簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 中村昌敏
Nakamura Masatoshi
論文名稱： 安心領導的內涵與組織行為的影響： 文化差異的比較研究
Conceptualization of "An-xin Leadership" and Impact on Organizational Behavior: Comparison of Cultural Differences
指導教授： 邱皓政
Chiou, Haw-Jeng
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Management
論文出版年： 2018
畢業學年度： 106
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 103
中文關鍵詞： 安心 、安心領導 、信賴關係（Rapport） 、信任與不信任 、Parentalship 、小籠包模型 、修身 、肯定
英文關鍵詞： An-xin, An-xin Leadership, Trust Relationship (Rapport), Basic Trust and Basic Mistrust, Parentalship, 小籠包 model, Self-cultivation, Acknowledgement
DOI URL： http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GIM.001.2018.F08
論文種類： 學術論文
相關次數： 點閱：239  下載：31 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 當今多元社會，由於複雜的文化背景與現有許多領導理論， 領導者不易領導和管理員工。研究提出一個問題:「能否形成一個上層的概念，即更普遍的領導方式，涵容現有的領導理論概念？」，且提醒了我們一個概念:「安心」。

    此研究中，首先透過訪談來理解及界定「安心」和「安心領導」的概念。16名受訪者包括八名臺灣人與八名日本人，分別是四名領導階級和下屬。其次，找出了“安心領導”機制，其特點是（1）Counselorship、（2）Parentalship、（3）Directorship、（4）Comradeship，這是我們歸納出的新概念。第三，研究發展出“小籠包模式”，其中我們發現了“Parentalship”是其他三項特徵的基礎。最後，我們討論了“安心領導”帶領員工的方式，以及“安心領導”該具體執行的行動。

    Due to current diverse society, cultural backgrounds and many complex existing leadership theories, it is very difficult for leaders to lead and manage employees. Then, one question was come up with, which was “Is it possible to develop an upper concept that leadership of universal way, which includes lower concepts that are past existing leadership theories? Then, it reminded us of one word, “An-xin (peace of mind)”.

    In this research, we, firstly, understood and defined concept of both “An-xin” and “An-xin Leadership” by doing interview study. 16 interviewees included eight Taiwanese and eight Japanese, which four subordinates and leaders, respectively. Second, we figured out a mechanism of “An-xin Leadership”, whose characteristics were (1) Counselorship, (2) Parentalship, (3) Directorship and (4) Comradeship, which are our new concept. Third, we developed the "小籠包 model” because we had discovered that "Parentalship" underlied the other three characteristics. Lastly, we discussed how “An-xin Leadership” lead employees and what “An-xin Leadership” need to do.

    Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Research background and motivation 1 1.2 Meaning of “An-xin” in different cultural management 2 1.3 Research purpose 5 Chapter 2: Literature 6 2.1 Comparison of Eastern and Western Cultural Differences 6 2.1.1 Eastern Culture 6 2.1.1.1 Chinese culture 6 2.1.1.2 Japanese culture 9 2.1.2 Western culture 12 2.2 Review of Leadership Theory 13 2.2.1 Characteristic Theory 14 2.2.2 Behavioral Theory 15 2.2.3 Contingency Theory 16 2.2.4 Theory of Charismatic Leadership / Transforming Leadership 18 2.2.5 Emergence of Various Theories 20 2.3 An-xin 25 2.3.1 An-xin from universal perspective 25 2.3.2 An-xin from organizational perspective 26 2.3.3 An-xin from NLP perspective 27 2.3.4 An-xin from Japanese perspective 30 2.3.5 An-xin from American perspective 31 2.3.6 An-xin from Chinese perspective 33 2.4 Solution Focus Brief Therapy Approach (SFBT) 36 2.4.1 What is SFBT? 36 2.4.2 Three important SFBT’s philosophies 37 2.4.3 OK message 38 Chapter 3: Methodology 41 3.1 Purpose of Interview 41 3.2 Participants 42 3.3 Interview Question Framework 44 3.4 Analyses 45 3.4.1 Five Steps Analytic Process 46 3.4.2 SCAT (Steps for Coding and Theorization) 46 Chapter 4: Research Findings 48 4.1 Result of Interview 48 4.1.1 Background Information of Taiwanese Interviewees 48 4.1.2 Background Information of Japanese Interviewees: 51 4.2 Coding & Categorizing for Subordinates’ “Not An-xin” 55 4.2.1 Coding for Subordinates’ “Not An-xin” 56 4.2.2 Categorizing for Subordinates’ “Not An-xin” 65 4.3 Feeling for Category of Subordinates’ “Not An-xin” 67 4.4 Coding & Categorizing for Leaders’ “An-xin Leadership” 68 4.4.1 Coding for Leaders’ “An-xin Leadership” 69 4.4.2 Categorizing for Leaders’ “An-xin Leadership” 78 Chapter 5: Discussion and Conclusion 83 5.1 Discussion 83 5.1.1 Comparison with Taiwanese and Japanese data 83 5.1.2 Compassion at Work 85 5.1.3 Google’s Project Aristotle 86 5.2 “小籠包“ Model 88 5.3 Conclusion 90 5.4 Managerial Implications 93 5.5 Limitations & Further Study Recommendations 94 Reference 97

    - English References

    Bergman, J. Z., Rentsch, J. R., Small, E. E., Davenport, S. W., & Bergman, S. M. (2012). The shared leadership process in decision-making teams. The Journal of social psychology, 152(1), 17-42.
    Blake, R. R., Mouton, J. S., & Bidwell, A. C. (1962). Managerial grid. Advanced Management-Office Executive.
    Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage.
    Cameron, K. (2012). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    Campbell, D. T., & Ross, H. L. (1968). The Connecticut crackdown on speeding: Time-series data in quasi-experimental analysis. Law and Society Review, 33-53.
    Chuang, A., Hsu, R. S., Wang, A. C., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Does West “fit” with East? In search of a Chinese model of person–environment fit. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 480-510.
    Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Sage Publications.
    Duhigg, C. (2016). What Google learned from its quest to build the perfect team. The New York Times Magazine, 26, 2016.
    Dutton, J. E., Workman, K. M., & Hardin, A. E. (2014). Compassion at work.
    Erikson, E. H. (Ed.). (1963). Youth: Change and challenge. Basic books.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
    George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. John Wiley & Sons.
    Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2013). Primal leadership: Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Harvard Business Press.
    Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership.
    Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of marketing, 18(4), 36-44.
    Hefferman, M. (2015). Beyond Measure: The Big Impact of Small Changes. Simon and Schuster.
    Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Natemeyer, W. E. (1979). Situational leadership, perception, and the impact of power. Group & Organization Studies, 4(4), 418-428.
    Hirai, M. (2000). Stereotypes about the Japanese. THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 39(2), 103-113.
    Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). sage.
    House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative science quarterly, 321-339.
    House, R. J. (1976). A 1976 Theory of Charismatic Leadership. Working Paper Series 76-06.
    Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American journal of Sociology, 92(4), 944-974.
    Jean-Paul, S. (1956). Being and nothingness.
    Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail.
    Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews. An introduction to qualitative research writing. Thousand Oaks, CA.
    LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Leitch, J., Lancefield, D., & Dawson, M. (2016). Strategy+business. 10 Principles of Strategic Leadership. https://www.strategy-business.com/article/10-Principles-of-Strategic-Leadership (accessed 2017-11-12)
    McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview, Sage Publication, Newbury Park, CA.
    McKergow, M. (2012). Solution-focused approaches in management. C. Franklin, TS Trepper, W. Gingerich, y EE McCollum, EE (Eds.). Solution-focused brief therapy: A handbook of evidenced-based practice, 327-341. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
    Ruth, B. (1946). The chrysanthemum and the sword: patterns of Japanese culture. Cambridge, MA.
    Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. The Journal of psychology, 25(1), 35-71.
    Tichy, N. M., & Devanna, M. A. (1986). The transformational leader (pp. 73-79). New York: Wiley.
    Webb, S. & Webb, B. (1932). Methods of Social Study, Longmans Green, London.

    - Japanese References

    青木　安輝　(2006). 『解決志向の実践マネジメント』.　河出書房新社
    麻野　耕司　(2015). 『すべての組織は変えられる－好調な企業はなぜ「ヒト」に投資するのか―』.　PHPビジネス新書
    アラン・ブライマン (2008). 『ディズニー化する社会』.　明石書店
    岩田奇志（2017）. 中国社会の行動原理:「関係」(guanxi) と 「想い」(想法 xiangfa)− 日中比較文化論の視点から−.
    ウヴェ・フリック著.　小田博志他訳　(2002).　『質的研究入門－「人間の科学」のための方法論』.　東京：春秋社
    大谷尚. (2008). 4 ステップコーディングによる質的データ分析手法 SCAT の提案―着手しやすく小規模データにも適用可能な理論化の手続き―.
    小笹　芳央 (2011). 『変化を生み出すモチベーション・マネジメント－６つのマジックで思考と行動が変わる－』.　PHPビジネス新書
    佐藤郁哉 (2008). 『質的データ分析法　原理・方法・実践』.　東京：新曜社
    謝雅美　(1999). 『台湾人と日本人―日本人に知ってほしいこと』.　総合法令出版、pp. 144-145
    濱口　恵俊　(1982). 『間人主義の社会』.　東洋経済新聞社
    松下　幸之助　(1978). 『実践経営哲学』.　PHP研究者
    三隅二不二, & 田崎敏昭. (1965). 組織体におけるリーダーシップの構造-機能に関する実証的研究. 教育・社会心理学研究, 5(1), 1-13.
    山岸　俊男　(1990). 『社会的ジレンマの仕組み―「自分一人ぐらい」の心理の招くもの』.　サイエンス社
    山岸　俊男　(1999). 『安心社会から信頼社会へ―日本型システムの行方』.　中央公論新社
    山岸　俊男　(2002). 『心でっかちな日本人―集団主義文化という幻想』.　日本経済新聞社
    山崎　啓支　(2007). 『NLPの基本がわかる本』.　日本能力協会マネジメントセンター
    山崎　啓支　(2009). 『「人」や「チーム」を上手に動かす―NLPコミュニケーション術』.　明日香出版社

    - Chinese References

    陳俞金雪, 2015, 儒家安身立命之道研究, 明道大學碩士論文, 彰化, 台灣
    鄭伯壎・樊景立 華人組織的家長式領導：一項文化觀點的分析，本土心理學研究，第13卷第6期，頁127-180

    下載圖示
    QR CODE