005）。幽默感的定義與測量：多向度幽默感量表之編製。應用心理研究，26，167-187。
陳瑋琦（2003）。幽默理解與感知量表之編製暨影響幽默理解與感知因素的探討。私立輔仁大學心理學研究所碩士論文，新北市。
陳學志（2004）。從「哈哈」到「啊哈」—統整知、情意、行的幽默課程對創造力培養的影響。教育心理學報，35(4)，393-411。
陳學志、徐芝君（2006）。幽默創意課程對教師幽默感及創造力的影響。師大學報：教育類（創造力特刊），51(2)，71-93 。
陳學志、卓淑玲、賴惠德（2005）。解決問題發揮創意的次好方法就是發現其中的幽默：幽默中的創意與創意中的幽默。應用心理研究，26，95-115。
陳學志、洪素蘋、許禕芳、邱皓政、關秉寅、詹志禹（2009）。擴散性思考與聚斂性思考的交會：有限解答之擴散性思考測驗之編製與信效度檢驗。教育科學研究期刊，54(4)，29-61。
陳學志、彭淑玲、吳清麟（2011）。純頓悟與假頓悟中文遠距聯想測驗之創造力解題歷程。創造學刊，2(2)，25-51。
陳學志、彭淑玲、曾千芝、邱皓政（2008）。藉由眼動追蹤儀器探討平均掃視幅度大小與創造力之關係。教育心理學報，39，127-149。
陳學志、蘇嘉鈴、葉季蓉（2011）。幽默對創造力認知與特質成分之預測效果研究，創造學刊，2(1)，53-78。
許峻豪、鄭谷苑（2005）。圖像幽默理解歷程與雙路徑幽默理解模式。應用心理研究，26，117-142。
張雨霖（2014）。不同發展階段的創造性潛能與傾向潛在組型及創意自我效能中介效果。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導所博士論文，臺北市。
張雨霖、邱發忠、陳學志（2013）。創造力關鍵思考技法。載於潘裕豐（主編），創意之法取徑通「幽」——從創造幽默通往幽默創造的技法。（202-228頁）。臺北市：禾楓書局。
張雨霖、吳哲源、陳學志、吳清麟（2016）。中文部件組字遠距聯想測驗之發展與其信、效度研究。測驗學刊。
張春興（1994）。教育心理學。臺北市：東華書局。
張紋(巾英)（2012）。新移民與非新移民國中生幽默感與學業成就之研究—以臺中市某大型國中為例。臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系學位論文，臺北市。
黃博聖、陳學志、劉政宏（2012）。「中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」之編製及其信、效度報告。測驗學刊，59(4)，581-607。
劉世南、郭誌光（2002）。創造力理論的發展：一個心理構念演進的省思。資優教育季刊，85，20-30。
劉佩雲（1990）。性別、創造力、自我檢校與幽默感的關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，臺北市。
蔡秉勳、林緯倫、林烘煜（2013）。心情對了，創意就來了—情緒對發散性思考與頓悟問題解決的不同影響。教育心理學報，45(1)，19-38。
潘朝昱（2008）。國中學生創造性傾向量表編製及相關因素之研究。國立臺灣師範大學創造力發展碩士在職專班碩士論文，臺北市。
潘裕豐、黃曉嵐、蔡淑君、胡翠茵、張芝萱（譯）（2014）。創造力理論與當代議題面面觀（原作者：James C. Kaufman and Robert J. Sternberg）。臺北市：禾楓。
潘裕豐（2016）。大學藝術學院學生創造力與遠距聯想之關係研究。創造學刊，7(1)，1-18。
蔣國英（譯）（2007）。創意心理學（原作者：Todd Lubart）。臺北市：遠流。（原著出版年：2003）
蕭颯、王文欽、徐智策（1995）。幽默心理學。臺北市：智慧。
蘇靜如（2009）。國中生幽默感對生活壓力與幸福感之調節作用。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系教學碩士班碩士論文，臺北市。
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A mode of creativity and innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 40-167.
