簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 廖冠評
Liou, Kuan-Ping
論文名稱: 國小特殊教育教學輔導教師參與初任教師導入方案之研究
A Study on the Mentor Teachers Participating in Special Education Beginning Teachers Induction of Elementary School .
指導教授: 胡心慈
Hu, Shin-Tzu
口試委員: 鄒小蘭
Chau, Hsiao-Lan
張素貞
Chang, Su-Chen
胡心慈
Hu, Shin-Tzu
口試日期: 2023/07/07
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 175
中文關鍵詞: 特殊教育教學輔導教師導入輔導方案初任教師互動歷程專業成長
英文關鍵詞: special education, mentor teacher, induction program, beginning teacher, interactive relationship, professional growth
研究方法: 半結構式訪談法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202301039
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:83下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 特教領域中,教學輔導教師在導入輔導方案中是靈魂人物,但以他們為焦點的研究數量偏少。可謂,在研究中教學輔導教師往往是配角。本研究旨在探究教學輔導教師投入導入輔導的動機以及信念,透過教學輔導教師的觀點,理解他們與初任教師的互動關係,並聚焦在教學輔導教師在導入輔導歷程中的專業成長以及需求。本研究採質性研究法,藉由訪談、觀察以及研究札記等資料,形成教學輔導教師在參與導入輔導方案中的立體面貌,本研究結論與建議如下:

    壹、導入輔導方案的運作-教學輔導教師層面
    教學輔導教師除了具有支持性及專業性角色外,他們同時也是一名「資源網絡連結者」,協助初任教師形成社群網絡來建立關係。在導入輔導的歷程中,教學輔導教師協助初任教師整合理論與實務,以發展問題解決策略。以制度層面而言,教學輔導教師的成員固定且為數過少,如透過培訓提高教學輔導教師的數量,較能夠舒緩導入輔導吃重的量能。

    貳、導入輔導方案的歷程-教學輔導教師與初任教師之間
    在導入輔導的歷程中,雙方關係的型態初期-關係建立期,以支持性為主;中期為實質輔導期,雙方關係型態有多元的發展,包含「單向指導型」、「互動熱絡型」以及「平淡疏離型」;後期雙方關係將轉變成亦師亦友的狀態。此外,教學輔導教師與初任教師對導入輔導方案產生共識,則能幫助導入輔導運作過程更為順利。

    參、教學輔導教師的動力、信念與專業成長
    教學輔導教師間的同儕團體動力,有助於他們加入並且長期投入於導入輔導方案中。而支撐他們持續投入導入輔導的歷程,其信念源自於導入輔導確實能夠提供初任教師支持,並且幫助特教學生有更好的學習品質。此外,教學輔導教師在導入輔導歷程中並非單向付出,而是在教學相長中有專業的成長,同時也有精進成長的需求。

    Mentor teachers are often considered key person in beginning teachers induction programs. However, in research on the induction programs, they are often portrayed as supporting roles. This study aimed to explore the mentor teacers’ motivation and belief. From the perspective of mentor teachers, understanding the interaction interac-tive relationship between mentor teachers and beginning teachers, as well as their challenges, professional growth, and needs throughout the induction process. This study adopted a qualitative research methodology. By utilizing interviews, observations, and research notes, among other data sources, contribute to a rich and multifaceted understanding of the mentor teachers' role in the beginning induction programs.

    a、 The operation of implementing counseling pro-grams-mentor teachers’ aspect.
    Apart from having supportive and professional roles, mentor teachers were also serve as "resource network connectors." They assisted be-ginning teachers in forming a community network to establish rela-tionships. In induction process, mentor teachers assisted beginning teaches integrate theory and practice to develop problem-solving strategies. In terms of operational aspects, mentor teachers were fixed and their numbers were too few. By increasing the number of in-structional mentor teachers through training, the burden of imple-menting counseling can be alleviated more effectively.

    b、 The progress of implementing counseling programs- men-tor teachers and beginning teachers.
