研究生: |
陳翠鳳 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
運用語音溝通板(SGDs)介入之教學策略對口語受限重度智能障礙學生社交互動之成效 The Effectiveness of Using Speech Generating Devices(SGDs) as Teaching Strategies on Social Interactive Behaviors of Students with Limited Verbal and Severe Intellectual Disabilities |
指導教授: | 杜正治 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2012 |
畢業學年度: | 100 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 162 |
中文關鍵詞: | 重度智能障礙學生 、社交互動行為 、輔助溝通 、語音溝通板 |
英文關鍵詞: | Severe intellectual disabilities, social interactive behavior, augmentative & alternative communication (AAC), speech generating devices(SGDs) |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:1327 下載:41 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討運用語音溝通板(SGDs)介入之教學策略對提升口語受限重度智能障礙學生社交互動(邀請、輪流、讚美)行為之成效,研究對象為兩名就讀特殊教育學校高職部二年級口語受限之重度智能障礙女學生,自變項為語音溝通板(SGDs)介入之教學策略,依變項為研究對象進行邀請、輪流、表達讚美共三個社交互動行為的出現次數及提示策略得分率之表現情形。
本研究採單一受試研究法之跨行為多基線設計,從基線期、介入期及維持期三個實驗階段蒐集資料,並以視覺分析法和C統計分析資料,瞭解介入效果,最後訪談參與教師及同儕,作為本研究之社會效度。
本研究結果顯示:
一、研究對象使用語音溝通板(SGDs)介入之教學策略進行邀請互動之次數及提示策略得分率均提升,且在維持期有保留效果。
二、研究對象使用語音溝通板(SGDs)介入之教學策略進行輪流互動之次數及提示策略得分率均提升,且在維持期有保留效果。
三、研究對象使用語音溝通板(SGDs)介入之教學策略進行讚美互動之次數及提示策略得分率均提升,且在維持期有保留效果。
四、本研究具有良好之社會效度。
本研究依據研究結果,提出未來運用語音溝通板(SGDs)介入重度智能障礙社交互動教學及研究之建議,提供實務工作者及其他研究者做參考。
The Effectiveness of Using Speech Generating Devices(SGDs)as Teaching Strategies on Social Interactive Behaviors of Students with Limited Verbal and Severe Intellectual Disabilities
Chen, Tsui-Feng
Abstract
The primary purpose of this study was to explore the effectiveness of using speech generating devices (SGDs) as teaching strategies on social interactive behaviors of two students with limited verbal and severe intellectual disabilities. Participants were two 2nd-grade girl students in the senior vocational department of a special education school. The independent variable was the speech generating devices (SGDs) teaching strategies, whereas the dependent variables were the participants’ social interactive behaviors (i.e., inviting, taking turns, and expressing praise) in terms of frequency and prompting scores.
This study employed a multiple-baseline design across behaviors including the baseline, intervention and retention phases. The data were obtained from these three experimental phases and processed with the technique of visual and simplified time-series analysis to examine the intervention effects. Additionally, the researcher interviewed the participants’ peers and teachers participating in this study to ensure social validity of this study.
The results of this study were specified as follows:
A. The obtained data showed that SGDs raised the frequency and
prompting scores in the participants’ inviting behaviors,and during maintenance phase the behaviors were retained.
B. The obtained data showed that SGDs raised the frequency and
prompting scores in the participants’ turn-taking behaviors,and
during maintenance phase the behaviors were retained.
C. The obtained data documented that SGDs increased the frequency and prompting scores in the participants’ praise-expressing behaviors ,and during maintenance phase the behaviors were retained.
D. The obtained data from interviews indicated that the study demonstrated positive social validity.
In the conclusion, implications for teaching SGDs strategy were addressed and suggestions for future studies were proposed.
Keywords: Severe intellectual disabilities, social interactive behavior, augmentative & alternative communication (AAC), speech generating devices(SGDs)
參考書目
中文部分
王欣宜(1998):身心障礙者的社會技巧教學。國教輔導,3 (37),14-18。
王欣宜(2005):高職階段智能障礙學生所需社交技巧課程內涵之探討。 特殊教育教學與趨勢, 9401,1-14。
王欣宜、李宜珊、林祐暄、陳奕廷(2006):高職特教班社交技巧教學之理論與實務。臺北市:五南。
王俊凱、連婉婷(2005):電腦輔助教學對高功能自閉症兒童功能性詞彙(名詞)識字學習成效之研究。臺北市: http://blog.xuite.net/unlimiter1001/unlimiter/21143181科技輔具文教基金會觀摩大會手冊文章。
王大延、王樂成、何宗翰、林惠鸞、辛怡葳、高識綦、陳櫻桃、張洛嘉、葉倩玲(譯)(2008):兒童語言與溝通障礙(D. K. Bernstein & E. Tiegerman-Farber 著:Language and communication disorders in Children)。臺北市: 心理。
行政院衛生署(2008):身心障礙等級。2011年8月22日,取自http://dohlaw.doh.gov.tw/Chi/FLAW/FLAWDAT10.asp
吳雅萍(2011):輔助溝通系統使用者的學校溝通參與評量工具發展與英用之研究。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系博士論文,未出版。
宋慧敏、孫淑柔(2003):圖片兌換溝通系統對促進智能障礙兒童溝通能力之研究。特殊教育叢書(1)-特殊教育論文集,9-28。臺北市。
李宏俊(2007):AAC應用於國小低功能無口語自閉症學童主動溝通成效之研究。花蓮市:國立花蓮教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
李旻青(2005):替代性溝通訓練在國小中、重度智能障礙學童購物技能學習之成效研究。臺南市:國立臺南大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
李旻青、莊妙芬(2006):替代性溝通訓練在國小中、重度智能障礙學童購物技能學習之成效研究。特殊教育與復健學報(16),99-123。
杜正治(2006):單一受試研究法。臺北市:心理。.
杜正治(譯)(1994):單一受試研究法(J. W. Tawney, & D. L. Gast著:Single Subject Research In Sepcial Education)臺北市:心理。
周信鐘(2007):圖片兌換溝通系統訓練方案對提升智能障礙學生溝通行為成效之研究。嘉義市:國立嘉義大學特殊教育學系研究所碩士論文,未出版。.
林宜瑩(2006):功能性溝通訓練對重度障礙學童干擾行為之成效。臺北市:臺北市立教育大學身心障礙教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林欣怡(2004):圖片兌換溝通系統對改善國小低功能自閉症自發性溝通行為類化之成效。臺北市:國立台北師範學院碩士論文,未出版。
林欣怡、楊宗仁(2005):圖卡兌換溝通系統對改善國小低功能自閉症學生自發性溝通行為類化之成效。特殊教育研究學刊,29,199-224。
林桂英(2009):自然情境教學對重度智能障礙學生自發性溝通成效之研究。嘉義市:國立嘉義大學特殊教育學系研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林淑莉(2007):如何幫助使用輔助溝通系統之學生融入融合環境中?特殊教育季刊,104, 1-13。
林惠卿(2006):輔助溝通系統訓練增進唐氏症兒童購物行為之研究。臺北市:國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
林翠英(2005):特殊需求學生的課程與教學。特殊教育季刊,96,23-31。
林錦麗(2006):正向行為支持計畫對無口語自閉症兒童哭鬧行為處理成效之研究。臺北市:臺北市立教育大學身心障礙教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林寶貴(2004):溝通障礙理論與實務。臺北市:心理。
洪湘綾(2005):運用溝通輔具對自閉症幼兒口語表達教學成效之研究。臺中縣:朝陽科技大學碩士論文,未出版。
胡菁萍(2003):合作學習對增進智能障礙學生同儕社會互動之教學效果研究。臺東市:國立臺東大學碩士論文,未出版。
胡雅婷(2009):輔助溝通系統對國小無口語中度智能障礙學童溝通表達成效之研究。花蓮市:國立花蓮教育大學身心障礙與輔助科技研究所碩士論文,未出版。
柯惠菁(譯)(2009):身心障礙者的輔助科技(Bryant, Diane Pedrotty & Bryant, Brian R.著:Assistive Technology for People With Disabilities )臺北市:心理。
教育部(2006):身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準。2011年8月20日,取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=FL009187
&KeyWordHL=&StyleType=1。
張心盈(2007):戲劇活動技巧應用於國小智能障礙學童。臺南市:國立臺南大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
莊妙芬(1997):智能障礙兒童與自閉症兒童口語表達能力之比較研究。特殊教育與復健學報,5,1-35。
莊妙芬(2002):中重度智能障礙兒童的異常行為與溝通功能之研究。東台灣特殊教育學報,4,53-76。
莊瓊惠(2005):大班幼兒對障礙兒童的瞭解及互動意願之研究。於中華民國發展遲緩兒童早期療育協會舉辦之「第六屆全國早療相關服務論文發表大會暨國際研討會」發表之論文,台中市。取自http://www.caeip.org.tw/html/fhtml/index.php?load=read&id=255
許天威(2003):個案實驗研究法。臺北市:五南。
許天威、許享良、張勝成(2005):新特殊教育通論第二版。臺北市:五南。
許月琴(2000):溝通障礙者的輔助科技:輔助溝通系統簡介。特殊教育季刊(75), 38-40。
許耀分(2003):圖片兌換溝通系統教學對增進自閉症兒童自發性使用圖片溝通行為之研究。臺北市:臺北市立師範學院身心障礙教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
郭慧仙(2006):功能性溝通訓練對促進國小重度智能障礙兒童溝通能力之成效。臺南市:國立臺南大學碩士論文,未出版。
梁靜琴(2004):輔助溝通系統教學對跨國婚姻身心障礙子女的主動溝通表達之影響。臺北市:國立臺北教育大學碩士論文,未出版。
陳春秀(2009):無聲世界的有聲經驗:當PDA與聽障學生在職場相遇。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文,未出版。
陳冠銘(2009):攜帶式微電腦語音溝通板教學策略對增進國中低口語能力自閉症學生溝通行為之成效。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
陳泰伶(2007):正向行為支持計畫對改善國小普通班學生不聽從行為成效之研究。臺北市:臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
陳景蔚(2002):擴大與替代溝通在特殊教育上的應用現况與評量。南台科技大學資訊管理系會議論文。
曾怡惇(2005):國小初任特教教師採用情境教學策略教導智能障礙學生溝通效果之研究。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
曾柏源(2006):運用輔助溝通系統教導輪替策略對增進普瑞德威利症候群學童溝通行為成效之研究。臺北市:國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
曾進興(譯)(2002):教導重度障礙學生溝通技能-融合教育實務(J.E. Downing, P. Mirenda,V.M. Durand, E. Mapstone,L. Youngblade著:Teaching Communication Skills to Students with Severe Disabilities)。臺北市:心理。
鈕文英(2003):啟智教育課程與教學設計。臺北市:心理。
黃光慧(2010):輔助溝通系統介入對提升無口語國中智能障礙學生語言表達能力之研究。花蓮市:國立東華大學身心障礙與輔助科技研究所碩士論文,未出版。
黃志雄、陳明聰(2008):阿明的電腦夢:重度障礙學生輔助溝通介入之行動研究。特殊教育學報 (27),129-156。
黃富廷(2007):輔助性科技的人文意涵。臺北市:心理。
楊國屏(1996):輔助溝通系統。科學月刊,27(11),925-935。
楊熾康總校閱(譯)(2007):輔助科技:原則與實行(A. M. Cook, & S. M. Hussey著:Assistive Technologies:Principles and Practice)臺北市:心理。
葉馨葦(2010):AAC對提升特殊學校國中中度智能障礙學生溝通能力之研究。花蓮市:國立東華大學身心障礙與輔助科技研究所碩士論文,未出版。
董愉斐(2005):應用圖片兌換溝通系統教學法增進自閉症兒童主動溝通行為之研究。屏東市:國立屏東師範學院特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
廖怡欣(2004):運用科技輔具對增進國小中低功能自閉症學生購物行為之研究。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
劉羽珊(2011):運用SGD對低功能自閉症兒童進行溝通訓練之效果研究。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
鄧育欣(2007):圖片兌換溝通系統對國小智能障礙學生溝通行為成效之研究。彰化市:國立彰化師範大學碩士論文,未出版。
劉麗容(1994):如何克服溝通障礙:病理‧診斷‧治療‧保健。臺北市:遠流。
歐真真(2011):電子輔助溝通系統教學對國小中重度智能障礙兒童溝通與行為之介入成效。國立屏東教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
蔡桂芳(2001):高職階段智能障礙學生社會技能訓練效果之研究。彰化市:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系博士論文,未出版。
蔡美華等(譯)(1999)。單一受試者設計與分析(Curtis H. Krishef著: Fundamental approaches to single subject design and analysis)。台北市:五南。
鄭莉雅(譯)(2010):智能障礙:定義.分類和支持系統(The AAIDD AdHoc Committee on TERminology and Classificatio著:Intellectual Disbility:Definition ciassification ,and systems of supports,11th ed.)。臺北市:心路社福基金會。
錡寶香(2002):重度障礙兒童的溝通需求與療育。國小特殊教育,34, 13-20。
錡寶香(2006):兒童語言障礙:理論評量與教學。臺北:心理。
鍾玉春(2005):教導夥伴中心問題的策略對唐氏症生溝通能力之成效研究。臺北市:國立台北師範學院特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
英文部份
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.(2005).Roles and Responsibilities of Speech-Language Pathologists with Respect to Alternative Communication: Position Statement. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/docs/pdf/PS2005-00113.pdf
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.(2009). Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). Retrieved from
http://www.asha.org/public/speech/disorders/AAC.htm#types_aac
Barger A. R., Domaracki, J. W., Kearney V. N., & Kubina, R. M. (2004). Multiple baseline designs: The use of a single-case experimental design in literacy research. Reading Improvement, 41, 217-225.
Barnette J. J., & Wallis B. Anne. (2005). The missing treatment design element: Continuity of treatment when multiple postobservations are used in time-series and repeated measures study designs. American Journal of Evaluation (26), 106-123.
Beirne-Smith, M., Patton, J., & Ittenbach, R. (1994). Mental Retardation. New York,NY:Macmillan College Publishing Co.
Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Binger, C. & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the
expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC.
Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(1), 30-43.
Brown, E., & Cohen, S. (1996). Self-determination and young children. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 21, 22-30.
Bruno J, & Trembath D.(2006) Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during a weeklong intervention program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication,22(4),300-313.
Buhrmester, D. (1990). Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adoloscence. Child Development, 61, 1101-1111.
Carothers, D. E., & Taylor, R. L. (2004). Social-Cognitive processing in children with Asperger syndrome. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 39(2),177-187.
Cook, A.M., & Polgar, J.M. (2007). Cook & Hussey’s assistive technologies: Principles and practice (3 rd ed.). St. Louis, MI: Mosby Elsevier.
Crane, L. (2002). Mental retardation: A community integration approach, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomas Learning Group.
Davis, A., Dyches, T., Lucido, B., & Young, J. (2002). Generalization of
skills using pictographic and voice output communication devices.
Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 124-131.
Drager, D. R. K., Light, C. J., Speltz, C. J. H., Fallon, A. K., & Jeffries, Z. L. (2003). The Performance of Typically Developing 2 1/2-Year-Olds on Dynamic Display AAC Technologies With Different System Layouts and Language Organizations. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 2 (46), 298-314.
Durand, V. M. (2001).Future directions for children and adolescents with mental retardation. Behavior Theraphy,32,633-650
Downing, J. (2002). Including students with severe and multiple disabilities in typical classrooms: Practical strategies for teachers (2 nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Gresham, F.M., & MacMillan, D.L. (1997). Social competence and affective characteristics of students with mild disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 67(4), 377-415.
