簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 胡博閔
Hu, Po-Min
論文名稱: 數位遊戲學習對學童創造力與實作技能影響之研究
The influence of students’ creativity and practical skill by Digital Game-Based Learning
指導教授: 蕭顯勝
Hsiao, Hsien-Sheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技應用與人力資源發展學系
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 150
中文關鍵詞: 創造力實作技能數位遊戲學習心流理論
英文關鍵詞: Creativity, Practical skill, Digital game-based learning, Flow
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:170下載:54
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 創造力是新穎的具體表現,可由行為歷程、實物作品中所展現。藉由實作技能,創造力將融入每一製作環節,成就一項具有吸引力的產品。雖然實作技能與創造力具有相當密切的關係,但證實此論點的研究卻寥寥無幾。本研究擬以準實驗方式探討數位遊戲學習對學童創造力之成效與實作技能的影響。
      本研究首先針對創造力教學策略與心流理論之特點應用於數位遊戲學習系統,並用以進行教學實驗,對照傳統課堂教學方式,進行創造力與實作技能成效之統計分析及探討,另外再依學童於實作過程中之行為予以記錄並進行序列分析,作為輔助推論學童在實作技能成效上具有差異之原因。
      結果發現,相較於傳統課堂學習,數位遊戲學習不但有效地提升學童創造力,亦能彰顯學童實作技能,證實了創造力的提升是有助於實作技能表現的。

    Creativity which could be display by the behavior or concrete products of a process is an originally tangible manifestation. By using practical skill, the creativity infiltrates in each step of the process, then an attractive product will be accomplished finally. The relationship between practical skill and creativity is close, but there are fewer researches to prove it. For this, the study plans to delve the influence of students’ effect of creativity and practical skill after Digital Game-Based Learning by using quasi-experimental designs.
      First, the study develops a Digital Game-Based Learning system based on creativity teaching strategies and Flow theory, and then teaching by the system. Compared with traditional classroom teaching, the study analyzes and discusses the effect of creativity and practical skill. Second, taking down students’ behavior in the practical process and inferring what the cause of the different inference of students’ practical skill was by Sequence analysis.
      The result shows that compared to the traditional classroom teaching, Digital Game-Based Learning raises students’ creativity and strengthens students’ practical skill more effectively. The point at issue proves that raising of the creativity is helpful on the performance of the practical skill.

    謝  誌 i 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目  錄 v 表  次 vii 圖  次 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 待答問題 5 第四節 研究範圍與限制 6 第五節 研究流程 7 第六節 名詞釋義 9 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 創造力 11 第二節 實作技能 26 第三節 數位遊戲學習 32 第四節 本章小結 36 第三章 研究方法 37 第一節 研究架構 37 第二節 研究對象 39 第三節 研究設計與實施 40 第四節 創造力教學之數位遊戲學習系統 45 第五節 研究工具 51 第六節 資料分析 57 第四章 研究結果與討論 59 第一節 實作技能評量與創造力測驗之相關性分析 59 第二節 不同教學方式對學童創造力之影響分析 66 第三節 不同教學方式對學童實作技能之影響分析 76 第四節 學童進行實作活動之行為分析 86 第五節 數位遊戲學習系統滿意度分析 97 第五章 結論與建議 101 第一節 結論 101 第二節 建議 105 參考文獻 107 附  錄 115 附錄一 教學活動設計 117 附錄二 數位遊戲學習系統之創造思考遊戲說明 123 附錄三 系統滿意度問卷 143 附錄四 學生成績一覽表 149

    毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。台北:心理。
    王鼎銘(1999)。科技發展與科技教育學習經驗。生活科技教育,32(11),2-9。
    伍建學(2004)。網路遊戲教學策略對國小學生科技創造力影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所網路教學組碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    李珮禔(2008)。泰國曼谷創意設計中心參訪心得分享。2009年8月31日,取自http://c037.wtuc.edu.tw/ezcatfiles/c037/img/img/565/18
