本研究旨在探討玩具產業如何在眾多削價競爭的環境中運用識別策略模式建立自有品牌獨特風格之產品，藉由品牌與產品的快速連結以創造好的產品識別及品牌價值。其研究目的是協助台灣製造玩具的中小企業找出適用的產品識別策略模式，研究的理論架構藉由產品造形理論、PIS產品形象理論延伸，從產品的「形狀」、「色彩」、「材質」、「構造」、「功能」、「主題」、「文化」、「經典原形沿用」八個方向來進行表格歸納分析，再根據產品開發流程制定產品識別策略模式的使用時機，並以案例分析歸納出常用的識別手法供後續設計上參考與使用，最後以台灣玩具製造商PlayMe公司為例進行實際的識別策略模式的運用及創作。產品識別策略模式之建構以品牌的核心理念及價值為前提下，找出現有產品之識別手法以達到「異中求同」、「同中求異」之目標，提供後續設計時快速導入識別策略模式，依循研究將識別策略模式歸納下重點：
從相關產品案例分析，得出玩具產品識別設計手法中以「形狀」、「材質」、「功能」識別居多，玩具形狀識別手法多使用擬人擬物及仿生識別手法且在材質上皆使用單一材質的呈現延續到不同的系列商品，功能上各家商品皆容納不同的功能加入玩具，使玩具不只是玩具成為多功能的餐具、文具或禮品，並在產品開發的過程中必須將產品識別的概念加入產品設計流程，讓品牌核心的識別要素與造形結合，才能確切的掌握產品識別的要素。此研究成果將有助於玩具產業在建立產品識別時如何將識別要素加入設計，提供後續發展產品識別性相關研究之參考。

The purpose of this study is to investigate Product Identity Strategy to establish products with unique brand image in the toy manufacturers with its competitive environment. Exceptional product identity and brand value are formed through swift connection between brand and products. This study is designed to investigate the Product Identity Strategy of the toy industry with the purpose of helping Taiwanese SMEs who are engaged in toy design to identify the suitable Product Identity Strategy and understand the steps and manners of the usage of the design strategy by the product modeling of the Taiwanese toy manufacturers-PlayMe. The theoretical framework of this study is based on forming Product Theory and Product Identity System Theory (PIS). In accordance with the product shape, color, quality, structure, function, cultural meaning, unique theme, and classic modeling in total eight factors, to develop the Product Identity System. The construction of the Product Identity of Strategy for toy is under the premise of the brand’s core idea and value. To identify the Product Identity Strategy of various products by case studies of “seeking common ground while keeping differences” vs. “seeking difference from common points”. And furthermore, the strategy is applied to the creative design for toys.Abide by the design model of the study, summary is organized as following points:
According to the literature and analyzing product cases, the Product Identity Strategy is expressed with shape, material, and functionality in most cases. The technique to distinguish the shape of the toy is often determined by the method of personification ,physicalification and bionic. Also are using a single materials to extend to various series of products. Each company incorporates different functions and transforms toys into multifunction tableware, stationery, or gifts. The concept of product identity must be included in the process of product development so that the elements of the product identify can be better controlled by combining the core identifycation of brand and design. The Preliminary result of this study will benefit the toy manufacturers to develop their product identity by knowing how to add the elements of identity in the design which will be the reference of product identity related research.

小林重順. (1991). 造形構成心理. 台北: 藝風堂.
孔国琴. (2010). 探析品牌设计中的产品语言识别. 商場現代化(618), 58-59.
王玲. (2008). 浅谈产品设计的视觉识别. [Visual Identity of Product Design]. 成都紡織高等專科學校學報, 25(2), 68-70.
王家民, 毛翠翠, & 张娜. (2010). 玩具产品的造形与角色设定. [Modelling of Toys and Designing of Roles]. 山西高等學校社會科學學報, 22(12), 155-156.
何明泉, & 蔡子瑋. (1995). 產品意象語言研究--以本土性意象為例. 成功大學學報, (科技．醫學篇)卷(30期), 頁99-115.
何曉佑. (2000). 產品設計程序與方法---產品設計. 北京: 中國輕工業.
吳思華, & 司徒達賢. (1982). 企業經營策略的選擇. 管理評論, 1(1), 92-100.
李新富. (1999). 企業形象策略的意涵、價值與影響因素之探討. 國立臺中商專學
報, 31, 315-338.
汪宗慶. (2005). 產品識別造形文法規則的推導與應用─以nokia行動電話造形演化為例. 國立交通大學.
周開華. (1996). 產品識別認知因素之探討. 國立台灣科技大學.
官政能. (1995). 產品物徑. 台北市: 藝術家出版社.
林光宏. (2004). 行動電話設備供應商之策略研究-以諾基亞公司為例. 國立交通大學.
林明杰, 陳基祥, & 李昱辰. (2007). 品牌形象與產品設計對新產品開發績效影響之研究－以台灣精品獎得獎廠商為例. [Effects of Brand Image & Product Design on New Product Development Performance-The Manufacturing of Taiwan Excellence Awards as an Example]. 中原企管評論, 5(1), 65-85.
林炎旦. (2011). 童漾好玩—台灣玩具經典百年. 50.
林桂嵐. (2006). 挑食的設計: 天下遠見出版股份有限公司.
林磐聳. (1989). 企業識別系統. 台北: 藝風堂出版社.
柯善军, & 刘红杰. (2010). 基于品牌意象的产品造形评价技术研究. [Research of Product Model Evaluation Based on Brand Image]. 包裝工程, 31(18), 38-41.
