簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 韓維民
Han Weimin
論文名稱: 帝國史詩:維吉爾、但丁、塔索與米爾頓的政教觀
The Imperial Epic: Politics and Religion in Vergil, Dante, Tasso and Milton
指導教授: 慕禮生
Madison Morrison
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2000
畢業學年度: 88
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 115
中文關鍵詞: 帝國史詩政教衝突維吉爾、但丁、塔索與米爾頓依尼德,神曲,耶路撒冷的解救,失樂園天國次序與人間次序
英文關鍵詞: the imperial epics, the clash between the church and the empire, Vergil, Dante, Tasso and Milton, Aeneid, the Divine Comedy, Gerusalemme Literata, Paradise Lost, Paradise Regained, Samson Agnostes, heavenly order and earthly order
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:139下載:17
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘要
    作者研究維吉爾、但丁、塔索與米爾頓四位史詩詩人,旨在分析他們作品中政治與宗教的關係。對這四位詩人而言,古羅馬帝國為放諸四海而皆準的帝國典範。對維吉爾而言,即將奠定的羅馬城為世界帝國光榮的縮影。朱比特與朱諾衝突的和解攸關和諧政治體系的建立。在「神曲」特別是在「王國論」中,但丁調和教皇國與神聖羅馬帝國的關係。對但丁而言,屬靈國度是屬於教皇的,如同世間國度是屬於皇帝一般。無此二者,一個和平與安定的世界帝國即無實現的可能。以塔索來說,「耶路撒冷的解放」代表基督徒十字軍征服近東回教徒的軍事行動。塔索藉著十字軍征服聖地,有意重述亞提安戰役(「伊尼德」第八書)。塔索之維吉爾式帝國統一設計有著雙重意義,一為反對宗教改革並試圖在教皇的權威下維持基督教的統一性,二為表達出意大利統一的願望。對米爾頓而言,他不僅視羅馬為古羅馬帝國的遺產和教皇權力的象徵,且妨礙英國清教徒革命。人們認為太天主教化的英國國教會與史圖爾特王朝通力合作抑制在國教會內進一步政治與宗教改革的訴求。從他的主要二部詩「失樂園」和「復樂園」中,米爾頓視撒旦為邪惡的擴張主義者,且將其與史圖爾特國王相提並論,此國王企圖將國教會的正統教義擴及全國並阻礙英國國協的形成。雖然米爾頓對維吉爾式的帝國典範有所修正,但其目標與維吉爾有部分雷同之處,那就是建造和鞏固未來的國家。

    Abstract
    My intention in studying these four major epic poets, Vergil, Dante, Tasso and Milton, is to analyze the relationship of politics to religion in their works. For all four poets the universal empire is modeled on that of Rome. For each, however, empire has a slightly different meaning. For Vergil the future Rome is a microcosm of the grandeur of the macrocosmic empire. The reconciliation between Jupiter and Juno is essential to the constitution of the political cosmos. In the Divina Commedia, and especially the De Monarchia, Dante harmonizes the papacy and the Holy Roman Empire. For him the spiritual dominion is to the Holy See what the temporal dominion is to the emperor: without both, a peaceful and stable universal empire would be unobtainable. For Tasso the Gerusalemme Liberata represents the Christian crusaders’ campaign to conquer the Muslim Near East. Tasso, in the representation of the crusaders’ conquest of the Holy Land, deliberately recapitulates the battle of Actium (in Aeneid 8). The purpose of Tasso’s Vergilian scheme of imperial unification is two-fold. On the one hand, it opposes the Reformation and attempts to maintain the unity of Christian faith under papal authority. On the other hand, it expresses the desire for a unified Italy. For Milton, Rome, representing Roman imperial legacy and papal power, jeopardized the Puritan revolution in England. For the Church of England, considered too Catholic by most Puritans, cooperated with the Stuart monarchy to restrain religious and political appeals for further reform in the Church. In Milton’s two major poems, Paradise Lost and Paradise Regain’d, Satan, as a diabolic expansionist, is compared to the Stuart king who seeks to extend nationwide the orthodox religious teachings of the Church and to sabotage the coming of the English Commonwealth. Although Milton revises the Vergilian model of empire, he nonetheless partakes of Vergil’s aim to constitute and fortify a future nation.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT----------------------------------------------------i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT-------------------------------------------iii INTRODUCTION------------------------------------------------1 CHAPTER One: Imperial Religion and Politics in Vergil----------------13 Two: Imperial Religion and Politics in Dante-----------------36 Three: Imperial Religion and Politics in Tasso--------------57 Four: Anti-imperial Religion and Politics in Milton-----------73 CONCLUSION---------------------------------------------------103 BIBLIOGRAPHY-------------------------------------------------------------------110

    Bibliography
    Alighieri, Dante. The Comedy of Dante Alighieri. Trans. Dorothy L. Sayers.
    London: Penguin, 1969.
    ——. Il Convivio. Trans. Richard H. Lansing. New York: Garland, 1990.
    ——. De Vulgari Eloquentia. Trans. Steven Botterill. Cambridge: Cambridge
    UP, 1996.
    ——. Monarchy. Trans. Donald Nicholl. London: Weidenfield & Nicolson,
    1954.
    Altizer, Thomas J. J. History as Apocalypse. New York: State U of New York P,
    1985.
    Anderson, William. Dante the Maker. London: Routledge, 1980.
    Ansprenger, Frank. The Dissolution of the Colonial Empires. London: Routledge,
    1981.
    Armitage, David, et al., eds. Milton and Republicanism. Cambridge: Cambridge
    UP, 1995.
    Armstrong, A. H., ed. Classical Mediterranean Spirituality: Egypt, Greek, Roman.
    New York: Crossroad, 1989.
    Aschcroft, Bill, et al., eds. Key Concepts in Post-Colonial Studies. London:
    Routledge, 1998.
    Bible. King James Version of 1611.
    Bloom, Harold. Modern Critical Views: Vergil. New York: Chelsea House, 1986.
    Boulting, William. Tasso and His Times. New York: Haskell House, 1968.
    Bowra, C. M. From Virgil to Milton. London: MacMillan, 1972.
    Brand, P. C. Torquato Tasso: A Study of the Poet and of His Contribution to
    English Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1965.
    Brundage, James A., ed. The Crusade: Motives and Achievements. Boston: Heath,
    1964.
    Burns, J. H. The Cambridge History of Medieval Political History c. 350-c. 1450.
    Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1988.
    Burrow, Colin. Epic Romance: Homer to Milton. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993.
    Cairns, Francis. Virgil’s Augustan Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge Up, 1989.
    Chevallier, R., ed. Présence de Virgile. Paris: Société D’ Édition, 1978.
    Clarke, M. L. The Roman Mind: Studies in the History of Thought from Cicero to
    Marcus Aurelius. New York: Norton, 1968.
    Clements, Robert J., ed. American Critical Essays on The Divine Comedy. New
    York: New York UP, 1967.
    Conte, Gian Biagio. Latin Literature: A History. Trans. Joseph B. Solodow,
    Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1994.
    Corns, Thomas N. John Milton: the Prose Works. New York: Twayne, 1998.
    Davis, Charles T. Dante’s Italy and Other Essays. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania UP,
    1984.
    Dalen, Hendrik van. Introduction to Political Science: People, Politics and
    Perception. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
    Davis, Norman. Europe. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1996.
    Davies, Stevie. Images of Kingship in Paradise Lost: Milton’s Politics and
    Christian Liberty. Missouri: Missouri UP, 1983.
    D’Entreves, A. P. Dante as a Political Thinker. Oxford: Clarendon, 1952.
    Doyle, Michael W. Empires. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1986.
    Eliot, T. S. What Is a Classic. New York: Haskell, 1974.
    Evans, J. Martin. Milton’s Imperial Epic: Paradise Lost and the Discourse of
    Colonialism. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1996.
    Feeney, D. C. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition.
    Oxford: Clarendon, 1991.
    Feeney, Denis. Literature and Religion at Rome: Culture, Contexts, and Belief.
    Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
    Fergusson, Francis. Dante. New York: Collier, 1966.
    Ferguson, John. The Religions of the Roman Empire. London: Thames and
    Hudson, 1970.
    Ferrante, Joan M. The Political Vision of the Divine Comedy. New Jersey:
    Princeton UP, 1984.
    Frazer, James Sir. The Golden Bough. Kent: Wordsworth, 1993.
    Garnsey, P. D. A., eds. Imperialism in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge
    UP, 1978.
    Garrison, James D. Pietas from Vergil to Dryden. Pennsylvania: State U of
    Pennsylvania P, 1987.
    Gaunt, Peter. The British War. London: Routledge, 1997.
    Gibbon, Edward. The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.
    London : Oxford UP, 1906
    Goodman, Martin. Mission and Conversion: Proselytizing in the religious History of
    the Roman Empire. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.
    Grant, Michael. The History of Rome. London: Faber and Faber, 1993.
    ——, and Rachel Kitzinger, eds. Civilization of the Ancient
    Mediterranean: Greece and Rome. New York: Charles Scriber’s Sons, 1988.
    Grayson, Cecil, ed. The World of Dante: Essays on Dante and His Times. Oxford:
    Clarendon, 1980.
    Griffin, Jasper. Virgil. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1986.
    Griffin, Miriam. Seneca: a Philosopher in Politics. Oxford: Clarendon, 1992.
    Grimal, Pierre. Love in the Ancient Rome. Trans. Arthur Train, Jr. Norman:
    Oklahoma UP, 1986.
    Hanford, James Holly. A Milton Handbook. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts,
    1946
    Hardie, Philip R. Vrigil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford: Clarendon,
    1986.
    Hardin, Richard F. Civil Idolatry: Desacralizing and Monarchy in Spenser,
    Shakespeare, and Milton, Newark: Delaware UP, 1992.
    Helgerson, Richard. Forms of Nationhood: the Elizabethan Writing of England.
    Chicago: Chicago UP, 1992.
    Hill, Christopher. Milton and the England Revolution. New York: Viking, 1977.
    ——. Society and Puritanism in Pre-Revolutionary England. London: Panter,
    1964.
    ——. The Collected Essays of Christopher Hill. Vol. I. Sussex: Harvester, 1985.
    Kallendorf, Craig. In Praise of Aeneas: Virgil and Epideictic Rhetoric in the Early
    Italian Renaissance. Hanover: New England UP, 1989.
    Knoppers, Laura Lunger. Historicizing Milton: Spectacle, Power, and Poetry in
    Restoration England. Athens: Georgia UP, 1994.
    Loewenstein, David. Milton and the Drama of History. Cambridge: Cambridge
    UP, 1990.
    Lord, George Deforest. Trials of the Self: Heroic Ordeals in the Epic Tradition,
    Hamden: Archon, 1983.
    Milton, John. The Complete Prose Works of John Milton. Ed. Don M. Wolfe.
    New Haven: Yale UP, 1953.
    ——. The Complete Poetry of John Milton. Ed. John T. Shawcross. New York:
    Anchor, 1963.
    More, Edward. Studies in Dante. 2nd series. New York: Greenwood, 1968.
    Morgan, Kenneth O., ed. The Oxford Illustrated History of Britain. Oxford:
    Oxford UP, 1984.
    Morris, Colin. The Papal Monarchy: The Western Church from 1050 to 1250.
    Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989.
    Mullet, Michael. The Counter-Reformation. London: Routledge, 1995.
    Murrin, Michael. The Allegorical Epic: Essays in Its Rise and Decline. Chicago:
    Chicago UP, 1980.
    Otis, Brook. Virgil: A Study in Civilized Poetry. Norman: Oklahoma UP, 1995.
    Pavlock, Brabrara. Eros, Imitation, and the Epic Tradition. Ithaca: Cornell UP,
    1990.
    Porter, Andrew. European Imperialism, 1860—1914. London: Macmillan, 1994.
    Pöschl, Viktor. The Art of Vergil: Image and Symbol in the Aeneid. Ann Arbor:
    Michigan UP, 1962.
    Quint, David. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton.
    New Jersey: Princeton UP, 1993.
    Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. Structure and Function in Primitive Society. New York:
    The Free Press, 1952.
    Rodee, Carlton, et al., eds. Introduction to Political Science. 3rd ed. New York:
    Magran-Hill, 1976
    Rives, J. B. Religion and Authority: in Roman Carthage from Augustus to
    Constantine. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.
    Rowse, A. L. Milton the Puritan. London: Macmillan, 1977.
    Sabine, George H. A History of Political Theory. 4th ed. Hinsdale: Dryden, 1973.
    Schumpeter, Joseph. Imperialism. New York: Meridian, 1951.
    Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon, 1978.
    ——. Culture and Imperialism. London: Chatto & Windus, 1993.
    Shotter, David. The Fall of the Roman Republic. London: Routledge, 1994.
    ——. Augustus Caesar. London: Routledge, 1995.
    Spence, Sarah. Rhetorics of Reason and Desire: Vergil, Augustine, and the
    Troubadours. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1988.
    Strauss, Leo and Joseph Cropsey, ed. History of Political Philosophy. Chicago:
    Chicago UP, 1987.
    Tasso, Torguato. Jerusalem Delivered. Trans. Palph Nash. Detroit: State U of
    Wayne P, 1964.
    ——. Discourses on the Heroic Poem. Trans. Mariella Cavalchini and Irene
    Samuel. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1973.
    Toohey, Peter. Reading Epic: An Introduction to the Ancient Narrative. London:
    Routledge, 1992.
    Vergil. The Aeneid. Trans. Robert Fitzgerald. New York: Random House, 1992.
    Watlins, John. The Specter of Dido: Spenser and Virgilian Epic. New Haven: Yale
    UP, 1995.
    Wilkinson, L. P. The Georgics of Virgil: A Critical Survey. Norman: Oklahoma
    UP, 1997.
    Wilson, A. N. The Life of John Milton. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1983.
    ——. Paul: the Mind of the Apostle. New York: Norton, 1997.
    Wiltshire, Susan Ford. Public and Private in Vergil’s Aeneid. Amberst:
    Massachusetts UP, 1989.
    Wolfe, Don M. Milton and His England. New Jersey: Princeton UP, 1971.
    Yates, Frances A. Astraea. London: Pimlico, 1975.
    Zagorin, Perez. Milton: Aristocrat & Rebel: The Poet and his Politics. New York:
    Brewer, 1992.

    QR CODE