    In induction process, the initial stage was focus on establishing a supportive relationship. The middle stage involved substantive guid-ance and support. The relationship between both parties undergoes diverse development, including "teaching model", "active and enthu-siastic interaction model", and "dull and distant model". In the later stage, the relationship would transition into a state of being both mentor and friend. Moreover, when mentor teachers and beginning teachers reached a consensus on implementing the mentoring pro-gram, it could greatly facilitate the smooth operation of the mentoring process.

    c、 Mentor teachers’ motivation, beliefs, and professional growth
    Peer group dynamics among mentor teachers contributed to their engagement and long-term commitment to the implementation of the mentoring program. Their sustained commitment to the pro-cess of mentoring stems from the belief that mentoring indeed pro-vided support for beginning teachers. And it helped improve the learning quality of special education students. In addition, mentor teachers did not merely provide one-sided support in the mentoring process. They also experienced professional growth through the mu-tual learning and, at the same time, had a desire for continuous improvement.

    第一章 緒論1 第一節 研究背景與動機1 第二節 研究目的與問題7 第三節 名詞釋義8 第二章 文獻探討9 第一節 初任教師導入方案9 第二節 教學輔導教師制度31 第三章 研究方法 53 第一節 研究設計53 第二節 研究參與者53 第三節 研究程序56 第四節 研究工具57 第五節 資料處理與分析58 第六節 研究信實度62 第七節 研究倫理64 第四章 研究結果與討論65 第一節 特殊教育教學輔導教師的職務觀點66 第二節 特教導入輔導方案之運作歷程96 第三節 教學輔導教師的信念與專業成長130 第四節 研究省思150 第五章 研究發現與建議153 第一節 研究發現153 第二節 研究限制與建議158 參考文獻161 附錄一 訪談同意書172 附錄二 國小特教教學輔導教師導入歷程之研究訪談大綱173 附錄三 訪談紀錄表175

    丁一顧(2003)。美、英、紐、日初任教師導入方案及其對我國之啟示。課程與教學季刊,6(3),87-104。
    丁一顧(2011)。臺北市校本教學輔導教師制度運作模式建構之初探。臺北市立大學學報,42(1),1-20。
    丁一顧、張德銳(2007)。臺北市教學輔導教師制度實施成效與問題的三年縱貫研究。臺北市立教育大學學報,38(2),1-32。
    丁一顧、張德銳、高紅瑛(2007)。臺北市中等學校教學輔導教師制度實施成效與困難之研究。國民教育研究學報,18,115-144。
    王永慈(2021)。特殊教育教師跨校專業發展的團體運作歷程之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系。
    林宜玄、劉怡萱(2009)。高級中等學校初任教師導入輔導需求及導入方案內涵之研究。銘傳教育電子期刊,51-72。
    林官蓓、陳建志、陳瑞庭(2015)。高雄市國民中小學教學輔導教師制度之研究。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(7),152-181。
    林俊彥、翁博威(2009)。教學輔導教師專業能力之研究。學校行政,63,25-35。
    林淑馨(2010)。質性研究:理論與實務。巨流圖書股份有限公司。
    洪靖雯(2012)。臺中市國民小學教學輔導教師制度實施現況與實施困難之研究-以三所個案學校為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育學系課程與教學所。
    桃園市教育局(2020年10月5日)。桃園市109學年度特殊教育初任教師導入方案研習實施計畫。取自https://special.moe.gov.tw/study_three.php?id=425842
    張民杰(2010)。臺北市教學輔導教師方案的功能-代理教師觀點。新竹教育大學教育學報,27(1),33-60。
    張弘勳、蔡淑苓、沈繻淯(2014)。學校初任教師導入訓練之研究。學校行政,89,12-141。
    張芬芬(2010)質性資料分析的五步驟:在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊,35,87-120。
    張芬芬(2019)。素養是師生共構融會貫通的活知識-108課綱知識論。台灣教育評論月刊,8(10),01-05。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/8-10/topic/01.pdf
    張德銳(2009)。美國教學輔導教師制度及其在我國中小學教師專業成長之應用。教育資料集刊,42,181-202。
    張德銳(2017)。以認知教練提升有效教學-教學輔導教師的觀點。市北教育學刊,58,1-9。
    許子云(2007)。教學輔導互動歷程及其對教學導師專業成長影響之研究(未出版碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所。
    許月玫(2002)。國民小學教學輔導教師制度之研究(未出版碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。
    許藤繼(2011)。臺灣國民小學教學困難教師之成因與輔導。教育資料集刊,49,1-30。
    胡心慈、張育琳(2019):攜手同行:建構特教初任教師導入方案之旅。教育科學研究期刊,64(1),53-80。
    范淑惠(2014):國中初任特殊教育教師職場導入歷程研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系。
    梁碧明、林彥岑、劉育靈、戴君宴、鍾宏亮(2009)。特殊教育教師初任職歷程之探究。特教叢書-特殊教育現在與未來,71-82。https://special.moe.gov.tw/periodicalInfo.php?guid=C46D6A6E-0273-49E9-A2D2-70BA1C290190&paid=1341&_g=10F99137-2343-4A84-A1D6-3D1AA5163407&_p=38&token=f79c055fb15b49c63386f942ebbf1454
    鈕文英(2017)。質性研究方法與論文寫作(二版)。雙葉書廊有限公司。
    教育部(2012)。中華民國師資培育白皮書:發揚師道,百年樹人。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/Download.ashx?u=C099358C81D4876CC76BC3215266429688C51908E957AA469494B1D88FE7AB095C2966547A1ADDF7B354D80B9E346783B21129435D904360DE50530AD08C92E0AD36C48541A4B3D6&n=70FF865D5FF4A15C6529A091A8E3627F8CF7DC9DBF086AD82442EE21DEE054D8D424F437A1884765D40682AF0E479632&icon=..pdf
    教育部(2020年修正)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要-總綱。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/35950/96151.pdf
    教育部(2021年2月16日)。教育部補助辦理教師專業發展實踐方案作業要點。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000567
    教育部(2021年2月17日)。109年中小學初任教師導入輔導暨知能研習實施計畫。https://eii.ncue.edu.tw/Novice_Apply/
    教育部(2022年12月16日)。十二年國民基本教育相關業務。https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=D33B55D537402BAA&s=37E2FF8B7ACFC28B
    教育部補助辦理教師專業發展實踐方案作業要點(2022年12月26日)修正公布。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000567
    鄒小蘭(2013)。教學輔導教師制度對特殊教育教師專業成長之應用。特殊教育季刊,127,45-52。
    新北市教育局(2020)。新北市特殊教育輔導團到校輔導實施計畫。https://sec.ntpc.edu.tw/var/file/4/1004/attach/86/pta_9810_3453030_51927.pdf
    臺北市教育局(2009)。臺北市立高級中等以下學校教學輔導教師及研究教師作業要點。https://www.laws.taipei.gov.tw/Law/LawSearch/LawInformation?lawId=P05C2010-20190425&realID=05-03-2009
    臺北市教學輔導教師網(2021)。臺北市教學輔導教師認證手冊,2021年7月5日。http://mt.utaipei.edu.tw/檔案下載/。
    潘杏宜(2016)。初任特殊教育教師導入輔導需求之研究(未出版碩士論文)。中原大學特殊教育學系。
    蔡汶蓁(2016)。一位新手特教教師專業成長之自我敘說(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育學院特殊教育學系。
    簡賢昌(2008)。臺北市國小教學輔導教師與初任教師互動歷程之研究(未出版博士論文)。臺北市立教育大學教育學系博士論文。
    羅寶鳳、陳麒(2020)。初任教師工作困擾、教學效能與專業表現之研究。教育科學研究期刊,65(2),37-71。
    Boreen, J., Johnson, M. K., Niday, D., & Potts, J. (2004) 。啟導初任教師:貴人引導制的引導、反思與教練方法(林心茹譯)。遠流。(原著出版於2003年)。
    Kross, E. (2021)。強大內心的自我對話習慣:緊張下維持專注,混亂中清楚思考,身陷困難不被負面情緒拖垮,任何時刻都發揮高水準表現(胡宗香譯)。天下雜誌。(原著出版於2021年)
    丁一顧(2003)。美、英、紐、日初任教師導入方案及其對我國之啟示。課程與教學季刊,6(3),87-104。
    丁一顧(2011)。臺北市校本教學輔導教師制度運作模式建構之初探。臺北市立大學學報,42(1),1-20。
    丁一顧、張德銳(2007)。臺北市教學輔導教師制度實施成效與問題的三年縱貫研究。臺北市立教育大學學報,38(2),1-32。
    丁一顧、張德銳、高紅瑛(2007)。臺北市中等學校教學輔導教師制度實施成效與困難之研究。國民教育研究學報,18,115-144。
    王永慈(2021)。特殊教育教師跨校專業發展的團體運作歷程之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系。
    林宜玄、劉怡萱(2009)。高級中等學校初任教師導入輔導需求及導入方案內涵之研究。銘傳教育電子期刊,51-72。
    林官蓓、陳建志、陳瑞庭(2015)。高雄市國民中小學教學輔導教師制度之研究。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(7),152-181。
    林俊彥、翁博威(2009)。教學輔導教師專業能力之研究。學校行政,63,25-35。
    林淑馨(2010)。質性研究:理論與實務。巨流圖書股份有限公司。
    洪靖雯(2012)。臺中市國民小學教學輔導教師制度實施現況與實施困難之研究-以三所個案學校為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育學系課程與教學所。
    桃園市教育局(2020年10月5日)。桃園市109學年度特殊教育初任教師導入方案研習實施計畫。取自https://special.moe.gov.tw/study_three.php?id=425842
    張民杰(2010)。臺北市教學輔導教師方案的功能-代理教師觀點。新竹教育大學教育學報,27(1),33-60。
    張弘勳、蔡淑苓、沈繻淯(2014)。學校初任教師導入訓練之研究。學校行政,89,12-141。
    張芬芬(2010)質性資料分析的五步驟:在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊,35,87-120。
    張芬芬(2019)。素養是師生共構融會貫通的活知識-108課綱知識論。台灣教育評論月刊,8(10),01-05。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/8-10/topic/01.pdf
    張德銳(2009)。美國教學輔導教師制度及其在我國中小學教師專業成長之應用。教育資料集刊,42,181-202。
    張德銳(2017)。以認知教練提升有效教學-教學輔導教師的觀點。市北教育學刊,58,1-9。
    許子云(2007)。教學輔導互動歷程及其對教學導師專業成長影響之研究(未出版碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所。
    許月玫(2002)。國民小學教學輔導教師制度之研究(未出版碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。
    許藤繼(2011)。臺灣國民小學教學困難教師之成因與輔導。教育資料集刊,49,1-30。
    胡心慈、張育琳(2019):攜手同行:建構特教初任教師導入方案之旅。教育科學研究期刊,64(1),53-80。
    范淑惠(2014):國中初任特殊教育教師職場導入歷程研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系。
    梁碧明、林彥岑、劉育靈、戴君宴、鍾宏亮(2009)。特殊教育教師初任職歷程之探究。特教叢書-特殊教育現在與未來,71-82。https://special.moe.gov.tw/periodicalInfo.php?guid=C46D6A6E-0273-49E9-A2D2-70BA1C290190&paid=1341&_g=10F99137-2343-4A84-A1D6-3D1AA5163407&_p=38&token=f79c055fb15b49c63386f942ebbf1454
    鈕文英(2017)。質性研究方法與論文寫作(二版)。雙葉書廊有限公司。
    教育部(2012)。中華民國師資培育白皮書:發揚師道,百年樹人。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/Download.ashx?u=C099358C81D4876CC76BC3215266429688C51908E957AA469494B1D88FE7AB095C2966547A1ADDF7B354D80B9E346783B21129435D904360DE50530AD08C92E0AD36C48541A4B3D6&n=70FF865D5FF4A15C6529A091A8E3627F8CF7DC9DBF086AD82442EE21DEE054D8D424F437A1884765D40682AF0E479632&icon=..pdf
    教育部(2020年修正)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要-總綱。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/35950/96151.pdf
