本研究探討第一類身心障礙者接受庇護性就業服務後，其生活品質的現況及影響因素。運用問卷調查方式，以北部某地區庇護工場之員工為研究對象，共抽取85名身心障礙者參與研究，並以符合國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統(International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health，簡稱ICF)鑑定為第一類身心障礙者，其中智能障礙者73人，慢性精神病者12人；障礙類別為輕度36人、中度42人及重度及極重度8人；年齡介於20至30歲51人、介於31至40歲25人及介於41至64歲9人。本研究採用荷蘭 Arduin 基金會和比利時根特大學所發展的個人成果量表（Personal Outcomes Scale）中文版為評估工具，其分為8大層面(個人發展、自我決策、人際關係、社會融合、權利、情緒福祉、身體福祉及物質福祉)，每個層面皆有6個特定指標，總共48題。另使用描述性統計、相關係數分析、單因子變異數分析與雪費法、迴歸分析等統計方法。經過統計資料分析後，其研究結果是依據本研究三大研究問題，其為身心障礙庇護員工生活品質現況、生活品質相關因素及差異性分析、生活品質八大層面之差異性分別討論如下:
一、 就身心障礙庇護員工生活品質現況中，其生活品質於八大層面的滿意度面呈現為中等以上滿意度，以下為滿意度最高前三項(情緒福祉、個人發展及物質福祉)及最低前兩項(社會融合及權利)之顯著差異層面。
(一) 生活品質現況滿意度最高前三項如下：
1. 身心障礙庇護員工在生活品質的情緒福祉層面向有最高滿意度。
2. 身心礙者庇護員工在生活品質之個人發展層面，有基本獨立生活能力。
3. 身心障礙庇護員工在生活品質之物質福祉層面，擁有固定薪資收入。
(二) 生活品質現況滿意度最低前兩項中，以社會融合滿意度最低，次低為權利層面之生活品質滿意度。
二、 就身心障礙庇護員工生活品質相關因素及差異性分析中，其個人因素(障礙程度、年齡)、就業狀況(工作年資、工時)與生活品質各層面(個人發展、自我決策、基本權利、社會融合及物質福祉)間存在相關因素，而且彼此間有顯著差異性。
(一) 身心障礙庇護員工之障礙程度愈輕微，在個人發展及自我決策之生活品質滿意度愈高。
(二) 隨著年齡增加，身心障礙庇護員工愈能夠反應其在生活品質獲得更多的基本權利。
(三) 隨著工作年資增加，身心障礙庇護員工能夠反應其有較多的社會融合機會，對物質福祉的生活品質滿意度也愈高。
(四) 工時愈長，降低身心障礙庇護員工參與社會融合機會，但其對物質福祉有較高的滿意度。
三、 就身心障礙庇護員工在生活品質八大層面之差異性中，其對於年齡、工作年資及工時皆有預測效果。
綜合言之，身心障礙庇護員工在生活品質現況中，以情緒福祉滿意度最高，其表示身心障礙庇護員工對於目前庇護職場能獲得安全感、成就感及滿意目前的狀況。第二高為個人發展滿意度，表示他們認為自己具備獨立生理能力、有能力照顧自己、追求自己感興趣的事情，第三則是物質福祉層面，其表示他們有穩定收入，可以讓他們擁有薪資支配權及個人重要物品；然而，在身心障礙庇護員工之生活品質現況中，以最不滿意的層面為社會融合，其表示個人與社區之間的互動較差，是為低度社會參與，第二不滿意層面為權利，其表示在執行身心障礙庇護員工在執行個人權利的機會也較少。
在生活品質相關因素及差異性分析中，個人因素(障礙程度、年齡)及就業狀況(工作年資、工時)與生活品質各方面(個人發展、自我決策、基本權利、社會融合及物質福祉)之間存在相關性及顯著差異性，其為身心障礙者之障礙程度愈輕微，其在個別學習發展及自主選擇權之生活品質有較好的表現。年齡愈長之身心障礙者，他們在個人及法定權利的基本認知表現較佳；身心障礙庇護員工的工作年資愈多，他們在社會融合參與的機會則愈多。又因工作年資增長，獲得薪資收入隨之增加，掌控自己財務規劃的機會愈大，對於物質福祉之生活品質較好。身心障礙庇護員工在庇護工場的工時愈長，他們可參與社會融合的機會則愈少，但工時愈長，他們獲得收入則愈多，其物質福祉的生活品質愈高。
最後，在身心障礙庇護員工生活品質八大層面之差異性分析中，其生活品質八大層面對於年齡、工作年資及工時皆有預測效果，分別表示年齡對於權利層面之生活品質有顯著影響力，年齡愈大的身心障礙庇護員工，愈能夠回應其個人權利維護的認知表現愈好；工作年資愈長的身心障礙庇護員工，愈能夠回應其社會融合機會愈高，獲得薪資收入愈多及物質福祉之生活品質表現愈好；他們每週工時愈長，愈能回應其參與社會互動的時間愈少，但會讓他們獲得愈高的薪資收入，其愈高的薪資收入會讓他們在生活品質之物質福祉層面有愈好滿意度。

This study explores the current status and influencing factors of the quality of life of persons with disabilities in the first category after receiving sheltered employment services. A total of 85 people with disabilities, in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), they were identified as the first category of persons with physical and mental disabilities, including 73 people with intellectual disabilities and 12 people with chronic mental illness; the disorder category was mild. There were 36 people with severe disease, 42 people with moderate disease and 8 people with severe and very severe disease; 51 people between 20 and 30 years old, 25 people between 31 and 40 years old, and 9 people between 41 and 64 years old. This study uses the Chinese version of the Personal Outcomes Scale developed by the Arduin Foundation in the Netherlands and Ghent University in Belgium as an evaluation tool, which is divided into 8 levels (personal development, self-decision-making, interpersonal relationships, social integration, rights, emotional well-being, physical well-being, and material well-being), each of which has 6 specific indicators for a total of 48 questions. Other statistical methods such as descriptive statistics, correlation coefficient analysis, one-way analysis of variance, Scheffe method, and regression analysis were used. After statistical data analysis, the research results are based on the three major research questions of this study, which are the current situation of the quality of life of employees with disabilities, the analysis of related factors and differences in the quality of life, and the differences in the eight aspects of the quality of life. The differences are discussed as follows:
