簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 程煒婷
Cheng, Wei-Ting
論文名稱: 教師支持與中學生學習投入關係:學業情緒的中介暨情緒調節的調節效果
The relationship between teacher support and learning engagement for junior high school students: academic emotions as a mediator and emotion regulation as a moderator
指導教授: 陳慧娟
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 101
中文關鍵詞: 教師支持學習投入學業情緒情緒調節
英文關鍵詞: Academic emotions, Emotion regulation, Learning engagement, Teacher support
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201882
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:229下載:42
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討中學生知覺教師支持、學習投入、學業情緒與情緒調節的相關情況,並以學生在數學科的學習情形為主要研究範圍。
    本研究以臺灣地區的國中生為主要研究對象,有效樣本共計830人,其中男生405人,女生425人,以問卷調查方式進行資料蒐集,研究工具包括「學習投入量表」、「教師支持量表」、「學業情緒量表」及「情緒調節量表」,資料以描述性統計、t考驗、變異數分析、多變量變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關及迴歸進行統計考驗。
    主要研究結果顯示:(1)學生有中等程度的投入,但在主體投入程度較不足;主體不熱衷也偏高。而學生普遍能知覺到高程度的教師支持,在學習上擁有正向的情緒體驗以及中等程度的情緒調節,但愉悅感受稍嫌較低,焦慮與無聊的情緒感受亦偏高。(2)不同年級在投入量表有顯著差異。(3)教師支持、投入與正向情緒三者之間,兩兩皆有顯著正相關,教師支持與學習不熱衷、負向情緒之間的關係為負相關,學習不熱衷與負向情緒則有顯著正相關。(4)正、負向情緒對教師支持與投入,以及教師支持與 不熱衷之關係都具有中介效果。(5)情緒調節對教師支持與投入的關係具有調節效果。本研究針對研究結果提出結論與建議,以供教育人員與未來相關研究參考。

    The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the teacher support, learning engagement, academic emotions and emotion regulation in mathematics learning. Participants were 830 junior high school students in Taiwan, including 405 boys and 425 girls. Data were collected by the “engagement-disaffection scale”, “teacher support scale”, “academic emotions scale”and “emotion regulation scale” , then analyzed through the descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, MANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis.
    The findings were as follows:
    1. Students had moderate scores in engagement, but lower scores on agentic engagement , and higher scores on agentic disaffection . Teacher support, positive academic emotions and emotion regulation were generally good and positive, except that enjoyment was insufficient, both anxiety and boredom were higher.
    2. Engagement of junior high school students varied significantly in the grade.
    3. Teacher support, engagement and positive academic emotions positively correlated with each other. Teacher support was negatively associated with both disaffection and negative emotions. Disaffection positively correlated with negative emotions.
    4. Both positive and negative emotions significantly mediated the relationship between teacher support and engagement. Also, the relationship between teacher support and disaffection was mediated by positive and negative emotions.
    5. Emotion regulation as a moderator of the association between techer support and engagement.
    Results of the study were discussed for educational practice and future research.

