研究生: |
劉銘祐 Liu, Ming-You |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
教學輔助設備產品與服務品質對使用者忠誠度影響之探討 A Study of the Effects of Teaching Aids Product Quality and Service Quality on User Loyalty |
指導教授: |
周世玉
Chou, Shih-Yu |
口試委員: |
周世玉
Chou, Shih-Yu 施人英 Shih, Jen-Ying 蔡明志 Tsai, Ming-Chih |
口試日期: | 2022/05/10 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 45 |
中文關鍵詞: | 硬體品質 、軟體品質 、廠商服務品質 、知覺價值 、使用者滿意度 、忠誠度 |
英文關鍵詞: | hardware quality, software quality, service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction, loyalty |
研究方法: | 調查研究 、 敘事分析 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200579 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:79 下載:15 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
中華民國政府近年來在前瞻計畫內積極發展數位建設、網路基礎建設、充實數位化教室等方面注入了大量的資源,本著國家的競爭力從教育做起的遠景,積極的提供最新科技進入學校的課堂上。近幾年來在教室中輔助教學設備銷量最大宗,教師感受到助益最大的設備是觸控顯示器,無論是顯像的效果、亮度、彩度、穩定性高及低耗材等多項優點的商品,致使採購該設備的金額每年以著倍數的成長,熱潮趨勢相對帶動了全國性的教學創新以及授課型態大幅改革的榮景。
以往企業經營管理的心路歷程,大都是專注在產品的售價與成本之間如何取得獲利的利基點。在現代科技蓬勃發展的商場環境中,如何培養出具有高度忠誠度的顧客群,相信是每個企業經營者的最終目標;在「硬體品質」該項中追求穩定安全性,在「軟體品質」的範疇中設計出讓使用的顧客覺得具有高度的便利性,「廠商服務品質」是消費者對於企業感受最直接也是最深刻的代表,透過廠商服務的品質可以感受到企業對顧客的尊重與專業。
本研究以硬體品質、軟體品質、廠商服務品質為自變數,以知覺價值、使用者滿意度為依變數,以學校各班級教室中教學使用的觸控顯示器為研究場景,探討使用該產品的客戶,心中感受最深刻的是哪一個自變數構面;經過設計問卷、蒐集答卷者的資料後經過統計軟體的分析,及參考專家學者的文獻後,研究結果得到使用者滿意度最高的是軟體品質,其次是硬體品質,再來就是廠商的服務品質,此三項自變數對於使用者滿意度與忠誠度的各項假設均成立且有正向影響。
In the past, the mentality of enterprise management was mostly focused on the niche point of how to obtain profit between the selling price and cost of the product. That modern technology is flourishing in the business environment, how to cultivate a highly loyalty base is believed to be the ultimate goal of every business operator; ” is designed to make customers feel highly convenience. Service quality is the most direct and profound representative of consumers’ feelings for the company. Through the quality service, can feel the company’s respect and professionalism for customers. .
This research takes hardware quality, software quality, and service quality as independent variables, and takes perceived value and customer satisfaction as dependent variables, and takes the touch monitors used in teaching classrooms of the school as the research scene to discuss the customers who use the product. , which aspect of the independent variable is most deeply felt in my heart; after designing questionnaires, collecting respondents’ data, analyzing statistical software, and referring to the literature of experts and scholars, the research results show that the highest user satisfaction is the software quality , followed by the hardware quality, and then the service quality. These three variables are all established and have a positive impact on the assumptions of customer satisfaction and loyalty.
1.洪嘉蓉(2003),台北市政府教育局服務品質之研究,臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
2.洪嘉蓉(2004),服務品質、滿意度與忠誠度關係之研究─以中華電信公司ADSL 顧客為例,大葉大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
3.陳順宇. (2005). 多變量分析. 台北: 華泰書局.
4.張敏慧(2005)。提昇學生就讀意願之教育服務品質競爭優勢強化研究-以七所私立大學為例。中華大學科技研究所碩士論文。
5.謝錦堂. (2013). 消費者知覺風險與知覺價值對購買意圖之影響: 社群網站服務之實證研究. Electronic Commerce Studies, 11(4), 431-451.
6.Bhote, K. R. (1996). Beyond customer satisfaction to customer loyalty: The key to greater profitability. American Management Association.
7.Cronin Jr, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. Journal of marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
8.Day, E. (2002). The role of value in consumer satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 15, 22.
9.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
10.Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of marketing, 62(2), 46-59.
11.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. (1998). Black (1998), Multivariate data analysis.
12.Juran, J. M. (1974). Management of quality control. JM Juran.
13.Kemerer, C. F. (1987). An empirical validation of software cost estimation models. Communications of the ACM, 30(5), 416-429.
14.Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing management: The millennium edition (Vol. 10). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.Monroe, K. (1990), Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions (2nd. ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
16.Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings. Journal of retailing.
17.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. 1988, 64(1), 12-40.
18.Reeves, C. A., & Bednar, D. A. (1994). Defining quality: alternatives and implications. Academy of management Review, 19(3), 419-445.
19.Regan, W. J. (1963). The service revolution. Journal of marketing, 27(3), 57-62.
20.Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of marketing, 66(1), 15-37.
21.Taguchi, G. (1986). Introduction to quality engineering: designing quality into products and processes (No. 658.562 T3).
22.Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22.