研究生: |
陳凱婷 Chen, Kai-Ting |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
離婚母親在未成年子女探視權司法歷程之詮釋現象研究 The Divorced Mother’s Visitation Right of the Minor Children in the Judicial Process: A Hermeneutic Phenomenology Study |
指導教授: |
鄔佩麗
Wu, Pei-Li |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
教育心理與輔導學系 Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling |
論文出版年: | 2019 |
畢業學年度: | 107 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 325 |
中文關鍵詞: | 主體生成 、未成年子女探視權 、詮釋現象心理學 、親權 、離婚母親 |
英文關鍵詞: | Child custody, Divorced mother, Hermeneutic Phenomenology Study, Subjectivity becoming, Visitation right of the minor children |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201901021 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:174 下載:5 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
研究目的:本研究以詮釋現象心理學為基礎,探討離婚母親在離婚或離開夫家後,因遭逢探視未成年子女之困難,透過司法系統爭取未成年子女探視權之心理歷程,及探究此經歷對離婚母親主體性的影響。
研究方法:本研究之研究參與者為四位離婚母親,其中一位為試探性研究受訪者,另三位為正式研究受訪者。四位受訪者皆接受二次面對面訪談,訪談時長分別為三小時及一小時。受訪者們歷經之司法歷程包括了:酌(改)定未成年子女會面交往、酌(改)定未成年子女權利義務之行使或負擔以及離婚等。本研究透過辯證對子分析,理解受訪者之視框破裂與新視框的形成歷程,並探討離婚母親的司法經歷、期間的心理歷程及主體生成歷程。
研究結果:一、離婚夫妻間未解決之衝突會引發後續母親探視孩子的困難。母親無法行使或負擔未成年子女權利義務的原因包含:希望讓孩子維持原本熟悉的生活環境、父親能夠提供相對豐富的資源、不堪在婚姻關係中遭受權利剝奪而先行離開夫家、受前夫或前夫家人之虐待或暴力威脅等。二、離婚母親在與司法系統互動中經驗到:法官的公正與溫和有助其在法庭上為自己發聲;對程序監理人的觀感受最終親權歸屬與會面交往是否順利之影響;心理諮商師有助釐清想法及思考如何突破困境;社工的協助可免除遭受前夫暴力威脅的恐懼;合作父母、親權之相關課程增加當事人的親職知能與法律知識。三、非同住母親探視未成年子女困境之突破:母親們會於有限的會面交往機會中,盡力突破空間與時間的限制,以多元的方式積極參與孩子的生活。同時,當孩子受到主要照顧者之離間,母親們會透過:(1)以信任作為與孩子互動的基礎;(2)以行動作為爭取與孩子接觸的證明;(3)以時間來驗證母親的耐心與用心等方式,證明自己是夠好的母親;(4)離婚母親於司法歷程中的主體生成是為:經過司法歷程,夫妻間的破壞性關係逐漸靜止,母子關係轉向建立內在穩定連結,隨著人我邊界的移動與清晰,離婚母親之主體性逐漸開展。
研究結論與建議:歷經前述之司法歷程,母親們在遭逢許多非預期的破裂事件後,自我從以關係為優先轉向主體性發展,自我得以有新的面貌與實踐。然而,法院裁判後,會面交往之實行仍有許多困難之處,並對離婚母親及未成年子女之心理與生活產生影響,是故如何能夠完整發揮法院裁判之作用,以維護離婚母親與家庭離異未成年子女之權益,有待後續研究持續關注。本研究最後提出相關建議,其層面包含:(1)對專業助人工作者及司法系統之實務建議;(2)對離婚母親如何自行開展主體性之建議;(3)對未來研究之建議,以供相關專業人員與關心此議題者參考。
關鍵字:探視權、親權、離婚、詮釋現象心理學、主體生成
Based on the interpretation of phenomenological psychology, this study explored the psychological process of divorced mothers who encountered difficulties in visiting their minor children and sought access rights to their children through the judicial system after a divorce or after leaving their husband’s family, as well as exploring the impact of the divorced mothers’ subjectivity becoming.
The research participants include four divorced mothers, of whom one was an exploratory research participant and the other three were formal research participants. All the four participants underwent two face-to-face interviews lasting three hours and one hour respectively. The judicial procedures experienced by respondents included: child custody, visitation, and divorce.
In this study, through dialectical pair analysis, an insight was gained into the course of the participants’ course of frame rupture and new frame formation. At the same time, researcher explored the judicial experience of divorced mothers, and the psychological process and subjectivity becoming in the process.
The results of this study are based on the following four sections: (1) the formation of marriage breakdown and difficulties in visiting; (2) the interactive experience of the divorced mother and judicial system; (3) the breakthrough of the plight of the non-resident mothers visiting their minor children; and (4) the generation of the divorced mothers’ subjectivity throughout the juridical process.
Despite the many unexpected rupture events encountered by the mothers throughout the judicial process, they managed to break free from the relationship-based shackles, leading to the development of subjectivity and self-development and implementation. However, after a court judgement, there are still difficulties in implementing the visit and socializing with the minors, and the psychological and daily related impacts on the divorced mothers and their minor children remain. How to bring court judgment into full play in order to protect the right of divorced mothers and the minor children from broken families are issues requiring constant attention.
Finally, the recommendations based on the research results include: (1) practical advice to professional helpers and the justice system; (2) advice on how divorced mothers can self-improvement their subjectivity; and (3) providing recommendations for follow-up studies, which shall serve as a reference for relevant professionals and those concerned with this issue.
一、中文文獻
丁興祥、賴誠斌(2002):歷史及社會文化脈絡中個人主體性之建構:以沈從文的堅持為例。應用心理研究,16,173-214。
內政部(2017):105年第23週內政統計通報(我國離婚對數變動狀況分析)。取自內政部統計處網站:http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=10664,2017年4月23日。
方格正(2014):年輕成人罹癌康復後生命經驗之詮釋。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。
方格正、李佩怡(2016):詮釋現象心理學方法論之整理與補充。本土心理學研究,46,121-148。
王宣惠(2015):家事事件法施行後之親權暨會面交往事件之研究。國立中正大學法律系研究所碩士論文。
司法院(2019):地方法院家事事件裁判未成年人監護權歸屬情形---按事件別分。取自司法統計網站https://www.judicial.gov.tw/juds/report/sf-31.htm,2019年8月17日。
司法院(2019):地方法院離婚事件附帶子女監護權歸屬。取自司法統計網站https://www.judicial.gov.tw/juds/,2019年8月17日。
江宛凌(2006):以塔羅牌為媒介諮商中低自尊大學生所知覺重要事件與晤談感受之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育心理輔導學系碩士論文。
何青蓉(2002):橫看成嶺側成峰:「主體性」是什麼?應用心理研究,16, 25-27。
余德慧(2001):詮釋現象心理學。台北:心靈工坊。
余德慧、徐臨嘉(1993):詮釋中國人的悲怨。本土心理學研究,1,301-329。
余德慧、蔡怡佳(1995):「離合」在青少年發展歷程的意義。本土心理學研究,3,93-140。
吳煜宗(2004):離婚後親子間之會面交往。法學講座,30,52-62。
吳豐維(2006):何謂主體性?一個實踐哲學的考察。思想,4,63-78。
呂俐安(1991):母親對孩子的敘說—從敘說資料探討母親的心理結構。台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
李素芬、陳凱婷(2016):書寫療癒:西方表達性書寫與本土心理位移書寫。輔導季刊,52(4),59-69。
沈清松(1990):現代哲學論衡。臺北:黎明文化事業股份有限公司。
林之珮(2008):離婚後與子女離居女性之婚姻與母職之心理歷程敘事研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
林秀玲、戴嘉南、黃瑛琪(2008)。浴火鳳凰:一位喪子母親的哀傷調適與意義重建歷程研究。諮商輔導學報,19,31-68。http://dx.doi.org/10.6308/JCG.19.02
林詩敏(2014):程序監理人制度在親權酌定事件之運用:諮商心理師經驗。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
邱憶晨(2016):探視父母使用未成年子女會面交往服務之親子關係維繫經驗。國立臺北大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
洪瑞斌(2012):失業經驗中的生涯韌性與韌力:對成年男性失業者之質性研究初探。中華輔導與諮商學報,34,143-173。
洪遠亮,2010:簡析會面交往的離間現象及司法因應之道。法學新論,21,43-78。
胡韶玲(2004):四位低收入戶單親母親的復原歷程—論親子力量的影響。國立台北大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。
翁開誠(2002):覺解我的治療理論與實踐:通過故事來成人之美。應用心理研究,16,23-69
馬憶南(2009):父母與未成年子女的法律關係-從父母權利本位到子女權利本位。月旦民商法雜誌,25,51-64。
高淑清(2008):質性研究的18堂課—首航初探之旅。高雄:麗文文化。
張英陣、彭淑華(1996):從優勢的觀點論單親家庭。東吳社會工作學報,2,227-272。
張誼方(2015):離婚或不離婚?婚姻關係解密之探究~~客體關係理論的詮釋。國立暨南國際大學輔導與諮商研究所博士論文。
畢恆達(1995):生活經驗研究的反省:詮釋學的觀點。本土心理學研究,4,224- 259。
許淑珍(2009):離婚家庭子女與不同住父母的親子互動-子女的經驗與感受。輔仁大學兒童與家庭學系碩士班碩士論文。
郭淑美(2005):離婚婦女爭取子女監護權歷程探究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
郭靜晃(2016):人類行為與社會環境(第二版)。新北:揚智文化。
陳淑琦(2012):優勢中心取向督導模式運用於新手諮商師之研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系所博士論文。
陳棋炎、黃宗樂、郭振恭(2014):民法繼承新論(修訂十版)。台北:三民。
曾鈞玫(2017):離婚事件中親權酌定之實務考察。全國律師,21(10),68-89。
曾孆瑾、高緻真與蔡明芳(2009):從「兒童少年最佳利益」探討社會工作者在監護訪視的多樣性評估指標與困境。臺灣社會工作學刊,7,129-162。
黃逸柔(2013):離婚後親權人之決定與未成年子女最佳利益之研究。中正大學法律研究所碩士論文。
黃詩淳、邵軒磊(2018):酌定子女親權之重要因素:以決策樹方法分析相關裁判。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,47(1),299-344。
黃翠紋、溫翎佑(2017):親權酌定事件中未成年人最佳利益維護之實務困境-從社工員的觀點。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,13(1),1-26。
鄒川雄(2005):從創新導向之本土化觀點論經典教育的意義—大學基進經典教育論綱。教育與社會研究,8,1-34。
翟宗悌、王佩辰、鄔佩麗(2017):善了!心理諮詢師在離婚調解中的服務敘事。輔導與諮商學報,38(2),1-24。
劉宏恩(2014):離婚後子女監護案件「子女最佳利益原則」的再檢視—試評析2013年12月修正之民法1055條之1規定。月旦法學雜誌,234,193-207。
劉禹婕(20081):離開抑或留下-女性離婚抉擇歷程之探討。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文。
劉惠琴(2002):性別與心理學的相遇。應用心理研究,16,83-108。
鄧學仁(2010): 子女最佳利益之適用爭議與發展方向。臺灣法學雜誌,155,45-61。
鄧學仁(2013):子女福利與親權法之課題。月旦法學雜誌,216,102-118。
鄧學仁(2017):善意父母原則於離婚親權酌定之運用。月旦法學雜誌,265,110-119。
鄭諺霓(2015):離婚後未成年子女親權酌定之實證研究。國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
盧怡任、劉淑慧(2014):受苦經驗之存在現象學研究:兼論諮商與心理治療的理論視野。中華輔導與諮商學報,37,177 – 207。
謝未遲(2014):從家庭系統觀點看離異家庭子女拒絕探視之現象:個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
韓貴香(1999):離婚婦女之生活資源與適應。國立政治大學心理學系碩士論文。
顏桂英(2014):勞燕已分飛,幼雛怎麼辦?家事調解員對離婚父母的子女監護、會面交往之成功調解策略研究。玄奘大學應用心理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
蘇妍如(2004):社工員執行監護權訪視之現況與決策。國立暨南國際大學碩士論文。
白美正譯(2011):超越佛洛伊德:精神分析的歷史。台北:心靈工坊。Mitchell, S. A. & Black, M. J. (1995). Freud and beyond: a history of modern psychoanalytic thought. NY: Basic Books.
張君玫譯(2003):母職的再生產:心理分析與性別社會學。台北:群學。Chodorow, N. (1999). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley. University of California Press.
張婉儀譯(2006):如何幫助父母離異的孩子—附離婚法律問題。台北:沃爾文化。Klosinski, G. (2004). Scheidung–Wie helfen wir den Kindern?Deutschland: Patmos.
楊維玉譯(2012a):6-9歲孩子,為何喜歡裝大人?台北:心靈工坊。Aves, C., Youell, B. (2006). Understanding 6-9 year-olds. London: Jessica Kingsley.
楊維玉譯(2012b):10-14歲孩子,為何喜歡裝大人?台北:心靈工坊。Aves, C., Youell, B. (2006). Understanding 10-14 year-olds. London: Jessica Kingsley.
劉慧卿譯(2001):母性精神分析—女性精神分析大師的生命故事。台北:心靈工坊。Sayers, J. (1991). Mothers of psychoanalysis: Helen Deutsch, Karen Horney, Anna Freud, Melanie Klein. USA: Penguin Books.
蔡錚雲譯(2005):現象學導論。新北:桂冠。Dermot Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology, NY: Routledge.
二、英文文獻
Agllias, K. (2015). Difference, choice and punishment: Parental beliefs and understandings about adult child estrangement. Australian Social Work, 68(1), 115-129.
Arditti, J. A. (1995). Noncustodial parents: Emergent issues of diversity and process. Marriage & Family Review, 20, 283-297.
Arditti, J. A., & Madden-Derdich, D. A. (1993). Noncustodial mothers: Developing strategies of support. Family Relations, 42(3), 305-314. doi:10.2307/585560
Babcock, G. M. (1998). Stigma, identity dissonance, and the nonresidential mother. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 28(1-2), 139-156.
Bemiller, M. (2010). Mothering from a distance. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 51(3), 169-184. doi:10/1080/10502551003597824
Bos, A. E. R., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Stutterheim, S. E. (2013). Stigma: Advances in theory and research. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/01973533.2012.746147
Boss, P. (2010). The trauma and complicated grief of ambiguous loss. Pastoral Psychology, 59, 137-145. doi:10.1007/ s11089-009-0264-0
Carlson, M. J. (2006). Family structure, father involvement, and adolescent behavioral outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(1), 137-154.
Chen, K.T., & Lee, S. F. (2014, Jul. ). The study of impact of Psychological Displacement Paradigm in Diary-Writing on client conceptualization for counseling. Paper presented at 7th European Conference on Psychology. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley:University of California Press.
Clumpus, L. (1996). The feminism and psychology undergraduate prize 1995: Prizewinning entry – no-woman’s land: The story of non-custodial mothers. Feminism & Psychology, 6, 237-244. doi:10.1177/09593535596062012
Fabricius, W. V., & Luecken, L. J. (2007). Post-divorce living arrangements, parent conflict, and long-term physical health correlates for children of divorce. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 195-205.
Ferguson, S. K. (1994). Mothers without children: implications for practice. Journal of Women and Social Work, 9, 401-417.
Filder, B. J., & Bala, N. (2010). Children who resisting post separation contact with a parent: Concepts, controversies, and conundrums. Family Court Review, 48(1), 10-47.
Fischer, J. L. (1983) Mothers living apart from their children. Family Relations, 32, 351-357.
Garber, B. D. (2011). Parental alienation and the dynamics of the enmeshed parent–child dyad: Adultification, parentification, and infantilization. Family Court Review, 49(2), 322-335. doi:10.1111/J.1744-1617.2011.01374.x
Goldscheider, F., Scott M. E., Lilja, E., and Bronte-Tinkew, J. (2015). Becoming a Single Parent: The Role of Father and Mother Characteristics. Journal of Family Issues, 36(12), 1624–1650. doi: 10.1177/0192513X13508405
Gottman, J. M. & Gottman, J. S. (2018). The Science of Couples and Family Therapy: Behind the Scenes at the Love Lab. New York: Norton.
Greif, G. L. (1997). Working with noncustodial mothers. Families in Society, Article 68, 46–51.
Greif, G. L., & Pabst, M.S. (1988). Mothers without custody. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Hamer, J., & Marchioro, K. (2002). Becoming custodial dads: Exploring parenting among low-income and working-class African American fathers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 116-129.
Herrerias, C. (1995). Noncustodial mothers following divorce. Marriage and Family Review, 20(1/2), 233-255.
Herrerias, C. (2008). Inequities faced by noncustodial mothers. Journal of interdisciplinary feminist thought, 3(1), 1-25.
Johnston, J. R., Roseby, V., & Kuehnle, K. (2009). In the name of the child: A developmental approach to understanding and helping children of conflicted and violent divorce. New York: Springer.
Kielty, S. (2005). Mothers are non-resident parents too: A consideration of mother’s perspectives on non-residential parenthood. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 27(1), 1-16. doi:10.1080/09649060500085487
Kielty, S. (2007). Non-resident motherhood: Managing a threatened identity. Child and Family Social Work, 13, 32-40. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2007.00512.x
Kielty, S. (2008). Working hard to resist a “bad mother” label. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 7(3), 363-379. doi:10.1177/1473325008093707
Kruk, E. (2010). Collateral damage: The lived experiences of divorced mothers without custody. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 51, 526–543. doi:10.1080/10502556.2010.504103
Kruk, E. (2015). The lived experiences of non-custodial parents in Canada: A comparison of mothers and fathers. International Journal for Family Research and Policy, 1(1), 80-95.
Lee, S. F., & Chen, K. T. (2014, Jul. ). The Effects of Counseling Interns adopting Psychological Displacement Paradigm in Dairy-Writing on Individual Counseling Practice. Paper presented at 28th International Congress of Applied psychology. Paris, France.
Lee, S. F., & Chen, K. T. (2015, Aug. ). The Influences of Counseling Interns adopting the Psychological Displacement Paradigm in Diary-Writing on the self. Paper presented at Division 17 of the APA convention, August, Toronto.
Leinonen, J. A., Solantaus, T. S., & Punamäki, R. L. (2002). The specific mediating paths between economic hardship and the quality of parenting. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 423-435. doi:10.1080/01650250143000364
Levin, K. A., & Currie, C. (2010). Family structure, mother-child communication, father- child communication, and adolescent life satisfaction. Health Education, 110(3), 152-168.
Lewis, M. W., & Petry, N. M. (2005). Contingency management treatments that reinforce completion of goal-related activities: participation in family activities and its association with outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend, 79(2), 267-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.01.016.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
Lowenstein, L. F. (2010). Attachment theory and parental alienation. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 51(3), 157-168. doi:10.1080110502551003597808 Major & O'Brien, 2005
McMurray, A. (1992). Influences on parent-child relationships in non-custodial mothers. Australian Journal of Marriage and Family, 13, 138-147.
Meggiolaro, S & Ongaro, F.(2015). Life satisfaction among older people in Italy in a gender approach – CORRIGENDUM. Ageing & Society, 35(7), 1-24.
Menning, C. L. (2006). Nonresident fathers’ involvement and adolescents’ smoking. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 47(1), 32-46.
Merriam. S. (1995). What Can You Tell From An N of l? : Issues of Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4, 50-60.
Mitchell, K. S., Booth, A., & King, V. (2009). Adolescents with nonresident fathers: Are daughters more disadvantaged than sons? Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 650-662.
Morris, E., Hippman, C., Murray, G., Michalak, E. E., Boyd, J. E., Livingston, J., Inglis. A., Carrion, P., & Austen, J. (2018). Self-stigma in relatives of people with mental illness scale: Development and validation. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 212, 169-174. doi:10. 1192/bjp.2017.23
Neimeyer, R. A. (2001). The language of loss: Grief therapy as a process of meaning reconstruction. In R. A. Neimeyer (Ed.). Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss (pp. 261-292). Washington, DC: American
Neimeyer, R. A., & Anderson, A. (2002). Meaning reconstruction theory. In N. Thompson (Ed.), Loss and grief: A guide for human service practitioners (pp. 45-64). New York: Palgrave.
Ormrod, J. (2018). The challenges facing non-resident mothers following divorce: a literature review. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 46, 6, 694–708.
Osborne, C., Berger, L. M., Magnuson, K. (2012). Family structure transitions and changes in maternal resources and well-being. Demography, 49, 23-47.
Pagano, A.M. (2000). Journeys of women without custody. Danbury, CT: Rutledge Books, Inc.
Pandey, S. C., & Patnaik, S. (2014). Jharkhand Journal of Development and Management Studies XISS. Ranchi, 12(1), 5743-5753.
Rich, A. (1982). Of Woman Born. New York: Norton.
Ricoeur, P. (1974). Metaphor and the Main Problem of Hermeneutics. On Metaphor, 6(1), 95-110. DOI: 10.2307/468343
Santora, J., & Haysy, P. A. (1998). Coping outside traditional roles: The case of noncustodial mothers and implications for therapy. Women & Therapy, 21, 53–66. doi:10.1300/J015v21n04.04
Stewart, S.D. (1999). Nonresident mothers’ and fathers’ social contact with children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(4), 894-907.
Sullivan, M. J., & Kelly, J. B. (2001).Legal and Psychological Management of Case with an Alienated Child. Family Court Review, 30(3), 299-315.
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight a "big-tent" criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851.
Vogt Yuan, A. (2014). Father–Child Relationships and Nonresident Fathers’ Psychological Distress. Journal of Family Issues, 37, 603-621.
Wallerstedt, C., & Higgins, P. (1996). Facilitating perinatal grief between the mother and the father. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 25(5), 389-394.
Wallerstein, J., Lewis, J., Packer, R. S. (2013). Mothers and their children after divorce: Report from a 25-year longitudinal study. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(2), 167-184.
Winnicott, D.W. (1953). Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena—A Study of the First not me possession. J. Psycho-Anal., 34, 89-97.
Winnicott, D.W. (1964). The Child, the Family and the Outside World. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
Winnicott, D.W. (1963). The development of the capacity for concern. Bull. Menninger Clin, 27, 167-176.