    誌謝詞 i 中文摘要 iii 西文摘要 v 目次 vii 表次 ix 圖次 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 4 第三節 名詞釋義 4 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 學習投入理論與相關研究 7 第二節 教師支持理論與相關研究 11 第三節 學業情緒理論與相關研究 16 第四節 情緒調節理論與相關研究 21 第五節 教師支持、學習投入、學業情緒與情緒調節相關研究 23 第三章 研究方法 27 第一節 研究架構 27 第二節 研究假設 28 第三節 研究參與者 29 第四節 研究工具 30 第五節 研究程序 43 第六節 資料分析 44 第四章 研究結果與討論 45 第一節 各變項現況分析 45 第二節 不同背景變項在學習投入的差異情況 50 第三節 教師支持、學業情緒與學習投入之相關情形 52 第四節 學業情緒在教師支持與學習投入的中介效果 56 第五節 情緒調節在教師支持與學習投入的調節效果 60 第五章 結論與建議 65 第一節 結論 65 第二節 研究限制 66 第三節 建議 67 參考文獻 73 中文部分 73 西文部分 75 附錄 87 附錄一 不同背景變項在學習投入各分量表之差異分析 87 附錄二 教師支持與學習投入各分量表的中介關係摘要表 89 附錄三 情緒調節分量表在教師支持與投入的調節效果摘要表 91 附錄四 情緒調節在教師支持與投入各分量表的調節效果摘要表 92 附錄五 學習投入量表使用同意書 93 附錄六 教師支持量表使用同意書 94 附錄七 學業情緒量表使用同意書 95 附錄八 情緒調節量表使用同意書 96 附錄九 正式問卷量表 97

    中文部分
    天下雜誌(2011年4月28日)。天下2010中學生科學教育大調查。天下雜誌。取自http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5008245
    王智弘(2006)。尋找美麗心世界:談公務人員的情緒管理與壓力調適。研習論壇月刊,69,13-19。
    毛國楠、劉政宏、彭淑玲、李維光、陳慧娟(2008)。能力信念、學業自我價值後效與學業成就對國小學生學習動機與學習情緒之影響。教育心理學報,39(4),569-588。
    江文慈(1999)。情緒調整的發展軌跡與模式建構之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    江文慈(2000)。探尋情緒調整的發展軌跡:從兒童後期到青少年期。世新大學學報,10,31-62。
    江民瑜(2013)。學業情緒為中介的自我調整學習模式:以數學領域為例。當代教育研究季刊,21(3),113-150。
    李俊青(2007)。學業情緒歷程模式之分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
    何琦瑜(2016年9月)。為什麼我們要關心「減C大動員」?親子天下,82, 14。取自https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/information-detail?id=3140
    吳宛縈(2017年6月9日)。會考數學非選考兩題,四分之一考生放棄答題。今日新聞網。取自http://www.nownews.com
    邱皓政(2008)。量化研究與統計分析(第三版)。臺北市:五南。
    林曉雲(2015年6月6日)。國中會考成績,英數城鄉落差嚴重。自由時報。取自http://news.ltn.com.tw/news
    林志成(2016年6月4日)。國中會考成績公布,5A考生占6.86%,1/3英數吊車尾。中時電子報。取自http://www.chinatimes.com/ newspapers
    林芝安(2016年5月)。把數學變遊戲,練出邏輯力。未來Family,11。取自https://gfamily.cwgv.com.tw
    林淑惠、黃韞臻(2012)。中部大學生學習投入與學習倦怠之分析。輔導與諮商學報,34(1),51-67。
    胡惠純(2014)。教育制度如何影響教學行為:十二年國民基本教育對小學數學領域教師教學策略之影響。嘉大教育研究學刊,32,91-106。
    施淑慎(2008)。學習情境中之自主支持與國中生成就相關歷程間關係之探討。教育與心理研究, 31(2),1-26。
    施皓耀、陳梅仙、白晨如(2017年8月9日)。反覆練習解題,就能學好數學?【部落格文字資料】。取自http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/
    profile/52/article/5970
    柴曉運、龔少英(2013)。中學生感知到的數學教師支持問卷的編制。 心理與行為研究。11(4),511-517。
    許芳菊(2011年4月)。解讀男孩的5個不可思議。親子天下,22。取自https:// www.parenting.com.tw/
    陸桂芝、龐麗華(2008)。初中1~3年級學生的學業情緒與學業成就的相關研究。教育探索,210,124-125。
    教育部(2015)。國民教育階段學生學習精進規劃情形報告。2016年4月6日,取自http://www.ey.gov.tw/Upload/RelFile/3179/
    723453/216738df-067d-4183-b784-3526087400a0.pdf
    陳姵君(2008)。青少年依附關係、自我認同、獨處能力與情緒調節之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
    張義平(2014年8月11日)。家有青少年之國中生到底在想什麼。【部落格文字資料】。取自http://best.parenting.com.tw/blogger
    _article.php?w=1112
    國立臺灣師範大學科學教育中心(2014)。國際數學與科學教育成就趨勢調查2011國家報告。取自http://www.sec.ntnu.edu.tw/
    timss2011/downloads/g501.pdf
    黃豊茜(2010)。學業情緒歷程模式: 探析情緒調整策略的效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
    臺灣PISA國家研究中心(2014)。臺灣 PISA 2012 精簡報告。取自http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/data/TaiwanPISA2012ShortReport.PDF
    蕭瑞玲(2002)。國小學童情緒調整及相關因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東市。
    賴英娟、巫博瀚(2016)。臺灣國中生「數學學習情緒量表」之發展與現況分析。測驗學刊,63(2),83-110。
    簡嘉菱、程炳林(2013)。環境目標結構、自我決定動機與學業情緒之關係。教育心理學報,44(3),713-734。
    顏志龍、鄭中平(2017)。給論文寫作者的統計指南:傻瓜也會跑統計(第二版)。 臺北市:五南。
    龔心怡、李靜儀(2015)。影響國中經濟弱勢學生之學業表現與中輟傾向之因素:以「脈絡-自我-行動-結果」之動機發展自我系統模式為取向。教育科學研究期刊,60(4),55-92。

    西文部分