Amir, O., Biederman, I., Wang, Z., & Xu, X. (2015). Ha Ha! Versus Aha! A direct comparison of humor to nonhumorous insight for determining the neural correlates of mirth. Cerebral Cortex, 25(5), 1405-1413.
Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., & Nance, J. T. (2000). Exposure to humor before and after an unpleasant stimulus: Humor as a preventative or a cure. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 13(2), 177-191.
Coulson, S. (2000). Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. NY：Harper Collins.
Fisher, S., & Fisher, R. L. (1983). Personality and psychopathology in the comic. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research: Volume II applied studies (p. 54). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. NJ: McGraw-Hill.
Hauck, W. E., & Thomas, J. W. (1972). The relationship of humor to intelligence, creativity, and intentional and incidental learning. The journal of experimental education, 40(4), 52-55.
Hsu, K., Lin, W., & Chen, H. (2011, January). Personality correlates of different creative processes: Perceptual sensitivity and effortful control as major constructs. Paper presented at the 12th annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.
Isen, A. M. (1999). Positive effect. In T. Dalgleish & M. Powers (Eds.), The handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 75-94). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jurcova, M. (1998). Humor and creativity-Possibilities and problems in studying humor. Studia Psychologica, 40(4), 312-316.
Kohler, W. (1927). The mentality of apes (2nd ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kuiper, N. A., & Martin, R. A. (1998). Laughter and stress in daily life: Relation to positive and negative affect. Motivation and Emotion, 22, 133-153.
Kuiper, N. A., Martin, R. A., & Olinger, L. J. (1993).Coping humor, stress, and cognitive appraisals. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 25, 81-96.
Lin, W. L., Hsu, K. Y., Chen, H. C., & Wang, J. W. (2012). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: A dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 112.
Martin, R. A. , & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(6), 1313-1324.
Martin, R. A. (2000). Humor. In A. E. Kazdin(Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology(Vol. 4)(pp. 202-204). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association and New York: Oxford University Press.
Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48-75.
Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. London: Elsevier.
Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological review, 69(3), 220.
Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, M. T. (1967). Examiner’s manual, Remote Associates Test. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Metcalfe, J. (1986). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 288–294.
Mumford, M. D., & Whetzel, D. L. (1996). Insight, creativity, and cognition: On Sternberg and Davidson’s the nature of insight. Creativity research Journal, 1, 103-107.
Ohlsson, S. (1984). Restructuring revisited:Ⅱ. An information processing theory of restructuring and insight. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 25, 117-129.
O’Quin, K., & Derks, P. (1997). Humor and creativity: A review of the empirical literature. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity handbook (vol. 1)(pp. 227-256). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research (pp. 216-222). New York: Bearly Limited.
Rookey, T. J. (1973). Pennsylvania Assessment of Creative Tendency. NJ: Educational Testing Service Princeton.
Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527-561). NY: Guilford.
Sternberg, R. J. &Lubart, T. 1. (1995). Defying the Crowd. Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: The Free Press.
Svebak, S. M. (1996). The development of the sense of humor questionnaire: from SHQ to SHQ-6. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 9, 341-361.
Thorson, J. A., & Powell, F. C. (1993). Development and validation of a Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, January, 49(1), 13-23.
Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Prinecton, NJ: Personnel Press.
Veatch, T. C. (1998). A theory of humor. Humor International Journal of Humor Research, 11, 160-215.
Wakefield, J. F. (1992). Creative thinking: Problem-Solving Skills and the Art Orientation. Norwood, New Jersey.
Weisberg, R. W. (1995).Prolegomena to theories of insight in problem solving: a taxonomy of problems. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson, (eds.). The nature of insight (pp. 157-196). Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Williams, F. E. (1969). Models for encouraging creativity in the classroom by integrating cognitive-affective behaviors. Educational Technology, 9(12), 7-13.
Williams, F. E. (1980). Creativity assessment packet. Buffalo, NY: DOK.
Szabo, A. (2003). The acute effects of humor and exercise on mood and anxiety. Journal of Leisure Research, 35, 152-162.
Ziv, T. A. (1984). The influence of humorous atmosphere on divergent thinking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 68-75.