研究生: |
張彥 Zhang, Yan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
在新媒體匯流下探討成人閱讀動機、態度及行為-以臺灣VOGUE為例 The Impacts of New Media Convergence on Reading Motivation, Attitude and Behavior for Adults: A Case Study of VOGUE Taiwan |
指導教授: | 柯皓仁 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖書資訊學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 138 |
中文關鍵詞: | 新媒體匯流 、閱讀動機 、閱讀態度 、閱讀行為 |
英文關鍵詞: | New media convergence, reading motivation, reading attitude, reading behavior |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GLIS.009.2018.A01 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:267 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究通過新媒體匯流下對數位閱讀的接受度來探討對使用者閱讀動機、態度及閱讀行為的影響。本研究以科技接受模型為架構,將數位閱讀的接受度分為感知有用性、感知易用性和感知有趣性三大面向。這三大面向中均包含了新媒體匯流的五大功能特性:多媒體、超連結、即時性、互動性和個人化。
本研究透過網路問卷發放的方式,發放問卷對象為VOGUE雜誌FACEBOOK粉絲專頁、APP應用程式和官網均使用過之人群,最後共計回收500份有效問卷。結果發現,數位閱讀接受度中的感知有用性、感知易用性和感知有趣性對閱讀動機、態度和閱讀行為有正向影響。另從多元線性迴歸分析中得出,只有感知易用性和感知有趣性對閱讀動機和態度具有解釋力。在閱讀行為面向上,只有閱讀態度對閱讀時間具有解釋力。當數位閱讀的接受度滿足後,使用者的閱讀動機會更強烈,閱讀態度會更積極,閱讀行為也會隨之受到正向影響。
另外,本研究建議數位閱讀的使用者了解數位閱讀的特性,熟悉數位閱讀功能以提高功能利用率。也建議雜誌業者提高數位閱讀的普及率及在數位閱讀接受度得到滿足的基礎上讓使用者進行閱讀活動。
This study explores the effect of new media convergence on the reading motivation, reading attitudes, and reading behaviors of adults. Based on the technology acceptance model, the acceptability of digital reading is divided into three major aspects: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived fun.
These three major orientations include the five major features of the new media convergence: multimedia, hyperlinks, immediacy, interactivity, and personalization.
In this study, questionnaires were distributed on the Internet. The target participants were the adults who already had the experiences in using all the following three VOGUE Magazine media, FACEBOOK fan page, APP, and the official website. Finally, a total of 500 valid questionnaires were collected. The results of this study found that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived fun in digital read acceptance have positive effects on reading motivation, reading attitude and reading behavior. In addition, from multiple linear regression analysis, only perceived ease of use and perceived fun have explanatory power for reading motivation and attitude. In reading behavior, only reading attitude has explanatory power to reading time. When the acceptance of digital reading is satisfied, the users’ reading motivation will be stronger, the reading attitude will be more positive, and the reading behavior will be positively influenced.
Finally, this study suggests that readers need to understand the characteristics of digital reading and be familiar with it to maximize utilization. It is also recommended that magazine companies need to promote the digital reading and give users a good reading environment to read based on the satisfaction of digital reading acceptance.
方盈潔(2008)。微網誌使用行為研究:以 PLURK使用者為例。政治大學廣播電視學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
王婉妮(2014)。網絡新媒體特點及其現狀。傳媒期刊秀:今傳媒,12(1)。
吳心慈(2014)。以軟硬整合思維重新探討智慧型手機商業模式。國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園市。
吳憶蘋(2012)。網路民眾「吸收新知涉入生活型態」、「知識獲取態度及行為」以及「數位閱讀接受度」之關聯性研究。輔仁大學統計資訊學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
吳聲毅(2004)。數位教材製作。臺北市:金禾資訊。
宋曜廷、劉佩雲、簡馨瑩(2003)。閱讀動機量表的修訂及相關因素研究。中國測驗學會測驗學刊,50(1),47-72。
李美枝(1981)。性別特質問卷的編製及男女大學生四種性別特質類型在成就動機、婚姻、事業及性態度上的比較。中華心理學刊,23(1), 23-27。