Gresham, M. F. (1998). Social skills training: should we raze, remodel, or rebuild? Behavior Disorders, 24 (1), 19-25.
Haring, N. G., & McCormick, L. (1986). Exceptional Children and Youth: An introduction to special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Janis R. C.(1993). Using general-case instruction to teach spontaneous and generalized requests for assistance to learners with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps (JASH), 18(3),177-187.
Joan Bruno, & David Trembath(2006). Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during a weeklong intervention program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication,22(4), 300-313.
Krishef, C. H. (1991). Fundamental approaches to single subject design and analysis. Malabar: Krieger Publishing Co.
Light, J. C. (1988). Interactions involving individuals using augmentative communication systems:State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66-82.
Light, C. J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication ,5, 137- 144.
Light, C. J., & Binger, C. (1998). Building communicative competence with individuah who use augmentative and alternative communication. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Merrell, K. W., & Gimpel, G. A. (1998). Social skills of children and adolescents. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbum.
Mussel, W. R. C., & St. Louis, W. K. (1988). Communication Programming for Persons With Severe Handicaps: Vocal and Augmentative Strategies (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Ostryn, C. L., Wolfe, S. P. & Rusch, R. F. (2009). A Review and Analysis of the Pictnre Exchange Communication System (PECS) for Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorders Using a Paradigm of Communication Competence. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33(1/2), 13-24.
Salzberg, C. L., & Villani, T. V. (1983). Speech training by parents of Down's syndrome toddlers: Generalization across settings and instructional contexts. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 87(4), 403-413.
Sargent, R. L. (1998). Social skills for school and community-Systematic instruction for children and youth with cognitive delays. Reston, VA: The Division on Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities of the Council for Exceptional Children.
Schlosser, R. W. (2003). The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice. New York: Academic Press.
Schlosser, R.W., Sigafoos, J. & Koul, R. K. (2009). Autism Spectrum Disorders and AAC. Paul H., 141-169.
Sigafoos, J., Didden, R., & O'Reilly, M. (2003). Effects of speech output on
maintenance of requesting and frequency of vocalizations in three
children with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative
Communication, 19 (1). 37-47.
Sigafoos, J., Drasgow, E., Halle, J. W., O'Reilly, M., Seely-York, S.,
Edrisinha, C., & Andrews, A. (2004). Teaching VOCA use as a
communicative repair strategy. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 34, 411-422. doi: 10.1023/B:JADD.0000037417.04356.9c
Sigafoos, J., Green,V. A., Payne, D., Son, S. H. O'Reilly, M. & Lancioni, G. E. (2009). A Comparison of Picture Exchange and Speech-Generating Devices: Acquisition, Preference, and Effects on Social Interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (25), 99-109.
Smith, C. A.(1982). Promoting the social development of young children:
Strategies and activities. Palo Alto,CA : Mayfied Publishing Company.
Stephens, T. M., Hartman, A. C., & Lucas, V. H.(1982).Teaching children basic skills-a curriculum handbook.(2nd ed.). Columbus,OH: Merill.
Valiquette, C., Sutton, A. & Ska, B. (2010). A graphic symbol tool for the evaluation of communication,satisfaction and priorities individuals with intellectual disability who use a speech generating device. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 26 (3), 303-319.doi:10.1177/ 0265659010369281
Walker, H. M., McConnell, S., Holmes, D. Todis, B.,Walker, J.,& Golden, N.(1988).The Walker Social Skills Curriculum: The Accepts Program. Austin,Tex:Pro-ed.
Yorkston, K. M., Baylor, C. R., Dietz, J., Dudgeon, B. J., Eadie, T., Miller, R. M. & Amtmann, D. (2008). Developing a scale of communicative participation: A cognitive interviewing study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 6 (30), 425-433.
Zigler,E.(1966).Personality structure in the retardate.In N. R.Ellis(Ed.)International review of research in mental retardation(pp. 77-108). New York,NY:Academic Press