徐啟賢, & 林榮泰. (2011). 文化產品設計程序. [A Study on Cultural Product Design Process]. 設計學報, 16(4), 1-18.
高 清漢, 莊. 明. (1997). 台灣產品形家定位之探討. 設計學報, Vo.2(No.2).
高李恩. (2013). CIS設計-以麥當勞為例 / 高李恩. from http://newdesignmethod.blogspot.tw/2013/03/cis.html
高林于. (2003). 產品形象與企業形象的相互關係研究-以行動資訊產品為例 論文名稱(外文)：A Study on the Relationships between Corporate Identity Image and Product Image Using Mobile Information Product Design as an Example. (碩士), 華梵大學.
高瞩, & 吉晓民. (2008). 品牌产品造形传承的哲学思考. [Philosophical Thinking of the Inheritance in Appearance Design of Brand Products]. 包裝工程, 29(8), 163-165.
張文智. (1998). 設計政策與設計策略在產品設計之應用. 工業設計, 27(1), 2-7.
張凌浩, 劉. (2005). 產品形象的視覺設計. 南京: 東南大學出版社.
張義林. (2007). NOKIA手機之時尚要素探討與設計應用 論文名稱(外文)：Exploration and Design Application of The Fashionable Elements of NOKIA Mobile Phone. (碩士), 大同大學.
張萬權. (2000). 市場資訊. 鍛造, 9(2), 9-11.
郭令威. (2009). 消費者色彩偏好與產品配色計劃之研究. 成功大學. Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database. (2009年)
陳文印. (2001). 產品意象識別為設計創新策略之實證研究. Paper presented at the 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告.
陳宜文, & 張文智. (2011). 臺灣3C品牌產品識別推行現況與策略研究. [Exploring the Product Identity Status and Policies of Taiwan-based 3C Brands]. 設計學報, 16(3), 95-114.
陳俊宏. (1989). 色彩意象之調查分析. 第四屆技術及職業教育研討會論文集, 5001-5016.
陳品妤, & 黃光玉. (2009). 精品珠寶品牌故事之比較：以Cartier、Chanel、Tiffany為例. [A Comparative Study of the Brand Stories of Cartier, Chanel, and Tiffany]. 廣告學研究(31), 1-34.
朝倉直己. (1985). 藝術設計的平面構成. 台北: 北星.
童慧明. (2002). DI——新世纪工业设计观. 装饰, Vo.4.
楊宙航. (2002). 產品品牌造形風格之識別研究-以行動電話為例. 銘傳大學.
蔡子瑋. (1994). 產品形容詞語言研究-以本土形容詞為例. 國立成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文, 台南.
魏佳卉. (2011). 幸福玩具王國-臺灣囝仔的童年. 觀‧臺灣(10).
羅凱, & 林品章. (2007). 高品牌價值之識別設計造形模式認知研究. [An Investigation on the Cognitive Model of High-Brand-Value Identity Design]. 設計學報, 12(4), 1-20.
蘇芳儀. (2007). 玩心童趣：福爾摩沙玩具特展專刊. 高雄: 科工館.
蘇錦皆. (1997). 素描講義:基礎素描的觀念與表現. 台北: 雄獅圖書.
杨颖, & 张艳河. (2009). 品牌特征族的个性化产品造形设计研究. [Research on Personalized Form Design Based on Product Brand Characteristics Family]. 中國機械工程, 20(4), 460-466.
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.
Biel, A. L. (1992). How Brand Image Drive Brand Equity. Journal of Advertising Research, VoL.32(6), 6-12.
Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16.
Bowman, W. G. (1990). Graphic communication. New York: Facts on File Inc.
Cagan, M. (2004). Speaking The Buick language:capturing,understanding,and exploring brand identity with shape grammars. Design Studio, 25(No.1), 28.
Clausewitz, K. V. (2010). 戰爭論精華
A Short Guide To Clausewitz On War (鈕先鍾, Trans.): 麥田.
Dobni, & Zinkhan. (1990). In search of brand image: A foundation analysis. Advancies in Consumer Research, 17(2), 110-119.
Handa, R. (1999). Against arbitrariness: Architectural signification in the age of globalization. Design
Studies, 20(4), 363-380.
HAYEK, F. A. (1952). The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology.
Kandinsky, W. (1998). 藝術的精神性 (吳瑪悧, Trans.). 台北: 藝術家出版社.
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing measuring managing customer-based brand. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-23.
Kim&Young. (2003). Corporate Identity through Product Design Applied with Brand Management System. 6th Asian Design Conference.
Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing Management. New Jersey: 10th edition.
Lefkoff-Hagius, Roxanne, Mason, & H., C. (1993). Characteristic, beneficial, and image attributes in consumer judgments of similarity and preference. (Vol. Vol.20, pp. 100-110).
Meyer, T. (2003). Helmuth von Moltke 1848-1916. Der Europäer, 7(8).
Miller, A. G. D. (1993). Assessing Porter's (1980) model in terms of its generalizability, accuracy
and simplicity. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 553-585.
Nandan, S. (2005). An exploration of the brand identity-brand image linkage:A communications perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 12(4).
Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J. & Maclnnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50, 135-145.
Yair, K., Press, M., & Tomes, A. (2001). Crafting competitive advantage: Crafts knowledge as a strategic
resource. Design Studies, 22(4), 377-394.
Yair, K., Tomes, A., & Press, M. (1999). Design through marking: Crafts knowledge as facilitator to
collaborative new product development. Design Studies, 20(6), 495-515.
Zedig, C. (1984). from http://playsam.com/es