簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉韶郁
Shau-Yu Liou
論文名稱: 轉型領導與員工績效之關係:自我效能的中介與權力距離的調節
The Relation between Transformational Leadership and Work Performance: The Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy and the Moderating Effect of Power Distance
指導教授: 李隆盛
Lee, Lung-Sheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技應用與人力資源發展學系
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 110
中文關鍵詞: 轉型領導自我效能權力距離工作績效
英文關鍵詞: transformational leadership, self-efficacy, power distance, work performance
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:249下載:13
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討企業主管轉型領導與員工自我效能、權力距離以及工作績效之間的關係。研究係透過調查研究法,以臺灣地區製造業與服務業主管及其員工作為研究對象,共發放主管與部屬配對問卷150套,回收262個配對,有效問卷共計230對,有效回收率為88%。所蒐集資料以積差相關、變異數分析、迴歸分析等方式進行分析與驗證。獲致下列三項主要發現:(1) 轉型領導有助於部屬自我效能的建立,使部屬對於自己成功執行工作任務抱有信心;當部屬擁有高自我效能時,工作績效將有明顯增長;故本研究再次驗證了轉型領導與部屬自我效能,以及自我效能與部屬績效之間的正向關係。(2) 部屬的自我效能對於轉型領導與工作績效之間的關係具有「完全中介」的效果。(3) 本研究發現部屬的權力距離取向對自我效能與工作績效具有調節效果。上述結果不僅對於轉型領導文獻具有實質貢獻,對實務工作者而言,亦提供重要的啟示。

    This study was to explore correlations among transformational leadership, self-efficacy of the employees, power distance and work performance. By way of a questionnaire survey, the subjects of this study were the supervisors and their subordinates. Totally, 300 pairs of dual questionnaire were mailed out and 262 pairs were returned, among which 230 pairs were valid. The percentage of valid questionnaire is 88%. The collected data was analyzed and verified by Pearson’s correlation analysis and regression analysis. Three major findings of this study are as follow: (1) Transformational leadership helps the employees establish their self-efficacy, enabling them to be confident in successfully carrying out a task; and work performance increases noticeably when employees have high self-efficacy. This finding verifies that the positive correlation of transformational leadership and self-efficacy of the employees, and self-efficacy and employees’ performance. (2) Self-efficacy of the employees poses a fully intermediate effect on the relation of transformational leadership and work performance. (3) This study has found that employees’ orientation of power distance has a mediating effect on self-efficacy and work performance. The findings stated above not only contribute to the literature of transformational leadership, but they also provide important revelations to people who practice it every day.

    謝誌......................................................i 中文摘要.................................................iii 英文摘要...................................................v 目錄.....................................................vii 表次......................................................ix 圖次......................................................xi 第一章 緒論.................................................1 第一節 研究背景與動........................................1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題...................................4 第三節 研究範圍與限制......................................5 第四節 重要名詞釋義........................................7 第二章 文獻探討............................................11 第一節 轉型領導..........................................11 第二節 工作績效..........................................20 第三節 自我效能..........................................25 第四節 權力距離..........................................30 第三章 研究設計與實施.......................................33 第一節 研究架構與假設.....................................33 第二節 研究方法與實施.....................................40 第三節 研究對象與工具.....................................44 第四節 資料處理與分析.....................................54 第四章 研究結果與討論.......................................59 第一節 樣本結構..........................................59 第二節 各變項現況分析.....................................62 第三節 不同背景變項在各構面之差異分析.......................67 第四節 各變項之相關分析...................................74 第五節 主要效果與中介效果的檢驗............................77 第六節 調節效果的檢驗.....................................80 第五章 結論與建議...........................................87 第一節 結論..............................................87 第二節 建議..............................................91 參考文獻...................................................93 一、中文部份.............................................93 二、英文部份.............................................95 附 錄.................................................101 附錄一 主管意見調查問卷..................................103 附錄二 員工意見調查問卷..................................107

