研究生: |
周碩樑 chou , shou-liang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
專業能力標準轉化技職教育課程之機制研究 A mechanism study for translating skill standards into curriculum design for vocational-technical education |
指導教授: |
田振榮
Tien, Chen-Jung |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
工業教育學系 Department of Industrial Education |
論文出版年: | 2005 |
畢業學年度: | 93 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 227 |
中文關鍵詞: | 專業能力 、能力標準 、課程轉化 、概念構圖 、詮釋結構模式 、構圖說明模式 |
英文關鍵詞: | Professional ability, skill standard, course is transformed, concept mapping, Interpretive Structural Model, Illustrative mapping method |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:205 下載:95 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
面臨全球化的影響與國際競爭趨勢,各國積極投入教育投資與改革、提昇教育的內容與品質,以提供國家經濟建設發展與全球化競爭所需的優質人力,因應此一需求,技職教育體系建立「能力標準」,並藉此做為課程設計,確有其必要性。
基於上述,本研究旨在建構以專業能力標準取向之專業課程轉化機制。透過文獻分析了解專業能力發展、課程設計及課程轉化之相關理論,做為研究之依據。在專業能力發展方面,研究方法以焦點團體為主,並採用功能分析法,以「一般化學實驗室操作人員專業能力」為分析的對象,發展出功能圖及能力標準。在課程轉化方面,以腦力激盪為主,找出主要概念,組成課程內容。
本研究獲得以下結論:
一、在專業能力發展方面
(一) 專業能力標準的發展,可提供教育領域課程設計的依據。
(二) 功能分析法進行能力分析,適用的範圖相當廣泛。
(三) 功能分析師是整個功能分析活動最重要的催化者。
二、專業能力標準的轉化方面
(一) 構圖工具選用電腦軟體進行概念概念,有助於概念圖的形成。
(二) 構圖者在進行概念構圖,需具備該專業領域之專業素養。
(三) 概念圖的修改在概念構圖過程中佔有重要性。
(四) 概念構圖方式可由個人單獨完成、或由小組團隊進行。
(五) 專業能力標準所擷取的概念,較易進行概念構圖。
三、專業課程設計方面
(一) 概念構圖是一個課程設計的理想工具。
(二) 概念構圖的技術可用來分析教科書內容,了解其是否一份好教材。
(三) 概念圖層次結構呈現概念與概念間聯,有助安排課程內容。
(四) 專業能力標準轉化技職課程機制為概念構圖、詮釋結構模式、構圖說明模式依序進行,獲得完整課程內容。
Face the influence that is globalized and international competition trend, various countries invest educational investment and reform , content and quality of promoting education actively, high-quality manpower needed by offering national economic construction and development to compete with globalization, this demand that because answer , sets up ' the ability standard ', and design for course by this in duty education system of the skill , really have its necessities.
Because of being above-mentioned , aim at building and constructing and shifting to new management mechanisms with professional course of the standard orientation of professional ability in this research. Analyse through documents that understand the relevant theories transformed in professional ability development , course design and course, do it for the basis of studying. In developing in professional ability, the research approach takes focus group as the core, adopt the analytic approach of the function, regard ' the general attenbant's professional ability of chemical laboratory ' as the target of analysing, develop the functional diagram and ability standard. Transform the respect in course, rely mainly on the fact that the mental work is agitated , find out the main concept , make up the course content .
This research obtains the following conclusion:
First, in developing in professional ability
1. The development of the professional ability standard, can offer the basis that the course is designed of the educational field .
2. The analytic approach of the function carries on ability and analyses , suitable Fan's picture is quite extensive.
3. The function analyst is a person who analyses activity most important catalysis of the whole function.
Second, transformation of the professional ability standard
1. The composition tool selects the computer software for use and carries on the concept concept, contribute to the forming of the concept picture.
2. The composition person is carrying on the concept composition, need to possess the professional accomplishment of this professional field.
3. The modification of the concept picture occupies the importance in the course of concept composition.
4. The composition way of the concept can be finished, or gone on by group's group alone by individual.
5. The concept fetched that the professional ability standard picks is relatively apt to carry on the concept composition.
Design the respect in third , professional course
1. The concept composition is an ideal tool that a course is designed.
2. The technology of the concept composition can be used for analysing the content of the textbook, understand a good teaching material of it.
3. The concept picture hierarchical structure appears and unites among the concept and concept, help to arrange the course content .
4. Professional ability standard transform skill duty course mechanism for concept composition , annotate structure way , composition prove the way goes on in order, obtain the intact course content .
參考書目
一、中文部份
丁鋐鎰 (民90)。國中氧化還原概念之精熟學習研究。國立台灣師範大學化學系碩士論文,未出版。
王嘉陵 (民90)。概念教學法及其在數學科教學上的應用。國教輔導,41(1),20-21。
王薌如 (民83)。概念圖教學在國中生物學習之成效。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
台北市教師研習會 (民91)。社會學習領域一階段(1-2)能力指標具體行為細項。
台北縣十分國小 (民90)。生活課程能力指標、主題單元教學目標雙向檢核表。
台北縣鷺江國小 (民90)。生活課程能力指標分析表。
田振榮(民89)。職業分析在技職教育類科調整的應用。技術及職業教育,60,37-43。
田振榮(民89)。職業類科行業分析。江文雄主編職業類科教材教法,163-187。台北:師大書苑。
田振榮(民90)。我國高職學生專業能力標準之建構。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告,計畫編號:NSC 89-2511-S-003-154-X03.。
田振榮(民91)。我國高職學生專業能力標準之建構(二)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告,計畫編號:NSC 89-2511-S-003-154-X03.。
江文雄,田振榮,林炎旦(民88)。技職校院學生能力標準建構與能力分析模式之規劃研究。臺北:教育部技職司委託國立臺灣師範大學工業教育系研究。
羊憶蓉、成露茜(民86)。邁向二十一世紀新新教育―從澳洲「關鍵能力」教育計畫試探台灣的教改前景。社教雙月刊,78,13-16。
行政院主計處(民81)。中華民國職業標準分類。台北:行政院主計處。
行政院勞工委員會(民89)。中華民國職業分類典。台北:行政院勞工委員會。
何寶珠 (民78)。心理學與哲學在科學教育上的應用—概念圖與V圖的理論、製作與應用。科學教育月刊,120,16-24。
佐藤隆博 (1996)。授業設計評價。東京:明治圖書。
余民寧 (民91)。基本能力指標的建立與轉換。教育研究月刊,96,11-16。
余民寧(民88)。有意義的學習-概念構圖法。台北:商鼎文化出版社。
余民寧、陳嘉成(民85)。概念構圖:另一種評量方法。政大學報,73,161-200。
吳局振(民86)。大專畢業生工作能力發展之研究----以電機電子類科為例。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
吳明清 (民80)。教育研究。台北:五南。
吳偉碩 (民90)。網路合作概念構圖系統之發展。台南師學院資訊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
吳裕聖(民90)。概念構圖教學策略對國小五年級學生科學文章閱讀理解及概念構圖能力之影響。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
宋志雄 (民81)。探究國三學生酸與鹼的迷思概念並應用以發展教學診斷工具。國立彰化範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
李子建、黃顯華(民85)。課程:範式、取向和設計。台北:五南圖書。
李坤崇 (民90)。能力指標轉化的理念。載於教育部(主編),國民中小學九年一貫課程理論基礎(142-169頁)。
李坤崇 (民90)。綜合活動學習領域教材教法。台北:心理。
李坤崇 (民90a)。綜合活動學習領域教材教法。臺北:心理出版社。
李坤崇 (民90b)。九年一貫課程國中綜合活動學習領域多元評量方式與策略之發展與實施研究(I)。國科會專案研究報告NSC 89-2413-H-006-014-FB。
李坤崇 (民91a)。多元化教學評量。載於教育部主編:國中小教師基礎研習手冊,120-162頁。臺北:教育部。
李坤崇 (民91b)。綜合活動學習領域能力指標概念分析。教育研究月刊,98,111-122。
李坤崇 (民91c)。國民中小學成績評量準則之多元評量理念。載於教育部主編:國中國小校長與督學培訓手冊,137-154頁。台北:教育部。
李坤崇 (民91d)。多元化教學評量理念與推動策略。教育研究月刊,91,24-36。
李明潔 (民91)。體育實習教師對「有效體育教學」知識結構變化之研究。國立臺灣師範大學 體育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
李建儒 (民89)。全球資訊網之電腦輔助學習系統之研究—以力的分解與合成為例。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
李啟塤、陳秀枝編 (民77)。能力。教育心理學名詞彙編,224。台北:千華。
李隆盛 (民88)。能力分析方法與蝶勘(DACUM)法,職場導向能力與課程發展研討會,台灣師大。
李暉、郭重吉、段曉林 (民83)。國中理化教師試行建構主義教學之個案研究。科學教育,27-47。
杜炯烽(民88)。技職教育的通途大道-沒有專業,沒有前途;只有專業,前途有限。技職教育的回顧與前瞻,107-110。教育部技職司:台北。
周談輝、張吉成(民85)。新加坡工藝教育學院職業訓練課目之規劃與特色。技術及職業教育,31,54-59。
林生傳(民83)。概念學習與發展的階次模式理論研究(一)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC-82-0301-H-017-005。
林宜利 (民92)。「整合繪本與概念構圖之寫作教學方案」對國小三年級學童記敘文寫作表現之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。未出版。
林清山 (民86)。教育心理學—認知取向。台北:遠流。
林筱雯 (民91)。運用概念構圖為後設認知工具於國小二年級自然科之行動研究。屏東師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
林慧貞(民91)。美國社區學院課程設計模式之研究。台灣師範大學社會教育學系博士論文,未出版。台北。
邱上真(民78)。知識結構的評量:概念構圖技巧的發展與試用。國立台灣教育學院特殊教育學系暨研究所特殊教育學報,4,215-244。
施良方 (民85)。學習理論。高雄:麗文。
洪素珠(民90)。學生「辨識錯誤概念敘述」能力的探討。國立高雄師範大學化學系碩士論文,未出版。
夏征農主編(民81)。能力。辭海,3778。台北:東華。
徐綺穗 (民84)。概念教學模式之探討。國立台南師範院初等教育學報,8,199-218。
朗文出版集團(1996)。朗文當代英漢雙解詞典。香港:朗文出版。
高新建 (民90)。基本能力的課程與教學轉化。台北市師範學院學報,32,237-254。
高新建(民90)。基本能力課程與教學轉化。台北市立師範學院學報,32,237-254。
高新建(民92)。能力指標轉化模式(一):能力指標之分析及其教學轉化。輯於黃炳煌主編,社會學習領域課程設計與教學策略,51-99。台北:師大書苑。
康自立(民71)。工業職業教育能力本位課程發展之理論與實際。台北:中國工業職業教育學會。
張子超、楊冠政 (民86)。學生環境知識概念結構發展的研究。師大學報:科學教育類,42,37-48。Cm005
張春興 (民78)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
教育百科辭典編審委員會主編(民83)。能力。教育百科辭典,362。台北:五南。
現代教育事典(1988)。能力的定義。東京:株式會社勞動旬報社。
莊明貞 (民88)。「兩性教育」九年一貫國民教育課程綱要之規畫。教育研究資訊,7(4),28-47。
莊明貞(民88)。「兩性教育」九年一貫國民教育課程綱要之規劃。教育研究資訊,7(4),28-47。
許天維、林原宏 (民86)。詮釋結構模式的理論與應用簡介。國教輔導,34(1),31-35。
許天維、林原宏 (民86)。詮釋結構模式的理論與應用簡介。國教輔導,34(1),31-35。
許榮富、黃芳裕 (民84)。當今科學概念發展研究賦予科學學習的新意義。科學教育月刊,178,3-13。
郭至和 (民89)。國小鄉土教學活動課程轉化之個案研究。課程與教學,3(3),49-72。
郭至和(民89)。國小鄉土教學活動課程轉化之個案研究。課程與教學,3(3),49-72。
陳俊宏、胡豐榮、許天維 (民93)。IM法及其在教育上的應用。測驗統計簡訊,60,21-31。
陳惠娟 (民92)。國中綜合活動領域實概念構圖教學之成效研究。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。Cm009
陳琦、劉儒德 (民86)。當代教育心理學。北京:北京師範大學。
陳新轉(民91)。社會學習領域能力指標之「能力表徵」課程轉化模式。教育研究月刊,100,86-1000。
陳嘉成 (民85)。以概念構圖為學習策略之教學對小學生自然科學習之成效研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
陳嘉成、余民寧 (民87)。以概念構圖為學習策略之教學對自然科學習的促進效果之研究。國立政治大學學報,77,201~234。
陳憲章(民91)。閱讀概念圖教學策略應用於高工立體圖教學成效之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育學系在職進修碩士論文,未出版,台北市。Cm001
勞委會職訓局(民90)。技能檢定規範製訂及學術科試題命製規則。行政院勞工委員會:台北。
湯仁燕 (民89)。多元文化的課程轉化與教學實踐。教育研究集刊,44,91-115。
湯清二 (民82)。我國學生生物細胞概念發展研究迷思概念之唔談與概念圖。彰化師範大學學報,4,141-170。
黃台珠 (民73a)。概念的研究及其意義。科學教育月刊,66,44-51。
黃台珠 (民73b)。學生所學到的概念正是您所要教的。科學教育月刊,74,41-51。
黃台珠 (民83)。概念的研究及其意義。科學教育月刊,66,44-55。
黃玉佳 (民92)。概念構圖與摘要策略對不同性別學生學習成效之影響。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
黃政傑(民80)。課程設計。台北:東華書局。
黃政傑,李隆盛 (民85)。技職教育概論。台北:師大書苑。
黃鴻傅 (民87)。概念構圖在自然科教學上的運用。國教輔導,38(1),13-18。
楊思偉 (民91)。基本能力指標之建構與落實。教育研究月刊,96,17-22。
楊朝祥編著 (民73)。能力。技術職業教育辭典,34。台北:三民。
葉連祺 (民91)。九年一貫課程與基本能力轉化。教育研究月刊,96,49-63。
趙寧 (民87)。教學設計之呈現方式在概念學習上的應用。台北市:師大書苑。
歐陽鍾仁 (民80)。科學教育概論。台北:五南。
蔡秉燁、鍾靜蓉 (民92b):詮釋結構模式運用於構造化教學設計之研究。教育研究資訊,11(2),10。
鄭麗玉 (民82)。認知心理學—理論與應用。台北市:五南圖書。
謝真華(民88)。概念構圖教學對國小四年級學童在自然科學習成效之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
謝榮富 (民92)。概念構圖策略與認知型態對自然科網路化教學影響之研究。東海大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
鍾聖校 (民83)。對科學教育錯誤概念研究之省思。教育研究資訊,2(3),89-110。
魏明通 (民86)。科學教育。台北:五南。
二、日文部份
佐藤隆博 (1996)。構造學習法 入門。東京:明治圖書。
佐藤隆博 (1996)。授業設計評價。東京:明治圖書。
服部 環 (2002)。Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM)。上網日期04/15/2004,網址 http://www.human.tsukuba.ac.jp/~hattori/ism/ism424.pdf
三、英文部份
Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implication . New York: Freeman and company.
ANTA (1999), National training package development handbook, Australian National Training Authority, Melboune:Australia.
ANTA (2001). Training Package Development Handbook. Retrieved from http://www.anta.gov.au/publication.asp, July 20, 2002.
ANTA(1999). Training Package Development Handbook. Brisbane: ANTA.
ANTA(2001). Training Package Development Handbook. Retrieved from http://www.anta.gov.au/publication.asp, July 20, 2002.
Apple,M.W. (1990). Indeolegy and Curriculum (2nd ed.). London, New York: Routledge.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The Psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Education Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Bailey, T. (1997). Integrating academic and industry skill Standards (MDS-1001). National Center for Research in Vocational Education, Berkeley: California.
Bailey, T. (1997). Integrating academic and industry skill Standards (MDS-1001). National Center for Research in Vocational Education, Berkeley: California.
Bailey, T., & Merritt, D. (1995). Making Sense of Industry-Based Skill Standards (MDS-777). National Center for Research in Vocational Education, Berkeley: California.
Barnes, S., & Nobles. D. (2000).Group Two Public Sector National Vocational Qualifications in England and Skill Standards in Texas. Retrieved from http://www.coe.tamu.edu/~stenning/studyabroad/group2.htm, July 05, 2002.
Bromley, K. D. (1991). Webbing with literature: Creating story maps with children's books. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Carnevale, A. P., Gainer, L. J., & Meltzer, A. S. (1990). Workplace basics: The essential skills employers want. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.
Carnevale, P. (1991). America and the new economy. Jossey Bass: San Francisco.
Collins, A. M., & Quilian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.
Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce (1990). America's choice: High skills or low wages! Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy.
Down, C. M. (2000). Key Competencies in Training Packages. AVETRA Future Research, Research Futures Conference. Canberra.
Down, C. M. (2000). Key Competencies in Training Packages. AVETRA Future Research, Research Futures Conference. Canberra.
Drake,S.M. (1998), Creating Integrated Curriculum: Proven Ways to Increase Student Learning, California Corwin Press.
Eisner,E.W.(1969). Instructional and Expressive Educational Objetives. In W.J. Popham, E.W. Eisner, H.J. Sullivan & L.L. Tyler(Eds.), Instructional
Elias,J.L. & Memiam,S.(1980). Philosophical Foundations of Adult Education. Malabar, Florida: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
European Training Foundation (1999). Development of Standards in Vocational Education and Training-Specification, Experience, Examples, Volume 2. Retrieved from http://www.etf.ed.int.
European Training Foundation (1999). Development of Standards in Vocational Education and Training-Specification, Experience, Examples, Volume 2. Retrieved from http://www.etf.ed.int.
Fields of Education and Training Manual (1999). http://www.scb.se/klassifikationer/FieldsAndTrainingl.pdf
Finch, C. R., & Crunkilton, J. R. (1989), Curriculum development in vocational and technical education: Planning, content, and implementation (3 rd ed.), Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
Flecker, J., & Hofbauer, J. (1998). Capitalising on Subjectivity: the ‘New Model Worker’ and the Importance of Being Useful. In Thompson, P. & Warhurst, C. (eds.): Workplaces of the Future. Basingstoke, Macmillan Business, 104-123.
Freire P.(1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, Penguin Books.
Ganzglass, E., & Martin, S. (1993). State initiatives on industry-based skill standards and credentials. Washington, DC: National Governors' Association.
General Accounting Office. (1993). Occupational skill standards--Experience in certification systems shows industry involvement to be key. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
General Accounting Office. (1993). Occupational skill standards--Experience in certification systems shows industry involvement to be key. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
Geof Hawke. "Keeping curriculum relevant in a changing world." SENAI International SeminarBelo Horizante, Brasil (2002): 2-8.
Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 61-98.
Hargreaves,A.(1982). Resistance and Relative Autonomy Theories. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(2).
Harns, D.E. & Carr, J.F. (1996), How to Use Standards in the Classroom, Alexandria, Virginia ASCD.
Hashweh, M. Z. (1988). Descriptive studies of students conceptions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(2), 513-529.
Heimlich, J.E., & Pittelman, S. D. (1986). Semantic mapping: Classroom application. Delaware: International Reading Service.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hoachlander, G. (1995). Making pilots: An inquiry into standards. Paper presented at the 1995 American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Holley, C. D., Dansereau, C. F., McDonald, B. A., Garland, J. C. & Collins, K. W. (1979). Evaluation of a hierarchical mapping technique as an aid to prose processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 227-237.
Howe, A.C. (1996). Development of Science Concepts within a Vygotskian Framework. Science Education, 80(1), 35-51.
HUDIS, PRULR M. BUILDING LINKAGES: MAKING INTEGRATED STANDARDS WORK FOR EDUCATION AND INDUSTRY. U.S.Department of Education and Office of Vocational and Adult Education. -65. 2000. Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Education.
ILO (2001). Competencia laboral. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/public/spanish/region/ampro/cinterfor/temas/complab/index.htm, July 20, 2002.
International Labour Office(1990). International Standard Classification of Occupations, ISCO-88. Geneva: International Labor Office.
ISCED (1976). International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED), COM/ST/ISCED, Paris: Unesco.
ISCED (1999). Operational manual for ISCED-1997 (International standard classification of education). UNESCO Institute for Statistics. http://www.uis.unesco.org/en/pub/isced/ISCEDMan146.pdf.
ISCO (2002). INTERNATIONAL STANDARD CLASSIFICATION OF OCCUPATIONS ISCO-88, http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/class/isco.htm.
Jntz, R. (1988). Concept Teaching. In Arends, R.L., Learning to teach. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, (1999). Learning by Reflecting With Technology: Mindtools for Critical Thinking. In Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson (Eds.), Learning With Technology—A Constructivist Perspective. 152-190. NJ: Merrill.
Kearns, P. (2001). Review of research generic skills for the new economy. National Center for Vocational Education Research: Australia.
Kinigstein, J.B. (1981). A Conceptual Approach to Planning an Environmental Education curriculum. M.S. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. Cm005
Klausmeier, H. J., Ghatala, E. S., & Frayer, D. A. (1974). Conceptual learning and development. A Cognitive Approach. New York: Academic Press.
Klein, Steven G. Applying the Standard: Using Industry Skill Standards To Improve Curriculum and Instruction. 1996.
Klein,M.F.(1985). Curriculum Design. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite(Eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Education,pp.1163-70. Oxford: Pergaman.
Lee, C. S., DeWitt, C., Litman, R. (1996). Occupational Skill Standards Projects. U.S. Department of Education.
Lee, C. S., DeWitt, C., Litman, R. (1996). Occupational Skill Standards Projects. U.S. Department of Education.
Leff, Judy and Joyce Malyn-Smith. Making Skill Standards Work: Highlights From the Field. Newton, MA: Education Development Center, Inc., 1999.
Lester M., Syder, Jr., and . Taxonomy of Academic Performance Indicators. -36. 2000. Decatur, Georgia, Southern Association of Colleges & School.
Losh, Charles L. The Linkage System: Linking Academic Content Standards and Occupational Skill Standards. -10. 2000. V-TECS, Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Losh, Charles L. Using Skill Standards for Vocational-Technical Education Curriculum Development. Center on Education and Training for Employment, -60. 2000. Center on Education and Training for Employment.
Mansfield, B. (1990). Knowledge, evidence and assessment, in H. Black & A. Wolf. (Eds) Knowledge and competence; current issues in training and education, London:Employment Department.
Mansfield, B. (2001). Linking vocational education and training standards and employment requirements: An international manual. European Training Foundation, http://www.etf.eu.int(2001/5/7).
Mansfield, B. (2001). Linking vocational education and training standards and employment requirements: An international manual. European Training Foundation, http://www.etf.eu.int(2001/5/7).
Mansfield, B., & Mitchell, L. (1996). Towards a competent workforce, Gower Publishing: UK.
Mardiney, R.L. (1985). The Development and Evaluation of a Conceptually Based Environmental Education Program on Wildflower Ecology for Cornell Plantations and Elementary schools. M.S. Thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. Cm005
Marsh,C.J.(1992). Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum. London: Falmer Press.
Mayer, R.E. (1987). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive approach. New York: Freeman.
McNeil,J.D.(1990). Curriculum: A Comprehensive Introduction (4th ed.) .Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foreman/Little, Brown Higher Education.
Merrill, M.D., Tennyson, R.D. & Posey, L.O. (1992) Concept Learning: An Instructional Design Guide. Englewood, Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology.
Mertens, L. (1999). Labour competence: emergence, analytical frameworks and institution models. International Labour Office: Cinterfor.
Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H. & Novak, J. D. (2000). Assessing Science understanding: A Human Constructivist View. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.
Novak, J. D. (1984). Application of advances in learning theory and philosophy of science to the improvement of chemistry teaching. The Journal of Chemical Education, 61(7), 607-612.
Novak, J. D. (1988). Learning science and the science of learning. Study in science Education, 15, 77-101.
Novak, J. D.(1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge :concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Novak, J.D. (1988). Learning science and the science of learning. Studies in Science Education, 15, 77-101
NSSB(2000a). Built to Work-A Common Framework for Skill Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nssb.org, July 10, 2002.
NSSB(2000b). Skill Companions Guide. Retrieved from http://www.nssb.org, July 10, 2002.
Oliva,P.F.(1997). Developing the Curriculum (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
Pella, M. O. (1966). Concept learning in science. The Science Teacher, 33(1) , 31-34.
Pella, M. O. (1996). Concept Learning in Science. The Science Teacher, 33(9), 31-34.
Raizen, S. A. (1989). Reforming education for work: A Cognitive science perspective. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
Raizen, S. A. (1989). Reforming education for work: A Cognitive science perspective. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
Resnick, L. B. & Wirt, J. G. (Eds.) (1996). Linking school and work: Roles for standards and assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Resnick, L. B. & Wirt, J. G. (Eds.) (1996). Linking school and work: Roles for standards and assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1985). Representation of knowledge. In A. M. Aitkenhear & J. M. Slack (Eds.), Issues in cognitive modeling 15-62.
SCANS (1991). Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills, What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
SCANS (1992). Learning a living: A blueprint for high performance. Department of Labor:Washington.
Schubert,W.H.(1986). Curriculum: Perspective, Paradigm, and Possibility. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Stasz, C.(1990). The economic imperative behind school reform: A review of literature, National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
Stenhouse,L.(1975). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann.
Stitt-Gohdes, W., Lambrecht, J., & Redmann, D. H. (2000). The Critical-Incident Technique In Job Behavior Research. The Journal of Vocational Education Research. 25, Issue I.
The Boeing Company(1999). Performance Assessment and Curriculum Development Guidebook Volume II. Center for Learning Connections, Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, Retrieved from http://www.wa-skills.com.
Tyler, R.W.(1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Wandersee,J.H. (1990). Concept mapping and the cartography of cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching ,.27(10), 923-936。
Weinert, F.E. (1999). Definition and selection of competencies:Concepts of Competence. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.