研究生: |
黃允蔚 Huang, Yun-Wei |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
個人、社會及烏托邦模型的辯證探究:以撒.艾西莫夫於《基地》系列中之歷史觀 Dialectical Explorations of the Individual, Society and Utopian Models: The Idea of History in Isaac Asimov’s Foundation Series |
指導教授: |
黃涵榆
Huang, Han-Yu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
英語學系 Department of English |
論文出版年: | 2019 |
畢業學年度: | 107 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 107 |
中文關鍵詞: | 以撒.艾西莫夫 、《基地三部曲》 、《基地後傳》 、心理史學 、烏托邦 、史觀 、科幻小說 |
英文關鍵詞: | Isaac Asimov, the Foundation trilogy, the Foundation sequels, psychohistory, utopia, idea of history, science fiction |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201900477 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:193 下載:24 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在《基地》(Foundation)系列中,以撒.艾西莫夫(Isaac Asimov)採用愛德華.吉朋(Edward Gibbon)的《羅馬帝國衰亡史》(The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire)作為架構,加以將其歷史以未來敘事之方法呈現出社會發展與個人行為之衝突。本文主要以分析《基地三部曲》(the Foundation trilogy)及《基地後傳》(the Foundation sequels)來探討艾西莫夫對於影響歷史進程的主要條件及其基地史觀。首先,我以烏托邦架構分析心理史學(psychohistory),並闡述其為何為意識形態形式(form of ideology);進而探究在歷史進程中自由意志與決定論(free will and determinism)之衝突。在《基地》系列中,讀者可以看到,當科學在歷史進程上扮演著重要角色時,個人行為與情感同樣地也在歷史發展史中有著不可忽視的地位。本文旨在分析文本中不同層級的衝突與張力,試圖從中闡明艾西莫夫的歷史理念,並探究出影響《基地》歷史進程的最終條件。
In the Foundation series, Asimov adopts the framework from Edward Gibbon’s The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire and maneuvers history to a futuristic narration with the confrontations between social phenomena and individual behaviors. This thesis explores Asimov’s idea of history by discovering the major conditions that govern historical process in his fictional universe, mostly from the Foundation trilogy and the sequels. I begin with the analysis of psychohistory under a utopian framework, and I see psychohistory as a form of ideology. Then, I examine the struggles between free will and determinism in the course of Foundation history. While science plays a crucial role in determining the process of history, individual behaviors, emotions and sentience also represent powerful forces within historical development. This thesis follows Asimov’s linear historical process and attempts to divulge the major stimulation within the Foundation history.
Works Cited
Asimov, Isaac. Foundation. New York: Bantam Books, 2004.
---. Foundation and Earth. New York: Bantam Books, 2004.
---. Foundation’s Edge. New York: Bantam, 2004.
---. Foundation and Empire. New York: Bantam Books, 2004.
---. I, Asimov. New York: Bantam, 1995.
---. It’s Been a Good Life. Ed. Janet Jeppson Asimov. New York: Prometheus Books, 2002.
---. The Robots of Dawn. New York: Bantam, 1994.
---. Robots and Empire. London: Harper Collins Publishers, 1996.
---. The Roving Mind. New York: Prometheus Books, 1997.
---. Second Foundation. New York: Bantam Books, 2004.
---. “Social Science Fiction.” Modern Science Fiction. Ed. Reginald Bretnor. New York: Coward-McCann, 1953. 157-196.
Beiranvand, Asieh, Shahram Afrougheh, and Elham Ahmadi. “A Study of Hegelian Dialectical Embodiment in ‘Nostromo’ written by Joseph Conrad.” European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences 4.1 (2015): 98-105.
Berger, Albert I. “Theories of History and Social Order in ‘Astounding Science Fiction,’ 1934-55.” Science Fiction Studies 15.1 (1988): 12-35.
Boon, Kevin Alexander. “Episteme-ology of Science Fiction.” Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies 6.1 (2000): 11-28.
Bradley, F. H. Appearance and Reality: A Metaphysical Essay. London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1893.
---. Ethical Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Dean, John. “Strangely Familiar Forms: Exploitations of Romance in American Science Fiction and Fantasy.” Revue Française D'études Américaines 9 (1980): 149-58.
Eagleton, Terry. Marxism and Literary Criticism. Oakland: UC Press, 1976.
---. “Utopia and its Opposites.” Socialist Register 2000: Necessary and Unnecessary Utopias 36 (2009): 31-40.
Fitting, Peter. “The Concept of Utopia in the Work of Fredric Jameson.” Utopian Studies 9.2 (1998): 8-17.
Foucault, Michel. “What Is Enlightenment?.” The Foucault Reader. Ed. Paul Rabinow. New York: Pantheon Books, 1984. 32-50.
Freedman, Carl. Ed. Conversations with Isaac Asimov. Jackson: UPM, 2005.
Grigsby, John L. “Asimov’s Foundation Trilogy and Herbert’s Dune Trilogy: A Vision Revered.” Science Fiction Studies 8.2 (1981): 149-55.
Gunn, James. Isaac Asimov: The Foundations of Science Fiction. New York: Oxford UP, 1982.
Hassler, Donald M. “Science Fiction and High Art.” Extrapolation 28.2 (1987): 187-94.
Ingersoll, Earl G. “A Conversation with Isaac Asimov.” Science Fiction Studies 14.1 (1987): 68-77.
Jameson, Fredric. Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and other Science Fictions. New York: Verso Books, 2005.
---. “Progress Versus Utopian; Or, Can We Imagine the Future?.” Science Fiction Studies 9.2 (1982): 147-58.
Käkelä, Jari. The Cowboy Politics of an Enlightened Future: History, Expansionism, and Guardianship in Isaac Asimov’s Science Fiction. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2016.
---. “Managing and Manipulating History: Perpetual Urgency in Asimov and Heinlein.” Fafnir- Nordic Journal of Science Fiction and Fantasy Research 1.2 (2014): 7-22.
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.
Labounty, David. “The Origins of Inspiration: Winwood Reade’s Role in the Foundation of Isaac Asimov’s Psychohistory.” Extrapolation 39.4 (1998): 364-72.
Luckhurst, Roger. Science Fiction. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005.
Lukács, Georg. History and Class Consciousness. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1968.
McCracken, Scott. Pulp: Reading Popular Fiction. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998.
McTaggart, J. M. E. A Commentary on Hegel’s Logic. London: Cambridge University Press, 1910.
---. The Nature of Existence. Vol. 2. London: Cambridge University Press, 1927.
Miller, Joseph J. “The Greates Good for Humanity: Isaac Asimov’s Future History and Utilitarian Calculation Problems.” Science Fiction Studies 31.2 (2004): 189-206.
Miller Jr, Fred D., and Nicholas D. Smith. Thought Probes: Philosophy Through Science Fiction Literature. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1981.
Moylan, Tom. “Steps of Renewed Praxis: Tracking the Utopian Method.” Minnesota Review 86 (2016): 101-121.
Palumbo, Donald E. An Asimov Companion: Characters, Places and Terms in the Robot/Empire/Foundation Metaseries. North California: McFarland, 2016.
Parrinder, Patrick. Science Fiction: Its Criticism and Teaching. London: Methuen, 1980.
Roberts, Adam. Science Fiction: The New Critical Idiom. London: Routledge, 2000.
Robinson, Kim Stanley. “The Great Unknown-Can We Trust Our Own Predictions?” Scientific American 315.3 (2016): 80-85.
Schneider, Susan. Science Fiction and Philosophy: From Time Travel to Superintelligence. New York: Wiley, 2016.
Shaviro, Steven. Discognition. London: Repeater Books, 2016.
Smith, Erin A. Hard-Boiled. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2000.
Solstein, Eric, and Gregory Moonsnick. John W. Campbell’s Golden Age of Science Fiction. Text Supplement. New York: Digital Media Zone, 2002. DVD-ROM.
Suvin, Darko. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.
---. “On the Poetics of the Science Fiction Genre.” College English 34.3 (1972): 372-82.
---. Positions and Presuppositions in Science Fiction. Hong Kong: The Macmillan Press, 1988.
Touponce, William F. Isaac Asimov. Woodbridge: Twayne Publishers, 1991.
Tymn, Marshall B. “Science Fiction: A Brief History and Review of Criticism.” American Studies International 23.1 (1985): 41-66.
Wilson, Raymond J. “Asimov’s Mystery Story Structure.” Extrapolation 19.2 (1978): 101-7.