簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 宋珮綺
Sung, Pei-Chi
論文名稱: 高中輔導教師焦點解決反思團隊督導歷程經驗與成果之研究
The Experience and Outcome Study of High School Guidance Teachers Participating in Solution-Focused Reflecting Team Supervision
指導教授: 許維素
Hsu, Wei-Su
口試委員: 許維素
Hsu, Wei-Su
洪莉竹
Hung, Li-Chu
張德聰
Chang, Te-Chung
陳秉華
Chen, Ping-Hwa
王玉珍
Wang, Yu-Chen
口試日期: 2024/06/25
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 509
中文關鍵詞: 反思團隊督導焦點解決督導同儕團體督導焦點解決反思團隊督導高中輔導教師
英文關鍵詞: reflecting team supervision, solution-focused supervision, peer group supervision, solution-focused reflecting team supervision, high school guidance teachers
研究方法: 主題分析半結構式訪談法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401111
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:68下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討高中輔導教師參加焦點解決反思團隊督導的歷程經驗與成果。以滾雪球方式邀請到六名高中輔導老師為研究對象,招募條件為工作年資10年以上,曾接受焦點解決訓練18小時以上。本研究資料搜集方式為六次焦點解決反思團隊督導,每次90分鐘。每次團體依據焦點解決反思團隊督導流程進行,分有六階段(準備階段、報告階段、澄清階段、肯定階段、反思階段、統整階段),參與者在各階段採輪流發言的進行方式。每位參與者在六次團體中亦輪流擔任主持人、提案者與反思團隊成員三種角色。在第三次團體結束後和第六次團體結束後,邀請參與者接受一對一的半結構式訪談,以了解參與者中期歷程經驗與成果、整體歷程經驗與成果。資料分析階段,由研究者與一位具有質性分析訓練背景的協同研究者採取「主題分析法」進行資料歸納分析。
    研究結果以參與者個別歷程經驗與成果、中期歷程經驗與成果、整體歷程經驗與成果分別呈現。中期與整體歷程經驗與成果共同反映六大主題,包括(1)「提升成員積極參與的動機」,如團體氣氛、同儕背景、成員熟悉度、工作同盟、普同感、平等結構等影響成員參與動機的因素。(2)「團體六階段的歷程經驗與成果」,包含準備階段、報告階段、澄清階段、肯定階段、反思階段、統整階段的特徵與效果。(3)「輪流擔任三種角色歷程經驗與成果」,包含擔任主持人、提案者及反思團隊成員的學習、體驗與收穫。(4)「專業能力的學習與收穫」,如諮商歷程反思、多元觀點與介入策略、專業賦能感、焦點解決思維與技術的學習等。(5)「學校應用的經驗與成果」,如增進輔導教師自我反思、自我覺察、專業認同,和同校或跨校成員的經驗。以及(6)「應用建議」,如日後執行與推廣的注意事項與安排建議。以此六大主題架構,中期歷程經驗與成果包含25個次主題、細分為81個類別,整體歷程經驗與成果則包含29個次主題、細分為84個類別。
    研究討論分為八個部分,第一節為參與者歷程經驗的學習收穫與轉變。第二節到第六節則分別從參與程度、六階段歷程經驗與成果、三種角色歷程經驗與成果、專業能力的學習與收穫、學校實踐等五個面向,將參與者在焦點解決反思團隊督導中期歷程經驗與成果以及整體歷程經驗與成果進行對照,並討論其轉變。每節討論依照以下四個向度進行討論:(1)中期與後期持續出現的經驗向度、(2)中期出現在後期有程度上轉變的經驗向度、(3)僅中期出現的經驗向度、(4)僅後期出現的經驗向度。第七節依據本研究結果與文獻進行對話,即焦點解決反思團隊督導模式與一般團體督導、同儕團體督導、反思團隊督導、焦點解決督導、焦點解決反思團隊督導相關研究進行對話。第八節針對第一到第七節的研究發現進行綜合討論。
    最後,依據研究結果與討論提出本研究之結論以及對未來研究的建議,以期能提供未來在進行焦點解決反思團隊督導實務與研究之參考。

    This study aims to explore the experiences and outcome of high school guidance teachers participating in solution-focused reflecting team supervision (SFRTS). Using the snowball sampling method, six high school guidance teachers with over ten years of experience and a minimum of 18 hours of solution-focused brief therapy training were invited as research informants. Data collection involved six 90-minute SFRTS sessions, each following a six-stage process: Preparation, presenting, clarifying, affirming, reflecting, and closing. Participants rotated speaking roles during each stage and took turns as the process manager, the presenter, and team member throughout the sessions. Additionally, two one-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted after the third and sixth sessions of SFRTS to gather mid-term and overall participation experiences and outcomes. A co-researcher with a training background in qualitative analysis was invited and thematic analysis was used when conducting the data analysis.
    The research results are presented in terms of individual participant processes experiences and outcomes, mid-term processes experiences and outcomes, and overall processes experiences and outcomes. Both mid-term and overall processes experiences and outcomes reflect six major themes, which include:
    (1) Enhancing members' motivation for active participation: Factors included group atmosphere, peer background, familiarity among members, working alliances, a sense of universality/commonality, an egalitarian relational structure, and others.
    (2) Group processes and outcomes across the six stages: Characteristics and effects of each stage (ex. preparation, presenting, clarifying, affirming, reflecting, and closing) emerged.
    (3) Processes and outcomes derived from rotating three roles: Experiences and gains were noted from serving as the process manager, presenter, and reflecting team members.
    (4) Acquiring professional competency: This involved reflecting on the counseling process, considering diverse perspectives and intervention strategies, gaining a sense of professional empowerment, and acquiring solution-focused thinking and techniques.
    (5) Experiences and outcomes of school application: This facilitated school guidance counselors in self-reflection and self-awareness, and promoted their professional identity. Within- same-school and cross-schools experience were exchanged.
    (6) Suggestions for SFRTS application: Recommendations were made for future implementation and promotion SFRTS, including considerations and suggested arrangements.
    Under these six major themes, the mid-term experiences and outcomes included 25 sub-themes and 81 categories, while the overall process experiences and outcomes encompassed 29 sub-themes and 84 categories.
    The discussion is divided into eight sections. Section one discusses participants' growth and transformation. Sections two to sections six compare and contrast participants' mid-term and overall SFRTS experiences and outcomes, highlighting five dimensions: Participation level, process experiences and outcomes across six stages, experiences and gains in three roles, professional skillset building, and school practice. All comparing and contrasting follow four axes: (1) experiences recurring in both mid-term and later stages, (2) experiences occurring in mid-term but changing in later stages, (3) experiences occurring only in mid-term, and (4) experiences occurring only in later stages. Section seven compares the study's findings with existing literature on group supervision, peer group supervision, reflective team supervision, solution-focused supervision and SFRTS. Section eight reviews sections one to seven for an integrative discussion.
    Finally, conclusions and suggestions for future research are presented based on the study's findings and discussions. This aims to provide insights for future SFRTS implementation and research.

    第壹章緒論1 第一節研究動機1 第二節研究目的與研究問題10 第三節名詞釋義11 第貳章文獻探討15 第一節團體督導15 第二節同儕團體督導與反思團隊督導32 第三節焦點解決督導48 第四節焦點解決反思團隊督導71 第叁章研究方法95 第一節研究取向95 第二節研究參與者97 第三節研究工具101 第四節研究程序112 第五節研究資料處理與分析124 第六節研究倫理140 第肆章研究結果143 第一節研究參與者個別歷程經驗與成果143 第二節焦點解決反思團隊督導中期歷程經驗與成果210 第三節焦點解決反思團隊督導整體歷程經驗與成果267 第伍章討論333 第一節參與者歷程經驗的學習收穫與轉變333 第二節從參與程度看參與者中期與整體歷程經驗與成果之對照與轉變344 第三節從六階段歷程經驗與成果看參與者中期與整體歷程經驗與成果之對照與轉變353 第四節從三種角色歷程經驗與成果看參與者中期與整體歷程經驗與成果之對照與轉變370 第五節從專業能力的學習與收穫看參與者中期與整體歷程經驗與成果之對照與轉變386 第六節從校園實踐看參與者中期與整體歷程經驗與成果之對照與轉變398 第七節與文獻對話412 第八節綜合討論433 第陸章結論與未來研究建議463 第一節研究結論463 第二節未來研究建議474 參考文獻479 附錄501

    Anderson, H.(2008):《合作取向治療:對話.語言.可能性》(周和君譯)。張老師文化。(原出版年:1997)
    Corey, G.(2017):《諮商與心理治療理論與實務》(修慧蘭、鄭玄藏、余振民、王淳弘)。雙葉。(原出版年:2017)
    Hawkins, P., & Shohet, R.(2003):《助人專業督導》(王文秀、李泌芬、謝淑敏、彭一芳譯)。學富。(原著出版年:2000)
    Maxwell, J. A.(2018):《質性研究設計:互動取向的方法》(陳劍涵譯)。心理出版社。(原著出版年:2013)
    Patton, M. Q. (1995):《質的評鑑與研究》(吳芝儀、李奉儒譯)。桂冠。(原著出版年:1990)
    Pichot, T. & Dolan, Y. M.(2007):《焦點解決短期治療:社區機構的有效運用》(陳郁珊、黃淑賢、鄭媖瑋、謝蕙春、許維素譯)。心理出版社。(原著出版年:2003)
    Punch, K. F.(2006):《社會科學研究法:量化與質化研究取向》(林世華、陳柏熹、黃寶園、傅瓊儀、趙如錦譯)。心理出版社。(原著出版年:2005)
    Sharry, H. (2006):《焦點解決團體工作》〈周玉真譯〉。心理出版社。(原出版年:2001)
    Sklare, G. B.(2019):《學校輔導中的焦點解決短期諮商》(許維素、陳宣融譯)。心理出版社。(原出版年:2014)
    王文秀(2018):〈諮商督導的美麗與哀愁〉。見蕭文、田秀蘭(主編),《臺灣輔導一甲子》,頁281–334。心理出版社。
    王麗斐、杜淑芬(2009):〈臺北市國小輔導人員與諮商心理師之有效跨專業合作研究〉。《教育心理學報》,41,295–320。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20090402
    中華日報(2021年1月9日):〈小校跨校合作,師生雙贏〉。中華日報。https://tw.stock.yahoo.com/news/%E5%B0%8F%E6%A0%A1%E8%B7%A8%E6%A0%A1%E5%90%88%E4%BD%9C- E5%B8%AB%E7%94%9F%E9%9B%99%E8%B4%8F-160033839.html. https://tw.stock.yahoo.com/news/%E5%B0%8F%E6%A0%A1%E8%B7%A8%E6%A0%A1%E5%90%88%E4%BD%9C- E5%B8%AB%E7%94%9F%E9%9B%99%E8%B4%8F-160033839.html]
    朱素芬(2009):《高中職輔導教師之督導者專業知能的研究》(未出版碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學。http://doi.org/ 10.6837/NCNU.2009.00066
    朱嘉美(2021):《心理治療與易經》。天馬。
    何長珠(2020):《團體諮商:心理團體的理論與實務》。五南。
    李宛芸(2011):《中學校輔導教師個案輔導工作團體督導之經驗研究》(未出版碩士論文),國立彰化師範大學。
    宋珮綺、許維素(2023):〈焦點解決反思團隊督導成效之研究:以學校輔導與諮商人員為例〉。《本土諮商心理學學刊》,14(2),77–109。
    宋銘豐(2003):《建構同儕合作情境促進教師專業成長》(未出版碩士論文),國立臺中教育大學。
    余冠英(2008):《團隊學習下國中教師的專業成長》(未出版碩士論文),國立彰化師範大學。
    林世欣、曾仁美、徐西森(2021):〈專任輔導教師之督導需求初探〉。《諮商心理與復健諮商學報》,35,47–63。http://doi.org/10.6308/JCPRC.202102_(35).0003
    林本炫(2007):〈不同質性研究方法的資料分析比較〉。見周平、楊弘任(主編),《質性研究方法的眾聲喧嘩》,頁127–150。復文。
    林怡琪(2019):《焦點解決短期治療訓練對國中專任輔導教師專業承諾與輔導自我效能之成效研究》(未出版碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學。 http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU20190022
    林香君(1998):〈焦點解決短期治療及其督導模式(上)〉。《諮商與輔導》,150,11–15。
    林昕蓉(2014):《焦點解決短期諮商訓練對提升電話志工諮商自我效能與學習效果之研究》(未出版碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學。
    林家興(2012):《諮商督導實務》。見林家興、趙舒禾、方格正、黎欣怡、李露芳、葉安華等(合著),《諮商督導實務》,頁104–124。雙葉。
    林清文(2007):《學校輔導》。雙葉。
    林淑華(2019):《學校輔導教師督導者之督導經驗與學校輔導督導系統建構》(未出版博士論文),國立臺灣師範大學。https://doi.org/10.6345/DIS.NTNU.DEPC.001.2019.F02
    林淑華、田秀蘭、吳嘉寶(2017):(高中職輔導教師工作困境、因應方式與督導需求初探)。《家庭教育與諮商期刊》,20,87–116。
    林淑華、田秀蘭、盧宏文(2020):(學校輔導教師督導者之督導經驗與學校輔導督導系統建構)。《教育心理學報》,52,311–335。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202012_52(2).0004
    吳秀碧(2012):〈受督者知覺有益學習的督導關係內涵之探究〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》,33,87–118。http://doi.org/10.7082/CJGC.201208.0087
    吳芝儀(2018):〈1980~1990的研究焦點〉。見蕭文、田秀蘭(主編),《臺灣輔導一甲子》,頁101–108。心理出版社。
    吳宛亭(2016):《國中專任輔導教師焦點解決學派訓練成效之研究》(未出版碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學。
    吳啟誠(2013):〈檢視融合教育之論述與研究:以台灣為例〉。《特教論壇》,15,22–34。https://doi.org/10.6502/SEF.2013.15.20-32
    吳啟誠、張瓊云(2020):〈主題分析在教育研究上的應用〉。《特殊教育發展期刊》,69,29–42。https://doi.org/10.7034/DSE.202006_(69).0003
    周玉真(2007):〈焦點解決親職團體之團體效果與療效因素分析〉。《教育心理學報》,39(1),1–21。http://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20070123
    周麗玉(2005a):〈以學校為中心的臨床個案督導工作(上)~以臺北縣某國中的四年督導經驗為例〉。《諮商與輔導》,232,41–44。http://doi.org/10.29837/CG.200504.0016
    周麗玉(2005b)。〈以學校為中心的臨床個案督導工作(下)~以臺北縣某國中的四年督導經驗為例。《諮商與輔導》,233,37–41。http://doi.org/10.29837/CG.200505.0012
    胡幼慧(2009):《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。巨流。
    柯雅瓊(2009):《國中輔導教師受督導需求之研究》(未出版碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學。
    柯雅瓊、許維素(2011):〈學校輔導教師督導模式初探〉。《輔導季刊》,47(1),30–41。http://doi.org/ 10.29742/GQ.201103.0004
    洪莉竹(2005):〈創造學校輔導人員的專業定位:專業學校諮商師的角色與功能〉。《教育研究月刊》,134,11–21。
    洪莉竹(2018):〈焦點解決短期治療〉。見蕭文、田秀蘭(主編),《臺灣輔導一甲子》,135–138。心理出版社。
    洪莉竹、李韻如(2011):〈建構諮商師的反思能力:促進反思的督導團體〉。《國民教育》,51(4),12–19。
    洪菁惠、洪莉竹(2013):〈社會建構主義在焦點解決短期治療中的實踐〉。《臺灣心理諮商季刊》,5(2),1–27。
    施香如(2010):〈團體督導與過程回顧:新手團體領導者的督導型式與媒介應用經驗〉。《輔導季刊》,46(1),25–31。https://doi.org/10.29742/GQ.201003.0004
    施香如(2015):〈諮商實務課程團體督導之學習經驗初探:循環發展督導模式及反饋小組的應用〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》,43,127–157。
    徐西森(2011):《團體動力與團體輔導》。心理出版社。
    徐西森、黃素雲(2023):《諮商督導理論與研究》。心理出版社。
    高淑清(2008):《質性研究的18堂課—首航初探之旅》。麗文文化。
    鈕文英(2021):《質性研究方法與論文寫作》。雙葉。
    許育光(2011):〈國小輔導教師之實務培訓與督導需求初探〉。《教育實踐與研究》,24(2),99–127。https://doi.org/10.6776/JEPR.201112.0102
    許維素(2003):《焦點解決短期諮詢的應用》。天馬。
    許維素(2005):〈輔導教師學校系統觀的重要性〉。《輔導季刊》,41(3),72–74。
    http://doi.org/ 10.29742/GQ.200509.0010
    許維素(2007):〈焦點解決督導成效之研究〉。《教育心理學報》,38(3),331–354。http://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20070116
    許維素(2009):〈焦點解決督導構成要素之研究〉。《教育心理學報》,41(2),475–496。http://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20080213
    許維素(2012):《高中職輔導教師督導者訓練方案暨成效之相關研究――以焦點解決取向為基》(計畫編號:NSC99-2410-H-003-037-MY2)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃研究成果報告,行政院。
    許維素(2014):《焦點解決短期治療-理論與實務》。心理出版社。
    許維素、吳宛亭(2018):〈焦點解決短期治療訓練對國中專任輔導教師之成果研究〉。《教育心理學報》,50(2),315–340。http://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201 812_50(2).0007
    許維素、陳宣融(2015):〈焦點解決短期治療在臺灣地區學校輔導中的應用〉。《心理研究》,8(4),16–22。
    許維素、游于萱(2017):〈輔導教師之焦點解決督導員訓練成效研究〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》,49,147–182。http://doi.org/10.3966/172851862017080049006
    許維素、蔡秀玲(2008):〈高中職輔導教師焦點解決團體督導成效之研究〉。《教育心理學報》,39(4),603–622 。http://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20080213
    許維素、蔡秀玲(2011):〈高中職輔導教師學習焦點解決短期諮商效果之初探研究〉。《全球心理衛生E學刊》,2(1),1–19 。
    許韶玲(2003):〈督導者知覺受督導者影響諮商督導過程之因素〉。《應用心理研究》,18,113–144。
    陳向明(2002):《社會科學質的研究》。五南。
    陳均姝(2002):(焦點解決督導模式實務)。見劉焜輝(主編),《諮商督導—實務篇》,頁181–221。天馬。
    陳志賢、黃正鵠(2002):〈高中職專任輔導教師繼續專業教育需求之調查研究〉。《高師輔導所刊》,7,83–103。http://doi: 10.6308/CG.07.04
    陳宣融(2016):《高中職輔導教師參與焦點解決督導者訓練經驗之研究》〈未出版碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學。
    陳秉華(2006):〈SFBT的督導〉。見李玉嬋、林世莉、洪莉竹、張佳雯、張德聰、許維素、陳秉華、葉貞屏、樊雪春(合著),《焦點解決諮商的多元應用》,209–238。張老師文化。
    陳淑芬、陳秉華(2018):〈反思團隊之發展及實務應用〉。《輔導季刊》,54(2),26–36。
    陳淑琦(2012):《優勢中心取向督導模式運用於新手諮商師之研究》(未出版博士論文),國立彰化師範大學。
    郭秝語(2012):《焦點解決督導對高中職輔導教師輔導自我效能內涵之影響》(未出版碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學。
    郭洪國雄(2004):《焦點解決短期諮商訓練—對國中輔導老師諮商效能之分析研究》(未出版博士論文),國立彰化師範大學。
    教育部(2022):教育部年度施政計畫。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/3/relfile/6312/80992/00b4fb80-9d57-4556-a6d1-99c0d738f2d3.pdf
    教育部(2020):教育部年度施政方針。https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED2100/News_Content.aspx?n=D23E9B1FC9ED5D63&sms=4186928212B88A3A&s=E4D1735A88BB7258
    教育部(2022年8月1日):〈教育部學生輔導諮商中心〉。https://ccme.cloud.ncnu.edu.tw/
    教育部國民及學前教育署(2022年8月10日)。108課綱資訊網。https://12basic.edu.tw/12about-3-1.php
    游于萱(2014):《高中職輔導教師接受焦點解決督導訓練方案之成效研究》(未出版碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學。
    黃政昌、黃瑛琪、連秀鸞、陳玉芳(2012):《輔導原理與實務》。心理出版社。
    黃婉如(2016):《中學輔導教師參與「校際輔導同盟督導團體」的專業成長經驗之研究》(未出版碩士論文),國立彰化師範大學。
    黃國彰(2018):《同儕團體督導能力評量表之編制研究》(未出版博士論文),國立高雄師範大學。
    黃瑞琴(2021):《質性教育研究方法》。心理出版社。
    黃慧森(2016):《敘事取向迴響團隊模式團體督導歷程與經驗之分析》(未出版博士論文),國立高雄師範大學。
    彭淑婷(2012):《國民中學輔導教師督導員訓練方案之成效評估》(未出版碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學。
    張佳雯、許維素(通訊作者)、陳秉華(2019):〈臺灣諮商輔導人員知覺焦點解決短期治療之文化合適性研究〉。《本土諮商心理學學刊》, 10(3),1–35。
    馮佳怡(2013):〈教師專業學習社群的觀點探索-基隆市國中輔導教師督導團體的發展〉。《中等教育》。64(3),128–137。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2013.64.3.10
    奧康奈爾、帕默(2009):《焦點解決治療應用手冊》(鄭英瑋、劉威成、鍾洞偉、許維素譯)。心理出版社。(原作出版年:2003)
    楊雅雯(2009):《焦點解決團體督導對高中職輔導教師之賦能內涵研究》(未出版碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學。
    葉姵君(2023):《桃園市國小專任輔導教師接受團體督導之經驗探究》(未出版碩士論文),國立嘉義大學。
    廖本富(2001):〈在焦點解決督導中催化受督導者「重新得力」〉。《輔導季刊》。37(1),20–29。
    黎欣怡、田秀蘭、吳熙琄、王孟甯(2021):〈後現代敘事合作取向團體督導歷程中的督導思維與督導策略〉。《教育心理學報》,53(1),199–222。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202109_53(1).0009
    潘正德(2012):《團體動力學》。心理出版社。
    潘淑滿(2003):《質性研究:理論與應用》。心理出版社。
    蔡秀玲(2017):〈團體督導中影響學校輔導教師學習之因素初探〉。《輔導季刊》。53(3),20–30。https://doi.org/10.29742/GQ.201103.0004
    劉一竹(1999):《團體督導對準諮商員專業諮商能力影響之研究》(未出版碩士論文),國立彰化師範大學。
    謝麗紅、林詠昌(2014):〈團體諮商工作同盟量表編製研究〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》,40,59–93。https://doi.org/10.29837/CG.201006.0003
    謝麗紅、翁毓秀、林詠昌(2007):〈團體督導對碩士層級準諮商師團體領導能力督導效果之分析研究〉。《輔導與諮商學報》,29(2),99–116。https://doi.org/10.29837/CG.201006.0003
    魏麗敏(2024):〈十二年國教實施國中小學校輔導工作之現況與展望〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》,13 (3),1–9。https://doi.org/10.29837/CG.201006.0003
    蘇于珊、許維素(2020):〈焦點解決短期諮商對青少年身體意象諮商成效之相關研究〉。《教育心理學報》,52 (1),163–189。http://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202009_52(1).0007
    蘇韋列(2019):(你,曾為團隊妥協嗎?社會互動導致的生心理反應)。《科學月刊》,589,46–49。https://doi.org/10.6162/SRR.1998.37.20
    蘇盈儀(2006):《自我覺察督導模式在同儕督導上之應用:以國民中學輔導工作人員為對象》(未出版碩士論文),國立彰化師範大學。
    Andersen, T. (1987). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26, 415–428.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1987.00415.x.
    Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In S. McNamee & K. J. Gergen’s (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 25–39). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8975-8_15
    Attridge, W. C. (2007). Advancing the dialogue: A grounded theory analysis of reflecting team group supervision in counseling practicum [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Texas A & M University, Commerce, TX.
    Baggerly, J., & Osborn, D. (2006). School counselors' career satisfaction and commitment: Correlates and predictors. Professional School Counseling, 9(3), 197–205.
    Bailey, R., Bell, K., Kalle, W., & Pawar, M. (2014). Restoring meaning to supervision through a peer consultation group in rural Australia. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(4), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2014.896785
    Benshoff, J. B. (1992). Peer consulation for professional counselors. Ann Arbor: Clearinghouse on Counseling and Personnel Services.