李素足(1999)。臺中縣市國小中高年級學童閱讀動機的探討。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
那福忠(2014)。APP 閱讀新體驗。今日印刷,3,51-52。
周慶祥(2013)。如何匯流?數位多媒體新聞敘事策略分析。政治大學公共行政暨企業管理教育中心主辦,數位創世紀學術實務研討會,臺北市。
林怡臻(2011)。以資源基礎觀點比較傳統媒體與新媒體新聞產製之競爭優勢。國立交通大學傳播與科技學碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
林珊如(1999)。數位時代的閱讀:青少年網路閱讀的爭議與未來。圖書資訊學刊,8(2),29-53。
林珊如(2003)。大學教師網路閱讀行為之初探。圖書資訊學刊,1 (1),75-92
林華(1997)。超文本文本呈現模式及訊息設計之研究。國立交通大學資訊科學系碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
林慧玲(2012)。語文閱讀教學策略,臺北:秀威資訊
夏瑜敏(2011)。時下年輕人數位閱讀的態度與樂趣之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
張春興(1996),教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北:東華。
張雪婷(2015)。新媒體背景下我國報業的走向研究。新聞研究導刊,17,56-57。
張新仁(1992)。寫作教學研究。高雄:復文。
張毓仁、柯華葳、邱皓政、歐宗霖、溫福星(2010)。教師閱讀教學行為與學生閱讀態度和閱 讀能力自我評價對於閱讀成就之跨層次影響:以 PIRLS 2006 為例。教育科學研究期刊, 56(2),69-105。
莊克仁(2015)。圖解民意與公共關係。臺北:五南
陳友信(2014)。高雄市國小教師生活型態、數位閱讀動機與行為之關係研究。大仁科技大學文化創意產業研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
陳世娟、邵婉卿(2015)。臺灣成年民眾數位閱讀載具與閱讀行為之現況調查。大學圖書館,19(1),41-69。
陳志萍(2012)。影音分享網站之個人印象管理研究。廣告學研究,37,79-104。
陳明秀(2007)。智慧型手機對電腦媒介溝通之影響初探。世新大學資訊傳播學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
陳冠華(2002)。媒體形式對於閱讀動機和行為的影響:以實體小說和電子版小說為例。國立中央圖書館臺灣分館館刊,8(1),66-82。
陳威珞(2011)。Justin TV 網路影音直播平臺使用行為研究。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
陳珮慈(1996)。成人閱讀之研究-以臺北市立圖書館永春分館讀者為例。圖書與資訊學刊,(18),41-61。
陳素燕(2013)。成人休閒閱讀行為探析。人文與社會科學簡訊,14(3),127-135。
陳清河(2008)。後電子媒介時代。臺北:三民書局。
陳碩琳(2003)。學習投入與目標取向之後設分析研究。教育研究月刊,234,86-106
陳麗穎(2003)。論手機媒體信息傳播。湖南师范大学新闻与传播学院碩士論文,未出版,湖南市。
曾信誠(2004)。以本體論為基礎之使用者喜好萃取、隱私權控管與側寫建構。朝陽科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
馮秋萍(1998)。兒童閱讀行為之探討。圖書與資訊學刊,25,63-72。
黃蘭鍈、胡安妮、吳凱琳(2008)。多媒體簡訊行動廣告效果之研究。行銷評論,5(4),481-513。
楊帆、海鷹(2014)。基於多點觸控技術的企業人機交互平臺設計。電子設計技術,2,6-6 。
楊慧娟(2006)。網路新文學:新媒體的應用實務與展望。臺北:五南
楊曉雯(1996)。高中生閱讀行為研究:以臺北市立建國高級中學學生為例。淡江大學教育資料科學學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
葉乃靜(2014)。隨興休閒閱讀與資訊行為研究:兼論「遊玩」和「沈浸」概念的適用性。圖書資訊學研究,1 (12),1-36。
賈馥茗(2009)賈馥茗教育學體系研究。臺北:五南
電子雜誌出版服務平臺(2014)。「商周隨身讀」質量並重APP閱讀享受.檢自http://www.acer.net/ebook/content_v3/news_app_show.jsp?newsno=1062&category=3
劉小華、黃洪(2016)。互聯網+新媒體:全方位解讀新媒體運營模式。臺北市:崧博
劉佩雲、簡馨瑩、宋曜廷(2003)。國小學童閱讀動機與閱讀行為之相關研究。教育研究資訊,11(6),135-158。
歐展嘉(2009)。Moodle平臺使用者結合Web2.0教學科技使用行為之研究。國立臺灣體育大學休閒產業經營學系碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
蔡雅芳(2010)。文學雜誌閱讀者閱讀動機、閱讀行為與滿意程度之研究---以雲嘉 南五縣市國文教師為例。南華大學出版學研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
賴苑玲(2006)。國小六年級學童之家庭,班級及學校圖書館閱讀環境與其閱讀態度之研究。 社會科教育研究,11,47-86。
魏澤群(2005)。使用者最大—從優使性 (Usability)出發的網站設計原則。臺北:網奕資訊科技。
Adam, N., & Wild, M. (1997). Applying CD ROM interactive storybooks to learning to read. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(2), 119-132.
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J.(1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new technologies?, Decision Sciences, Vol. 30 (2) , 361-391.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Alexander, J. E., & Filler, R.C. (1976). Attitudes and reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Alexander, J. E., & Heathington, B. S. (1988). Assessing and correcting classroom reading problem. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Ankeny, J. (2014). The Paper Chase. Entrepreneur, 42(7),40-43.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.NewYork:W. H. Freeman.
Bar-Ilan, J., Shoham, S., Idan, A., Miller, Y., & Shachak, A. (2008). Structured versus unstructured tagging: A case study. Online Information Review, 32(5), 635-647.
Barnett, L. A. (1990). Playfulness: definition, design, and measurement. Play and Culture, 3 : 319-336.
Barua, A. C., & Whinston, A. B. (1996). Creating a collaboratory in cyberspace: theoretical foundation and an implementation.Journal of Organizational Computing, 5(4) : 417-442.
Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1191-1205.
Corsini, R. J. (1994)﹒Encyclopedia of psychology. New York: John Wilex& Sons.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35: 982–1003, doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Davis, F.D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information system : theory and results. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Sloan School of management, Cambridge, MA.
Deuze, M. (2003). The web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media & Society, 5(2), 203–230.Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 59-68.
Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites : definition,history,and scholarship,Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230
Esrock, S. L., & Leichty, G. B. (2000). Organization of corporate web pages:Publics and functions. Public Relations Review, 26(3), 327-344.
Fisher, J. (2013). Take Better Smartphone Photos. PC Magazine,127-131.
Gambrell, L.B. (1996). Creating classroom cultures that foster reading motivation. The Reading Teacher, 50, 14-25.
Gambrell, L. B., Codling, R. M., & Palmer, B.M. (1996). Elementary student’s motivation to read (Reading Research Rep No.52). Athens, GA: NationalReading Research Center.
Graham,S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theoriesandprinciplesofmotivation, Handbook of educational psychology 63-84. Simon & SchusterMacMillian.
Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading engagement.Newark,DE:International ReadingAssociation.
Hao, S., Meng, Z., & Krishna, A. (2014). Computer Interfaces and the "Direct-Touch" Effect: Can iPads Increase the Choice of Hedonic Food?.Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 53(5),745-758. doi: 10.1509/jmr.14.0563
Hatt. F. (1976). What Does the Reader Want? The Reading Process : A Framework for Analysis and Description. Lonon, Clive Bingley.
Igbaria, M., Schiffman, S. J., & Wieckowski, T. J. (1994). The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour& Information Technology, 13(6), 349-361.
Landow, G. P. (1997). Hypertext 2.0: The Convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore, MD; London, UK: The John Hopkins University Press.
Larson, L. C. (2010). Digital readers: The next chapter in e-book reading and response. The Reading Teacher, 64(1), 15-22. doi:10.1598/RT.64.1.2
Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and young adults: Social media and mobile Internet use among teens and young adults Retrievedfromhttp://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-andYoung-Adults.aspx
Metsala, J. L. (1996). How children’s motivations relate to literacy development and instruction.The Reading Teacher , 49(8), 60-62.
Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context. Information & Management, 38, 217-230.
Morrow, L. (1996). Motivating reading and writing in diverse classroom: Social and psychological contexts in a literature-based program, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Newhagen, J. E., & Rafaeli, H. (1996). Why Communication Researchers Should Study the Internet: A Dialogue. Communication, 46:1, 4-13.
Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y. F. (1997). Measuring the flow experience among web users, Manuscript, Vanderbilt University, Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Rickek, M.A. (1989). Reading problems:Assessment and teaching strategies.New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Scolari, C. A. (2009). Mapping conversations about new media: The theoretical field of digital communication. New Media & Society, 11(6), 943–964.
Sledgianowski, D., & Kulviwat, S. (2009). Using social network sites: The effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(4), 74-83.
Smith, F. (1988). Understanding reading: A psycho-linguistic analysis of reading and learning to read (4th ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Smith, M.C. (1991). An Investigation of the Construct Validity of the Adult Survey of Reading Attitude. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the College Reading Association, November, 1991, Alexandria, VA.
Solomon, M. R. (2005). Consumer behavior, New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Education
Stanovich, K.E., & Conningham, A.E. (1992). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitives correlates of print exposure.Memory and Cognition, 20,51-68
Stovall J. G. (2004). Webjornalism: practice and promise of a new medium, University of Alabama.
Tague, J. (1995). Measuring information: An information servicesperspective. New York, NY: Academic Press
Taylor, S., & Todd, P.A. (1995), Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models, Information Systems Research, Vol. 6(2), 144-176.
Tomas, K. (2013). Virtual Reality: Why Magazines Should Adopt a Mobile-First Pub- lishing Strategy. Publishing Research Quarterly, 29(4),301-317. doi: 10.1007/s12109-013-9330-7
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D.(1990). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test, Decision Sciences (27:10), Y: Self-Efficacy 451-481.
Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation.
Williams. (1985). Gratification associated with New Communication Technologiesin in K.E. Rodengren,
Palmgreen.P., & Wemner L. A. (2001). Media Gratifications Research. Beverly Hills: Sage, 241-252.
Yamauchi, Y., & Nagaoka, K. (2011). Comparison on Reading Behaviors between Digital Book and Printed Book for Satisfaction and Speed. IEICE technical re- port, 110(453),27-32.
Yamauchi, I. & Nagaoka, S. (2009), Reforms of patent examination request system in Japan: some lessons, IIR Working Paper.
Ziming, Liu. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years,Journal of Documentation, 61(6),700-712, From:https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510632040