研究生: |
呂美娟 Mei-Chuan Lu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
基本字帶字識字教學對國小識字困難學生成效之探討 The Effectiveness of Chinese Stem-Deriving Instruction on Elementary Students with Severely Word-Recognition Difficulties |
指導教授: | 洪儷瑜 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
畢業學年度: | 87 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 273 |
中文關鍵詞: | 識字困難 、識字補救教學 、識字能力 、基本字帶字識字教學 、自我監控 |
英文關鍵詞: | wod-recognition difficulties, Chinese Stem-deriving instruction,, reading remedial instruction, self-minitoring |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:365 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在中文字的構字規則中,中文字可以利用基本字將之歸類為一組字,基本字帶字識字教學乃以字族的特性所設計的識字教學。本研究的主要目的在探討基本字帶字教學法和基本字帶字加自我監控法對於增進國小識字困難學生的識字學習表現、包括看字讀音、造詞、聽寫和選出正確國字等識字能力,是否具有立即效果、兩週短期保留和14週長期保留,並探討對閱讀相關認知能力的影響。研究方法採單一受試法之倒返設計,實驗程序是A1-B-A2-BC,基線階段(A1 & A2)實施一般識字教學法,介入階段(B)實施基本字帶字教學法,介入階段(BC)則實施基本字帶字加自我監控法。研究對象是三名分別就讀台北縣國小之識字困難學生,以識字表現和閱讀相關認知測驗中得分探討基本字帶字教學法和基本字帶字加自我監控法之成效。資料處理則採用視覺分析的方式。
本研究的主要發現如下:
(1)立即成效:基本字帶字教學法和基本字帶字加自我監控法對於增進三位國小識字困難學生之識字學習表現具有立即效果。
(2)兩週短期保留:基本字帶字教學法對於增進二位國小識字困難學生(甲和乙)之識字學習表現具有短期保留效果。基本字帶字加自我監控法對於增進三位國小識字困難學生之識字學習表現具有短期保留效果。
(3)14週長期保留:實驗教學後之14週追蹤發現三位國小識字困難學生之識字學習表現具有不同成效之長期保留效果,以受試乙成效最佳,受試甲成效次之,受試丙則成效較不明顯。
(4)閱讀相關認知測驗:基本帶字教學對三位受試的部件辨識能力皆有增進,其它測驗則無此現象。
根據上述結果,本研究對中文識字困難之補救教學及未來相關研究提出數點建議。
According to Chinese orthographic principle, Chinese characters can be grouped by the stem.. The Chinese Stem-deriving instruction ( CSDI in short) was proposed in which Chinese characters are taught in a group sharing the same stem, which is also called Stem-family instruction. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of CSDI on three elementary students with severely word-recognition difficulties (SWRD in short). The single-subject reversal design (A1-B-A2-BC) was utilized in this study. CSDI was implemented in the first experimental phase while the traditional instruction method was done in two basal phases. The CSDI with self-monitoring writing was implemented in the second experimental phase, called as BC. The accuracy of the taught characters were measured every class (called as immediate effectiveness) and two weeks after the class (called as short-term effectiveness), and fourteen weeks after the experiment instruction period (call as long-term effectiveness).
The findings were concluded as follow:
1. The CSDI and CSDI with self-monitoring writing improved three students with SWRD on the accuracy of the taught characters were measured and approved the positive immediate effectiveness.
2. The CSDI only improved two students with SWRD on the accuracy of the taught characters were measured at two weeks after the class. However, the CSDI with self-monitoring writing improved three students with SWRD on the accuracy of the taught characters were measured at two weeks after, which approved the positive short-term effectiveness.
3. The follow-up effectiveness of the CSDI & CSDI with self-monitoring writing were checked in the fourteen weeks after the experiment phases. The various effectiveness were found.
According to the aforementioned findings, application of these instruction to reading remedial instruction, the learning guidance and the further research were recommended.
參考書目
一、中文部份
王文科(民84):教育研究法。台北市:五南。
天津市教育科學院普教所、天津市東郊區教科室編(民79):九種識字教學法探新。天津:天津市教育科學院情報室。
方金雅(民85):國小學生一般字彙知識、認字能力與國語文學業成就之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
安子介(民77):240字佔了漢字“常用字”百分之五十八。載於袁曉圓編,二十一世紀--漢字發揮威力的時代,171-174頁。北京:光明日報出版社。
吳世雄(民87):論認知心理記憶原理對漢字教學的啟迪。華文世界,89,46-54。
吳武典、張正芬編製(民73):國語文能力測驗。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育中心出版。
吳芳香(民87):國小二年級優讀者與弱讀者閱讀策略使用與覺識之研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
吳英成(民80):學生形聲字的偏誤與其學習策略的關係。載於第三屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集教學與應用篇(pp.121-130)。世界華文教育協進會編印。
吳朝輝(民70):革新國小國語課課本芻議。台東師專學報,9,12-21。
吳朝輝(民85):識字應從字族始。東師語教學刊,10,70-110。
吳瑞屯、蔡佳蓉(民83):中國文字消息處理過程中形碼扮演的角色。載於第三屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集理論與分析篇(下冊)(pp.107-123)。世界華文教育協進會編印。
吳璧純、方聖平(民77):以中文字形的概念區辨性探字詞辨識。中華心理學刊,30,9-19。
汪瑩(民88):海峽兩岸小學語文課程教材之比較。載於1999兩岸小學教育學術研討會論文集。國立嘉義師範學院編印。
李思維、王昌茂(民85):漢字形音字。武漢:華中師範大學出版社。
李振清(民77):漢字教學的理論與實際。華文世界,50,1-5。
李瑋玲(民79):閱讀華文和英文涉及相同的認知歷程嗎?載於第二屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集理論與分析篇(下冊)(pp.101-114)。世界華文教育協進會編印。
杜正治(民83):單一受試研究法。台北市:心理。
杜學知(民42):論漢字的難易與特性。大陸雜誌語文叢書,1(3),155-156。
周何、沈秋雄、邱德修、周聰俊、莊錦津(民78):中文字根孳乳表稿。台北市:國立中央圖書館。
周宗盛主編(民70):實用國語辭典。台北市:大林。
林宜平(民72):漢字「形」、「音」、「義」的比對:一個語音轉錄的字彙觸接模式。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林玫慧(民84) :閱讀理解策略教學對國小閱讀障礙學生的閱讀成效之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林政華(民80):漢字簡化問題。人文及社會學科教學通訊,4(1),187-201。
林素貞(民86):相似字與非相似字呈現方式對國小一年級學生生字學習效果之比較。特殊教育與復健學報,5,227-251。
林清山譯(民82):教育心理學—認知取向。台北市:遠流。
邱上真(民82):認知學派的學習理論,載於李詠吟編學習輔導,51-113頁,台北市:心理。
邱上真、洪碧霞(民85):國語文低成就學閱讀表現之追蹤研究(Ⅰ)。國科會專題計畫成果報告,未出版。
柯華葳(民82a):台灣地區閱讀研究文獻回顧。載於中國語文心理學研究第一年度結案報告(pp. 31-76)。國立中正大學認知科學研究中心。
柯華葳(民82b):語音覺識測驗。國立中正大學,未出版。
柯華葳(民83):兒童生字的處理。載於第三屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集理論與分析篇(下冊)(pp.125-131)。世界華文教育協進會編印。
柯華葳、李俊仁(民88):閱讀困難的理論架構及驗證,發表於學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷研討會。
洪慧芳(民82):文字組合規則與漢語閱讀障礙—對漢語閱讀障礙學童的一項追蹤研究。國立中正大學心理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
洪儷瑜(民85a):國語文低成就學生在閱讀歷程的視知覺能力之研究。國科會專題研究計畫成果報,未出版。
洪儷瑜(民85b):學習障礙者教育。台北市:心理。
洪蘭譯(民84):心理學。台北市:遠流。
胡志偉(民78):中文詞的辨識歷程。中華心理學刊,31(1),33-39。
胡志偉、顏乃欣(民84):中文字的心理歷程。載於曾進興主編,語言病理學,第一卷。台北市:心理。
唐美蘭(民86):中國語文科字族文集中識字課程評鑑:香港國際小學的個案研究。香港中文大學教育學院哲學碩士論文,未出版。
康寶文(民87):同族字教學-小學生學習漢字之捷徑。發表於一九九八國際語文教育研討會。
高傳正(民77):國字部首排列位對兒童認字之影響。國教園地,27,30-32。
袁曉圓、徐德江(民77):二十一世紀應是漢字發揮其威力的時代。載於袁曉圓編,二十一世紀--漢字發揮威力的時代,1-9頁。北京:光明日報出版社。
國民編譯館(民86a):國民小學國語教學指引(第二冊)。台北市:國立編譯館。
國立編譯館(民86b):「國民小學常用字彙研究」字頻總表。台北市:國立編譯館。
張春興(民83):教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華。
張清鐘(民71):從國字演化與特性談國字的教學。教師之友,23,11-14。
張漢宜(民85):兒童音韻、聲調覺識、視覺技巧、短期記憶與閱讀能力之關係。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
張學濤(民86):基本字帶字識字教學法應用于外國人漢字學習。載於第五屆世界華語文教學研討會文集教學與應用篇(pp.209-214)。世界華文教育協進會編印。
連韻文(民74):中文唸字歷程的探討:聲旁的語音觸發作用。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
郭生玉(民75):單一受試(小N)的實驗設計。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,33,143-162
郭為藩(民67):我國學童閱讀缺陷問題初步調查及檢討。師大教育研究所集刊,20,57-78。
陳仁風、陳阿寶(民86):一千高頻度漢字的解析及教學。發表於法國第二屆國際漢字教學學術研討會。
陳弘昌(民85):國小語文科教學研究。台北市:五南。
陳正治(民85):國小國字教學基本能力之探討。載於國小語文教學論集。台北市:台北市立師範學院。
陳秀芬(民87):中文一般字彙知識教學法在增進國小識字困難學生識字學習成效之探討。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
陳美芳(民74):「修訂魏氏兒童智力量表」對國小閱讀障礙兒童診斷功能之探討。師大特殊教育研究學刊,1,249-276。
陳烜之(民73):閱讀中文時對部件偵測的歷程。中華心理學刊,26(1),29-34。
陳烜之(民76):閱讀中文時對單字偵測的歷程。中華心理學刊,29(1),45-54。
陳榮華編(民86):魏氏兒童智力量表第三版(中文版)指導手冊。台北市:中國行為科學社。
陳靜子(民85):國語文低成就學童之生字學習:部首歸類與聲旁歸類教學效果之比較。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
陸莉、劉鴻香(民83):修訂畢保德圖畫詞彙測驗指導手冊。台北:心理。
曾世杰(民85):閱讀低成就學童及一般學童的閱讀歷程成份分析研究。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版。
曾世杰(民88):國語文低成就學生之工作記憶、聲韻處理能力與唸名速度之研究。載於學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷研討會會議手冊。
曾世杰、簡淑真(民84):國語文低成就學生之工作記憶與聲韻處理能力之研究。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版。
曾世杰、邢敏華(民86):語言模式、語言產生效率與工作記憶與聾人的中文閱讀。行政院國科會專題研究計畫報告,未出版。
曾志朗(民80):華語文的心理學研究,本土化的沉思。載於楊中芳與高尚仁編,「中國人中國心」:發展與教學篇(pp.539-582)。台北市:遠流。
曾志朗、洪蘭(民67):閱讀中文字:一些基本的實驗研究。中華心理學刊,20,45-49。
曾志朗、洪蘭(民79):漢字裡空間關係的知覺歷。載於第二屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集理論與分析篇(下冊)(pp.89-100)。世界華文教育協進會編印。
程祥徽、田小琳(民81):現代漢語。台北市:書林。
黃沛榮(民85a):漢字部件研究。載於第七屆中文字學全國學術研討會論文(pp.343-359)。
黃沛榮(民85b):文字知識與華文教學。載於現代漢字問論集(pp.78-94)。
黃秀霜(民85):中文年級認字量表之編製及國語低成就兒童認字困難之診斷。國科會專題研究計,未出版。
黃碧雲(民79):通過〝漢字部件分色教學色〞開拓華文教學與華文研究的新境界。載於第二屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集教學與應用篇(pp. 221-228)。世界華文教通協進會編印。
萬雲英(民80):兒童學習漢字的心理特點與教學。載於高尚仁、楊中芳編,中國人─發展與教學篇(pp. 404-448)。台北市:遠流。
裘錫圭(民84):文字學概要。台北市:萬卷樓。
趙友培(民44):鑰匙字研究。台北市:中華文化出版事業委員會。
鄭昭明(民67):漢字記憶的語言轉錄與字的回譯。中華心理學刊,20,39-43。
鄭昭明(民70):漢字認知的歷程。中華心理學刊,20,39-43。
鄭昭明、陳學志(民80):漢字簡化對文字讀寫的影響。華文世界,62,86-104。
蕭淳元(民84):國語低成就兒童音韻能力特徵之探討。台南師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
戴汝潛、郝家杰(民86):識字教學改革一覽。人民教育,1,32-33。
謝敏娜(民71):中文「字」與「詞」的閱讀與語音轉錄。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
蘇淑貞、宋維村、徐澄清(民73):中國閱讀障礙學童型及智力測驗。中華心理學刊,26(3),41-48。
二、英文部份
Aaron, P. G., & Joshi, R. M. (1993). Reading problems: Consultation and remediation.
Blandford, B. J., & Lloyd, J. W. (1987). Effect of Self-instructional procedure on handwriting. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(6), 342-346.
Bruck, M. (1988). The word recoginition and spelling of dyslexic children. Reading research Quarterly, 23, 51-69.
Bryant, P. & Bradley, L. (1985). Children’s Reading Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.
Condus, M. M., Marshall, K. J., & Miller, S. R. (1986). Effects of the keyword mnemonics strategy on vocabulary acquisition and maintenance by learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 609-613.
Eden, G. F., Stein, J. F., Wood, M. H., &Wood, F. B. (1995). Verbal and visual problems in reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 272-290.
Elbert, J. C. (1984). Short-term memory encoding and memory search in the word recognition of learning-disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(6), 342-345.
Elliott, J. L., & Gentile, J. R. (1986). The efficacy of a mnemonic technique for learning disabled and nondisabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 237-241.
Frank, A. R., Wacker, D. P., Keith, T. Z., & Sagen, T. K. (1987). Effectiveness of a spelling study package for learning disabled students. Learning Disability Research, 2, 110-118.
Fulk, B. M., Lohman, D., & Belfiore, P. J. (1997). Effect of integrated picture mnemonics on the letter-sound accquistion of transitional first-grade students with special needs. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(4), 33-42.
Gagne, E. D. (1985). Reading. In E. D. Gagne. (Ed.), The cognitive psychology of school of school learning(pp.165-198). Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
Gerstein, R., Woodward, J. & Darch, G.(1981). Direct Instrurion :A Research-based Approach to Curriculum Design Teaching. Exceptionsl Children, 53(10), 17-31.
Goddard, Y. L., & Meron, T. E. (1998). Pleaze teacher, help me learn to spell better. Teaching Exceptional Children, July/Aug, 38-43.
Gordon, J., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1993). Spelling intervetion:A review of literature and implication for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Research & Practice, 8(3), 175-181.
Graham, S., & Freeman, S. (1986). Stratery training and teacher vs student-controlled study condition: effects on LD student’s spelling performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 15-22.
Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Lloyd, J. W. (1996). Introduction to Learning Disabilities. Needham Heights, Mass: Allyn and Bacon.
Hallahan, D. P., Lloyd, J. W., Kosiewicz, M. M., Kauffman, J. M., &Graves, A. W. (1979). Self-monitoring of attention as a treatment for a learning disabled boy’s off-task behavior. Learning disabilities Quarterly, 2, 24-32.
Harris, K. R. (1986). Self-monitoring of attentional behavior versus self-monitoring of productivity: Effect on on-task behavior and academic responsr rate among learnimg disabled children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 417-423.
Harris. K. R. Graham, S., Reid, R., McElroy, K., & Hamby, R. (1994). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of performance: Replcation and Cross-task comparison. Learning disabilities Quarterly, 17, 121-139.
Haskell, D. W., Foorman, B. R., & Swank, P. R. (1992). Effects of three orthographic/phonological units on first-grade reading. Remedial and Special Education, 13(2), 40-49.
Huang J. T. & Wang M. Y. (1992). From unit to gestalt: perceptional dynamics in recognizing chinese character. In H. C. Chen. & O. J. L. Tzeng(Eds.), Language process in chinese. North-Holland: Elsevier.
Johnston, S. (1997). The issuese involved in developing a spelling program for adults with dyslexica. Australian of Learning Disabilities, 2(4), 24-26.
Kamhi, A. G. (1991). Causes and consequences of reading disabilities. In A. G. Kamhi & H. W Catts(Eds.), Reading disabilities: a developmental language perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Kamhi, A. G. & Catts, H. W.(1991). Reading disabilities: terminology, definitions, and subtyping issues. In A. G. Kamhi & H. W Catts(Eds.), Reading disabilities: a developmental language perspective. Needham Heights, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
Kaval, K.(1981). Meta-analysis of relationship between visual perceptional skills and reading achievement. Journal of Learning disabilities, 15, 42-51.
Kearney, C. A., & Drabman, R. S. (1993). The write-say for improving spelling accuracy in children with learning disabilities, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(1), 52-66.
Kosiewicz, M. E., Hallahan, D. P., Lloyd, J. & Craves, A. W. (1982). Effect of self-correction procedures on handwriting performance. Learning disabilities Quarterly, 5, 71-87.
Lerrner, J. (1993). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis and teaching strategies. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Lovett, M. W., Warren-Chaplin, P. M., Ransby, M. J., & Borden, S. L. (1990). Training the word recognition skills of reading disabled children:treatment and transfer effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 769-780.
Mahan, V. (1993). Mnemonics and the learning disabled child. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 17(2), 157-166.
Mann, V. A. (1993). Phoneme awareness and future reading abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 259-269.
Marini, A. E. (1990). Phonetic encoding and its impact on short-term memory abilities and academic tasks for students with learning disabilities. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 14(2), 150-166.
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Levin, J. R.(1985). Mnemonics strategy instruction with learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 94-99.
McCormick, S. (1995). Instructing students who literacy problems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice hall.
Peterson, P. L., & Swing, J. S. R. (1983). Problems in classroom implementation of cognitive strategy instrution. In M. Pressley & J. R. Levins (Eds.), Cognitive strategy instruction: Educational applications(pp.267-287). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The Psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reid, R. (1996). Research in self-monitroing with stuents with learning disabilities: The present, the prospects, the pitfalls. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(3), 317-331.
Reid, R., & Harris, K. R. (1993). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of performance: Effect on attention academic performance. Exceptional Children, 60, 29-40.
Schloss, P. J. & Smith, M. A. (1994). Apllied behavior analysis in classroom. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Shaywitz, S. E. (1996). Dyslexia. Scientific American, Nov, 98-104.
Simms, R. B., & Falcon, S. C. (1987). Teaching sight words. Teaching Exceptional children, fall, 30-33.
Snider, V. E. (1997). Transfer of decoding skills to a literature basal. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12(1), 54-62.
Swanson, H. L. (1982). Verbal short-term memory encoding of learning disabled deaf, and normal readers. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 5, 21-28.
Swanson, H. L. (1993). Executive processing in learning-disabled readers. Intelligence, 17, 117-149.
Swanson, H. L. (1994). Short-term memory and working memory: do both contribute to our understanding of academic achievement in children and adults with learning disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 34-50.
Swanson, H. L., & Cooney, J. B. (1991). Memory and learning disabilities. In B. Y. L. Wong(Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities(pp.104-122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Taft M. & Zhu X. (1997). Submorphemic process in reading chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and cognition, 23(3), 761-775.
Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R., & Peng, D. (1995). Role of early presemantic phonological code in chinese charater identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 43-54.
Thomson, M. (1996). The teaching of spelling using techniques of simultaneous oral spelling and visual inspection. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1(1), 12-14.
Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.
Torgesen, J., Rashotte, C., Greenstein, J., Houck, G., & Portes, P. (1988). Academic difficulties of learnig disablied children who perform poorly on memory span tasks. In H. L. Swanson (ED.), Memory and learning disabilities: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Veit, D. T., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1986). Extended mnemonic instruction with learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 300-308.
Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D.M. (1985). Free recall ofconcrete and abstract words in poor and normal readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 363-380.
Walsh, P. C., Lowenthal, B., & Thompson, G. (1989). Cluster score performance of learning disabed students on the woodcock-johnson psycho-educational battery. Psychology in the Schools, 26, 19-27.
Wilhardt, L. & Sandman, C. A. (1988). Performance of nondisabled adults and adults with learning disabilities on a computerized multiphasic cognitive memory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(3), 179-185.
Wirtz, C. L., Gardner, R. III, Weber, K., & Bullara, D. (1996). Using self-correction to improving the spelling performance of low-achieving third graders. Remedial and Special Education, 17(1), 48-58.
Wolf, D. E., Desberg, P., & Marsh, G.(1985). Analogy strategies for improving word recognition in competent and learning disabled reader. The Reading Teacher, 38, 412-416.
Worden, P. E. (1983). Memory strategy instruction with the learning disabled. In M. Pressley & J. R. Levin(Eds,), Cognitive strategy research: Psychological Foundations (pp.139-153). New York: Springer-Verlag.