    Ahmed, W., Minnaert, A., van der Werf, G., & Kuyper, H. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents’ achievement: The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of youth and adolescence, 39(1), 36-46.
    Ahmed, W., van der Werf, G., Kuyper, H., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Emotions, self-regulated learning, and achievement in mathematics: A growth curve analysis. Journal of educational psychology, 105(1), 150-161.
    Akers, R. (2017). A journey to increase student engagement. Technology & Engineering Teacher, 76(5), 28-32.
    Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J-S., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 651-670.
    Arguedas, M., Daradoumis, T., & Xhafa, F. (2016). Analyzing how emotion awareness influences students' motivation, engagement, self-regulation and learning outcome. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 87-103.
    Artino JR, A. R., Holmboe, E. S., & Durning, S. J. (2012). Can achievement emotions be used to better understand motivation, learning, and performance in medical education? Medical Teacher, 34, 240-244.
    Belmont, M. J., Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J.P. (1992). Teacher as Social Context (TASC). Two measures of teacher provision of involve¬ment, structure, and autonomy support. Technical Report, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
    Bernstein-Yamashiro, B., & Noam, G. G. (2013). Relationships, learning, and development: A student perspective. New Directions for Youth Development, 137, 27-44.
    Boekaerts, M. (2016). Engagement as an inherent aspect of the learning process. Learning and Instruction, 43, 76-83.
    Brackett, M. A., Palomera, R., Mojsa‐Kaja, J., Reyes, M. R., & Salovey, P. (2010). emotion-regulation ability, burnout, and job satisfaction among British seconary- school teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 47(4), 406-417.
    Burić, I., Sorić, I., & Penezić, Z. (2016). Emotion regulation in academic domain: Development and validation of the academic emotion regulation questionnaire (AERQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 138-147.
    Colarossi, L. G., & Eccles, J. S. (2003). Differential effects of support providers on adolescents’ mental health. Social Work Research, 27(1), 19-30.
    Cole, P. M., Michel, M. K., & Teti, L. O. (1994). The development of emotion regulation and dysregulation: A clinical perspective. Monographs of the society for research in child development, 59(2‐3, Serial No. 240), 73-102.
    Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African-American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child Development, 65, 493–506.
    Conner, J. O., Miles, S. B., & Pope, D. C. (2014). How many teachers does it take to support a student? Examining the relationship between teacher support and adverse health outcomes in high-performing, pressure-cooker high schools. The High School Journal, 98(1), 22-42.
    Conner, J. O., & Pope, D. C. (2013). Not just robo-students: Why full engagement matters and how schools can promote it. Journal of youth and adolescence, 42(9), 1426-1442.
    Cooley, J. L., & Fite, P. J. (2016). Peer victimization and forms of aggression during middle childhood: the role of emotion regulation. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 44(3), 535-546.