    1186619.doc
    李貞穎(2008)。以線上遊戲實施創造力教學與評量之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所網路教學組碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    李堅萍(2001)。技能實作主題課程的課程特質與教學策略。國教天地,146,79-84。
    李堅萍(2006)。培育科技創造力應重視實作技能的教學與自我效能的激發。生活科技教育月刊,39(8),21-28。
    李坤崇(2006)。教學評量。台北:心理。
    吳清山、林天祐(1997)。實作評量。教育資料與研究,15,68。
    吳靜吉(2003)。創造力的評量:4P觀點。2009年8月31日,取自http://www.creativity.edu.tw/modules/wfsection/download.php?fileid=436
    何貴良、謝明達、李宗憲、蔡明崇(2006)。二十世紀藝術與人文探索式遊戲型數位學習平台設計。2006年台灣網際網路研討會論文集,花蓮。
    呂金燮(1999)。實作評量-理論。教育測驗與評量:教室學習觀點。台北:五南。
    林文川(2002)。創造力與創造性思考教學之研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
    林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗。台北:心理。
    周家卉(2008)。實作評量在生活科技課程實施之探討。生活科技教育月刊,41(7),51-83。
    洪榮昭(1999)。試析科技創作力。論文發表於國際科技教育整合思考研討會。
    翁凱昕(2006)。線上遊戲式學習對創造力之影響。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所網路教學組碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    張玉成(1993)。思考技巧與教學。台北:心理。
    張永福(2008)。實作評量的特性及其理論基礎。研習資訊,25(3),79-86。
    張麗華(2008)。創意的發想與實踐:探索→實作→反思→創新。2009年8月31日,取自http://blog.yam.com/ilovehrd/article/18
    723056
    張麗麗(2002)。評量改革的應許之地,虛幻或真實?談實作評量之作業與表現規準。教育研究,93,76-86。
    郭國禎、駱芳美(2004)。教師與教學評量-形成性評量與總結性評量的整合與運用。教育研究,127,85-92。
    教育部(2007)。全國新興能源暨綠色能源專題創意競賽。2009年8月31日,取自http://www.fgu.edu.tw/~student/www/news/a96020
    8.pdf
    教育部(2002)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要自然與生活科技學習領域。2009年8月31日,取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/data/files/clas
    s_rules/nature.pdf
    莊謙本(1998)。技能評量的內在與外在因素。教學科技與媒體,42,38-42。
    陳英豪、吳裕益(1992)。測驗與評量。高雄:復文圖書。
    陳瑜芬、鄭凱文、賴銘娟(2006)。以內容分析法探討創造力對於企業技術創新之影響。遠東學報,23(4),591-604。
    陳龍安(1998)。創造思考教學。菁莪季刊,2,14-18。
    陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際(第六版)。台北:心理。
    彭森明(1996)。實作評量(Performance Assessment)理論與實際。教育資料與研究,9,44-48。
    彭銘君(2005)。遊戲情境中思考風格對設計創造力的影響。國力交通大學理學院網路學習學程碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
    彭麗琦、周美智、陳湘玲、趙為娣(2005)。談創造力之培育-以閱讀教學為例。論文發表於第三屆創新與創造力研討會,台北。
    盧雪梅(1995)。實作評量的應許、難題和挑戰。教育論壇-實作評量與案卷評量,3-9,台北:國立教育資料館。
    賈馥茗(1979)。傑出科技創作學童創新歷程之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    蘇榮章(2006)。數位教育遊戲設計與評估指標之研究。國立政治大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。

    Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (3nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Amabile, T. M. (1987). The motivation to be creativity. In Isaksen S. C. (Ed.), Frontiers of Creativity Research, 223-254. New York: Bearly Limited.
    Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Colorado, Boulder: Westview Press.
    Bakeman R., & Gottman J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd Ed). UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.
    Edward, B. (1995). Serious creativity. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 18(5), 12-18.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
    Davis, G. A. (1986). Creativity is Forever. Iowa: Kendall Hunt.
    Debono, P. (1970). Relationships between academic learning time and teacher behaviors in a physical education majors skills Class. In Templin, T. T., & Olson, J. K. (Eds.), Teaching in Physical Education, 173-184. Illinois: Human Kinetics.