    教育部(2021年2月16日)。教育部補助辦理教師專業發展實踐方案作業要點。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000567
    教育部(2021年2月17日)。109年中小學初任教師導入輔導暨知能研習實施計畫。https://eii.ncue.edu.tw/Novice_Apply/
    教育部(2022年12月16日)。十二年國民基本教育相關業務。https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=D33B55D537402BAA&s=37E2FF8B7ACFC28B
    教育部補助辦理教師專業發展實踐方案作業要點(2022年12月26日)修正公布。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000567
    鄒小蘭(2013)。教學輔導教師制度對特殊教育教師專業成長之應用。特殊教育季刊,127,45-52。
    新北市教育局(2020)。新北市特殊教育輔導團到校輔導實施計畫。https://sec.ntpc.edu.tw/var/file/4/1004/attach/86/pta_9810_3453030_51927.pdf
    臺北市教育局(2009)。臺北市立高級中等以下學校教學輔導教師及研究教師作業要點。https://www.laws.taipei.gov.tw/Law/LawSearch/LawInformation?lawId=P05C2010-20190425&realID=05-03-2009
    臺北市教學輔導教師網(2021)。臺北市教學輔導教師認證手冊,2021年7月5日。http://mt.utaipei.edu.tw/檔案下載/。
    潘杏宜(2016)。初任特殊教育教師導入輔導需求之研究(未出版碩士論文)。中原大學特殊教育學系。
    蔡汶蓁(2016)。一位新手特教教師專業成長之自我敘說(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育學院特殊教育學系。
    簡賢昌(2008)。臺北市國小教學輔導教師與初任教師互動歷程之研究(未出版博士論文)。臺北市立教育大學教育學系博士論文。
    羅寶鳳、陳麒(2020)。初任教師工作困擾、教學效能與專業表現之研究。教育科學研究期刊,65(2),37-71。
    Boreen, J., Johnson, M. K., Niday, D., & Potts, J. (2004) 。啟導初任教師:貴人引導制的引導、反思與教練方法(林心茹譯)。遠流。(原著出版於2003年)。
    Kross, E. (2021)。強大內心的自我對話習慣:緊張下維持專注,混亂中清楚思考,身陷困難不被負面情緒拖垮,任何時刻都發揮高水準表現(胡宗香譯)。天下雜誌。(原著出版於2021年)
    Achinstein, B., & Athanases, S. Z. (Eds.). (2006). Mentors in the making: Developing new leaders for new teachers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
    Beutel, D., Crosswell, L., Willis, J., Spooner-Lane, R., Curtis, E., & Churchward, P. (2017). Preparing teachers to mentor beginning teachers: an Australian case study. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education. 6(3), 164-177.
    Billingsley, B. S. (2004). Special teacher retention and attrition: A critical analysis of the research literature. The Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 39-55.
    Billingsley, B., & Bettini, E. (2019). Special education attrition and retention : A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 697-744.
    Billingsley, B., Carson, E., & Klein, S. (2004). The working condition and induction support of early career special educators. Council for Exceptional Children, 70(3), 333-347.
    Billingsley, B., Bettini, E., & Jones, ND. (2019). Supporting Special Education Teacher Induction Through High-Leverage Practices. Remedial and Special Education, 40(6), 365-379. doi:10.1177/0741932518816826
    Boreen, J. (2009). Mentoring beginning teachers: Guiding, reflecting, coaching. Portland, OR: Stenhouse Publishers.