    Corso, M. J., Bundick, M. J., & Quaglia, R. J. (2013). Where student, teacher, and content meet: student engagement in the secondary school classroom. American Secondary Education, 41(3), 50-61.
    De Corte, E., Depaepe, F., Op’t Eynde, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Students’ self-regulation of emotions in mathematics: an analysis of meta-emotional knowledge and skills. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(4), 483-495.
    Djambazova-Popordanoska, S. (2016). Implications of emotion regulation on young children’s emotional wellbeing and educational achievement. Educational Review, 68(4), 497-515.
    Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of educational research, 59(2), 117-142.
    Fredricks, J. A. (2011). Engagement in school and out-of-school contexts: A multidimensional view of engagement. Theory into practice, 50(4), 327-335.
    Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
    Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
    Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Perceived learning environment and students’ emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17, 478 – 493.
    Frenzel, A. C., Thrash, T. M., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Achievement emotions in Germany and China. A cross-cultural validation of the academic emotions questionnaire—mathematics. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(3), 302-309.
    Froiland, J. M., & Oros, E. (2014). Intrinsic motivation, perceived competence and classroom engagement as longitudinal predictors of adolescent reading achievement. Educational Psychology, 34(2), 119–132.
    Galand, B., & Hospel, V. (2013). Peer victimization and school disaffection: Exploring the moderation effect of social support and the mediation effect of depression. British journal of educational psychology, 83(4), 569-590.
    Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Ludtke, O., & Hall, N. C. (2011). Between-domain relations of academic emotions: Does having the same instructor make a difference? The Journal of Experimental Education, 79(1), 84-101.
    Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. C. (2006). The domain specificity of academic emotional experiences. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(1), 5-29.
    Goetz, T., Lüdtke, O., Nett, U. E., Keller, M. M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2013). Characteristics of teaching and students’ emotions in the classroom: Investigating differences across domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 383-394.
    Graziano, P. A., Reavis, R. D., Keane, S. P., & Calkins, S. D. (2007). The role of emotion regulation in children's early academic success. Journal of school psychology, 45(1), 3-19.
    Gross, J. J. (1999). Emotion regulation: Past, present, future. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 551-573.
    Gross, J. J. (2001). Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current directions in psychological science, 10(6), 214-219.
    Gumora, G., & Arsenio, W. F. (2002). Emotionality, emotion regulation, and school performance in middle school children. Journal of school psychology, 40(5), 395-413.
    Guvenc, H. (2015). The Relationship between teachers' motivational support and engagement versus disaffection. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(3), 647-657.
    Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    Hendrickx, M. M., Mainhard, M. T., Boor-Klip, H. J., Cillessen, A. H., & Brekelmans, M. (2016). Social dynamics in the classroom: Teacher support and conflict and the peer ecology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 30-40.
    Holm, M. E., Hannula, M. S., & Björn, P. M. (2017). Mathematics-related emotions among Finnish adolescents across different performance levels. Educational Psychology, 37(2), 205-218.
    Hospel, V., & Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students' engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1-10.
    Jacobs, S. E., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Emotion regulation in education: Conceptual foundations, current applications, and future directions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education, (pp. 183-201). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27-38.
    Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588-600.
    Kahu, E., Stephens, C., Leach, L., & Zepke, N. (2015). Linking academic emotions and student engagement: mature-aged distance students’ transition to university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 481–497.
    Kelly, S., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Teacher support and engagement in math and science: Evidence from the high school longitudinal study. The High School Journal, 99(2), 141-165.
    Kennedy, B. L. (2011). The importance of student and teacher interactions for disaffected middle school students: A grounded theory study of community day schools. Urban Education, 46(1), 4-33.
    Kim, B., Lee, M., Kim, K., Choi, H., & Lee, S. M. (2015). Longitudinal analysis of academic burnout in Korean middle school students. Stress and Health, 31(4), 281-289.
    King, R. B., & Gaerlan. M. J. M. (2014). High self-control predicts more positive emotions better engagement, and higher achievement in school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(1), 81-100.
