簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃惠斌
論文名稱: 「全校性健康五蔬果」介入計劃對國中學生每日攝取五蔬果及相關因素之影響—以彰化縣立鹿鳴國中學生為例
指導教授: 劉潔心
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 健康促進與衛生教育學系
Department of Health Promotion and Health Education
論文出版年: 2003
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 176
中文關鍵詞: 五蔬果攝取
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:226下載:28
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要目的在發展一個「全校性健康五蔬果」介入計畫,並進一步探討其介入效果。

    本研究採「前測-後測不等組」實驗設計,分實驗組一、實驗組二及對照組。實驗組一及實驗組二為彰化縣立鹿鳴國中一年級學生,對照組為社經地位背景相近的彰化縣立和群國中一年級學生,各採三個班級為研究對象。

    「全校性健康五蔬果」介入計畫,分成班級性教學活動及全校性教學活動,各實施四週。實驗組一先接受班級性教學活動,再接受全校性教學活動介入,實驗組二只有接受全校性教學活動介入,且實驗組學校的營養午餐,每天至少供應一道青菜,每週至少供應兩次水果,而對照組則不接受任何實驗處理與支持性環境的改變。

    研究工具為前後測自填式結構性問卷,問卷回收率達98.11%。經前後測資料比對後,扣除無效問卷,最後有效人數為306人,佔95.92%(實驗組一104人,實驗組二109人,對照組93人)。

    研究結果如下:
    1. 「全校性健康五蔬果」介入計畫實施後,
    (1)實驗組一「每日五蔬果認知」「每日五蔬果自覺利益」「每日五蔬果社會支持」「每日五蔬果行為」後測得分高於前測且達顯著差異;「每日五蔬果自覺障礙」後測得分低於前測且達顯著差異。

    (2)實驗組二「每日五蔬果認知」「每日五蔬果自覺利益」「每日五蔬果社會支持」「每日五蔬果行為」後測得分高於前測且達顯著差異;「每日五蔬果自覺障礙」前後測得分則未達顯著差異。
    2. 「全校性健康五蔬果」介入計畫實施後,在控制前測得分下,
    (1)實驗組一「每日五蔬果認知」後測得分高於實驗組二且達顯著差異;「每日五蔬果自覺障礙」後測得分低於實驗組二且達顯著差異;「每日五蔬果自覺利益」「每日五蔬果社會支持」「每日五蔬果行為」與實驗組二未達顯著差異。

    (2)實驗組一「每日五蔬果認知」「每日五蔬果自覺利益」「每日五蔬果社會支持」「每日五蔬果行為」後測得分高於對照組且達顯著差異;「每日五蔬果自覺障礙」後測得分低於對照組且達顯著差異。

    (3)實驗組二「每日五蔬果自覺利益」「每日五蔬果社會支持」「每日五蔬果行為」後測得分高於對照組且達顯著差異;「每日五蔬果認知」「每日五蔬果自覺障礙」後測得分與對照組未達顯著差異。

    根據本研究結果,建議未來在發展每日五蔬果教育計畫課程時,應根據行為改變階段理論、社會認知理論、溝通說服模式、社會支持策略及影響每日五蔬果攝食行為的重要變項,發展一個包含全校健康促進理念的支持性環境改變及全面教學介入的計畫,而且教育活動必需包括媒體造勢及鼓吹(media - marketing campaign)活動,透過此全面性整合的教育方式,可增強學生改變的興趣與意願,且對學生每日五蔬果行為亦產生顯著提昇的效果。

    The purposes of this study were to develop an effective comprehensive 5-A-Day intervention program, and to determine the effectives of the intervention program.
    Quasi-experimental method was used to explore the effect of the campaign on junior high school students. Lu-Ming junior high school(experimental group 1 and experimental group 2)and Ho-Ching junior high school(control group)in Chanhwang were selected as the subjects. The 5-A-Day intervention program consisted of 3 components: 5 classroom activities, 5 school-wide activities, and school food service changes. Experimental group 1 took part 5 classroom activities and 5 school-wide activities, but experimental group 2 took part 5 school-wide activities only. In experimental school, vegetables were served every day and fruits served two days a week at school lunch. A closed-ended pre-posttest questionnaire was the instruments used to evaluate the intervention effectiveness. There were 306 students finished the pre-test and the post-test questionnaires(104 students for the experimental group 1, 109 students for the experimental group 2, 93 students for the control group).
    The data was analyzed by using paired-t-test, Chi-square test, one-way ANCOVA, and Wilcoxon’s sign-rank test with SAS 8e statistical software package.The result of the study were as follow:
    1. In the experimental group 1, the mean scores of knowledge, Prons, social support, and behavior about 5-A-Day in the post-test were better than the scores in the pre-test, and their differences were significant. In the experimental group 1, the mean score of the Cons about 5-A-Day in the post-test was less than the score in the pre-test, and its difference is significant.
    2. In the experimental group 2, the mean scores of knowledge, Prons, social support, and behavior about 5-A-Day in the post-test were better than the scores in the pre-test, and their differences were significant. In the experimental group 2,the difference of the mean score about 5-A-Day Cons in the post-test and in the pre-test was no significant.
    3. The mean score of knowledge about 5-A-Day in the post-test of the experimental group 1 is better than the core in the experimental group 2. The mean score of Cons about 5-A-Day in the post-test of the experimental group 1 was less than the core in the experimental group 2.The differences of the mean scores about 5-A-Day Cons, social support, and behavior in the experimental 1 and in the experimental 2 were no significant. .
    4. The mean scores of knowledge, Prons, social support, and behavior about 5-A-Day in the post-test of the experimental group 1 were better than the cores in the control group. The mean score of Cons about 5-A-Day in the post-test of the experimental group 1 was less than the core in the control group.
    5. The mean scores of Prons, social support, and behavior about 5-A-Day in the post-test of the experimental group 2 were better than the cores in the control group. The differences of post-test mean scores about 5-A-Day knowledge and Cons in the experimental 2 and in the control group were no significant.
    According to the findings of this study, some recommendations for the future 5-A-Day intervention program: health educators should accord strategies of behavior change, social cognitive theory, health communication theory, social support and other important items to development a comprehensive program that contains health school promotion concept, school environment changes, and media marketing campaign. Implementing the comprehensive intervention program will trigger off students’ changing motivation and their 5-A-Day effectiveness was proved.

    中文摘要………………………….. I 英文摘要………………………….. III 目次……………………………….. V 表次……………………………….. VIII 圖次……………………………….. XII 附錄次…………………………….. XIII 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機……………………………… 1 第二節 研究目的……………………………… 3 第三節 研究問題……………………………… 4 第四節 研究假設……………………………… 5 第五節 重要名詞界定………………………… 6 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 國內蔬果攝取情況及每日五蔬果 營養教育推展現況………………….. 9 第二節 國外每日五蔬果教育推動情況…….. 10 第三節 每日五蔬果教育介入策略的理論 基礎及其相關研究…………………… 18 第三章 全校性健康五蔬果介 入計畫之發展與形成 第一節 全校性健康五蔬果教育介入模式…… 35 第二節 全校性健康五蔬果教育介入流程…… 37 第三節 全校性健康五蔬果介入計畫之教育意 涵……………………………………… 41 第四章 研究方法 第一節 研究設計……………………………… 55 第二節 研究對象……………………………… 56 第三節 研究架構……………………………… 56 第四節 研究工具……………………………… 57 第五節 研究過程……………………………… 61 第六節 資料處理方式………………………… 64 第五章 研究結果 第一節 基本資料的描述與比較……………… 67 第二節 全校性健康五蔬果介入計畫對每日五 蔬果認知的影響……………………… 69 第三節 全校性健康五蔬果介入計畫對每日五 蔬果自覺利益的影響………………… 75 第四節 全校性健康五蔬果介入計畫對每日五 蔬果自覺障礙的影響………………… 80 第五節 全校性健康五蔬果介入計畫對每日五 蔬果社會支持的影響………………… 85 第六節 全校性健康五蔬果介入計畫對每日五 蔬果行為的影響……………………… 94 第七節 實驗組學生對全校性健康五蔬果介入 計畫之全校性教學活動評價………… 108 第六章 研究限制、討論與結論、建議 第一節 研究限制……………………………… 117 第二節 討論與結論………………………….. 117 第三節 建議…………………………………… 123 參考文獻 中文部分 ………………………………………….. 127 英文部分 ………………………………………….. 128 附錄 ………………………………………….. 141

    壹、中文部分
    王佩玲(民81)。兒童氣質、父母教養方式與兒童社會能力關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
    王慧琦(民83)。實施學校午餐指導活動對國小中年級學童飲食行為改變之研究。國立台灣師範大學家政研究所碩士論文。
    行政院衛生署(民82)。每日飲食指南,單張,統一編號: 1031285520002。台北:行政院。
    行政院衛生署(民90)。衛生統計。台北:行政院衛生署。
    吳幸捐、章雅惠、方佳雯、潘文涵(1999)。台灣地區成人攝取的食物總重量、熱量及三大營養素的食物來源,中華營誌,第24卷,58。
    李蘭、陸玉勺玲、李隆安、黃美維、潘伶燕、鄧肖琳(1995)。台灣地區成人的健康行為探討:分布情形、因素結構和相關因素。中華衛生雜誌,第4卷,第14期,358-367。
    林金玉、陳延芳、陳妙青、陳瑞菊、柯麗真、林真夙(民90)。評價社區健康營造工作成效三年計畫-八十八年下半年及八十九年報告。台北:行政院衛生署公共衛生研究所。
    林姿伶(民90)。台灣地區18-64歲國人飲食型態研究。國立台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。
    林莉馨(民84)。國小體重控制介入計畫效果之實証研究。國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文。
    張玉鳳(民90)。台北市某國中學生攝取蔬果行為相關因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文。
    教育部(民90)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北:教育部。
    許秀珍(民83)。營養教育對肥胖學童營養知識﹑營養態度﹑飲食行為﹑體位﹑血壓及血脂質之影響。靜宜大學食品營養研究所。
    郭生玉(民86)。心理與教育研究法。台北:精華書局。
    陳聖惠(民89)。成人降低脂肪攝取營養教育成效評估研究。國立台灣師範大學家政研究所碩士論文。
    彭汪家康、賴基銘、杭極敏(民90)。蔬菜水果與癌症。載於財團法人台灣癌症基金會主編,蔬果防癌飲食寶典(pp.5-24)。台北:財團法人台灣癌症基金會。
    曾明淑、高美丁、葉文婷、潘文涵(1999)。台灣地區居民之飲食特性。中華營誌,24卷,80。
    黃美惠(民90)。中部地區高中(職)生之營養知識、態度、飲食行為及其相關因素的調查研究。私立中山醫學院營養科學研究所碩士論文。
    劉貴雲(民86)。國小四年級學童營養教育介入實驗研究---社會學習理論之應用。國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所博士論文。
    鄭惠美(民87)。學童家長與學童蔬果攝取行為研究。衛生教育學報,13期,91-106。
    賴妙芬(民91)。促進糖尿病患者社會支持與充能效果之介入研究---以台北市石牌地區吉慶里和石牌里為例。國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所博士論文。

    貳、英文部分
    Allensworth DD, Kolbe L.J. (1987). The comprehensive school health program: Exploring an expanded concept. Journal of School Health, 57(10), 409-412.
    American Cancer Society (1993). Cancer facts & figures-1993. Publication No.5008.93. Altanta, GA: American Cancer Society.
    Anliker, J., Damron, D., Ballesteros, M., Feldman, R., Langenberg, P., & Havas, S. (1999). Using Peer Education in Nutrition Intervention Research: Lessons Learned from the Maryland WIC 5 A Day Promotion Program. Journal of Nutrition Education, 31, 347-354.
    Anliker, J., Damron, D., Ballesteros, M., Langenberg, P., Havas, S. (1999). Using the Stages of Change Model in a 5 A Day Guidebook for WIC. Journal of Nutrition Education,31, 175.
    Balch, G. I., Loughrey K., Weinberg, L., Lurie, D., & Eisner, E. (1997). Probing Consumer Benefits and Barriers for the National 5 A Day Campaign: Focus Group Findings. Journal of Nutrition Education , 29(4), 178-183.
    Bandura, A. (1986). The self system in reciprocal determinism.American Psychologist, 33, 344-358.
    Baranowski, T., Baranowski, J., Cullen, K. W., Moor, C.D., Rittenberry, L., Hebert, D. & Jones, L. (2002). 5 a Day Achievement Badge for African-American Boy Scouts: Pilot Outcome Results. Preventive Medicine, 34, 353-363.
    Baranowski, T. Domel, S., Gould, R., et al. (1993) Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among 4th and 5th grade students from focus groups using reciprocal determinism. Journal of Nutrition Education, 25(3), 114-120.
    Baranowski, T., Perry , C. L., Parcel, G. S. (1977). Social Cognitive Theory. In Glanz,K., Lewis, F. M., Rimer, B. K., (1977). Health Behavior and Health Education- Thoery, Research, and Pracyice(edsⅡ).Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
    Baranowski, T., & Stables, G. (2000). Process Evaluations of the 5-a-Day Projects. Health Education&Behaivor, 27(2), 157-166.
    Bareera, M., Sandier, I. N., Ramsay, T. B. (1981). Prelimirary development of a scale of social support : studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(4), 435-477.
    Basch, C. E., Zybert, P. & Shea, S. (1994). 5-A-Day: Dietary Behavior and the Fruit and Vegetable Intake of Latino Children. Am J Public Health, 84, 814-818.
    Baxter, S. D., Thompson, W. O. (2002). Fourth-Grade Children’s Consumption of Fruit and Vegetable Items Available as Part of School Lunches Closely Related to Preference. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34(3), 166-171.
    Beech, B. M., Rice, R. Myers, L., Johnson, C., Nicklas, T.A. (1999). Knowledge Attitudes and Practices Related to Fruit and Vegetable Consumption of High School Students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 24, 244-250.
    Beresford, S. A. A., Thompson, B., Feng, Z., Christianson, A., McLerran, D. & Patrick, D. L. (2001). Seattle 5 a Day Workside Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Comsuption. Proventive Medicine, 32, 230-238.
    Beresford, S. A. A., Shannon, J., McLerran, D., Thompson, B. (2000). Seattle 5-a-Day Work-Site Project: Process Evaluation. Health Education & Behaivor, 27(2), 213-222.
    Block, G., Patterson, B. & Subar, A. (1991). Fruit, vegetables, and, cancer prevention: a review of the Epidemiological evidence. Nutrition and cancer, 18, 1-29.
    Brinley, C., Barrar, C., & Cotugna, N. (2001). Stages for change tools to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in high school students. Journal of Nutrition Education, 33, 57-68.
    Campbell, M. K., DeVellis, M., Strecher, V. J., Ammerman, A. S., DeVellis, R. F. & Sandler, R. S. (1994). Improving Dietary Behavior: The Effectives of Tailored Messages in Primary Care Settings. American Journal of Public Health, 84(5), 783-787.
    Campbell, M. K., Motsinger, B. M., Ingram, A., Jewell, D., Makarushka, C., Beatty, B., Dodds, J., McClelland, J., Demissie, S. & Demark-Wahnefried, W. (2000). The North Carolina Black Churches United for Better Health Project: Intervention and Process Evaluation. Health Education & Behavior ,27 (2), 241-253.
    Campbell, M. K. ,Reynolds, K. D., Havas, S., Curry, S., Bishop, D., Nicklas, T., Palombo, R., Buller, D., Feldman, R., Topor, M., Johnson, C., Beresford, S. A. A., Motsinger, B. M., Morrill, C. & Heimendiger, J. (1999). Stages of Chagnge for Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Among Adults and Yough Adults Participating in the National 5-a-Day for Better Health Community Studies. Health Education & Behavior , 26(4), 513-534.
    Campbell, M. K., Symons M., Demark-Wahnerfried, W., Polhamus, B., Bernhardt, J. M., McClelland. J. W. & Washington, C. (1998). Stages of Change and Psychosocial Correlates of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Among Rural Afarican-American Church Members. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(3), 185-191.
    Chen, V. A., Vontham, E. & Groves, F. D. (1991). Cancer incidence in south Louisiana:1983-1986. Cancer in Louisiana, 7, 1-33
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention (1997). Guidelines for school health program to promote lifelong healthy eating.Journal of School Health,67(1),9-26.
    Chen, V.A., Vonyham, E., & Groves, F. D. Cancer incidence in south Louisiana : 1983-1986. Cancer in Louisiana: 1983-1986. Cancer in Louisiana. 1991 , 7, 1-33.
    Ciliska, D., Miles, E., O’Brien, M. A., Turl, C., Tomasik, H. H., Donovan, U. & Beyers, J. (2000). Effectiveness of Community-Based Interventions to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. Journal of Nutrition Education, 32(6), 341-352.
    Cullen, K. W., Bartholomew, L. K., Parcel, G. S. & Kok, G. (1998). Intervention Mapping: Use of Thoery and Data in the Development of a Fruit and Vegetable Nutrition Program for Girl Scouts. Journal of Nutriton Educatio,. 30, 188-195.
    D’Augelli, A. R. (1981) , Eating : A human development intervention perapective. Journal of Nutrition Education, 13(1), s54-s58.
    Department of Health and Human Services (1990). Healthy people 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. DHHS Publication No.(PHS) 91-50212. Washington,DC: U.S. Goverment Printing Office.
    Disogra , L., & Glanz, K. (2000). The 5 A Day Virtual Classroom: An on-line stratege to promote healthful Eating. Journal of the American Dietetic association, 100, 349-352.
    Dittus, K. L., Hillera, V. N. & Beerman, K. N. (1995). Benefits and Barriers to Fruit and Vegetable Intake: Relationship between Attitudes and Consumption. Journal of Nutrition Education , 27(3), 120-126.
    Doll,R., & Peto, R. (1981). The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. Journal of National Cancer Institution,66,1193-1308.
    Domel, S. B., Baranowski, T., Divis, H., Thompson, W. O., Leonard, S. B., Riley, P., Baranowski, J., B. & Smyth, M. (1993). Development and Evaluation of a School Intervention to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption among 4 th and 5 th Grade Students. Journal of Nutrition Education , l25(6), 345-349.
    Duyn, M. A. S., Heimendinger, J., Russek-Choen, E., Diclemente, C. C., Simes, L. S., Subar, A. F., Krebs-Smith, S. M., Pivonka, E., & Kahle, L. L. (1998). Use of the Transtheoretical Model of Change to Successfully Predict Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. Jounal of Nutrition Educaton, 30. 371-380.
    Feldman, R. H. L., Damron, D., Anliker, J., Ballesteros, M., Langenberg, P., DiClemente, C., Havas, S. (2000). The Effect of the Maryland WIC 5-A-Day Promotion Program on Participants’Stages of Change for Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 649-663.
    Flay, B. R., DiTecco, D., & Schlegel, R. P. (1980). Mass Media in the Health Promotion: An Analysis Using an Extended Information-Processing Model. Health Education Quarterly, 7(2), 127-147.
    Gester, H. (1991). Potential role of beta-carotene in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. International Journal of Vitamin and Nutrition Research. 61, 277-291.
    Gillespie, A. H. (1981). A theoretical framework for studying school nutrition education programs. Journal of Nutrition Education, 13(1), s54-s58.
    Glanz, K., Patterson, R. E., Kristal, A. R., DiClemente, C. C., Heimendinger, J., Linnan, L., McLerran, D. F. (1994). Stages of Change in Adopting Healthy Diets: Fat, Fiber, and Correlates of Nutrient Intake. Health Education Quarterly, 21(4), 499-519.
    Harrington K. F., Binkley, D., Reynolds, K. D., Duvall, R. C., Copeland, J. R., Franklin, F., Raczynski, J. (1997). Recruitment Issues in School-Based Research:Lessons Learned from the High 5 Alabama Project. Journal of School Health, 67(10), 415-421.
    Harris, K. J., Richter, K. P., Schultz, J., Johnson, J. (1998). Formative, Process, and Intermediate Outcome Evaluation of a Pilot School-based 5 A Day for Better Health Project. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(6), 378-381.
    Harvey-Berino, J., Ewing, J. F., Flynn, B. & Wick, J. R. (1998). Statewide Dissemination of a Nutrition Program: Show the Way to 5-a-Day. Journal of Nutrition Education , 30(1), 29-36.
    Havas, S., Anliker, J., Damron, D., Langenberg, P., Ballesteros, M. & Feldman, R. (1998). Final Results of the Maryland WIC 5-a-day Promotion Program. American Journal of Public Health August , 88, 1161-1167.
    Havas, S., Anliker, J., Damron, D., Feldman, R., Langenberg, P. (2000). Uses of Process Evaluation in the Maryland WIC 5-a-Day Promotion Program. Health Education&Behavior, 27(2), 254-263.
    Havas, S., Heimendinger, J., Damron, D., Nicklas, T. A., Cowan, A., Beresford, S. A. A., Sorensen, G., Buller, D., Bishop, D., Baranowski, T., Reynolds, K. (1995). 5 A Day for Better Health-Nine Community Research Projects To Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. Public Health Reports, 110(1), 69-79.
    Heaney, C. A., Israel, B. A. (1997). Social Network and Social Support. In Glanz, K., Lewis, F. M., Rimer, B.K. (Eds.), Health Behavior and Health Education.(pp.179-202). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Herrick, A. B., Stone, W. J. & Mettler, M. M. (1997) Stages of Change,Decisional Balance, and Self-efficacy Across Four Health Behaviors in a Worksite Enviroment. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 49-56.
    Hochbaum, G. M. (1981). Strategies and their rationale for changing people’s eating habits. Journal of Nutrition Education, 13(1), s59-s65.
    Hunt, M. K., Lederman, R., Potter, S., Stoddard, A., Sorensen, G. (2000). Results of Employee Involvement In Planning and Implementing the Treatwell 5-a-Day Work-Site Study. Health Education&Behavior, 27(2), 223-231.
    Janis, I.L.,Mann, M.A. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict , Choice and Commitment. New York: The Free Press, 1977.
    Johnson, C. S., Taylor, C. A., & Hample, J. S. (2000). More Americans Are Eating ”5 A Day”but Intakes Of Dark Green and Cruciferous Vegetables Remain Low. Journal of Nutrition, 130, 3063-3067.
    Keim, K. S., Stewart, B., & Voichick, J. (1997). Vegetable and Fruit Intake and Perceptions of Selected Young Adults. Journal of Nutrition Education, 29(2), 80-85.
    Kelder, S. H. (1994). Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking,physical activity and food choice behaviors. American Journal of Public Health,84,1121-1126.
    Kirby, S. D., Baranowski, T., Reynods, K.D., Taylor, G. &.Binkley, D. (1995). Children’s Fruit Vegetable Intake : Socioeconomic, Adult-Child,Regional, and Urban-Rural Influence. Jornal of Nutrition Education, 27, 261-271.
    Krebs-Smith, S. M., Cook, D. A., Subar, A. F., Cleveland, L. & Friday, J. (1995). US Adults’Fruit and Vegetable Intake, 1989 to 1991: A Revised Basline for the Healthy People 2000 Objective. American Journal of Public Health, 85(12), 1623-1629.
    Krebs-Smith, S. M., Heimendinger, J., Patterson, B.H., Subar, A.F., Kessler, R., Pivonka, E. (1995). Psychosocial Factors Associated with fruit and Vegetable Consumption. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10(2), 98-104.
    Larkey, L. K., Alatorre, C., Buller D. B., Morrill, C., Buller, M. K., Taren, D. & Lee, S. M. (1999). Communication strategies for dietary change in a worksite peer educator intervention. Health Education Research, 14(6), 777-790.
    Ling, A. M. C. & Horwath, C. (2001). Perceived Benefits and Barriers of Increased Fruit and Vegetable Consumption:Validation of a Decisional Balance Scale. Journal of Nutrition Education, 33, 257-265.
    Levy, A., Stokes, R. (1987). Effects of a health promotion advertising campaign on sales of ready to eat cereals. Public Health Report, 102, 397-403.
    Levy, A., Ostrove, N., Guthrie, T., Heimbach, J. (1988). Recent Trends and Beliefs About Diet/Disease Relationships: Results of the 1979-1988 FDA Health and Diet Surveys.1988.
    Mailbach, E., & Parrot, R. L.(1995): Designing health message, Cailfornia: Sage.
    Mark ,S. D. & Patricia, A. C. (1992). Program Planning for Health Education and Promotion .Lea & Febiger.
    McDonald, W. F., Brun, J., & Esserman, J. (1981). In-home interviews measure positive effects of a school nutrition program. Journal of Nutrition Education,13,140-144.
    McGuire, W. J. (1985). Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In R. E. Rice, C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (pp.43-65). Sage publications.
    Michela, J. L., Contento, I. R. (1986). Cognitive, motivational, social and environmental influences on childen’s food choices. Health Psychology, 5, 209-230.
    National Cancer Institute (1986). Cancer Control Objectives for the Nation: 1985-2000. Washington, DC: US Governrment Printing Office.
    Neill, K., Allensworth, D. D. (1994). A Model to Increase Consumption of Fruit and Vegetables by Implementing the “5-A-Day” Initiative. Journal of School Health, 64(4), 150-155.
    Nicklas, T. A. , Johnson, C. C., Myers, L., Farris, R. P. & Cunningham, A. (1998). Outcomes of a High School Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Gimme 5- A Fresh Nutrition Concept for Students. Journal of School Health, 68(6), 248-253
    Nicklas, T. A. , Johnson, C. C., Myers, L., Farris, R.,. Lyon, L., & Shi, R. (1997). Development of a School-based Nutrition Intervention for High School Students:Gimme5. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11 (5), 315-322.
    Nicklas, T. A. & O’Neil, C. E. (2000). Process of Conducting a 5-a-Day Intervention With High School Students: Gimme 5 (Louisiana). Health Education & Behavior , 27(2), 201-212.
    Park, E., Eaton, C.A., Goldstein, M. G., Depue, J., Niaura, R., Guadagnoli, E., Gross, N. M. & Dube., C. The Development of a Decisional Balance Mearsure of Physician Smoking Cessation Intervention. Preventive Medicine, 33, 261-267.
    Perry, C. L., Bishop, D. B., Taylor, G., Murray, D.M., Mays, R. W., Dudovitz, B. S., Smyth M. & Story, M. (1998). Changing Fruit and Vegetable Consumption among Children: The 5-a-Day Power Plus Program in St. Paul Minnesota. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 603-609.
    Perry,C.L.,Mullis,R.M., & Maile, M.C.(1985a). Modifying the eating behavior of young children. Journal of School Health,55,399-402.
    Perry,C. L., Klepp, K. I., & Schultz, J. (1988a). Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Community-wide strategies for youth. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 56, 358-364.
    Perry, C. L., Lytle, L. A., Feldman, H., Nicklas, T., Stone, E., Zive , M., Garceau ,A. & Kelder, S. H. (1998). Effects of the Child and Adolesscent Trial for Cardiovascular Health(CATCH)on Fruit and Vegetable Intake. Jounal of Nutrition Education, 30, 354-360.
    Perry, C. L., Luepker, R. V., Murray, M. D., Hearn, M. D., Halper, A., Dudovitz, B., Maile, M. C. & Smyth, M. (1989). Parent Involvement with Childrens’Health Promotion: A one-year follow-up of the Minnesota Home Team. Health Education Education Quarterly, 16, 171-180.
    Pierre, R.G., Cook, T.D., & Straw, R.B. (1981). An evaluation of the Nutrition Education and Trainig Program: finding from Nebraska. Evaluation and Program Planning,4, 335-344.
    Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983).Stages and processes of self-change of change of smoking toward an integravie model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinic Psychology, 51, 390-395.
    Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1991). The process of smoking cessation: an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(2), 295-304.
    Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., Evers, K.E. (1997). The Transtheoretical Model and Stages of Change . In Glanze, K., Lewis, F. M., Rimer, B. K.(Eds.), Health Behavior and Health Education. (pp 60-84). San Feancisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Prochaska, J. O., Velicer, W. F., Rossi, J. S., Goldstein, M. G., Marcus, B. H., Rakowski, W., Fiore, C., Harlow, L. L. Redding, C. A., Rosenbloom, D. & Rossi,S. R. (1994). Stages of Change and Decisional Balance for 12 Problem Behaviors. Health Psychology, 13(1), 39-46.
    Rakowski, W., Clark, M. A., Pearlman, D. N., Ehrich, B., Rimer, B. K., Goldstein, M.G., Dube, C.E.& Woolverton, H. Intergrating Pros and Cons for Mammography and Pap Testing: Extending the Construct Of Decisional Balance to Two Bahaviors. Preventive Medicine, 26, 664-673.
    Resnicow, K.Cohn, L., Reinhardt, J., Cross, D., Futterman. R., Kirschner, E. & Allegrante, J. P. (1992). A three-year evaluation of the Know Your Body Program in inner-city School Children. Health Education Quarterly, 19(4), 463-480.
    Reynolds, K. D., Hinton, A. W., Shewchuk, R. M. & Hickey, C. A. (1999). Social Cognitive Model of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Elementary School Children. Journal of Nutrition Education , 31(1), 23-30.
    Reynolds, .D., Franklin, F. A., Leviton, L. C., Maloy, J., Harrinton, K. F., Yaroch, A. L., Person, S., Jester, P. (2000). Methods, Results, and Lessons Learned From Process Evaluation of the High 5 School-Based Nutrition Intervention. Health Education & Behavior, 27(2), 177-186.
    Rice, R. E., & Atkin, C. K. (1989) . Public communication campaigns. Newbury Park, Calf: Sage Publication.
    Schlettweingsell, D. (1992). Nutrition and the quality of life: A measure for the outcome of nutrition intervention. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,55, s1263-1266.
    Shannon,B., Graves, K., & Hunt, M. (1982). Food behavior of elementary school students after receiving nutrition education. Journal of American Dietetic Association, 81, 428-434.
    Smith, K., Cook, A., Subar, A. F., Clevel , L. & Friday,J.(1995).US Adults’Fruit and Vegetable Intakes,1989 to 1991:A Revised Basline for the Health People 2000 Objective.American Journal of Public Health, 85(12), 1623-1629.
    Sorensen, G., Hunt, M.K., Cohen, N., Stoddard, A., Stein,E., Phillips, J., Baker, F., Combe, C., Hebert ,J.& Palombo, J. (1998). Worksite and family education for dietary change: the Treatwell 5-a-Day program.Health Education Research, 13(4), 577-591.
    Sorensen,G., Stoddard, A., Peterson, K., Cohen, N., Hunt, M. K. Stein, E., Palombo, R. & Lederman, R. (1999). Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Through Workside and Families in the Treatwell 5-a-Day Study. American Jounal of Public Health, 89, 54-60.
    Splett, P. L., & Story, M.(1992). Child nutrition : Objectives for the decade. Journal of the American Dietetic Association,91, 665-668.
    Sterm, M., Farquhar, J., Macoby, V.,Russell, S. (1976). Results of a two-year health education campaign on dietary behavior. Circulation, 54, 826-833.
    Story, M., Mays, R. W., Bishop, D. B., Perry, C. L., Taylor, G., Smyth, M., Gray, C. (2000). 5-a-Day Power Plus:Process Evaluation of a Multicomponent Elementary School Program to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption.Health Education & Behavior, 27(2), 187-200.
    Velicer, W. F., DiClemente, C. C., Prochaska, J. O., & Brandenburg, N.(1985). A decisional balance measure for predicting smoking cessation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1279-1289.
    Weaver , M., Poehlitz, M. & Hutchison, S. (1999). 5 A Day for Low-Income Families: Evaluation of an Advertising Campaign and Cooking Events. Journal of Nutrition Education, 31(3), 161-169.
    Weisburger, J.H.(1991). Nutritional approach to cancer prevention with emphasis on vitamins,antioxidants and carotenoids. America Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 53, 226-237.
    Willer, W. (1990). Vitamin A and lung Cancer. Nutrition Review, 48(5): 201-211.

    QR CODE