研究生: |
黃秋瑞 Rachel Huang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
以科學史教材協助高中教師瞭解克卜勒定律概念發展之效益研究 On the Effectiveness of Using Science History to Enrich the Understanding of Kepler’s Laws by Senior High Physics Teachers |
指導教授: |
譚克平
Tam, Hak-Ping |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科學教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Science Education |
論文出版年: | 2003 |
畢業學年度: | 91 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 159 |
中文關鍵詞: | 克卜勒定律 、科學史 |
英文關鍵詞: | Kepler's laws, science history |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:207 下載:18 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究目的為探討 (1) 研究者所設計的以克卜勒定律為主題科學史教材是否協助教師認識克卜勒理論發展方面的相關科學史。(2) 藉著對相關科學史的認識,來豐富教師對克卜勒科學家形象的詮釋。並探討教師在閱讀完教材後,(3) 在教學內容安排方面的改變為何,以及 (4) 在使用科學史進行教學之態度方面的改變為何。
本研究以準實驗研究設計為主,再輔以半結構晤談方式。研究對象為台北市高中物理教師與實習教師等共18位教師。所收集到的前、後測資料則以描述性統計方式進行分析。
研究結果顯示所設計的科學史教材, (1) 能協助教師對克卜勒定律相關科學史達成基本的認識,過半數教師也能舉例說明「數學簡單性」觀點對克卜勒發展理論的影響。 (2) 閱讀教材後,教師從原先將克卜勒詮釋為「努力不懈的呆板數學家」,改變為「有豐富創造力、信仰虔誠的數學科學家」。(3) 相較於閱讀前教師甚少運用科學史材料教學。在閱讀教材後,教師最多提到教材中有關「科學家的信念」、「理論發展過程」以及「理論的貢獻」方面的內容可使用於教學上。(4) 閱讀教材後,教師同意「科學史能幫助理解概念」的人數增加,並且同意若能簡化本科學史教材,應能作為「引起學生學習興趣」、「了解何謂科學」的合適材料,也認為克卜勒貢獻應介紹讓學生知道。但教師仍覺得科學史有瑣碎的缺點。
The purpose of this study is to (1) employ study materials designed by researcher about science history of Kepler’s laws to assist senior high physics teachers in knowing science history of Kepler’s laws, and (2) in enriching teachers’ cognition about Kepler. (3) Find the change of teachers’ arrangement of instruction. (4) Find the change of teachers’ attitude about using science history to instruction.
The research methods include questionnaires, and interviews. Eighteen teachers from Taipei participated in this study. The data is analyzed in describing statistics.The results of the research show:
(1) the study materials can assist teachers to know compendious science history of Kepler’s laws, and half of teachers can give examples to explain that ‘simplicity’ influence Kepler ‘s theory.
(2) After reading the study materials, teachers’ interpretation of Kepler’s sciencist image changed from Kepler is a and mechanical mathematicist working-hard to Kepler is a scientist having abundant originality and a scientist having a strong faith.
(3) After reading the study materials, teachers agreed the content of the study materials can be used in instruction. Specially, They mention the content about belif of sciencists, the course of theories’ development, and the contribution of sciencists’ theory.
(4) After reading the study materials, the amount of teachers agreed that science history can assist concept’s understanding increased.And they also agreed the study materials can bring about the motive to learning and help students to know ‘science’ if the study materials can be simplified. They also agreed that Kepler’s contribution should be teached. But teachers still feel science history is too muitifarious.
1. 哥白尼 (2001):天體運行論。武漢市:陜西人民出版社。
2. 伯特 (E.Burtt, 1994):近代物理科學的形而上學基礎。成都市:四川教育出版社。
3. 洪振芳、賴羿蓉 (1997):教師對以邏輯實證與後邏輯實證主義科學哲學觀建構之電化電池發展史教材的認識與抉擇。科學教育學刊, 5(3), 347-390。
4. 姚珩、黃秋瑞 (2003):克卜勒行星橢圓定律的初始內涵。科學教育月刊, 259, p1-16。
5. 徐光台 (2003):近代科學革命 - 從哥白尼到牛頓。台北市:中央研究院。
6. 格蘭特 (2000):中世紀的物理科學思想。上海:復旦大學出版社。
7. 韋斯特福爾 (2000):近代科學的建構 - 機械論與力學。上海:復旦大學出版社。
8. 黃寶蓉 (2000):科學本質在教與學的意涵之研究。未出版。
9. 戴維‧林德伯格 (2001):西方科學的起源 - 公元前六百年至公元一千四百年宗教、哲學和社會建制大背景下的歐洲科學傳統。北京:中國對外翻譯出版公司。
10. 羅伊德 (1984):亞里斯多德思想的成長與結構。台北市:聯經出版社。
11. Aiton, E. J. (1969). Kepler’s second law of planetary motion. Isis, 60, 75-90.
12. Barbour, B. (1989). Absolute or relative motion. New York: Cambridge, University Press.
13. Brush, S. G. (1974). Should the history of science be rated X? Science, 183, 1164-1172.
14. Brush, S. G. (1969). The role of history in the teaching of physics. The Physics Teacher, May, 271-280.
15. Dreyer, J. (1953). A history of astronomy from Thales to Kepler . New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
16. Dijksterhuis, E. J. (1986). The mechanization of the world picture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Jacobsen, T. (1999). Planetary systems from the ancient Greeks to Kepler. Seatle, WA: University Washington.
18. Koyr’e, A. (1992). The astronomical revolution Copernicus-Kepler-Borelli. NewYork: Dover Publications, Inc.
19. Kozhamthadam, J. (1995). Discovery of Kepler’s law: The Interaction of science, philosophy and religion. Notre Dame, ID:University of Notre Dame.
20. Martens, R. (2000). Kepler’s philosophy and the new astronomy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. Mattews, M. R. (1989). A role for history and philosophy in science teaching. Interchange, 20(2), 3-15.
22. Peter Barker & Bernard R. Goldstein (2001): Theological foundations of Kepler’s astronomy. Osiris, 16(1), 88-113.
23. Ruth Garner (1992): Learning from school texts. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), p53-63.
24. Stephenson, B. (1987). Kepler’s physical astronomy. New York: Springer-Verlag Inc.
25. Stephenson, B. (1994). The music of the heavens: Kepler’s harmonic astronomy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Wilson, C. (1968). Kepler’s derivation of the elliptical path. Isis, 59, 5-25