    King , R. B., McInerney, D. M., Jr.Ganotice, F. A., &Villarosa, J. B. (2015). Positive affect catalyzes academic engagement: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and experimental evidence. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 64–72.
    Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of school health, 74(7), 262-273.
    Kuperminc, G. P., Leadbeater, B. J., & Blatt, S. J. (2001). School social climate and individual differences in vulnerability to psychopathology among middle school students. Journal of School psychology, 39(2), 141-159.
    Kwon, K., Hanrahan, A. R., & Kupzyk, K. A. (2017). Emotional expressivity and emotion regulation: Relation to academic functioning among elementary school children. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(1), 75-88.
    Leptokaridou, E. T., Vlachopoulos, S. P., & Papaioannou, A. G. (2016). Experimental longitudinal test of the influence of autonomy-supportive teaching on motivation for participation in elementary school physical education. Educational Psychology, 36(7), 1138-1159.
    Lewis, G. (2013). Emotion and disaffection with school mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 70-86.
    Lietaert, S., Roorda, D., Laevers, F., Verschueren, K., & De Fraine, B. (2015). The gender gap in student engagement: The role of teachers’ autonomy support, structure, and involvement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 498-518.
    Linnenbrink, E. A. (2007). The role of affect in student learning: A multi-dimensional approach to considering the interaction of affect, motivation, and engagement. In P. Schutz, & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 107–124). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions and academic engagement: Introduction to the special issue. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 1-3.
    Lumby, J. (2012). Disengaged and disaffected young people: Surviving the system. British Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 261-279.
    Luo, W., Lee, K., Ng, P. T., & Ong, J. X. W. (2014). Incremental beliefs of ability, achievement emotions and learning of Singapore students. Educational Psychology, 34(5), 619-634.
    Malekzadeh, M., Mustafa, M. B., & Lahsasna, A. (2015). A review of emotion regulation in intelligent tutoring systems. Educational technology & society, 18(4), 435-445.
    Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., Bobis, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement among middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 1-18.
    Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, currents issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79, 327-365.
    Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), 197–215.
    McLaughlin, C., & Clarke, B. (2010). Relational matters: A review of the impact of school experience on mental health in early adolescence. Educational & Child Psychology, 27(1), 91-103.
    Mowat, J. G. (2010). ‘He comes to talk to me about things’: supporting pupils experiencing social and emotional behavioural difficulties—a focus upon interpersonal relationships. Pastoral Care in Education, 28(3), 163-180.
    Oram, R., Ryan, J., Rogers, M., & Heath, N. (2017). Emotion regulation and academic perceptions in adolescence. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 22(2), 162- 173.
    Park, S., Holloway, S. D., Arendtsz, A., Bempechat, J., & Li, J. (2012). What makes students engaged in learning? A time-use study of within-and between-individual predictors of emotional engagement in low-performing high schools. Journal of youth and adolescence, 41(3), 390-401.
    Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., Steingut, R. R., Trimble, S. S., & Pituch, K. A. (2016). Daily interest, engagement, and autonomy support in the high school science classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 180-194.
    Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 83–98.
    Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions:assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341.
    Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2005). Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ)—User’s manual. Munich: University of Munich, Department of Psychology.
    Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.
    Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259-282). New York, NY: Springer.
    Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2009). Goals, emotions, and emotion regulation:Perspectives of the control-value theory. Human Development, 52(6), 357-365.
    Phillippo, K. L., & Stone, S. (2013). Teacher role breadth and its relationship to student-reported teacher support. The High School Journal, 96(4), 358-379.
    Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Classroom processes and positive youth development: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of interactions between teachers and students. New Directions for Youth Development , 121, 33-46.
    Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher–student relationships and student engagement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 345-387.
    Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159-175.
    Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595.
    Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of educational psychology, 98(1), 209-218.
    Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267.
    Reschly, A. L., Huebner, E. S., Appleton, J. J., & Antaramian, S. (2008). Engagement as flourishing: The contribution of positive emotions and coping to adolescents' engagement at school and with learning. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 419-431.
    Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Baroody, A. E., Larsen, R. A. A., Curby, T. W., & Abry, T. (2015) . To what extent do teacher–student interaction quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders’ engagement in mathematics learning? Journal of Educational Psychology,107(1), 170-185.
    Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: a meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529.
    Sakiz, G. (2011). Perceived instructor affective support in relation to academic emotions and motivation in college. Educational Psychology, 32(1), 63-79.
    Sakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms? Journal of School Psychology, 50(2), 235-255.
    Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158-176.
    Shiota, M. N., & Kalat, J. W. (2012). Emotion (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of educational psychology, 85(4), 571-581.
    Skinner, E. A., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765-781.
    Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009a). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223–245). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009b). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 69 (3), 493-525.
    Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21-44). New York, NY: Springer.
    Skinner, E., Pitzer, J., & Brule, H. (2014). The role of emotion in engagement, coping, and the development of motivational resilience. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education, (pp. 331-347). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Strati, A. D., Schmidt, J. A., & Maier, K. S. (2017). Perceived challenge, teacher support, and teacher obstruction as predictors of student engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 131-147.
    Tas, Y. (2016). The contribution of perceived classroom learning environment and motivation to student engagement in science. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31, 557-577.
    Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of definition. Monographs of the society for research in child development, 59, 25-52.
    TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center. (2016). TIMSS 2015 and TIMSS advanced 2015 international results. Retrieved from http://timss2015.org /#/?playlistId=0&videoId=0
    Toivonen, A. K., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Louhiala, P., & Pyörälä, E. (2017). Medical students’ reflections on emotions concerning breaking bad news. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(10), 1903-1907.
    Totura, C. M. W., Karver, M. S., & Gesten, E. L. (2014). Psychological distress and student engagement as mediators of the relationship between peer victimization and achievement in middle school youth. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 43(1), 40-52.
    Trentacosta, C. J., & Izard, C. E. (2007). Kindergarten children’s emotion competence as a predictor of their academic competence in first grade. Emotion, 7(1), 77-88.
    Trigwell, K., Ellis, R. A., & Han, F. (2012). Relations between students' approaches to learning, experienced emotions and outcomes of learning. Studies in Higher Education, 37(7), 811-824.
    Tucker, C. M., Zayco, R. A., Herman, K. C., Reinke, W. M., Trujillo, M., Carraway, K., … Ivery, P. D. (2002). Teacher and child variables as predictors of academic engagement among low-income African American children. Psychology in the Schools, 39(4), 477-488.
    Tyson, D. F., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Hill, N. E. (2009). Regulating debilitating emotions in the context of performance: Achievement goal orientations, achievement-elicited emotions, and socialization contexts. Human Development, 52(6), 329-356.
    Upadyaya, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Development of school engagement in association with academic success and well-being in varying social contexts: A review of empirical research. European Psychologist, 18(2), 136-147.
    Valiente, C., Lemery-Chalfant, k., & Swanson, J. (2010). Prediction of kindergartners’ academic achievement from their effortful control and emotionality: Evidence for direct and moderated relations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 550 -560.
    Wang, M. T., Chow, A., Hofkens, T., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2015). The trajectories of student emotional engagement and school burnout with academic and psychological development: Findings from Finnish adolescents. Learning and Instruction, 36, 57-65.
    Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. (2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child development perspectives, 8(3), 137-143.
    Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23.
    Wang, L. J., Wang, W. C., Gu, H. G., Zhan, P. D., Yang, X. X., & Barnard, J. (2014). Relationships among teacher support, peer conflict resolution, and school emotional experiences in adolescents from Shanghai. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 42(1), 99-113.
    Watt, H. M. G., Carmichael, C., & Callingham, R. (2017). Students’ engagement profiles in mathematics according to learning environment dimensions: Developing an evidence base for best practice in mathematics education. School Psychology International, 38(2), 166-183.
    Zhen, R., Liu, R. D., Ding, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Y., & Xu, L. (2017). The mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and academic emotions in the relation between basic psychological needs satisfaction and learning engagement among Chinese adolescent students. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 210-216.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE