研究生: |
陳銨裴 Chen, An-Pei |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
課程改革下一位國小體育教師專業認同之敘說探究 Professional Identity of an Elementary School Physical Education Teacher : Narratives of Curriculum Reform |
指導教授: |
林靜萍
Lin, Ching-Ping |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
體育學系 Department of Physical Education |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 139 |
中文關鍵詞: | 十二年國教 、課程改革 、教師專業認同 、國小體育教師 |
英文關鍵詞: | 12-year Basic Education, Curriculum Reform, Teacher Professional Identity, Elementary School Physical Education Teacher |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202100314 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:165 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在了解國小體育教師專業認同建構歷程的經驗樣貌,及面對十二年國教課程改革的因應與困境,以提供相關啟示。研究方法:研究參與者為某縣市健體領域輔導團團員,並積極參與課改相關活動之國小男性體育教師。以敘說探究方式進行,採半結構式深度訪談,以編年式進行分析,直至資料飽和。研究發現與討論:教師個人特質、過往學習經驗、學生回饋、教師與教練、同儕及自我專業進修,對教師專業認同發展具影響力;教師專業認同發展歷程,是生命經驗與專業認同不斷在順應課改潮流下持續協商、重新定義與建構的動態歷程;教師對課改精神認同,能發揮能動性提升教師對其專業的認同;透過在校公開授課,漸漸影響學校體育文化,為課改帶來一線曙光。本研究所得結論:一、非專體育教師透過運動參與與不斷進修建立自信-形成體育教師專業認同。二、教師受環境影響產生角色衝突,體育教學磨練與學生回饋克服教師專業認同混沌-非專體育教師亦能成為專長體育教師。三、面對課改,教師發揮能動性瞭解其內涵並做出體育教學改變來因應。未來建議:一、鼓勵課改下的國小體育教師(非專長與專長)多參與運動培養體育相關興趣、參與相關研習、進修及培養多元能力。二、國小體育教師多元角色職務環境下-應持續專業成長維持教師熱忱。三、面對課改-體育教師應設計符應素養導向的課程在教學現場做出改變。四、未來建議可針對瞭解現場對課改不認同的體育教師探究其原因,以利課改推行。
The purpose of this research is to understand the experience of the construction process about professional identity of physical education teacher in primary school, and to provide relevant enlightenment to encounter the reform of 12-year Basic Education Curricula. Research method: The research participant is a member of National Health Education and Sports Counseling Organization, and also a primary school physical education teacher who has been actively participated in curriculum reform and related activities. The research is conducted with narrative inquiry and semi-structured interviews, and it would analysis by conducted chronologically record until the data is saturated. Findings and discussion: It showed there is a strong impact of teachers’ personal traits, past learning experiences, students' feedback, teachers, coaches, peers and self-advanced studies are related with the development of teacher’s professional identity ; the development process of teacher’s professional identity keep continuous to negotiate of life experience and professional recognition in compliance with the trend of curriculum reform. It is a dynamic process of redefinition and construction to adapt and fulfill the needs. Also, teachers recognize of curriculum reform can exert their initiative to enhance their recognition of profession. Furthermore, through public teaching in school, it has been gradually influenced sports culture at school and affect the curriculum reform in the right track. Conclusions: 1. Non-specialized physical education teachers have regained their self-confidence through sports participation and continuous learning, which could help them to build up the professional identity. 2. Teacher who had been affected by the environment and role, but physical education training and students’ feedback helped to overcome the confusion of professional identification - non-specialized physical education teachers could become and act as a specialized teacher. 3. Facing the curriculum reform, the teacher has took the initiative to understand the meaning deeply and made changes in the way to teach physical education. Suggestions: 1. Encourage physical education teachers of primary (non-specialized and specialized) who under the curriculum reform to participate more in sports in order to cultivate interests of sports. It suggested to participate in related workshops, engaged in advanced studies and foster multiple capabilities. 2. Under the multi-role environment, primary physical education teachers should maintain their professional development and also to keep their teaching passion. 3. Facing the curriculum reform, physical education teachers should design quality-oriented curriculum to fit in every the teaching site. 4. In the future, it recommends to explore more about the reasons why some of the physical education teacher are disagree on the curriculum reform, to facilitate the implementation of the curriculum reform.
水心蓓 (2016)。十二年國教體育課程綱要與學校體育。學校體育,153,4-6。
王秀槐 (2008)。課程改革與教師專業成長。中華教育季刊,59(3),28-41。
王宗騰、胡天玫 (2016)。國小及幼兒園體育課程架構:建構運動技能的學習內涵。大專體育,138,1-20。
王郁雯 (2016)。高中課程改革下的教師專業認同。教育學報,44(2),165-182。
王郁雯 (2016)。國小教師專業認同形塑之後現代觀點探究。碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
王郁雯 (2017)。從九年一貫課程到十二年國民基本教育:教師專業認同變化。課程研究,12(2),37-59。
吳子宏 (2003)。九年一貫健康與體育領域教師專業能力內涵之因素分析研究。未出版碩士論文,國立屏東師範學院,屏東縣。
吳忠誼 (2005)。運動員的身體故事-「運動人」、「不馴服」。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
李文惠 (2007)。學校中的臨時工/吉普賽人—國中代理代課教師工作處境及專業認同之探究。未出版碩士論文,國立高雄大學,高雄市。
李亦芳 (2009)。聆聽她/他們的聲音─多元身分下國中體育教師專業認同之建構。臺灣運動教育學報,3(2),61-78。
吳欣怡 (2005)。教師角色之初探。競技運動,7,82-86。
李怡貞 (2011)。公立高中(職)體育科教師甄選方式與專業能力之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
吳亭蕙 (2018)。國小代理教師專業認同發展歷程之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
何雯君 (2008)。課程改革中國小資深教師專業認同之個案研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
吳慎慎 (2002)。教師專業認同與終身學習:生命史敘說研究。未出版博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
李艷秋 (2016)。美國健康與體育教育者學會之演進。中華體育季刊,30,137-144。
周宏室 (1994)。臺北市學生對體育課目標認知之調查研究。臺北,文鶴出版社。
林欣姿 (2011)。兩位高中教師參與教師專業發展評鑑歷程中專業認同轉變之研究。碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
林孟嬌 (2006)。教師專業認同的建構-兩位不同師資教育背景教師的研究。碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
林思吟 (2016)。淺談差異化教學。臺灣教育評論月刊,2016,5(3),118-123。
周淑卿 (2003)。教室層級的課程設計:課程實踐的觀點。現代教育論壇,8,125-135。
周淑卿 (2004)。課程發展與教師專業。臺北:高等教育。
周淑卿 (2004)。我是課程發展的專業人員?教師專業身分認同的分析。教育資料與研究,57,9-16。
林琮智 (2016)。十二年國民基本教育課程健康與體育學習領域之國小教師專業需求分析。屏東大學體育學報,2,174-184。
胡幼慧編 (1996)。《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性主義研究實例》。臺北:巨流。
洪瑞璇 (2007)。國中教師專業認同之研究:遊走在「結構-能動」之間。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
侯銀華 (2005)。中等學校體育教師專業能力現況與進修阻礙因素。未出版碩士論文,私立輔仁大學,臺北市。
柴成瑋 (2005)。解構第四面牆-一位國小教師邁向轉化型知識份子之敘事探究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
高宣揚 (1999)。後現代論。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。
郭丁熒 (2003)。教師的多維影像。國立臺北師範學院學報,16(2),161-186。
陳玉枝、闕月清 (2003)。國小實習教師體育教學反省之調查研究:以臺東師範學院為例。92年度體育學術研討會專刊,219-234。
教育部 (2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要。臺北市:教育部。
陳伯璋 (2001)。學校本位課程發展與行動研究。中華民國課程與教學學會行動研究與課程教學革新。臺北市:揚智,33-48。
張怡沁譯 (2017)。幫助每一個孩子成功:發展正向性格,培養面對未來挑戰所需的恆久能力。臺北:親子天下。
康美文 (2003)。新竹市國民小學體育教師專業能力現況之研究。大專體育學刊,5(2),27-37。
陳盈位 (2002)。體育課不容「隨心所欲」調課。學校體育雙月刊,12(6),71-74。
陳垣翰 (2005)。國小體育教師基本專業能力之探討。學校體育,89,103-109。
陳奎憙 (2013)。教育社會學,第四版。臺北:三民。
國家教育研究院 (2015)。十二年國民基本教育健康與體育領域課程綱要草案研修說明。十二年國民基本教育領域/科目/群科課程綱要草案分區公聽會,會議手冊健康與體育領域。
國家教育研究院 (2016)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校-健康與體育領域(草案)。國家教育研究院於105年2月4日以教研課字第1051100103號函陳報教育部版。
郭淑芳 (2014)。新世代專業教師的省思與前瞻。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,7(1),47-70。
梁畢玲 (2005)。國小教師生活型態、專業認同與職涯滿意度關係之研究。未出版碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
許莉娟 (2011)。基隆市國小教師教育專業、教師角色認知與教學效能之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣海洋大學,基隆市。
張瑋芝 (2012)。從國民小學師資結構談體育教師專業能力。學校體育,22(2),108-112。
許義雄 (1994)。學校體育課程系統化規劃第三階段教材教法與評量。教育部委託國立臺灣師範大學學校體育研究與發展中心專案研究。
許義雄 (1998)。運動教育與人文關懷-課程教學篇。臺北市:師大書苑。
許義雄 (1998)。我國學校體育發展指標建構之研究。行政院國科會專題研究成果報告。
許義雄 (2000)。我國體育教師專業能力指標建構之研究。行政院國教科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
許瓊云 (1992)。體育教師之工作倦怠及因應策略。臺灣省學校體育,40-43。
黃安俐、白慧娟 (2017)。「跨越生涯荊棘高原」-一位國小教師的生命史。教育科學期刊,16(2),109-141。
黃珮瑜 (2002)。國民小學教師專業角色知覺、生涯滿意度與生涯承諾之關係。未出版碩士論文。國立臺中師範學院,臺中市。
黃國義 (1985)。理想的體育教師。臺北市:體育出版社。
曾瑞成 (2016)。談十二年國教體育課綱之研修特點。學校體育,153,19-23。
程瑞福 (2000)。臺灣地區中小學體育教師專業能力之研究。體育學報,28,123-132。
黃靖蓉 (2006)。實習教師專業認同發展歷程之敘說研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
程瑞福 (2010)。我國學校體育現況與展望學校體育課程與教學從標準化到彈性化。臺北:國立教育資料館。
程瑞福 (2010)。學校體育課程教學現況與展望。學校體育,121,25-29。
游肇賢 (2003)。國中兼任行政工作教師角色衝突與工作滿意度之調查研究。未出版論文,國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
黃麗靜 (2008)。臺北縣國民小學教師專業認同、社區意識與專業表現之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
楊巧玲 (2009)。教育改革對教師專業認同之影響:五位國中資深教師的探索性研究。師大學報,53(1),25-54。
詹宏基 (2008)。彰化縣國小健康與體育學習領域教師專業能力之研究。碩士論文,國立臺東大學,臺東縣。
楊明磊 (2001)。資深諮商工作者的專業發展-詮釋學觀點。未出版博士論文,國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
楊峰州、范慶瑜 (2017)。國小體育課程的探討。國教新知,64(2),51-62。
楊賀凱、黃毅志 (2009)。影響教師專業認同的因果機制:以臺東縣國中教師為例。中正教育研究,8(2),75-114。
楊智穎 (2011)。弱勢者教育改革中教師專業認同之研究:偏鄉學校教師敘事的省思。屏東教育學報,36,499-522。
雷新俊 (2010)。學校組織氣氛、教師專業認同、控制信念與組織公民行為之研究-以臺東縣國小教師為例。碩士論文,國立臺東大學,臺東縣。
廖靜薇 (2002)。臺灣地區精神醫療社會工作者專業認同之研究。碩士論文,私立東海大學,臺中市。
蔡敦浩、劉育忠、王慧蘭 (2011)。敘說探究的第一堂課 (二版)。臺北市:鼎茂。
劉先翔 (2017)。十二年國教國小健康與體育領域核心素養之教學策略。中華體育季刊,31(1),1-6。
劉育忠 (2009)。後結構主義與當代教育學探索:回到世界性真實(增訂版)。臺北:巨流。
劉育忠 (2010)。教育學的再想像:德勒茲思想與教育哲學。臺北:巨流。
歐宗明 (2002)。國小體育教師理想角色知覺調查研究。體育學報,3,201-210。
歐宗明 (2007)。教師與教練概念內涵之比較。臺南大學體育學報,2,126-139。
劉玲君 (2004)。我的變與辯:一位國小女姓代課老師追尋教師專業認同的生命敘說。碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
蔡清田 (2011)。從課程學理基礎與核心素養論k-12年級課程綱要。課程研究,6(2),63-83。
謝文全 (2016)。教育行政學。高等教育出版社。臺北市:作者。
羅智勇、周資眾 (2010)。體育教師與運動教練的任務與功能-以網球為例。屏東教大體育,13,195-200。
饒見維 (1996)。教師專業發展-理論與實務。臺北市:五南。
饒見維 (2001)。九年一貫課程與教師專業角色的省思。教師天地,113,7-13。
Kokemohr, R.、馮朝霖 (2001)。質性方法中的參照推論分析:傳記研究之案例分析。應用心裡研究,12,25-48。
Armour, K. M. (1997). Developing a Personal Philosophy on the Nature and Purpose of Physical Education: Life History Reflections. European Physical Education Review Volume, 3(1), 68-82.
Armour, K. M. & Jones, R. L. (1998). Physical education teacher’ lives and careers: PE, sport and educational status. London: Falmer.
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P.C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128.
Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective.Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 749-764.
Borich, G. D. (1999). Dimensions of self that influence effective teaching. In R. P. Lipka, & T. M. Brinthaupt (Eds.), The role of self in teacher development (pp. 92-117). N. Y., Albany: State University of New York Press.
Callero, P., L. (2003). The sociology of the self. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 115-133.
Chong, S., Low, E. L., & Goh, K. C. (2011). Emerging professional teacher identity of pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher education, 36 (8), 50-64.
Christensen, E. & MacDonald, D. (2014). Emergin teachers’ stories from the staffroom and beyond. Workplace Learning in Physical Education.
Clandinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1999). Shaping a professional identity: Stories of educational practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cooper, K., & Olson, M. R. (1996). The multiple ‘I’ s’ of teacher identity. In M. Kompf, W. R. Bond, D. Dworet, & R.T. Boak (Eds.), Changing research and practice: Teachers’ professionalism, identities and knowledge (pp. 78-89).
Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 677-692.
Dunn, R., G. (1997). Self, identity, and difference: Mead and the poststructuralists.The Sociological Quarterly, 38(4), 687-705.
da Cunha, M.A., Batista, P., & Graça, A. (2014). Pre-service physical education teachers’ discourses on learning how to become a teacher: [Re]constructing a profes- sional identity based on visual evidence [Special issue]. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 7(1), 141–171.
Dowling, F. (2006). Physical education teacher educators’ professional identities, continuing professional development and the issue of gender equality. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogym 11(3), 247-263.
Dowling, F. (2011). ‘Are PE teacher identities fit for postmodern schools or are they clinging to modernist notions of professionalism?’ A case study of Norwegian PE teacher students’ emerging professional identities. Sport Education and Society, 16(2), 201–222.
Dowling Næss, F. J. (1996). Life events and curriculum change: the life history of a Norwegian physical educator. European Physical Education Review, 2(1), 41- 53.
Esteve, J. M. (2000). Culture in the Scool: Assessment and the content of education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 23(1), 5-18.
Fenstermacher, G. D (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of Research in Education 20 (pp. 3-56). Washington.: American Educational Research Association.
Flores,M.A. (2001). Person and Context in becoming a New Teacher. Journal of Education for Teaching,27 (2), 135-148.
Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture, power and liberation. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep earning Engage the world change the world. Thousand Oaks, California:Corwin.
Giddens, A. (1991)。現代性與自我認同,趙旭東,方文(譯)。臺北:左岸。
Gonzalez-Calvo, G., & Femandez-Balboa. (2018). ‘’A Qualitative Analysis of the Factors Determining the Quality of Relations between A Novice Physical Education Teacher and His Students’ Families: Implications for the Development of Professional Identity. Sport, Education and Society, 23(5), 491-504.
Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2007). Teachers resilience: A necessary condition for effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1302-1316.
Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Ruthford (Ed.), Modernity and it futures (pp. 273-326). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, C., & Noyes, A. (2009). New regimes of truth: The impact of performative school self evaluation systems on teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(6), 850-856.
Hamman, D., Gosselin, K., Romano, J., & Bunuan, R. (2010). Using possible-selves theory to understand the identity development of new teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1349-1361.
Hargreaves, D. H. (1972). Interpersonal Relations and Education, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Izadinia, M. (2013). Teacher educators’ identity: A review of literature. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 426–441.
Karpova, N. V. (2016). Future physical education teacher’s professional identity formation specifics. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, (4), 19-19.
Keay, J. (2006). Collaborative learning in physical education teachers’ early-career professional development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 11(3), 285-305.
Kelchtermans, G. (2000). Telling dreams: A commentary to Newman from a European context. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(2000), 209-211.
Kerby, A. (1991). Narrative and the self. Bloomington. IN:Indiana University Press.
Knowles, G. J. (1992). Models for understanding pre-service and beginning teachers’ biographies. Illustrations from case studies. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp. 99-152). London:Routledge.
Margarida, A., Ana, P., Amândio, G., & Paula, B. (2012). Practicum as a space and time of transformation: Self-narrative of a physical education pre-service teacher. US-China Education Review, B7, 665–674.
Mead, G. H. (1934) .Mind, self and society. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
Montgomery, R. (2012). It serves a bigger purpose: The tension between professional identity and bureaucratic mandate in public education. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(3), 45-58.
Newman, C. S. (2000). ‘’Seeds of professional development in pe-service teachers: A study of their dreams and goals’’. In International Journal of Educational Research,33 (2), 123-217.
Nias, J.(1989).Primary teachers talking----A study of teaching as work. London: Routledge.
Nixon, J., Martin, J. Mckeown, P. & Ranson, S. (1997). ‘’Towards a learning profession: changing codes of occupational practice within the new management of education.’’ British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18, 5-28.
O’Sullivan, M. (2006). Professional lives of Irish physical education teachers: Stories of resilience, respect and resignation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 11(3), 256-248.
Oslen, B. (2008). Introducing teacher identity and this volume. Teacher Education Quarterly, Summer 2008, 3-25.
Rosaen, C. L. & Schram, P. (1998). Becoming a member of the teaching profession: Learning a language possibility. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(3), 283-303.
Rossi, T., Hunter, L., Christensen, E., & MacDonald, D. (2014). Workplace learning in physical education: Emerging teachers’stories from the staffroom and beyond. Florence, KY: Taylor and Francis.
Sachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity: Learning to be a teacher. In P. M. Denicolo & M. Kompf (Eds.), Connecting policy and practice: Challenges for teaching and learning in schools and universities (pp. 5-21).
Sparkes, A. C. (1991). Curriculum change: On gaining a sense of perspective. In N. Armstrong & A. C. Sparkes (eds.) Issues in Physical Education (pp. 1-19).
Sparkes, A. C. & Templin, T. J. (1992). Life histories and physical education teachers: exploring the meanings of marginality. In A. C. Sparkes (Ed.), Research in physical education and sport: Exploring alternative visions (pp. 118-145). London: The Falmer Press.
Swann, M., McIntyre, D., Pell, T., Hargreaves, L., & Cunningham, M. (2010). Teachers’ conceptions of teacher professionalism in England in 2003 and 2006. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 549-571.
Talbert, J. E, & McLaughlin, M. W. (1993). Understanding teaching in context. Teaching for understanding: challenge for policy and practice (pp. 167-206). New York: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publisher.
Thomas, & Beauchamp (2011). Understanding new teachers’ professional identities through metaphor. Teaching and teacher Education, 27(4),762-769.
Tinning, R. (2004). Rethinking the preparation of HPE teachers: Ruminations on knowledge, identity, and ways of thinking. Asia-Paci c Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 241–253.
Usher,R. & Edwards,R. (1994). Postmodernism and Education. London: Routledge.
Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Professional agency in the stream of change:Understanding educational change and teachers' professional identities. Teaching and teacher education, 47, 1-12.
Vähäsantanen, K., & Eteläpelto, A. (2011). Vocational teachers’ pathways in the course of a curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 291-312.
Vähäsantanen, K., Saarinen, J., & Eteläpelto, A. (2009). Between school and working life: Vocational teachers’ agency in boundary-crossing settings. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(6), 395-404.
Williams, J., & Ritter, J. (2010). Constructing new professional identities through self-study: From teacher to teacher educator. Professional Development in Education, 36(1&2), 77-92.
Wood, D. R. (2000). Narrating professional development: Teachers’ Stories as texts for improving practice. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 31(4), 426-48.
Younger,M.(2004).Starting point:student teachers’ reasons for becoming teachers and their preconceptions of what this will mean.European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(3),245-263.