簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳巧芸
Chen, Chiao-Yun
論文名稱: 希望類型對保險產品恐懼型廣告的說服效果:以調節焦點與自我建構為干擾變數
Persuasive Effectiveness of Hope Types in Fear-Appealing Insurance Advertising: The Moderating Effect of Regulatory Focus and Self-Construal
指導教授: 王仕茹
Wang, Shih-Ju
口試委員: 黃恆獎 洪秀瑜 王仕茹
口試日期: 2021/08/13
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Management
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 82
中文關鍵詞: 保險廣告恐懼訴求希望類型調節焦點理論自我建構產品態度
英文關鍵詞: Insurance advertisements, Fear-Appealing, The types of hope, Regulatory focus theory, Self-construal, Product attitude
研究方法: 實驗設計法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101322
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:100下載:19
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著國內整體經濟環境的發展以及金融市場的蓬勃發展,近年來國人對風險意識與保險觀念日益提升,保險有效契約投保率與普及率分別提升。有鑑於此,保險公司更致力於廣告行銷,其最常使用具有恐懼訴求之行銷廣告,並在廣告中將保險商品設計為在面對這些風險恐懼時的一種希望選擇,本研究旨在面對恐懼訴求廣告,將保險商品設計成何種希望能有較好的說服效果。
    本研究將試圖探討不同的希望類型(促進希望/預防希望)以及相關人士(自己/自己與家人),針對不同人格特質(調節焦點/自我建構)的消費者對於廣告中的保險商品其產品態度或是對於廣告中的保險商品其了解意願是否可能有所差異。研究方法利用受試者間實驗設計,操弄希望類型與相關人士,共有4組實驗組別,發放線上問卷,實驗對象為24至60歲之上班族,透過最終的研究結果,找出保險公司與消費者之間最有效的溝通策略。
    本研究結果顯示,將保險商品設計為預防希望,能避免一個負面的結果,且訴求的相關人士以自己的角度做出發,會使消費者對於保險商品的了解意願有更好的效果,除此之外有別於過去的文獻資料,預防型焦點者不再只先注重與他人團體的關係,在面對恐懼時也會先考慮到自身的風險。整體來說,消費者會對於能讓自己避免恐懼風險的保險商品有會有較好的了解意願。

    With the flourishing financial market, people's awareness of risk and insurance concept have promoted. Besides, the insurance coverage ratio and ratio of insurance prevalence have increased. Based on this phenomenon, insurance companies are more engaging in advertising marketing. They use advertisements with fear appealing most frequently and take insurance product as a kind of hope of facing their fears. Therefore, this study aims at how to design the insurance products to achieve the best persuasive effectiveness for fear-appealing insurance advertising.
    This study explores different types of hope (promotion hope/prevention hope) and related people (themselves/themselves and their families), targeting consumers with different personalities (regulatory focus/self-construal). There may be differences between the product attitude toward insurance products in advertising and the willingness of understanding more about those products. This study uses between-subject method to manipulate the types of hope and related people.
    The results show that designing insurance products as prevention hope can avoid a negative result. Consumers' willingness of understanding insurance products can increase when those related people take it from their own perspective. Prevention-focused people, at this time, do not focus on the relationship with other groups but focus on the risk of themselves while facing fear. To sum up, consumers have better willingness of understanding those insurance products which can prevent them from the risk of fear.

    第一章 緒論1 第一節 研究背景與動機1 第二節 研究流程5 第二章 文獻探討6 第一節 恐懼訴求6 第二節 因應恐懼的希望類型7 第三節 希望類型與調節焦點8 第四節 希望相關人士與自我建構10 第五節 調節焦點與自我建構12 第六節 廣告說服效果13 第三章 研究方法15 第一節 研究架構15 第二節 研究變數定義15 第三節 實驗設計17 第四章 研究結果23 第一節 樣本結構23 第二節 信度分析26 第三節 變數操弄檢定27 第四節 假設檢定29 第五章 結論與建議36 第一節 研究結果與討論36 第二節 行銷實務與管理意涵37 第三節 研究限制37 第四節 未來研究方向38 參考文獻39 附錄一:前測問卷(促進希望與自己) 49 附錄二:前測問卷(促進希望與自己家人) 55 附錄三:前測問卷(預防希望與自己) 61 附錄四:前測問卷(預防希望與自己家人) 67 附錄五:正式問卷73

    英文文獻
    Aaker, J. L. (2000). Accessibility or diagnosticity? Disentangling the influence of culture on persuasion processes and attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 340-357.
    Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2001). “I” seek pleasures and “we” avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33-49..
    Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). Understanding regulatory fit. Journal of marketing research, 43(1), 15-19.
    Averill, James R, Catlin, George, & Chon, Kyum K. (2012). Rules of hope: Springer Science & Business Media.
    Avnet, T., and Higgins, E. T. (2006a), “How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions“, Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 1–10.
    — (2006b), “Response to comments on ‗How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions“, Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 24–27.
    Brockner, J., Higgins, E. T., & Low, M. B. (2004). Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of business venturing, 19(2), 203-220.
    Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of marketing research, 32(2), 192-203.
    Bruininks, P., & Malle, B. F. (2005). Distinguishing hope from optimism and related affective states. Motivation and emotion, 29(4), 324-352.
    Burke, M. C., & Edell, J. A. (1989). The impact of feelings on ad-based affect and cognition. Journal of marketing research, 26(1), 69-83.
    Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (1995). Effects of self-referencing on persuasion. Journal of consumer research, 22(1), 17-26.
    Chandy, R. K., Tellis, G. J., MacInnis, D. J., & Thaivanich, P. (2001). What to say when: Advertising appeals in evolving markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(4), 399-414.
    Choi, T. R., Choi, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2019). I hope to protect myself from the threat: The impact of self-threat on prevention-versus promotion-focused hope. Journal of Business Research, 99, 481-489.
    Coulter, K. S., & Punj, G. (1999). Influence of viewing context on the determinants of attitude toward the ad and the brand. Journal of Business Research, 45(1), 47-58.
    Eckart, J. (2011). Mind Control Tactic – Fear Appeal. NLP & Hypnosis, April 5, 1.
    Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. Handbook of cognition and emotion, 98(45-60), 16.
    Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of consumer psychology, 13(3), 339-348.
    Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological science, 10(4), 321-326.
    Gore, P., Madhavan, S., Curry, D., & McClurg, G. (1998). Persuasive messages. Marketing Health Services, 18(4), 32.
    Gudykunst, W. B., & Lee, C. M. (2003). Assessing the validity of self construal scales: A response to Levine et al. Human Communication Research, 29(2), 253-274.
    Hamilton, R. W., & Biehal, G. J. (2005). Achieving your goals or protecting their future? The effects of self-view on goals and choices. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 277-283.
    Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive psychology, 38(1), 79-109.
    Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?. Psychological review, 106(4), 766.
    Henley, N., & Donovan, R. J. (2003). Young people’s response to death threat appeals: Do they really feel immortal?. Health education research, 18(1), 1-14.
    Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(2), 276.
    Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological review, 94(3), 319.
    Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). Academic Press.
    Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: value from fit. American psychologist, 55(11), 1217.
    Hur, H. J., & Choo, H. J. (2016). Comforting or rewarding myself: Choices for self-gifting. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 7(4), 238-251.
    Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(3), 349.
    Jones, M. D., & Crow, D. A. (2017). How can we use the ‘science of stories’ to produce persuasive scientific stories?. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1-9.
    Kim, N., & Ulgado, F. (2014). Motivational orientation for word-of-mouth and its relationship with WOM messages. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 24(2), 223-240.
    Lazarus, R. S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press on Demand.
    Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Hope: An emotion and a vital coping resource against despair. Social research, 653-678.
    Lee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: the role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78(6), 1122.
    Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 86(2), 205.
    Lennon, R., & Rentfro, R. (2010). Are young adults fear appeal effectiveness ratings explained by fear arousal, perceived threat and perceived efficacy. Innovative Marketing, 6(1), 58-65.
    Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(4), 854.
    MacInnis, D. J., & Chun, H. E. (2007). Understanding hope and its implications for consumer behavior: I hope, therefore I consume. Now Publishers Inc.
    MacInnis, D. J., & De Mello, G. E. (2005). The concept of hope and its relevance to product evaluation and choice. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 1-14.
    MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of marketing, 53(2), 48-65.
    Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. (1983). Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of experimental social psychology, 19(5), 469-479.
    Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing research, 27(3), 361-367.
    Mandel, N. (2003). Shifting selves and decision making: The effects of self-construal priming on consumer risk-taking. Journal of consumer research, 30(1), 30-40.
    Mao, H., Li, X., Desai, K. K., & Jain, S. P. (2016). Self-construal and feature centrality. Marketing Letters, 27(4), 781-789.
    Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98(2), 224.
    Mewborn, C. R., & Rogers, R. W. (1979). Effects of threatening and reassuring components of fear appeals on physiological and verbal measures of emotion and attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15(3), 242-253.
    Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude?. Journal of marketing research, 18(3), 318-332.
    Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological bulletin, 128(1), 3.
    Park, L. E., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Does self-threat promote social connection? The role of self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 203.
    Pennington, G. L., & Roese, N. J. (2003). Regulatory focus and temporal distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 563-576.
    Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Bizer, G. Y. (2000). Attitude functions and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach to matched versus mismatched messages. Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes, 133-162.
    Poels, K., & Dewitte, S. (2008). Hope and self-regulatory goals applied to an advertising context: Promoting prevention stimulates goal-directed behavior. Journal of Business Research, 61(10), 1030-1040.
    Pöhlmann, C., Carranza, E., Hannover, B., & Iyengar, S. S. (2007). Repercussions of self–construal for self–relevant and other–relevant choice. Social cognition, 25(2), 284-305.
    Ray, M. L., & Wilkie, W. L. (1970). Fear: The potential of an appeal neglected by marketing. Journal of Marketing, 34(1), 54-62.
    Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection and motivation. In J. Cacioppo & R. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology (pp. 76-153). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    Shah, J., Higgins, T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: how regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(2), 285.
    Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 20(5), 580-591.
    Smith, C. A., Haynes, K. N., Lazarus, R. S., & Pope, L. K. (1993). In search of the" hot" cognitions: Attributions, appraisals, and their relation to emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(5), 916.
    Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., ... & Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60(4), 570.
    Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological inquiry, 13(4), 249-275.
    Stotland, Ezra. (1969). The psychology of hope: Jossey-Bass.
    Sampson, Kim Witte, Kelly Morrison, Wen-Ying Liu, Anne P. Hubbell, Lisa Murray-
    Johnson, J. (2001). Addressing cultural orientations in fear appeals: Promoting AIDS-protective behaviors among Mexican immigrant and African American adolescents and American and Taiwanese college students. Journal of health communication, 6(4), 335-358.
    Van Hemert, D. A., Poortinga, Y. H., & van de Vijver, F. J. (2007). Emotion and culture: A meta-analysis. Cognition and emotion, 21(5), 913-943.
    Wänke, M., Bohner, G., & Jurkowitsch, A. (1997). There are many reasons to drive a BMW: Does imagined ease of argument generation influence attitudes?. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 170-177.
    Wan, E. W., Hong, J., & Sternthal, B. (2009). The effect of regulatory orientation and decision strategy on brand judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 1026-1038.
    Wei, W., Miao, L., Cai, L. A., & Adler, H. (2012). The influence of self-construal and co-consumption others on consumer complaining behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 764-771.
    White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2011). It's the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 472-485.
    Williams, K. C. (2011). Improving fear appeal ethics. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 5, 1-24.
    Williams, K. C. (2012). Fear appeal theory. Research in Business and Economics Journal, 5(1), 1-21.
    Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329-349.
    Williams, P., & Aaker, J. L. (2002). Can mixed emotions peacefully coexist?. Journal of consumer research, 28(4), 636-649.
    Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22.

    中文文獻
    丁慧蓮. (2018). 探討信任程度對於購買長期照顧保險意願之影響-以高齡社會認知為調節變數. (碩士), 東海大學, 台中市
    吳青松(2008),現代行銷學-國際性視野,台北:智勝文化。
    馬慶玲. (2011). 調節焦點影響廣告效果之研究. (碩士), 國立政治大學, 台北市.
    梁佳瑜. (2016). 調節焦點理論對食安認證產品說服效果之探討:以人格特質、訴求類型為干擾變數. (碩士), 國立中興大學, 台中市.
    陳仕庭. (2011). 調節配適應用於廣告說服效果-以時間框架為干擾變數. (碩士), 中原大學, 桃園縣.
    黃佩鈴. (2014). 自我建構對生前契約廣告之說服效果:以調節焦點與訊息框架為干擾變數. (碩士), 國立中興大學, 台中市.
    詹宜璇. (2016). 探討解釋水平理論與調節焦點理論之交互作用對消費者偏好選擇的影響. (碩士), 國立交通大學, 新竹市.
    蔡詠圭. (2012). 探討時間距離與調節焦點之交互作用影響個人對不同解釋水平高低的偏好選擇. (碩士), 國立交通大學, 新竹市.
    汪志堅、賴明政、周峰莎與楊燕枝 (2016),恐懼訴求下預防調控焦點對風險知覺 與因應之影響,管理評論,第35卷,第4期,頁75-93。
    汪志堅、楊運秀與李明倩(2013),拒菸廣告的恐懼訴求對年輕族群的說服效果:調控焦點與訊息框架之影響,台灣衛誌,32(1),頁62-74。
    林陽助與黃士明(2005),廣告主張、恐懼性訴求、涉入程度對廣告效果影響之研究,東吳經濟商學學報,第51期,頁181-226。
    韓釗、林詩堯(2014),應用恐懼訴求強化戒菸社會行銷設計,中國地方自治,67(7),頁3-22。
    蕭至惠、蔡進發與許雅涵(2012),自我建構與調節焦點對衝動性購買行為之影響,臺大管理叢,第23卷,第1期,頁119-150。
    蕭至惠、蔡進發與許雅涵(2012),廣告訴求與產品屬性的差異真能左右消費者對廣告效果的知覺,第9卷,第1期,頁61-90。
    顏志龍(2009),死亡威脅下訊息參照架構對說服之影響:調控焦點的調節效果,中華心理學刊Chinese Journal of Psychology,51卷,第2期,頁235-250。

    下載圖示
    QR CODE