研究生: |
林惠敏 Lin, Hui-Min |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國小學童對快樂與生氣情緒圖像之繪畫表現研究 A Study of Elementary School Children's Expressive Drawings Concerning Emotional Images of Happiness and Anger |
指導教授: |
陳瓊花
Chen, Chiung-Hua 王國川 Wang, Kuo-Chang |
口試委員: |
徐秀菊
洪詠善
李靜芳
陳瓊花
Chen, Chiung-Hua 王國川 Wang, Kuo-Chang |
口試日期: | 2022/01/14 |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
美術學系 Department of Fine Arts |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 189 |
中文關鍵詞: | 生氣 、快樂 、情緒圖像 、繪畫表現 |
英文關鍵詞: | Anger, Happiness, Emotional Image, Expressive Drawing |
研究方法: | 調查研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200053 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:166 下載:20 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在調查國小學童對快樂與生氣情緒圖像之繪畫表現,並探討不同地區、年級、生理性別的國小學童快樂與生氣情緒圖像之繪畫表現是否有顯著差異,進而分析不同階段學童繪畫表現特徵。本研究採問卷法,依方便取樣,以臺灣北、中、南、東地區,公立小學低、中、高年級為研究對象,計取得有效問卷1360份。資料以SPSS22.0進行分析,研究結果顯示:
一、國小學童對快樂與生氣情緒圖像表現方式,依調查結果發現大致可分為四大類:表情體態類、經驗敘事類、擬物象徵類、其他類。經驗敘事類為國小學童對快樂與生氣情緒圖像最常見之繪畫表現方式。
二、不同地區、年級、生理性別的國小學童對快樂與生氣情緒圖像繪畫表現,有顯著差異。中部地區學童以表情體態繪畫表現,顯著性高於其他地區;在經驗敘事與擬物象徵繪畫表現,顯著性分別低於其他地區。隨著年齡增加,國小學童在表情體態與擬物象徵繪畫表現,呈現增加趨勢;但經驗敘事繪畫表現卻呈現減少趨勢。對快樂情緒圖像,男性學童以表情體態及經驗敘事繪畫表現顯著性高於女性,而生氣情緒圖像,男性學童以經驗敘事及擬物象徵繪畫表現顯著性高於女性。
三、在表情體態類繪畫中表現人物形象,愈高年級學童愈能畫出眼、口、頭髮及圓形或橢圓頭型來表現人物臉部細節,且能以幾何形狀(混合型)、衣服或其他配件來畫出正面身體姿態。若以經驗敘事類繪畫表現詮釋快樂與生氣情緒圖像時,多數國小學童並未主動表現空間概念。若有主動表現空間概念,相對於多數低年級學童能表現「基底線」、「X光畫」、「重疊」空間表現,高年級學童更能表現「三度空間」。
This research was to investigate the patterns and differences from the gender, grades and regions of the elementary school children’s expressive drawings concerning their emotional image of happiness and anger in Taiwan. An analysis of the pupils’ representations along their learning stages as indicated by this case was subsequently made. This research adopted a questionnaire survey, having collected 1,360 convenience sample participants from first, third, and fifth grades of the public elementary schools in the northern, central, southern, and eastern Taiwan. The findings laid bare by the SPSS22.0 were as follows. First, the expressive drawings concerning emotional images according to the frequency of occurrence consisted of “facial expressions & body gestures,” “narrative treatment of experience,” “metaphoric narrative,” and the “miscellaneous.” The narrative treatment of experience is the most common way of expressive drawings of happiness and anger in elementary school children. Second, there existed significant differences among expressive drawings concerning emotional images of happiness and anger with respect to regions, the grade distribution, and gender. This research reported that students from the central part of Taiwan proved more inclined to exhibit happy and angry images employing facial expressions & body gestures than those from other regions of Taiwan. They, by contrast, proved less inclined to express their emotion through the practice of narrative treatment of experience, or metaphoric narrative. When it came to the gender perspective, the male interviewees proved more significant in expressive means of facial expressions & body gestures, and narrative treatment of their own experience in dealing with the emotional image of happiness than the female. The male interviewees also proved more significant than the female ones when presenting the image of anger via the narrative treatment of experience and metaphoric narrative. Thirdly, when it came to facial expressions & body gestures, the male students in the high grade of the elementary school proved more capable of presenting fine parts of the facial image including the eye, the mouth, the hair, which were portraited in a round or oval-head style. They also prove more capable of drawing body gestures from a front view, where the hand, foot, attires, and accessories lively figured in a geometric but mixed form of the body image. It was also important to note, however, that there was a general lack of spatial concepts in most cases when the narrative treatment of experience was in application to denote the emotional images of happiness or anger. It is nevertheless fortunately to report here that as a contrast to students from the low grade that proved capable of performing the techniques of setting base lines, and good at superimposing and overlapping as well as the X-ray painting, students from the higher grade excelled in three-dimension expressive drawings.
一、中文部份
Appelman, T. F. (2013)。來畫圖吧!從分析心理學的觀點了解兒童繪畫與遊戲的意義(許智傑、謝政廷,譯)。心理。(原著出版於2007年)
Arnheim, R. (1982)。藝術與視覺心理學(李長俊,譯)。雄獅。(原著出版於1976年)
Brittain, W. L. (1992)。幼兒創造力與美術(陳武鎮,譯)。世界文物。(原著出版於1979年)
Brookes, M. (2011)。用畫畫激發孩子的潛能(賴孟怡,譯)。木馬。(原著出版於1996年)
Freedman, K. (2017)。教導視覺文化─課程、美學及藝術的社會生活(陳瓊花、張家霖、吳冠嫻、洪嘉宏、徐玟玲、盧姵綺、江學瀅、楊馥如、陳育淳,譯)。國家教育研究院。(原著出版於2003年)
Knill, P. J., Levine, E. G., & Levine, S. K. (2011)。表達性藝術治療:理論與實務(許玉芳,譯)。五南。(原著出版於2005年)
Kramer, E. (2004)。兒童藝術治療(江學瀅,譯)。心理。(原著出版於1971年)
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2003)。焦點團體訪談(洪志成、廖梅花,譯)。濤石。(原著出版於2000年)
Lowenfeld, V. (1983)。創造與心智的成長-透過藝術談兒童教育(王德育,譯)。文泉。(原著出版於1957年)
Malchiodi, C. A. (2003)。兒童繪畫治療─繪畫:兒童的心靈之窗(吳武烈,譯)。五南。(原著出版於1998年)
Malchiodi, C. A. (2008)。藝術治療:心理專業者實務手冊(陸雅青、周怡君、林純如、張梅地、呂煦宗,譯)。學富。(原著出版於2003年)
Niemi, H., Too, A. & Kallioniemi A. (2017)。芬蘭教育奇蹟(陳佩英、林子斌,譯)。學富。(原著出版於2016年)
Peterson, R. A. (2011)。如何編製優質的問卷(王國川,譯)。五南。(原著出版於2000年)
Strongman, K.T. (1987)。情緒心理學(安宗昇、韋喬治,譯)。五洲。(原著出版於1973年)
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. (2003)。焦點團體訪談-教育與心理學適用(王文科、王智弘,譯)。五南。(原著出版於1996年)
王士樵(2012)。跨文化的兒童畫交流:觀賞外國小朋友的畫。國際藝術教育學刊,10(2),45-58。
王秀雄(1990)。美術心理學。臺北市立美術館。
王美娥、郭雨生、賴瓊琦(2007)。國小學童對形狀與色彩組合的情緒意象調查研究 。人文暨社會科學期刊,3(1), 81-94。
方德隆、吳佩珊(2009)。做情緒的主人:國小六年級樂觀情緒課程方案之行動研究。課程研究,4(2),29-55。
朱光潛(1993)。文藝心理學。臺灣開明。
朱秋香(2010)。美術教學活動對青少年情緒狀態之影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣藝術大學。
朱為民、余懷謹(2019)。故事力:TED專業講者親授,職場簡報、人際溝通無往不利。四塊玉文創。
朱錦鳳(2013)。兒童在畫人測驗的投射評量。心理。
江學瀅(2016)。玩藝術,酷思考。商周。
李靜芳(2012)。我們的未來不是夢:透過藝術培養富足的兒童。載於唐富美, 李靜芳, 四季文化編輯群(主編),幼兒藝術好好玩:幼兒多元藝術教育的探索與實踐(頁16-26)。四季。
沈翆蓮、羅美蘭(2014)。幼兒畫創意表達受個人/文化互動影響之觀察研究。國際藝術教育學刊,12(1),75-92。
阮淑宜(1991)。學前兒童情緒與認知之探討。幼兒教育年刊,4,87-94。
林文昌(1994)。色彩計劃。 藝術圖書。
林曼麗(2000)。台灣視覺藝術教育研究。雄獅。
洪詠善(2005)。以美感經驗轉化教學。課程與教學,8(2),25-40。
洪詠善、郭淑玲(2016)。教師的哲學8:心靈繪圖與書寫。國家教育研究院。
高震峰(2001)。流行文化對視覺藝術教育的衝擊與意義─從趴趴熊的例子談起載於蔡宜青(主編),現代教育論壇─藝術教育與流行文化論文集(頁59-66)。臺北市立師範學院。
徐秀菊(2000)。兒童及青少年對情緒感覺的繪畫表現策略之發展。花師學報,10,337-358。
徐秀菊(2001)。兒童畫山的情緒圖像創作與表現之研究。花師學報,11,169-202。
康耀南(2018)。塗鴉心世界─用繪畫重建對生命的喜悅。樂果。
陳玉花(1997)。創造性取向教學對國小兒童繪畫表現之實驗研究。國民教育研究集刊,5,225-226。
陳育淳(2000)。大眾文化對兒童繪畫發展的影響,彰化師範大學藝術教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
陳美秀(2001)。兒童繪畫表現與大眾文化關係之探討: 國小高年級學童自發性漫畫創作之多重個案研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
陳朝平、黃壬來(1995)。國小美勞科教材教法。五南。
陳穎彬(1993)。紅配綠畫童年。雄獅。
陳瓊花(2000a)。兒童與青少年審美思考之調查研究。師大學報:人文與社會類,45,45-65。
陳瓊花(2000b)。兒童與青少年如何說畫:在描述,表示喜好,和判斷繪畫作品時的觀念傾向。。
陳瓊花(2004a)。從畫與話探討台灣兒童與青少年的性別概念。藝術教育研究,8,1 – 27。
陳瓊花(2004b)。視覺藝術教育。三民。
陳瓊花(2020)。奇點教育─藝術涵養與美感教育。台灣教育研究期刊,1(1),1-8。
陳輝東(2003)。兒童畫的認識與指導。藝術家。
視覺設計研究所(1987)。色彩的冒險。唐代。
陸雅青(2017)。藝術治療─繪畫詮釋:從美術進入孩子的心靈世界。心理。
張春興(1991)。張氏心理學辭典。東華。
張繼文(1997)。藝術教學在特殊教育中的意義。國教天地,102,8-13。
溫惠珍(2010)。兒童美術教育相關理論探討。載於黃嘉勝(主編),視覺藝術領域教材教法(頁2-20)。五南。
趙惠玲(2005)。視覺文化與藝術教育。師大書苑。
潘元石(1991)。怎指導兒童畫。藝術圖書。
劉雅琪(2009)。E. W. Eisner 藝術教育思想中創造心智之研究(未出版碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。
劉豐榮(1991)。艾斯納藝術教育思想研究。水牛。
魏炎順、賴秀怡(2013)。藝起療過動症學童:一位班導師的處遇與成長。美育,195,54-61。
二、英文部份
Alschuler, R. & Hattwick, L. A. (1947). Painting and personality: A study of young children. University of Chicago Press.
Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception. University of California Press.
Boyatzis, C. J., & Varghese, R. (1994). Children's emotional associations with colors. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155(1), 77-85.
Bretherton, I., Fritz, J., Zahn-Waxler, C., & Ridgeway, D. (1986). Learning to talk about emotions: A functionalist perspective. Child development, 529-548.
Buck, J. (1966). The House-Tree-Person technique: Revised manual. Western Psychological Services.
Burns, R., & Kaufman, S. H. (1972). Actions, styles, and symbols in Kinetic Family Drawings (K-F-D). Brunner/Mazel.
Busnach, Z. (2017). Art education in Finland. LKCA. https://www.lkca.nl/~/media/downloads/bijeenkomsten/dutch-scandinavian%20exchange/finland.pdf
Chen, J. C. H. (2005). Students' conceptualizations of gender in Taiwan and the U.S. Visual Arts Research, 31(2), 10-25.
Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlike, M. E. (1999). Psychological testing and assessment . Mayfield Publishing.
Davis, J. (1997). The “U” and the wheel of “C:” Development and devaluation of graphic symbolization and the cognitive approach at Harvard Project Zero. In A. M. Kindler (Ed.) Child development in art. (pp. 46-58). Reston, National Art Education Association.
Denham, S. A. (2007). Dealing with feelings: How children negotiate the worlds of emotions and social relationships. Cognitie, Creier, Comportament/Cognition, Brain, Behavior,11(1).1-48.
Dilorio, C. K. (2005). Measurement in health behavior: Methods for research and education, Jossey-Bass.
Dorn, C. M. (1999). Mind in art: cognitive foundations in art education. Routledge.
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press.
Ellis, A. (1979). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Citadel.
Furth, G. (1988). The secret world of drawings. Sigo Press.
Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: The significance of children’s drawings. Basic Books.
Golomb, C. (1992). The child’s creation of a pictorial world. University of California.
Goodenough, F. L. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawing. World Book Company.
Gross, J., & Hayne, H. (1998). Drawing facilitates children's verbal reports of emotionally laden events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4(2), 163.
Kellog, R. (1970). Analyzing children’s art. Mayfield Publishing Company.
Kilbride, J. E., & Yarczower, M. (1976). Recognition of happy and sad facial expressions among Baganda and US children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 7(2), 181-194.
Kramer, E. (1993). Art as therapy with children. Chicago: Magnolia Street Publishers.
Lownfeld, V., & Brittain, W. L. (1987). Creative and mental growth. Macmillan.
Malchiodi, C. A. (1998).Understanding children’s drawings. Guilford Press.
Piaget, J. (1976). The psychology of intelligence. Littlefield.
Read, H. (1974). Education through art. Pantheon Books.
Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. Sage Published Ltd.
Schirrmacher, R. (1993). Art and creative development for young children. Delmar Publishers Inc.
Silver, R. (1993). Draw a story .Ablin Press.
Swenson, A. B. (1991). Relationship: Art education, art therapy, and special education. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 40-42.
Trentacosta, C. J., Izard, C. E., Mostow, A. J., & Fine, S. E. (2006). Children's emotional competence and attentional competence in early elementary school. School Psychology Quarterly, 21(2), 148.
Vicari, S., Reilly, J. S., Pasqualetti, P., Vizzotto, A., & Caltagirone, C. (2000). Recognition of facial expressions of emotions in school‐age children: the intersection of perceptual and semantic categories. Acta Paediatrica, 89(7), 836-845.
Wilson, B. (1976). Little Julian's impure drawings: Why children make art.Studies in Art Education, 17(2), 45-61.
Wilson, B. (2002). Becoming Japanese: Manga, childern’s drawings, and the construction of national character. JSTOR.https://www.jstor.org/stable/20715985
Winston, A. S., Kenyon, B., Stewardson, J., & Lepine, T. (1995). Children's sensitivity to expression of emotion in drawings. Visual Arts Research, 21(1), 1-14.