    Boyer, K. L. W. (1999). A Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of Mentorships on New Special Educators' Decisions To Remain in the Field of Special Education. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED438643.pdf
    Carver-Thomas, D., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher Turnover: Why It Matters and What We Can Do about It. Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-turnover-report
    Childre, A. L., & Van Rie, G. L. (2015). Mentor teacher training: A hybrid model to promote partnering in candidate development. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 34(1), 10-16.
    Clark, P. D. (2016). Mentoring and Professional Teacher Development: A Case Study of Mentor Teachers at a Rural North Carolina High School. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED570282
    Clement, M. C. (2000). Making Time for Teacher Induction: A Lesson from the New Zealand Model, The Clearing House, 73(6), 329-330, doi: 10.1080/00098650009599437
    Conderman, G., & Stephens, J. T. (2000). Voices from the Field: Reflections from Beginning Special Educators. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 33(1), 16–21. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990003300103
    Council for Exceptional Children (2020, August 05). The Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) is pleased to offer the New Special Educator Jumpstart Program, created just for first- through third year teachers. Retrieved from https://exceptionalchildren.org/events/new-special-educator-jumpstart-program?fbclid=IwAR2xd44ho-1nm9EvPhxWYCX-RHoCXtXh9v-ENEDTpq0HGdP-ukwjz7C9Knw
    Council for Exceptional Children(2003). The mentoring induction principles and guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/4713086/mentoring-induction-principles-and-guidelines-council-for-
    Dempsey, I., Arthur-Kelly, M., & Carty, B. (2009). Mentoring early career special education teachers. Australian journal of education, 53(3), 294-305.
    Doering, S. A. (2018). The induction mentor voice: A phenomenological study of effective practices for high quality K-12 teacher induction mentoring. Pepperdine University. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED582783
    Donne, V., & Lin, F. Y. (2013). Special education teacher induction: The wiki way. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 86(2), 43-47.
    Duffy, M. L., & Forgan, J. W. (2005). Mentoring new special education teachers: A guide for mentors and program developers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
    Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers college record volume, 103(6), 1013-1055.
    Furlong, J., & Maynard, T. (1995). Mentoring student teachers: The growth of professional knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Goldring, R., Taie, S., & Riddles, M. (2014). Teacher Attrition and Mobility: Results from the 2012-13 Teacher Follow-Up Survey. First Look. NCES 2014-077. National Center for Education Statistics.
    Griffin, C. C., Winn, J. A., Otis-Wilborn, A., & Kilgore, K. L. (2003). New teacher induction in special education: prepare for the center on personnel studies in special education, executive summary. Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education, University of Florida.
    Griffin, M. L. (2005). Perspectives of mentors and mentees involved in a special education resident teacher program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks.
    Hicks, C. D., Glasgow, N. A., & McNary, S. J. (2004). What successful mentors do: 81 research-based strategies for new teacher induction, training, and support. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
    Hobson, A. J. (2016). Judge mentoring and how to avert it: Introducing ONSIDE Mentoring for beginning teachers. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 5(2), 87-110
    Hobson, A. J., Malderez, A., Tracey, L., Homer, M., Mitchell, N., Biddulph, M., & Tomlinson, P. D. (2007). Newly qualified teachers’ experiences of their first year of teaching. Findings from Phase III of the Becoming a Teacher Project.
    Huling-Austin, L. (1988). A Synthesis of Research on Teacher Induction Programs and Practices. San Marcos, TX: Southwest Texas State Univ.
    Hunt, J. H., Powell, S., Little, M. E., & Mike, A. (2013). The effects of e-mentoring on beginning teacher competencies and perceptions. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(4), 286-297.
    Jones, M. (2000). Trainee teachers' perceptions of school-based training in England and Germany with regard to their preparation for teaching, mentor support and assessment. Mentoring and Tutoring, 8(1), 63-80.
    Ingersoll, R. M. (2012). Beginning teacher induction what the data tell us. Phi delta kappan, 93(8), 47-51.
    Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. M (2004). Do teacher induction and mentoring matter? NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 28-40.
    Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of educational research, 81(2), 201-233.
    Irinaga-Bistolas, C., Schalock, M., Marvin, R., & Beck, L. (2007). Bridges to success: A developmental induction model for rural early career special educators. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 26(1), 13-22.
    Israel, M., Kamman, M. L., McCray, E. D., & Sindelar, P. T. (2014). Mentoring in action: The interplay among professional assistance, emotional support, and evaluation. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 45-63.
    Lacireno-Paquet, N., Bocala, C., Fronius, T., & Phillips, D. (2012). The Characteristics and Experiences of Beginning Teachers in Seven Northeast and Islands Region States and Nationally. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 133. Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands.
    Mathews, H. M., Rodgers, W. J., & Youngs, P. (2017). Sense-making for beginning special educators: A systematic mixed studies review. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 67(1), 23-36.
    McLeskey, J., Barringer, M-D., Billingsley, B., Brownell, M., Jackson, D., Kennedy, M., Lewis, T., Maheady, L., Rodriguez, J., Scheeler, M. C.,Winn, J., & Ziegler, D. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.
    Melnick, S. A., & Meister, D. G. (2008). A comparison of beginning and experienced teachers' concerns. Educational research quarterly, 31(3), 39-56.
    Perez, Y. (2012). Early Career Special Education Teachers’ Perceptions of School Site Induction Support. FL: FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 614. doi: 10.25148/etd.FI12050220
    Rippon, J. and Martin, M. (2003) Supporting induction: relationships count. Mentoring and Tutoring 11(2), 211-226.
    Sanchez, A. R., Roegman, R., & Goodwin, A., L. (2016). The multiple roles of mentors. The multiple roles of mentors. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(2), 66-71.
    Sarason, S. B. (2003). The good teacher mentoring-setting the standard for support & success. New York, NY : Teachers College, Collumbia University.
    Serpell, Z.(2000). Beginig teacher induction: A review of the literature. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Washington, DC
    Smith, T. M., & Ingersoll, R. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover. American educational research journal, 41(3), 681-714.
    Sowell, M. (2017). Effective practices for mentoring beginning middle school teachers: Mentor's perspectives. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 90(4), 129-134.
    Taranto, G. (2011). New-teacher induction 2.0. Journal of digital learning in teacher education, 28(1), 4-15.
    Westling, D. L., Herzog, M. J., Cooper-Duffy, K., Prohn, K., & Ray, M. (2006). The teacher support program: A proposed resource for the special education profession and an initial validation. Remedial and special education, 27(3), 136-147.
    Westling, D. L., & Koorland, M. A. (1988). The special education educator’s handbook. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    William A., & Prestage, S. (2002). The induction tutor : mentor, manager or both? Mentoring and Tutoring, 10(1), 35-46.
    White, M., & Mason, C. Y. (2006). Components of a successful mentoring program for beginning special education teachers: Perspectives from new teachers and mentors. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29(3), 191-201. doi:10.1177/088840640602900305
    Whitaker, S. D. (2000a). Mentoring beginning special education teachers and the relationship to attrition. Exceptional Children, 66, 546-566.
    Whitaker, S. D. (2000b). What do first-year special education teachers need? Implications for induction programs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(1), 28-36.
    Whitaker, S.D. (2003). Needs of beginning special education teachers: Implications for teacher education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26(2), 106-117.
    White, M., & Mason, C. Y. (2006). Components of a successful mentoring program for beginning special education teachers: Perspectives from new teachers and mentors. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29(3), 191-201.
    Young, J. R., Bullough, R. V., Draper, R. J., Smith, L. K., & Erickson, L. B. (2005). Novice teacher growth and personal models of mentoring: choosing compassion over inquiry. Mentoring and tutoring, 13(2), 169-188.
    Zabel, R. H., & Kay Zabel, M. (2001). Revisiting burnout among special education teachers: Do age, experience, and preparation still matter?. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(2), 128-139.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE