本研究以仿生學及博物館運用建構主義進行之展場教育活動Tinkering工作坊，探討其對永續概念學習之影響。近年研究逐漸重視未來觀點，展望未來與思考未來是環境教育與永續發展教育之關鍵能力之一。本研究探討在參觀仿生展版、觀看仿生影片及參與Tinkering動手做工作坊前、後，對永續概念、仿生概念與未來希望感之影響。以準實驗研究法隨機分派實驗組(n=33)進行50分鐘快樂城市Tinkering動手做工作坊歷程、控制組(n=32)則沒有進行50分鐘快樂城市Tinkering動手做工作坊。研究結果顯示兩組間之永續概念前、後測差異分數，無顯著差異：兩組間之仿生概念前、後測差異分數，無顯著差異；兩組間之未來希望感前、後測有顯著差異。針對研究發現所提出的建議如下: 只有展版、影像等平面展示無法提升未來希望感，輔以仿生動手做工作坊歷程，可達到提升未來希望感之尺度與效果。

This study uses biomimicry and tinkering workshop under constructivism in the museum to explore its influence on hopes towards the future. Recently, more researchers are focusing their studies on the view of the future. Therefore, prospecting and reflecting the future are some of the key abilities for developing environmental and sustainable education programs. As a result, this research explores the participants' concept/understanding of sustainability, biomimicry, and hope by comparing their feedbacks before and after their visit to the workshop. Using the quasi-experimental research method, the experimental group (n=33) was randomly assigned to conduct a 50-minute Happy City Tinkering hands-on workshop, while the control group did not conduct a 50-minute Happy City Tinkering hands-on workshop (n=32). The results indicated that there were only trivial differences between the two groups’ ideas on sustainability and biomimicry. However, the two groups demonstrated diverse differences toward hope. According to the results of this research, the author came to the conclusion that merely exhibition panels and videos cannot achieve participants’ impressions/ideas of hope. It is through the biomimicry workshop can perhaps enhance the institution’s expected depth and effect towards audiences and participants’ ideas of hope.

中文部分
王順美 （2016）。臺灣永續發展教育現況探討及行動策略之芻議.。環境教育研究，12-1，111-139。
王啟祥 （2001)。博物館在學習社會中的角色與實踐。科技博物， 5:2，5-17。
江佳純 (2018)。新生物經濟時代的原創思維仿生(Biomimicry)設計思考與研發方法學介紹。生物經濟 NO.55, 79-85。
全球永續發展里程碑 (2016年6月15日) 取自聯合國永續發展知識平臺網站)。
取自http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/intgovmental.html
邱皓政 （2018）。量化研究與統計分析SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例。台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
吳芝儀、廖梅花（譯）（2018）。質性研究入門：紮根理論研究方法。（原作者：Anselm Strauss, Juliet Corbin）雲林縣：濤石文化事業有限公司。
周鴻騰 （2016）。仿生案例教學對大學生自然觀察智能、類比聯想、仿生設計能力與情意態度之成效分析（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。
倪上筑、Amy Lin與CSRone 永續報告平臺 (2018, July 24) 。全球永續發展高階政治論壇摘要：邁向永續與韌性社會的轉型之道。〔網路文章〕。擷取自https://npost.tw/archives/44987
陳淑敏、李文淵、楊育修、黃幼萱、吳志富（2017年6月15日）自造者教育的理念與實踐:國際案例與我國經驗之分析。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊 第6期擷取自http://pulse.naer.edu.tw/Home/Content/813dc2e3-f5d3-4533-a1e9-c174224cb74e?paged=2&insId=40977899-d342-4f01-94a7-66d446c9d3bb
張美珍 (2000)。從認知心理學派觀點探析博物館內學習。科技博物，4(4)，30-47。
張美珍 (2002)。從建構主義取向探究博物館教育活動的規劃設計。科技博物，6(6)，19-30。
張曌菲（譯）(1998)。人類的出路探尋生物模擬的奧妙（原作者：Janine M. Benyus）。台北市：胡桃木文化事業有限公司。
張珍悅、徐勝一(2010)。永續發展教育脈絡探討：「聯合國永續發展教育十年計畫」之回顧。地理研究，52，1-26。
超維度互動股份有限公司（2015）。原型工廠可行性評估與實驗工作坊計畫(未出版 報告書)。台北市：國立臺灣科學教育館。
葉欣誠 (2018 )。探討環境教育與永續發展教育的發展脈絡環境教育研究，第十三卷，第二期，2017 年，67-109 頁。
趙珩宇 (2015）。自造者運動對生活科技的啟示。科技與人力教育季刊，1(3)，1-20。
鄭宇鈞（2010）。博物館「動手做」活動促進觀眾對節水科技理解之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄市：國立高雄師範大學。
甄曉蘭、曾志華 (1997)。建構教學理念的興起與應用。國民教育研究學報，3，179-208。涂金堂（2017）。實驗研究法與共變數分析。台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
劉佳儒 (2018)。非制式教育場域辦理自造及科技教育活動之調查。 科技博物，22:3，135-156。
魏嘉儀（譯）（2019）。人類世的誕生從地質紀錄中反思人類與環境的關係，掌握改變未來的契機（原作者:Simon L. Lewis & Mark A.Maslin）台北市：積木文化
羅世宏、葉欣怡、薛丹琦（合譯）（2010）。質性資料分析文本、影像與聲音（原作者：Martin W. Bauer & George Gaskell）。台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
Michael Pawlyn (2010)。將大自然的智慧運用在建築上〔網路影片〕擷取自https://www.ted.com/talks/michael_pawlyn_using_nature_s_genius_in_architecture?language=zh-tw  
外文部分
Alerby, E. (2000). A Way of Visualising Children's and Young People's Thoughts about the Environment: A study of drawings, Environmental Education Research, 6:3, 205-222. DOI: 10.1080/13504620050076713
Bishop, P. C. and Hines, A. (2012) .Teaching about the Future. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bruner, J.S.(1971).Toward a Theory of instruction. Cambridge：Harvard University Press.
Buntting, C. & Jones, A. (2015). The Future in Learning Science: What’s in it
for the Learner? Switzerland: Springer.
Corcoran, Weakland & Wals .( 2017).Envisioning futures for environmental and sustainability education. Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Crutzen＆Stoermer.（2000）.The “Anthropocene”. IGBP NEWSLETTER 41
Simon L. Lewis & Maslin Mark A. (2015) Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, March 12 ,Vol.519：171-519.
Crutzen.（2002）.Geology of mankind . Nature, Jan 3,vol.415: 23-25.
Gutwill, Hido, &Sindorf. (2015). Research to Practice: Observing Learning in Tinkering Activities. The Museum Journal, Apr , vol.52 no.2:151-168.
Gordon, A. 2009. Future Savvy. New York: AMACOM.
Harkness, J.M. (2001). A lifetime of connections—Otto Herbert Schmitt, 1913–1998. Phys. Perspect.. http://www.thebakken.org/research/Schmitt/Otto.htm.
Hatch, M. (2014). The maker movement manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hoffman, J. (2019). Imagining 2060: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of University Students’ Perspectives. Journal of Futures Studies, June, 23(4): 63–78.
Kopnina, H. (2014). Future Scenarios and Environmental Education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45:4, 217-231.
Leemput, M.V. (2019). Destinations for Polyamorous Futures and Their MAD Lovers. Journal of Futures Studies, June , 23(4): 3–14.

Liu, S.C. and Lin, H. (2018). Envisioning preferred environmental futures: exploring relationships between future-related views and environmental attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 24:180-96 .
Martinez, S.L & Stager.G. (2013). Learning. Invent to Learn: Making, Tinkering and Engineering in the classroom. (pp.31-44). Torrance.CA：Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
McGeer, V. (2004). The art of good hope. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592, 100–127.
Moseley, C., B. Desjean-Perrotta, and J. Utley. (2010). “The Draw-an-Environment Test Rubric (DAET-R): Exploring Pre-service Teachers’ Mental Models of the Environment.” Environmental Education Research 16 (2): 189–208.
Ono.(2003). Learning from young people’s image of the future: a case study in Taiwan and the US. Futures 35：737–758.
R. S. Kurti, D. L. Kurti, L. Fleming(2014). The Philosophy of Educational Makerspaces Part 1 of Making an Educational Makerspace. Teacher Librarian. 41:5.8-12.
Slaughter. (2018). Futures Education: Catalyst for Our Times. Journal of Futures Studies, February 2008, 12(3): 15 – 30.
World Urbanization Prospects 2018: Highlights
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division
Snyder, C. R. (2000). Genesis: The birth and growth of hope. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Handbook of hope (pp. 25–38). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon, D. R. (2001). Hope theory. A member of the positive psychology family. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 257–275). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Vincent, Julian F.V.; Bogatyreva, Olga A.; Bogatyrev, Nikolaj R.; Bowyer, Adrian; Pahl, Anja-Karina (21 August 2006). "Biomimetics: its practice and theory". Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 3 (9): 471–482.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1971) The Psychology of Art .Cambridge: The MIT Press.
UNESCO/DESD(2009):(DESD,2005-2014) Review of Contexts and Structures for Education forSustainable Development 2009, Section for DESD Coordination, Division for the Coordination ofUnited Nations Priorities in Education: France.