1. In terms of the current quality of life of employees with disabilities, the satisfaction level of their quality of life in eight aspects is above average satisfaction, and the following are the top three items of satisfaction (emotional well-being, personal development and material well-being) and the lowest level of satisfaction. Significant differences between the two (social integration and rights)
(1) The top three items with the highest satisfaction with the current quality of life are as follows:
○1 Sheltered workshop employees with disability have the highest satisfaction in terms of quality of life and emotional well-being.
○2Protection for the sheltered workshop employees with disability have the basic ability to live independently in the aspect of personal development in terms of quality of life.
○3Disability shelter employees have stable salary income in terms of life quality and material well-being.
(2) The satisfaction with the current quality of life is the lowest. Among the first two items, the satisfaction with social integration is the lowest, and the satisfaction with the quality of life at the right level is the second lowest.
2. In the analysis of related factors and differences in the quality of life of employees with disabilities, their personal factors (degree of disability, age), employment status (working years, working hours) and various aspects of quality of life (personal development, self-decision, basic rights) , social integration and material well-being) are correlated and significantly different from each other.
(1) The milder the degree of disability of sheltered workshop employees with disability, the higher the satisfaction with the quality of life in terms of personal development and self-decision.
(2) As the age increases, the sheltered workshop employees with disability are more able to reflect that they have acquired more basic rights in the quality of life.
(3) With the increase of working years, sheltered workshop employees with disability can reflect that they have more opportunities for social integration, and the satisfaction with the quality of life of material well-being is also higher.
(4) The longer the working hours, the lower the opportunities for sheltered workshop employees with disability to participate in social integration, but they have higher satisfaction with material well-being.
3. The eight aspects of quality of life have predictive effects on age, working years and working hours.
All in all, the employees with disabilities have the highest satisfaction with emotional well-being in the current quality of life, which means that employees with disabilities can gain a sense of security, achievement and satisfaction with the current situation in the sheltered workplace. The second highest is personal development satisfaction, indicate that they believe they have independent physical abilities, capable of taking care of themselves, and pursuing their interests, the third is material well-being, which means they have a stable income, having a stable income that gives them control over their salary and personal belongings; however, in the current quality of life of employees with disabilities, the most dissatisfied level is social integration, which means that the interaction between individuals and the community is poor, which is low social participation, and the second level of dissatisfaction is rights. Employees who said they were enforcing disability asylum also had fewer opportunities to enforce their individual rights.
In the analysis of quality of life-related factors and differences, personal factors (degree of disability and age) and employment status (working years and working hours) and various aspects of quality of life (personal development, self-determination, basic rights, social integration and material well-being).
Finally, in the analysis of the differences in the eight aspects of the quality of life of employees with disabilities. The eight aspects of quality of life have predictive effects on age, working years, and working hours.

丁秀雲（2015）。住院慢性精神病患院內工作訓練對工作自我效能與生活品質之成效探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。臺北醫學大學醫務管理研究所。
王雲東（2007）。身心障礙者社區化就業服務方案之成本效益與成本效能分析─以臺北市92-94年度就服方案為例。臺大社工學刊，14，123-166。https:// 10.6171/ntuswr2007.14.03。
王榮德、姚開屏、游正芬、鍾智文（2000）。二十一世紀健康照護效性評量：生活品質與生活品質調整後之存活分析。臺灣醫學，4，72。https: 10.6320/FJM.2000.4(1).12。
王天苗、吳冠穎（2007）。他們是社會人嗎？－兩名啟智學校畢業青年的生活樣貌。特殊教育研究學刊，32（1），35-56。https:// 10.6172/BSE200703.3201003。
王弘智、劉佳華（2006）。台灣與美國精神障礙者庇護性就業之比較。雲嘉特教，4，43-49。
尤珮蓉、周月清、張淑娟（2016）。比較中老年與非中老年智障服務使用者支持需求與生活品質，台大社工學刊，34，85-128。https:// 10.6171/ntuswr2016.34.03。
朱貽莊、黃曉玲、許得億、林幸台（2016）。臺灣「社區日間作業設施」服務成效評估之研究：以育成社會福利基。身心障礙研究，14(2)，100-116。https://10.30072/JDR。
吳秀照（2007）。台中縣身心障礙者就業需求：排除社會障礙的就業政策探討。社會政策與社會工作學刊 ，11 (2)，148-197。https:// 10.6785/SPSW.200712.0148。
吳佳芳、林玲伊（2014）。台灣成年自閉症者生活品質之研究。臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌，10（1），1-12。https://10.6534/jtotrp.2014.10（1）。
李崇信（2002）。身心障礙者與庇護工場之我見。行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局就業安全，1：1，64-69。
李亞蓉（2011）。輕度精神障礙者工作現況與生活品質之研究─以高雄市為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。屏東科技大學社會工作研究所。
李昕寧、張千惠、鄭永福（2014）。我國重度視覺障礙成人在人口學變項之生活品質差異分析。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，10（3），https://175-202。10.29506/JLASS。
李建承、邱惠姿（2009）。身心障礙者自我決策與轉銜實務之探究。特教論壇，7，34-41。https:// 10.6502/SEF.2009.7.34-41。
李從業、吳玫勳、梁玉雯、蔣欣欣、嚴小燕、崔翔雲（1997）。慢性精神客觀生活品質之探討。護理研究，5（3），212-222。https://10.7081/NR.199706.0212。
李慧玲、吳錦喻、蔡佳瑜、陳快樂(2002)。慢性精神病患獨立生活技巧訓練團體之成效評估。職能治療學會雜誌，12，1-10。https:// 10.6594/JTOTA.2002.20.01。
林素麗（2008）。庇護性就業之社會效益與財務分析 —以「愛不囉嗦」承德店庇護工場為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。天主教輔仁大學社會企業研究所。
林宏熾（1999）。智能障礙青年社區生活品質驗證性因素分析及其相關因素之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，17，59-83。http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/6512。
林美玲、林宏熾 (2008)。極重度多重障礙兒童生活品質之個案研究，身心障礙研究季刊，6(2)，147-159。https:// 10.30072/JDR.200806.0005。
周月清、張芯瑜（2020）。109年職業重建個案管理服務對身障者生活品質效益評估研究，臺北：臺北市勞動力重建運用處。
姚開屏（2004）。台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質之發展及使用手冊。臺北：世界衛生組織生活品質問卷台灣版問卷小組。
高家常、黃惠滿（2014）。日間留院與居家照顧精神分裂病個案生活品質之比較研究。護理研究，22(2)，126-135。https:// 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000026。
郭秀註（2009）。慢性精神病患生活品質相關因素之研究-以北部某區域教學精神專科醫院復健病房住院病患為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺北教育大學生命教育與健康促進研究所。
張英鵬（2001）。我國大專身心障礙學生之生活品質研究。特殊教育學報，15，273-307。https:// 10.6768/JSE.200109.0273。
張秀如、盧淑敏(2020)。慢性慢性精神症患者生活品質的因素。新臺北護理期刊，23(1)，20-32。https:// 10.6540/NTJN.202103_23(1).0003。
廖吟凰（2015）。慢性精神患者症狀嚴重度、失能程度與生活品質之相關研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學復健諮商研究所。
葉翰林、張韋豪、姜義村 (2020)。智能障礙勞工之職能與體能檢測之關聯性研究。特殊教育學報，52，49-70。https:// 10.3966/207455832020120052003。
劉靜芬（2011）。身心障矮者庇護工場經營績效影響因素之探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立台北大學社會工作研究所。
莊凱翔（2017）。影響成年智能障礙者參與之相關因素探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。台北醫學大學醫務管理學研究所。
藍介洲（2003）。生產與保護-台北市中、重度視覺障礙者庇護工場就業服務之探究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立台灣大學社會工作研究所。
全國法規資料庫（2013）。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法。2011年6月19日取自：https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=h0080065
全國法規資料庫（2020）。精神衛生法。2011年6月19日取自：https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=l0020030
衛生福利部（2015）。認識精神疾病。衛生福利部委託國立台灣大學醫學院附設醫院精神醫學部。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/
衛生福利部 (2022)。100 年至 111 年最低生活費。衛生福利部社會救助及社工司網頁。https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dosaasw/mp-103.html
勞動部勞動力發展署(2022)。110年1-6月各地方政府庇護工場業務情形調查表。未公告資料。

Almalky, H. A. (2020). Employment outcomes for individuals with intellectual and developmental T disabilities: A literature review. Children and Youth Services Review, 1-10. https//:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104656.
Billstedt, E., Gillberg, I. C., & Gillberg, C. (2011). Aspects of quality of life in adults diagnosed with autism in childhood: A population-based study. Autism, 15(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361309346466.
Bramston, P., Bruggerman, K., & Pretty, G. (2002). Community perspectives and subjective quality of life. Community Integration, 49(4),305-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912022000028358.
Burge, P., Ouellette-Kuntz, H., & Lysaght, R. 2007. Public views on employment of people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 26(1), 29-37.
Chou, Y.C., Lin, L.C., Pu, C.Y., Lee, W.P., & Chang, S.C. (2008). Outcomes and costs of residential services for adults with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan: A comparative evaluation. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21, 114-125. https//: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2007.00373.x.
Chou, Y.C., Pu, C., Kroger, T., Lee, W., & Chang, S. (2011). Outcomes of a new residential scheme for adults with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan: A 2-year follow-up. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55, 823-831. https//: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01394.x.
Chou, Y.C., Schalock, R. L., Tzou, P. Y., Lin, L.C., Chang, A.L., Lee, W.P., & Chang, S.-C. (2007). Quality of life of adults with intellectual disabilities who live with families in Taiwan. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51(11), 875- 883.https//: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.00958.x.
Claes, C., Van Hove, G., van Loon, J., Vandevelde, S., & Schalock, R. L. (2010). Quality of life measurement in the field of intellectual disabilities: Eight principles for assessing quality of life-related personal outcomes. Social Indicators Research, 98(1), 61-72. https//: 10.1007/s11205-009-9517-7.
Carbó Carretéa, M., Guàrdia Olmos, J., & Giné, C. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Personal Outcomes Scale. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15, 236-252. https//10.1016/j.ijchp. 2015.04.002.
Claes, C., Vandevelde, S., Van Hove, G., van Loon, J., Verschelden, G., & Schalock, R. L. (2012). Relationship between self-report and proxy ratings on assessed personal quality of life-related outcomes. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 159 -165. https// 10.1111/j.1741-1130.2012.00353.x.
Cristina Simo˜es, Sofia Santos, & Claudia Claes.(2015). The Portuguese Version of Personal Outcomes Scale:A Psychometric Validity and Reliability Study, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology,16(2), 186-200.https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-53.2.129.
Carbó Carreté,M. Guàrdia-Olmos,J.Peró Cebollero,M. & Giné,C.(2019). Impact of the intellectual disability severity in the Spanish Personal Outcomes Scale. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,63(10),1221-1233.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jir.12634.
Cook, J. 2006. Employment barriers for persons with psychiatric disabilities: Update of a report for the President's Commission. Psychiatric Services, 57(10), 1391-1405. https:// 10.1176/ps.2006.57.10.1391.
Eggleton, I., Robertson, S., Ryan, J., & Kober, R. (1999). The impact of employment on the quality of life of people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 13(2), 95-107. https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-vocational-rehabilitation/jvr00047.
Garcia-Villamisar, D., Wehman, P., & Navarro, M.D.(2002). Changes in the quality of autistic people's life that work in supported and sheltered employment. A 5-year follow-up study Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 17 (2002) 309–312.http://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-vocational-rehabilitation/jvr00170.
Kober R. & Eggleton I. (2005).The effect of different types of employment on quality of life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 49, 756-764.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00746.x.
Kraemer B. R., McIntyre L. L. & Blacher J. (2003). Quality of life for young adults with mental retardation during transition. Mental Retardation 41, 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2003)41%3C250:qolfya%3E2.0.co;2
Karadayi, G., Emiroglu, B., & Ucok, A. (2011). Relationship of symptomatic remission with quality of life and functionality in patients with schizophrenia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 52(6), 701-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.11.012.
Laura Opsteyn. (2012). Quality of Life of individuals with an acquired brain injury:an investigation with the Personal Outcomes Scale. Netherlands: Universiteit Gent Faculteit Psychologie en Pedagogische Wetenschappen Academiejaar 2011 – 2012 Quality. https://libstore.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/001/893/841/RUG01-001893841_2012_0001_AC.pdf.
Lam, L. C., Ong, P.A., Dikot, Y., Sofiatin, Y., Wang, H., Zhao, M., Lai, K(2015). Intellectual and physical activities, but not social activities, are associated with better global cognition: A multi-site evaluation of the cognition and lifestyle activity study for seniors in Asia (CLASSA). Age and Ageing, 44(5), 385-840.https//10.1093/ageing/afv099.
Lehman, A. F., Ward, N. C., & Linn, L. S.(1982). Chronic mental patients: The quality of life issue. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1271-1276. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.139.10.1271.
Marwaha, S., & Johnson, S. 2004. Schizophrenia and employment. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39(5), 337-349. https://10.1007/s00127-004-0762-4.
Noelia Flores, Cristina Jenaro, M., Begona Orgaz M.,& Victoria Martin.(2010). Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 24, 133–141.
Roessler, R. T.,& Schriner K.F.(1991). The Implications of Selected Employment Concerns for Disability Policy and Rehabilitation Practice’s, Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 35(1):52-67.
Rüesch, P., Graf, J., Meyer, P. C., Rössler, W., & Hell, D. (2004). Occupation, social support and quality of life in persons with schizophrenic or affective disorders, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 39, 686–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-004-0812-y .
Shadish, W. R., Orwun, R. G., Silber, B. G., & Bootzin, R. R.(1985). The subjective well-being of mental patients in nursing homes. Evaluation and Progtam Planning, 8, 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(85)90045-X.
Schalock, R. L., Brown, I., Brown, R., Cummins, R. A., Felce, D., Matikka, L., & Parmenter, T. (2002). Conceptualization, measurement, and application of quality of life for persons with intellectual disabilities: Report of an international panel of experts. Mental Retardation, 40(6), 457-470. https//: 10.1352/ 0047-6765(2002)040<0457:CMAAOQ>2.0.CO;2.
Schalock, R. L. (2004). The concept of quality of life: What we know and do not know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(3), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00558.x.
Schalock, R. L., Verdgo, M. A., Jenaro, C., Wang, M., Wehmeyer, M., Xu, J., & Lachapelle, Y. (2005). Cross-cultural study of quality of life indicators. American Journal on Mental retardation, 110(4), 298-311. https:// 10.1352/ 0895-8017(2005)110[298:CSOQOL]2.0.CO;2.
Social Exclusion Unit. 2004. Mental health and social exclusion. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
Schur, L. (2002). The Difference a job makes: The effects of employment among people with disabilities. Journal of Economic Issues, 36(2), 339-347.https://10.1080/00213624.2002.11506476.
Turcotte, M. (2014). Insights on Canadian Socirty-Persons with disabilities and employment. Statistics CANADA Retrieved from https://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-006-x/2014001/article/14115-eng.htm.
Van Dongen, C. J. (1996). Quality of life and self-esteem in working and nonworking persons with mental illness. Community Mental Health Journal, 32(6), 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02251064.
Van Loon, J., Van Hove, G., Schalock, R. L., & Claes, G. (2008). Personal outcomes scale: A scale to assess an individual’s quality of life. Middelburg, the Netherlands, Stichting Arduin and Gent, Belgium: University of Ghent.https://hcpbs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/vanloonposmanual.pdf.
Van Loon, J. H. M., Bonham, G. S., Peterson, D. D., Schalock, R. L., Claes, C., & Decramer, A. E. M. (2013). The use of evidence-based outcomes in systems and organizations providing services and supports to persons with intellectual disability. Evaluation and Program Planning, 36(1), 80-87. https//: 10.1016/ j.evalprogplan.2012.08.002.
Verdugo, M. A., Navas, P., Gómez, L. E.,& Schalock, R. L. (2012). The concept of quality of life and its role in enhancing human rights in the field of intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research, 56(11), 1036-1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01585.x.
Winer J. J. (2000).Quality of life and the work environtment: the relationship between integration in the work environtment and quality of life as perceived by individuals with mental retardation. Dissertation Abstract International Section A: Humanities and Social Science 61, 2043. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/3887.