本研究以質性研究方法探討離婚父母共親職的樣貌，與不同樣貌下子女身歷其中的感受和經驗，同時亦探究影響良性共親職發展的助力與阻力。透過立意取樣以監護權歸母親所有且成為單親後仍能知覺父職參與的青少年子女為研究對象，共徵得七位單親青少年子女分別進行深度訪談。研究發現如下：

一、父母理性相待，子女能感受到父母雙方的愛，無忠誠衝突的困擾，亦有益於子女身心適應；父母間存在衝突角力，子女易衍生負向情緒與行為模式，心底也希望能不受父母紛爭所擾。
二、離婚父母共親職依關係特徵可分為三種樣貌，分別為「協同合作型」、「平行給愛型」、「聯盟角力交互型」。承上，前者所述以「協同合作型」為代表，「平行給愛型」次之，後者所述則特別見於「聯盟角力交互型」。
三、三種共親職樣貌從離婚至今的發展亦有所不同：「協同合作型」為「初期尷尬來往－其後協調合作」，「平行給愛型」為「初期緊張但未相互排除－其後少交集無合作」，「聯盟角力交互型」為「初期衝突且存在角力－其後合作漸增」。
四、就受訪子女觀點獲知母親對父職參與持開放認同態度、父親本身認同父職角色、子女接納父職、父母理性相待以子女最佳利益為考量等皆有利於離婚父母發展良性共親職。

文末就研究發現對離婚父母、相關實務工作與政策提出討論與建議，包含檢視現行單親家庭服務方案與調整服務項目、增進實務工作者相關專業素養、提高離婚商談資源的可近性與能見度、社政與教育系統接軌合作、相關政策之推動訂定等。最後，說明取樣限制使研究呈現的三種離婚後共親職樣貌為單親家庭的部份樣態，亦建議未來後續研究以離婚父母為對象，以更為細緻瞭解當事父母在共親職中的經驗脈絡，據以提供不同角度觀點的寶貴資訊。

This study assesses the utility of qualitative research method to investigate the pattern of coparenting after divorce and the feelings and experiences of the children themselves, as well as both promoter and suppresser of positive coparenting education. The research objects involved are the adolescents living in mother-custody associated with father's involvement. Through the purposive sampling method, there are seven single–parent adolescent have participated in in-depth interviews separately. The major findings are as fellows:

1.As long as the divorced spouses who have been treating each other rationally, and their children feeling loved by both of their parents. This would benefits the well being of children from not being disturbed of the loyal conflicts. Parental conflict would consequently promote children's negative emotions and behaviors. Children don't want to see their parents are troubled with arguing or fighting.

2.The patterns of coparenting after divorce can be further divided into three different types: “Cooperative Coparenting Relationships”, “Parallel Coparenting Relationships”, and “Competitive Alliance Relationships”. “Cooperative Coparenting Relationships” is the most common stereotype in the previous describing scenario; “Parallel Coparenting Relationships” the second, the “Competitive Alliance Relationships” would particularly happen in the following circumstance.

3.The differences between these three kinds of coparenting patterns have been changing since the date on which the deserting spouse divorced: “Cooperative Coparenting Relationships” is shifting from the embarrassing period of time – to coordinated phase；“Parallel Coparenting Relationships” is shifting from the initial phase of tension without totally isolated from each other – to later period of less communication and cooperation； “Competitive Alliance Relationships” is shifting from the initial phase of tension with conflicts and collisions – to increasing opportunity of cooperation.

4.The ideas from adolescent who were interviewed are including the open attitude of involvement and concern from mothers to fathers, the approval identity of father himself, the acceptance of the father from children, parents to act rationally in their child's best interests and etc. All of the above would favor a prosperous development of coparenting relationship after divorce.