    一、中文部分
    王安智(2004)。從轉型式領導到創造性績效產出的心理歷程。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    王朝明(2006)。運用結構方程模式探討領導型態、工作滿足、組織承諾與工作績效之影響-以桃園地區不動產仲介從業人員為例。國立東華大學企管系碩士論文,未出版,臺東。
    呂智忠(2003)。國家文化特質與消費倫理信念對消費者採購仿冒品行為之影響。國立東華大學國際企業研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺東。
    李隆盛、黃同圳(2000)。人力資源發展。臺北:師苑。
    吳宗祐(2008)。由華人主管威權領導到員工工作滿意度與組織承諾:信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。本土心理學研究,30,3-63。
    吳秉恩(2006)。領導學-原理與實踐。臺北:智勝。
    吳清山、林天佑(1998)。教育名詞:轉型領導。教育資料與研究,24,頁63。
    李堅萍、游光昭、朱益賢(2008)。自我效能影響影響創作性技能之發展階層研究-以陶藝拉坯技能為例。臺北市立教育大學學報,39(1),105-136。
    李夢麟、任慶宗、方顯光(2007)。知識經濟環境下之組織焦慮與自我效能對創新績效之研究。華人經濟研究,5(1),108-140。
    邵俊豪(2002)。臺北市國民中學校長轉型領導、交易型領導與學校本位管理決策類型之關係研究。國立政治大學教育學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    林淑華(2003)轉換型領導方式與員工工作滿足關係之研究-以臺北市立忠孝醫院為例。國立政治大學教育學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    胡本昌(2008)。大學校院教職員知覺校長轉型領導與其服務士氣之關係。高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
    孫本初(2001)。公共管理。臺北:智勝。
    孫志麟(2003)。教師自我效能的概念與測量,教育心理學報,34(2),139-156。
    陳鉉文(2008)。員工正向心理在轉換型領導與員工績效關聯性之中介機制探討。國立臺灣科技大學企業管理研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北。
    黃英忠(2003)。人力資源管理。臺北:三民。
    黃懿嬌(2007)。臺北縣國民小學校長轉型領導行為與組織再造關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    楊中芳、趙志裕(1987)。中國受測者所面臨的矛盾困境:對過份倚賴西方評定量表的反省。中華心理學刊,29(2),113-132。
    葉俊偉(2008)。企業組織因素對組織創新氣候與組織創新影響之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北。
    蔡培村、武文瑛(2004)。領導學:理論、實務與研究。高雄:高雄復文。
    蔡進雄(2000)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北。
    鄭伯壎、樊景立、周麗芳(2006)。家長式領導:模式與證據。臺北:華泰。
    鄭瀛川(2006)。績效管理練兵術。臺北:汎果。
    劉珈君(2007)。影響保險從業人員工作績效之研究-以國泰人壽北區為例。國立臺灣藝術大學應用媒體藝術所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    譚地洲(2004)。MBA教程之人力資源管理-從職能培訓到創造績效。臺北:世界商業文庫。
    賴盈宗(2006)。職能、自我效能與績效關聯性研究~以臺灣S人壽及中國大陸T人壽業務單位為例。暨南國際大學國際企業研究所碩士論文,未出版,南投。
    樊景立、鄭伯壎(1997)。華人自評式績效考核中的自謙偏差:題意、謙虛價值及自尊之影響。中華心理學刊,39(2),103-118。
    二、英文部分
    Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Audia, G., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2000). The paradox of success: An archival and laboratory study of strategic persistence following a radical environment change. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 837-853.
    Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441-462.
    Bagozzi, R., & Heatherton, T. (1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 35-67.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
    Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-47.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
    Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 91-113.
    Baron R. M., & Kenny D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182。
    Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press.
    Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire (2nd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
    Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (2000). Leaders: The strategies for taking change. New York: Harper & Row.
    Blake, R. P., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The management grid. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
    Bochner, S., & Hesketh, B. (1994). Power distance and individualism / collectivism, and job-related attitudes in a culturally diverse work group. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 233-257.
    Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109.
    Brouther, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal Of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203-223.
    Byars, L. L., & Rue, L. W. (1994). Human resource management (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Richard D. Irwin.
    Byrman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London: Sage Press.
    Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
    Bycio, P., Hackett, R. D., & Allen, J. S. (1995). Further assessment of Bass’s (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 468-478.
    Campbell J. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago, IL: Consulting Psychologists Press.
    Chen, X., & Farh, J. L. (1999). The effectiveness of transactional and transformational leader behaviors in Chinese organizations: evidence from Taiwan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management , Chicago.
    Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3, 127-150.
    Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735-744.
    Eden, D. (1990). Pygmalion in management. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Co.
    Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 715-729.
    Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 472-485.
    Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211.
    Hackett, R. D., Farh, J. L., Chen, Z., Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2008). Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: A test of a moderated mediated model. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings. New York: Academy of Management.
    Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9, 42-63.
    Hofstede, G., Bond M. (1988). The confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4-21.
    House, R. J., & Shamir, B. (1993). Toward the integration of transformational, charismatic, and visionary theories. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research : Perspectives and directions (pp. 81-107). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation : Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 891-902.
    Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G.(2001). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Kenny, D. A., Beashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 233-265). New York : McGraw-Hill.
    Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J. L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 744-764.
    Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 36-51.
    Litt, M.D. (1988). Self-efficacy and perceived control: Cognitive mediators of pain tolerance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 149-160.
    Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K.F. (2002). To parcel of not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151-173.
    Locke, E. A. (1993). The motivation sequence, the motivation hub, and the motivation core. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 288-299.
    Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effective correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.
    Miao, C. F., & Kenneth, R. E. (2007). The role of salesperson motivation in sales control systems intrinsic and extrinsic motivation revisited. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 417.
    Mulder, M. (1977). The daily power game. Leyden: Martinus Nijhoff.
    Northhouse, P. G. (2001). Leadership theory and practice (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Piccolo, F., & Coiquitt, A. (2006). Transformational leadership and organizational justice : Similarities and difference across cultures. Journal of International Business, 30, 763-779.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107-142.
    Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organizational behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Mall, Inc.
    Schermerhon, J. R. (1989). Management for Productivity. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    Sergiovanni, T. J. (1990). Value-added leadership: How to get extraordinary performance in schools. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577-594.
    Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Breinin, E., & Popper, M. (1998). Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates’ attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors’ appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 387-409.
    Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442-1465.
    Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction and strain. Journal of Management, 38, 1442-1465.
    Tyler, T. R., Lind, E. A., & Huo, Y. J. (2000). Cultural values and authority relations: The psychology of conflict resolution across cultures. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 1138-1163.
    Venkatraman, N., & Ramanunjam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11, 4, 801-814.
    Yukl, G. A. (1994). Leadership in organizations (3th ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
    Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE