本研究以生技製藥產業為研究對象，探討其因應環境變化及產業複雜性的挑戰下，企業如何藉由不同合作模式的建立，強化本身的競爭優勢；藉由分析企業合作模式及管理機制，深入瞭解多元合作之間如何平衡，與公司既有資源的連結的關係，藉以了解合作對於強化競爭優勢的策略意涵。
為蒐集個案所經歷的合作夥伴建立的資料，本研究以台灣前十大國資廠的個案公司，針對個案公司高層進行深入訪談，同時運用三角測定法以提高研究的可信度和結果的真實性。不同於過去研究以單一策略理論為基礎，蒐集資料時針對企業的不同合作之策略活動作多面向的探討，了解個案本身的動態學習的能力、核心優勢的發揮以及領導團隊的穩定性都將有助於企業實現更高效的合作成效。本研究中著重的多元合作模式分析出企業在無形資產（如技術專利、藥證）、事業版圖（市場及營運等）方面藉由合作建立了關鍵基礎，形成資源成功進入新市場。此多元合作的模式不僅提升了市場地位，更強化了整體產業競爭優勢。研究結果強調動態合作能力和競爭優勢與合作成效的正向關聯。在動態合作中，企業透過建立穩固的合作基礎和增強信任度，成功強化了產業競爭優勢。
與合作夥伴的緊密連結，有助於建立穩定的合作基礎，提高信任度，進一步加強合作成效。總結來說，本研究有幾個發現，第一、動態調整能力是企業建立合作模式的重要關係，第二、多元合作若形成互補資源，將更有助於建立優勢，第三、企業漸進式的合作，促使企業在內部管理資源槓桿，進而強化合作資源帶來的優勢。本研究為本土中小型製藥企業或其他行業提供了實用的見解，有助於制定更有效合作策略的參考，強調了動態合作能力在企業競爭中的關鍵角色。

This study focuses on the pharmaceutical industry to explore how companies cope with environmental changes and industry complexity, and how they strengthen their competitive advantage through establishing different cooperative patterns. By analyzing the ways of collaboration and management mechanisms, this research delves into how multiple cooperative balance with existing resources, aiming to understand the strategic implications of collaboration for enhancing competitive advantage. To collect data on the collaboration experiences of case companies, this study selects one of the top ten pharmaceutical companies in Taiwan as case studies and conducts in-depth interviews with senior executives. The triangulation method is employed to enhance the credibility of the research and the authenticity of the results. Unlike previous studies based on a single strategic theory, this research adopts a multifaceted approach to investigate various strategic activities of enterprises in collaboration, understanding how the dynamic learning ability, leveraging core competencies, and leadership stability of case companies contribute to more effective collaboration outcomes. The analysis of multiple cooperative patterns emphasizes that companies establish crucial foundations through collaboration in intangible assets (such as technological patents and drug licenses) and business territories (markets and operations), facilitating successful entry into new markets. This diversified collaboration not only enhances market position but also strengthens the overall industry's competitive advantage. The research results underscore a positive correlation between dynamic collaboration capability, competitive advantage, and collaboration effectiveness. Through dynamic collaboration, companies strengthen their industry's competitive advantage by building a solid collaborative foundation and enhancing trust.
The close connection with partners helps establish a stable collaborative foundation, increase trust, and further strengthen collaboration effectiveness. In summary, several findings emerge from this study: first, dynamic adjustment capability is crucial for companies to establish collaborative relationships; second, multiple cooperation, if complementary in resources, contributes to establishing advantages; third, the incremental collaboration of enterprises prompts them to gain internal management resources leverage, thereby enhancing the advantages brought by collaborative resources. This study provides practical insights for local small and medium-sized pharmaceutical companies or other industries, aiding in the formulation of more effective collaboration strategies, and emphasizes the key role of dynamic collaboration capability in corporate competition.

一、中文文獻
(一) 書籍著作
徐作聖(1999)，「策略致勝」，台北 : 遠流出版公司。
吳思華(1988)，產業政策與企業策，台北市 : 中華經濟研究所。
伍忠賢(2002)，企業併購理論與實務，台北市 : 新陸書局股份有限公司。
黃日燦(2016)，企業併購的十堂必修課，台北市 : 日月文化、洪圖出版社。
陳萬淇(1992)，「個案研究法」，台北 : 華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
紐文英(2023)，質性研究方法與論文寫作，四版，台北 : 雙葉書廊。
胡幼慧(2008)，質性研究: 理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，台北 : 巨流圖書(股)公司。
(二) 期刊文獻
1.吳青松(1996)，策略聯盟之國際發展趨勢，經濟情勢暨評論，2(3)，頁8-13。
2.吳 克(2005)，策略夥伴選擇準則與聯盟不穩定性之研究—以台灣半導體製造業為例，東吳經濟商學學報，第49期。
3.趙君豪( 2012)，以科技管理觀點看台灣藥廠之策略聯盟， 政大智慧財產研究所碩士論文。
4.郭瀞芬(2017)，從國際生技製藥業併購趨勢看台灣生技公司被併購價值，國立台灣大學，管理學院在職專班，財務金融組碩士論文。
5.彭鴻欣(2020)，台灣生技醫藥產業併購之關鍵成功因素，國立台灣大學健康政策與管理研究所碩士論文。
6.張淑玲(2004)，併購動機、整合機制與績效評估-以平衡計分卡為例，國立成功大學企業管理碩博研究所碩士論文。
7.李銘炘(2002)，生技產業之策略聯盟，元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
8.黃韋仁(2020)，品牌資產、策盟及市場績效-以兩岸生技業之A公司為例，國立虎尾科技大學學報 第三十五卷第二期，頁:117-131。
9.劉芳燕(2019)，影響併購前決策與併購後成效之因素-以K公司為例，國立中山大學管理研究所碩士論文。
10.連嘉琳(2007)，生技製藥產業策略聯盟成敗關鍵因素之探索研究，台大經濟研究所碩士論文。
11.陳炳崑(2017)，學名藥創新營運模式-以某製藥公司為例，國立政治大學經營管理碩士。
(三) 內部書刊
1. 健喬集團蘭花君子一甲子，2010年 10月
2. 健喬集團經營者小故事全集I & II & III，2020年 10月
3. 舅甥攜手共創國資製藥大業，2023年 03月
(四) 網路資訊
1.國家發展委員會-高齡化 (ndc.gov.tw)
2.2023生技產業白皮書Biotechnology-Industry-in-Taiwan.pdf，經濟部工業局https://www.biopharm.org.tw
3.健喬網站: https://www.synmosa.com.tw
4.生技-醫藥產業資訊網：http://www.biokin.org.tw/
5.公開資訊觀測站：http://newmops.tse.com.tw/
6.橘生https://www.kissei.co.jp/abouts/med/
7.海默尼https://hemony.com/products
8.瑩碩生技https://www.anxo.com.tw/
9.環球生技https://news.gbimonthly.com/tw/article/show.phpnum=20301
10.中華民國製劑發展協會https://www.cpmda.org.tw/news_show_n1.php?news_id=11394
二、 英文文獻
1.Barney, J. B. (1991), Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120
2.Birkinshaw et al., (2000), Journal of Management Studies , Managing the Post-acquisition Integration Process: How the Human Integration and Task Integration Processes Interact to Foster Value Creation, Volume 37, Issue 3: 395-425
3.Bradley, J.W., Korn, D.H., (1979), Acquisitions and Mergers: A Shifting Rout to Corporate
Growth. Management Review 68: 46-51
4.Chi, T. (1994), "Trading In Strategic Resources: Necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of exchange structure," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 4: 271-290
5.Coase, R. H.(1937), " The Nature of the Firm", Economica, Vol.4: 386-405
6.Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (1998), Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23: 491–512
7.Denzin, N.K. and Nicolin, Y.S.(2011),The SAGE Handbook of Qualitive Research
8.Eynon & Nodine.(1991), Seven Critical Success Factors for Value-Creating Acquisition, M & A Europe, April, 50
9.Feldman, ER & Hernandez, E. (2022), Synergy in mergers and acquisitions: Typology, life cycles, and value, Academy of Management Review: 1-109
10.Ferguson & Dickinson(1982), Critical Success Factors In The Eighties, Business Hozizons, Business Review, 65(8): 81-93.
11.Freidheim, CF. (1996), New world order in the boardroom，Directors and Boards-American Edition
12.Granovetter, Mark S. (1973), "The Strength of Weak Ties American Journal of Sociology Vol. 78, No. 6: 1360-1380
13.Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C. K. (1990), The Core Competence of Corporation, Harvard Business Review , 68(3), 79-91
14.Heskett etc.,(1994), ”Putting The Service-Profit Chain to Work”， Harvard Business Review (72:2) : 164-172
15.Hutt, MD., Stafford, ER., Walker, BA., Reingen ,PH., (2000), Case study: defining the social network of a strategic alliance，MIT Sloan Management Review Journal of Management.
16.Ketelhohn, W. (1993), What do We Mean by Cooperative Advantage ? European Management Journal Vol. 11, No. 1:30-37
17.Krishnan, HA., Hitt, MA & Park, D.,(2007), Acquisition Premiums, Subsequent Workforce Reductions and Post-Acquisition Performance, Journal of Management Studies, Volume 44, Issue 5 : 709-732
18.Marshall C & Rossman G B.(1989), Designing Qualitative Research Sage, London
19.Mcclintock & Greene,(1985), Triangulation In Practice, Evaluation and Program Planning
Volume 8, Issue 4: 351-357
20.Merriam, Sharon B., and Caffarella, Rosemary S. (1991), Learning in Adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 376 pages.
21.Nohria, N and Garcia-Pont ,C. (1991), Global Strategic Linkages and Industry Structure, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12: 105-124
22.Pareto, E. and Huston, JE. (1995), Realizing Value From Acquisitions, The Electricity Journal, August ~September: 38-43
23.Pekar, P. and Allio, R., (2002), Making Alliances Work: Guidelines for Success, Long Range Planning, vol. 27(4)
24.Penrose, E., (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, John Wiley, New York.
25.Porter, M. E., (1990), "The Competitive Advantage of Nations", New York, NY Free Press
26.Porter, M.E., (1996),”What is strategy?” Harvard Business Review 74(6): 61-80
27.Schon, A. (1978), Organizational learning: A theory of Action Perspective, Addison
-Wesley, Reading, MA
28.Sinha, D. K. & M. A. Cusumano. (1991), "Complementary Resources and Cooperative Research: A Model of Research Joint Ventures among Competitors." Management Science, 37 (9): 1091-1106
29.Teece, D. J (1994), The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 5, No. 3: 537-556
30.Teece, D. J., (2007), “Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Micro-Foundations
of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.28(13): 1319-1350
31.Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533
32.Tetenbaum, T. J. (1999), Beating the Odds of Merger & Acquisition Failure: Seven Key Practices That Improve the Chance for Expected Integration and Synergies, Organizational Dynamics, Autumn: 22-35
33.Yin, R. K. (1994), Case Study Research Design and Methods Sage, London, CA, 2nd Ed.
34.Williamson, O. E. (1975), “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications” New York: Free Press.