The suggestions of the research to divorcing parents, the real practice in the field and political policy have been brought up in the last paragraph, which including the single-parents family services, service adjustment proposal, enhance the Professional practice of relative workers, increase the accessibility and visibility resources of the divorce counseling, co-operation between social and academic system, promotion of the relevant policy and etc. At last, the restrictions of sampling to present as a part of the pattern of all those three different relations. There are also other suggestions of the future study of divorced parents with the purpose of deeper understanding of coparenting from different points of view.

※中文部份
王叢桂（2000）。促進參與父職因素的探討。應用心理研究，6，131-171。
王春美（2001）。父母知覺與祖輩親職教養行為一致性之研究。嘉義：國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文。
王叢桂（2004）。父母職責信念與工作價值觀。應用心理研究，22，201-216。
王郁琇（2005）。單親父親之親職實踐。台北：世新大學性別研究所碩士論文。
宋麗玉、曾華源、施教裕、鄭麗珍（2002）。社會工作理論－處遇模式與案例分析。台北：洪葉文化。
李佩怡（2000）。失落與悲傷。載於林綺雲主編，生死學，312-348。台北：洪葉文化。
李嘉莉（2001）。高雄縣市離婚婦女生活適應及其復原現況之研究。高雄：國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文。
李奕萱（2004）。在泥沼中成長－離婚婦女的適應與學習。台北：國立台灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
林慧華（2000）。離婚女性單親家庭兒童對父親主觀經驗之研究。台北：東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
林美珠、田秀蘭（譯）（2000）。助人技巧：探索、洞察、行動的催化。Hill, C.E.& O’Brein, K.M.著。台北：學富文化。
林之珮（2007）。離婚後與子女離居女性之婚姻與母職之心理歷程敘事研究。台北：國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
林哲立、邱曉君、顏菲麗（譯）（2007）。人類行為與社會環境。Ashford, J.B., LeCroy, C.& Lorite, K.L.著。台北：雙葉書廊。
柯淑敏（2007）。兩性心理學。台北：楊智文化。
施教裕、宋麗玉（2006）。高風險家庭關懷輔導處遇實施計劃執行狀況初探。社區發展季刊，114，103－117。
郭淑美（2005）。離婚婦女爭取子女監護權歷程探究。高雄：國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
章薇卿（譯）（2007）。走在失落的幽谷－悲傷因應指引手冊。Neimeyer, R.A.著。台北：心理。
陳星、莫東江、侯秋玲（譯）（1999）。良性離婚。Ahrons, C.著。台北：天衛文化。
陳若喬（2001）。單親小孩上大學--以優勢觀點探討青少年時期經歷父母離異事件的生活歷程。台北：國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。台北：五南。
陳若喬、鄭麗珍（2003）。破繭而出－青少年時期經歷父母離異之大學生生活歷程的優勢經驗。社會政策與社會工作學刊，7（1），35－97。
陳富美、利翠珊（2004）。夫妻的育兒經驗：親職分工與共親職的探討。中華心理衛生學刊，17（4），1-28。
陳桂英（2006）。單親家庭服務中心功能初探。南投：國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系碩士論文。
陳美秀（2008）。離婚訴訟家庭未成年子女的家庭角色、因應行為及保護因子之初探性研究。台北：國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
黃孟嬌（譯）（2008）。敘事治療的工作地圖。White, M.著。台北：張老師。
楊淑智（譯）（2008）。我們仍是一家人－孩子成年後對父母離婚有何意見。Ahrons, C.著。台北：新視野。
趙善如（2006）。家庭資源對單親家庭生活品質影響之探究：以高雄市為例。台大社工學刊，13，109－172。
潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究：理論與應用。台北：心理。
薛承泰（2003）。台灣地區人口特質與趨勢：對社會福利政策的幾個啟示。國家政策季刊，2（4），1－22。
賴月蜜（2005）。澳洲、香港、日本之家事商談相關制度比較研究－兼論我國家事商談制度之現況與發展。南投：暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系博士論文。
謝品蘭（1992）。單親家庭親子關係與生活適應之分析研究－以離婚分居家庭為例。台北：東吳大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
簡春安、鄒平儀（2004）。社會工作研究法。台北：巨流。

※西文部份
Bailey, S. J., & Zvonkovic, A. M.（2003）. Parenting after divorce: Nonresidential parents’perceptions of social and institutional support. Joumal of Divorce & Remarriage, 39（3/4）, 59-80。
Bonach, K.（2005）. Factors contributing to quality coparenting: Implications for family policy. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 43（3/4）, 79-103.
Bonach, K., Sales, E., & Koeske, G.（2005）. Gender differences in perceptions of coparenting quality among expartners. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 43（1/2）, 1-28.
Brody, G.H., & Flor, D.G.（1996）. Coparenting family interactions, and competence among African American youths. New Directions for Child Development. 74, Jassey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
Brwon, N.M., & Amatea, E.S.（2000）. Love and intimate relationships: Journeys of the heart. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M.（1999）. The divorce cycle: A major variation in the American life cycle. In B. Carter & M. McGoldrick（Eds.）, The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives, pp.373-380. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Clapp, G.（2000）. Divorce and new beginnings: A complete guide to recovery, solo parenting, co-parenting, and stepfamilies. New York: Wiley.
Clarke-Stewart, A., & Brentano, C.（2006）. Divorce: Causes and consequences. New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press.
Feinberg, M.E.（2003）. The internal structure and ecological context of coparenting: A framework for research and intervention. Parenting: Science and Practice, 3（2）, 95-131.
Hallman, M., Dienhart, A., & Beaton, J.（2007）. A qualitative analysis of fathers’ experiences of parental time after separation and divorce. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, & Practice about Men as Fathers, 5（1）, 4-24.
Kelly, J.B.（2007）. Children‘s living arrangements following separation and divorce: Insights from empirical and clinical research. Family Process, 46（1）, 35-52.
Margolin, G., Gordis, E.B., & John, R.S.（2001）. Coparenting: A link between marital conflict and parenting in two-parent families. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 3-21.
Markham, M.S., Ganong, L.H., & Coleman, M.（2007）. Coparental identity and mothers’ cooperation in coparental relationships. Family Relations, 56（4）. 369-377.
McBride, B.A., & Mills, G.（1993）. A comparison of mother and father involvement with their preschool age children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 457-477.
McHale, J.P., & Kuersten-Hogan, R.（2004）. Introduction: The dynamics of raising children together. Journal of Adult Development, 11（3）, 163-164.
McHale, J.P., Kuersten-Hogan, R., & Rao, Nirmala.（2004）. Growing points ofr coparenting theory and research. Journal of Adult Development, 11（3）, 221-234.
Schoppe, S.J., Fangelsdorf, S.C., & Frosch, C.A.（2001）. Coparenting, family process, and family structure: Implications for preschoolers’ externalizing behavior problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 15（3）, 526-545.
Sobolewski, J.M., & King, V.（2005）. The importance of the coparental relationship for nonresident fathers’ ties to children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67（5）, 1196-1212.
Stright, A.D., & Bales, S.S.（2003）. Coparenting quality: Contributions of child and parent characteristics. Family Relations, 52（3）, 232-240.
Stroebe, M., & Shut, H.（2003）. Meaning making in the dual process model of coping with bereavement. In R. Neimeyer（Ed.）, Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss, pp55-73. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Thompson, R.A., & Amato, P.R.（1999）. The postdivorce family: Children, parenting, and society. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Van Egeren, L.A., & Hawkins, D.P.（2004）. Coming to terms with coparenting: Implications of definition and measurement. Journal of Adult Development, 11（3）, 165-178.

※網路部份
兒童福利聯盟文教基金會（2007）。離婚協議商談服務。2008年5月21日，取自兒童福利聯盟文教基金會網站：http://www.children.org.tw/about_service_1.php?id=14