    Benshoff, J. M., & Paisley, P. O. (1996). The structured peer consultation model for school counselors.Journal of Counseling & Development, 74(3), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb01872.x
    Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision. (6th ed.), Pearson Education Inc.
    Bliss, E. V., & Bray, D. (2009). The smallest solution focused particles: Towards a minimalist definition of when therapy is solution focused. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 28(2), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2009.28.2.62
    Borders, L. D. (1991). A systematic approach to peer group supervision. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb01497.x
    Borders, L. D., (2012). Dyadic, triadic, and group models of peer supervision/consultation: What are their components, and is there evidence of their effectiveness? Clinical Psychologist, 16(2), 59–71.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9552.2012.00046.x
    Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vo1. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
    Briggs, J. R., & Miller, G. (2005). Success enhancing supervision. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(1–2), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1300/J085v16n01_45
    Carter, J. W., Enyedy, K. C., Goodyear, R. K., Arcinue, F., & Puri, N. N. (2009). Concept mapping of the events supervisees find helpful in group supervision. Trainning and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013656
    Carter, J. W., Pak, J. H., & Goodyear, R. K. (2000). Cultural differences in alliance formation during group supervision [Paper presented]. Division17 of the 2000 APA convention, Washington, DC.
    Chang, J. (2010). The reflecting team: A training method for family counselors.The Family Journal, 18(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480709357731
    Chen, H., Zhou, M., Li, H., Manoharasetty, A., Yu, Z., & Luo, H. (2024). Efficacy and executive function of solution-focused brief therapy on adolescent depression. Adolescent and Young Adult Psychiatry, 15, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1246986
    Chui, H., Li, X., & Luk, S. (2021). Does peer relationship matter? A multilevel investigation of the effects of peer and supervisory relationships on group supervision outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(4), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000553
    Cigrand, D. L., & Wood, S. M. (2011). School counseling and solution-focused site supervision: A theoretical application and case example. Journal of School Counseling, 9(6), 1–29.
    Corlett, L. (2015). Future models of supervision: Supporting practice and promoting professional growth and well-being in educational psychology through Collaborative Peer Support (CPS). Educational & Child Psychology, 32(3), 90–104.
    Crutchfield, L. B., & Borders, L. D. (1997). Impact of two clinical peer supervision models on practicing school counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 75(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556- 6676.1997.tb02336.x
    Cunanan, E. D., & McCollum, E. E. (2006). What works when learning solution-focused brief therapy. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 17(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1300/J085v17n01_04
    Cutcliffe, J. R., Hyrkäs, K., & Fowler, J. (2011). Routledge handbook of clinical supervision: Fundamental international themes. Routledge.
    Davis, A., Meloncelli, N., Hannigan A., & Ward, W. (2022). Implementation and evaluation of a new model of online, facilitated, peer group supervision for dietitians working in eating disorders: A descriptive overview informed by the kirkpatrick training evaluation framework. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1319215/v1
    De Jong, P., & Berg, I. K. (2012). Interview for solutions. (4th ed.), Cengage Learning.
    De Shazer, S. (1988). Clues:Investigating solutions in brief therapy. W.W. Norton. & Co.
    De Shazer, S., Dolan, Y., Korman, H., Trepper, T., McCollum, E., & Berg, I. K. (2021). More than miracles: The state of the art of solution-focused brief therapy (2nd ed.), Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003125600
    Dunn, R. L. (2004). The knowledge and competencies of effective school counselor supervision. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
    Enyedy, K. C., Arcinue, F., Puri, N. N., Carter, J. W., Goodyear, R. K., & Getzelman, M. A. (2003). Hindering phenomena in group supervision: Implications for practice. Professional Psychology: Research and practice, 34(3), 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.34.3.312
    Fowler, J. (2011). Solution-focused clinical supervision: Using solution-focused techniques within clinical supervision. In J. R. Cutcliffe, K. Hyrkäs & J. Fowler. (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Supervision: Fundamental international themes (pp. 102–110). Routledge.
    Franklin, C., Trepper, T., Gingerich W., & McCollum, E. (2012). Soiution-focused brief therapy: A handbook of evidence-based practice. Oxford University.
    Franklin, C. (2015). An update on strengths-based, solution-focused brief therapy. Health & Social Work, 40(2), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlv022
    Gong, H., & Hsu, W. S. (2017). The effectiveness of solution-focused group therapy in ethnic-chinese school settings: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 67(3), 383–409.
    https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00207284.2016.1240588.
    Hayes, L. R. (1989). Group supervision. In L. J. Bradley (Ed.), Counselor supervision: Principles, process, and practice (pp. 399–421). Accelerated Development Inc.
    Hess, A. K. (1980). Training models and the nature of psychotherapy supervision. In A. K. Hess (Ed.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 15–28). John Wiley & Sons.
    Hogan, D. (2017). Introduction to solution focused practice in Asian: Creative applications across diverse fields. In Hogan, D., Hogan, D., Tuomola, J., & Yeo, Alan K. L., Solution Focused Practice in Asia (pp. 1–6). Routledge.
    Holloway, E. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Sage.
    Hsu, W. S., & Kuo, B. C. H. (2013). Solution-focused supervision with school counselors in Taiwan. In F. N. Thomas (Ed.), Solution-focused supervision: A resource-oriented approach to developing clinical expertise (pp. 197–204). Springer.
    Hsu, W. S., & Chen, H. J. (2022)., Taiwanese high school counselors' experiences in a solutionfocused supervision training program. Journal of Solution Focused Practices, 6(2), 62–80. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/journalsfp/vol6/iss2/11.
    Iveson, C. (2002). Solution-focused brief therapy. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 8(2), 149–157.
    Iveson, C., George, E. & Ratner, H. (2012). Brief coaching: A solution focused approach. Hove: Routledge.
    Jacyna, N., & Harris-Waller, J. (2014). Time to reflect: Using solution-focused reflecting teams with family and children's services staff. Context, 134, 8–11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265123923
    Kassan, L. D. (2010). Peer supervision groups: How they work and why you need one. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 9(1), 52–60.
    Kellum, K. E. H. (2009). Structured reflecting teams in group supervision: A qualitative study with school counseling interns (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and theses database. (UMI No.3368916)
    Koob, J.J. (2002). The effects of solution-focused supervision on the perceived self-efficacy of therapists in training. The Clinical Supervision, 21(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/ 10.1300/J001v21n02_11
    Kort, B., Froerer A., & Walker, C. (2021). Creating a common language: How solution-focused brief therapy reflects current principles of change and common factors. Journal of Solution Focused Practices, 5(1), 30–44.
    Losey, B., & Norman, R. (2016). Using reflecting teams in counseling practicum. VISTAS Online.
    Macdonald, A. J. (2007). Solution-focused therapy: Theory, research & practice. Sage.
    Macdonald, A. J. (2011). Solution-focused training manual. Sage.
    Mastoras, S. M., & Andrews, J. J. W. (2011). The supervisee experience of group supervision: Implications for research and practice. Training & Education in Professional Psychology, 5, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023567
    McAuliffe G. J. (1992). A case presentation approach to group supervision for community college counselors. Counselor Education and Supervision, 31(3), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1992.tb00157.x
    McGhee, M. W., & Stark, M. D. (2021). Empowering teachers through instructional supervision: Using solution-focused strategies in a leadership preparation program. Journal of Educational Supervision, 4(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.4.1.5
    Metcalf, L. (1995). Counseling toward solutions: A practical solution-focused program for working with students, teachers, and parents. West Nyack.
    Miller, G., & de Shazer, S. (1998). Have you heard the latest rumor about…? Solution-focused therapy as a rumor. Family Process, 37(3). 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1998.00363.x
    Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Neimeyer, R. A. (1995). An invitation to constructivist psychotherapies. In R. A. Neimeyer & M. J. Mahoney (Eds.), Constructivism in psychotherapy (pp.1–8). American Psychological Association.
    Norman, H. (2003). Solution-focused reflecting team. In B. O’Connell & S. Palmer (Eds.), Handbook of solution-focused therapy (pp. 156–167). Sage. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446280478.n15
    O’Connell, B. & Palmer, S. (2003). Handbook of solution-focused therapy. Sage.
    O’Connell, B. (2005). Solution-focused therapy (2nd ed.), Sage.
    Page, B. J., Pietrzak, D.R., & Sutton, J.M. (2001). National Survey of School Counselor Supervision. Counselor Education & supervision, 41,142–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2001.tb01278.x
    Page, S. & Wosket, V. (1994). Supervising the counsellor: A cyclical model. Routledge.
    Pallikkuth, R., Kumar, T. M., Dictus, C. T., & Bunders‑Aelen, J. F. G. (2024). Design and evaluation of peer supervision for community mental health workers: A task‑shifting strategy in low‑resource settings. Community Mental Health Journal, 60, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-023-01161-7
    Park, I. Y., Kim, J., Franklin, C., Zhang, A., Guz, S., Shinohara, T., Yu, M., Cho, Y. J., & Hai, A. H. (2024). Comparing the Effectiveness of Solution-Focused Brief Therapy for Adolescent Outcomes in Schools Between the U.S. and East Asian Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, Sage. ttps://doi.org/10.1177/10443894241234089
    Paulson, L. R., & Casile, W. J. (2014). Building Bridges: A pilot program for training and support of rural supervisors. Clinical Supervisor, 33(2), 204–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2014.981990
    Pesqueira, M. I., Ramírez, I., Ceruti, P., & Carter, J. W. (2021). Practicing clinical supervision in chile: Lessons from 28 years of training. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 51(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-021-09494-8
    Peterson, J. S., & Deuschle, C. (2006). A model for supervising school counseling students without teaching experience. Counselor Education and Supervision, 45(4), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2006.tb00003.x
    Philage, G. E. (2021). Counselors' lived experience of solution-focused supervision: Windows of opportunity [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Barry University.
    Prest, L. A., Darden, E. C., & Keller, J. F. (1990). The fly on the wall: Reflecting team supervision. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16(3), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1990.tb00847.x
    Prieto, L. R. (1996). Group Supervision: Still widely practiced but poorly understood. Counselor Education & Supervision, 35(4), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1996.tb01930.x
    Ray, D., & Altekruse, M. (2000). Effectiveness of Group Supervision Versus Combined Group and Individual Supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2000.tb01796.x
    Roberts, E. B., & Borders, L. D. (1994). Supervision of school counselors: Administrative, program, and counseling. The School Counselor, 41, 149–157.
    Rudes, J., Shilts, L., & Berg, I. K. (1997). Focused supervision seen through a recursive frame analysis. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 23(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1997.tb00244.x
    Shah, R. (2019). The reflecting team: a new approach to case discussion. British Journal of General Practice, 69(689), 612. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X707069
    Shennan, G. (2014). Solution-focused practice: Effective communication to facilitate change. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Simmonds, S. (2019). A Critical Review of Teachers Using Solution-Focused Approaches Supported by Educational Psychologists. Educational Psychology Research and Practice, 5(1), 1–8.
    Smith, M. (2019). Through a glass darkly: Using a reflecting team approach in the development of supervisory practice. Group Analysis, 52(3), Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/0533316419839007
    Starling. P. V. & Baker. S. B., (2000). Structured peer group practicum supervision: Supervisees’ perceptions of supervision theory. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39, 162–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2000.tb01229.x
    Stiefel, I., Brand, M. S., Hinchcliffe, D. K., & Innes, W. R. (2013). Developing family therapy skills on a shoe string budget: A peer supervision and training approach Australian & New Zealand. Journal of Family Therapy, 34(4), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1033
    Stinchfield, T. A., Hill, N. R., & Kleist, D. M. (2010). Counselor trainees’ experiences in triadic supervision: A qualitative exploration of transcendent themes. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 32, 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-010-9099-8
    Sutton, J. M., & Page, B. J. (1994). Post-degree clinical supervision of school counselors. The School Counselor, 42(1), 32–39.
    Taylor, J. (2021). Play therapy group supervision. In C. Mellenthin, J. Stone., & R. J. Grant (Eds.), Implementing play therapy with Groups. (pp. 230–241). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003094531
    Thomas, F. N. (1996). Solution-focused supervision: The coaxing of expertise. In S. D. Miller, M. A. Hubble & B. L. Duncan (Eds.), Handbook of solution-focused brief therapy (pp. 128–151). Jossey–Bass.
    Thomas, S. (2005). The school counselor alumni peerconsulation group. Counselor Education and Supervision, 45(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2005.tb00127.x
    Thomas, F. N. (2013). Solution-focused supervision: A resource-oriented approach to developing clinical expertise. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6052-7
    Trotzer, J. P. (1999). The counselor and the group: Integrating theory, training and practice. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203782408
    Triantafillou, N. (1997). A solution-focused approach to mental health supervision. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 16(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.1997.16.4.305
    Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022100
    Tulleners, T., Taylor, M., & Campbell, C. (2024). Contribution of peer group supervision to nursing practice: An interpretive phenomenological study. Nurse Education in Practice, 75, 1–8.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103903.
    Ungar, M. (2006). Practicing as a postmodern supervisor. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2006.tb01588.x
    Waskett, C. (2006). The pluses of solution-focused supervision. Healthcare Counseling & Psychotherapy Journal, 6(1), 9–11.
    Watkins, C. E. (1995). Psychotherapy supervision in the 1990s: Some observations and reflections.American Journal of Psychotherapy, 49(4), 568–581
    https:://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1995.49.4.568
    Watkins, C. E. (2012). Development of the psychotherapy supervisor: Review of and reflections on 30 years of theory and research. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 66(1), 45–83. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2012.66.1.45
    Westwood, M. J. (1989). Group supervision for counseling-in-training. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 23(4), 348–353.
    Wetchler, J. (1990). Solution-focused supervision. Family Therapy, 17 (2), 129–138.
    Wilbur, M. P., Roberts–Wilbur, J. M., Hart, G., Morris, J. R., & Betz, R. L. (1994). Structured group supervision (SGS): A pilot study. Counselor Education & Supervision, 33(4), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1994.tb00293.x
    Wilkerson, K. (2006). Peer supervision for the professional development of school counselors: Toward an understanding of terms and findings. Counselor Education and Supervision, 46(1), 59–67.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-978.2006.tb00012.x
    Yalom, I. (1985). The theory and practice of group psychology. (3rded.). Basic Books.
    Young, J., Perlesz, A., Paterson, R., O’Hanlon, B., Newbold, A., & Chaplin, R., (1989). The reflecting team process in training. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 10(2), 69–74.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1467-8438.1989.tb00743.x
    Young, J., Saunders, F., Prentice, G., Macri-Riseley, D., Fitch, R., & Pati-Tasca, C. (1997). Three journeys toward the reflecting team. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 18(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1467-8438.1997.tb00265.x
    Yourman, D. B. (2003), Trainee disclosure in psychotherapy supervision: The impact of shame. Journal of Clinical Psychotherapy, 59, 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10162

    下載圖示
    QR CODE