    Drucker, T., Hattori, R. A., Rostain, A., & Wycoff, J. (2002). Innovation Network. Retrieved August 31, 2009, from http://www.thinksmart.com
    Eby, D. (2006). Creativity and Flow. Retrieved August 31, 2009, from http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Douglas_Eby
    Eva. V. (2007). Exploring processes of collaborative creativity-The role of emotions in children’s joint creative writing. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2,107-117.
    Gallucci, A. K. (l991). The relationship among the academic achievement learning style preferences and creativity of gifted and normal intermediate students in suburban new york school district. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI.
    Gove, P. B. (1986). Webster’s 3rd International Dictionary of the English Language. Springfield Massachuscetts: G. & C. Berrian Company.
    Guilford, J. P. (1959). Traits of creativity. In Vernon, P. E. (Ed.), Creativity, 167-188. England: Penguin.
    Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., & Winters, L. (1990). Issues in developing alternative assessments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the California Educational Research Association, Chicago.
    Hoffman, L. D., & Novak, P. T. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(7), 50-68.
    Jackson, P., & Messick, S. (1965). The person, the product and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. Journal of Personality, 33, 309-329.
    Kane, M. K., Crooks, T., & Cohen, A. (1999). Validating measures of performance. Educational Measurement, 18(2), 5-17.
    Kristian, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 13-24.
    Mellou, E. (1996). The two-conditions view of creativity. Journal of Creativite Behavior, 30(2), 126-149.
    Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance as-sessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.
    Moustakas, C. E. (1972). Loneliness and love. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
    Novak, P. T., Hoffman, L. D., & Yung, Y. F. (1998). Measuring the flow construct in online environment: A structural modeling approach. Retrieved August 31, 2009, from http://sloan.ucr.edu/blog/uploads/papers/Measuring%20the%20Flow%20Construct%20in%20Online%20Environments%20-%20A%20Structural%20Modeling%20Approach%20%5BHoffman,%20Novak,%20Yiu-Fai%20Yung%20-%20May%201998%5D.pdf
    Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner’s.
    Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative Behavior Guidebook. State University of New York College at Buffalo, Charles Scribner’s Sons.
    Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.
    Ricci, K., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Do computer-based games facilitate knowledge acquisition and retention? Military Psychology, 8(4), 295-307.
    Rollings, A., & Adams, E. (2003). Andrew Rollings and Ernest Adams on game design. USA: New Riders.
    Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Cumsille, P., Marianov, V., & Correa, M. (2002). Beyond Nintendo: design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade students. Computers & Education, 40, 71-94.
    Rose, L. H. & Lin, H. T. (1985). A meta-analysis of long-term creativity training programs. Journal of Creative Behavior, 18, 11-12.
    Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Baxter, G. P. & Shavelson, R. J. (1993). On the stability of performance assessments. Journal of Education Measurement, 30(1), 41-53.
    Runco, M. A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental Issues. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 3-30.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The nature of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity, 3-15. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Cognitive Psychology (3rd Ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
    Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87-98.
    Stiggins, R. (1987). Design and development of performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 6(3), 33-42.
    Thomas, B. W. (2007). Creative cognition as a window on creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 96-106.
    Torrance, E. P. (1971). Creativity and infinity. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 3, 35-41.
    Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can We teach Children to Think Creatively? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114-143.
    Wallas, G. (1962). The Arts of Thought. New York: Harcourt Brace Janonovica.
    Webster, J., Trevino, K. L., & Ryan, L. (1993). The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 1(3), 237-244.
    Whitehall, B., & McDonald, B. (1993). Improving learning persistence of military personnel by enhancing motivation in a technical training program. Simulation & Gaming, 24, 294-313.
    Wiggins, M. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Pbi Delta Kappan, 70, 703-713.
    Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessment: Authenticity, context, and validity. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(3), 200-214.
    Williams, F. E. (1970). Classroom ideas for encouraging thinking and feeling. New York: D. O. K. Publishers Inc.
    Williams, F. E. (1972). Identifying and measuring creative potential. NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE