研究生: |
林子毓 Lin Tzu-Yu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
幼兒在利社會情境的腦波探討 Exploration of Young Children’ s Brainwave in the Prosocial Context |
指導教授: | 鍾志從 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
人類發展與家庭學系 Department of Human Development and Family Studies |
論文出版年: | 2014 |
畢業學年度: | 102 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 94 |
中文關鍵詞: | 幼兒腦波 、利社會行為 、利社會情境 |
英文關鍵詞: | young children brainwave, procsocial behaviors, prosocial context |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:389 下載:9 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討幼兒在利社會情境時的腦波變化,以及教師對幼
兒平日觀察的利社會行為評定結果,同時,探求前兩者的關聯;也分
析不同背景變項下,幼兒在利社會情境的腦波以及教師評定的利社會
行為是否有顯著不同。採調查研究法,分別蒐集受試幼兒觀看利社會
影片時的腦波變化以及幼兒利社會行為教師評定結果。以立意取樣選
取臺北市三所國小附設幼兒園共 96 名 4 歲與 5 歲幼兒作為研究對象。
本研究所使用的測量工具有三:其一為「幼兒利社會行為教師評定量
表」;其二為「利社會情境影片─助人迴力鏢」;其三為「腦波儀」。
本研究的主要發現有三:
(一)腦波儀測得的幼兒利社會腦波反應與教師評定的幼兒利社會行為
沒有顯著相關。
(二) 受試幼兒利社會情境腦波不具有性別和年齡的差異,但是幼兒
利社會情境的分段γ波有性別和年齡的差異。四歲組的受試幼兒
在幫助情境、合作情境和分享情境的腦波反應高於五歲組的受試
幼兒。
(三) 教師評定的幼兒利社會行為具有年齡差異但不具有性別差異。在
教師觀察下,五歲組受試幼兒的利社會行為表現較四歲組受試幼兒
佳。
The purposes of this study were to explore young children’s brainwave changes in the prosocial context and to analyze the relationship between children’s brainwave changes and teachers’ observation about children’s procsocial behaviors. The subjects were 96 four-year-old and five-year-old children studying in three preschools in Taipei City selected by purposive sampling. There were three methods to collect data in this empirical research: one is questionnaire and the other is MindWave Mobile. Another is the questionnaire : the scale of young children’s prosocial behaviors, was assessed by teachers, and its aims to collect data of children’s procsocial behaviors. The other is the young children watched the video “Kindness Boomerang”, meanwhile the MindWave Mobile was used to collect theirs’ brainwave changes.
The main findings were as follows:
1. There is no significant correlation between young children’s brainwave and young children’s procsocial behaviors assessed by teachers.
2. There is no significant difference between young children’s brainwave and gender as well as young children’s brainwave and ages. However, there is a statistically significant difference between the means of Gamma wave (the four selected sections in the video-help, cooperation, share and comfort) and young children’s ages as well as genders. Four-year-old subjects’ Gamma waves in help, cooperation and share context are higher tthan five-year-old subjects.
3. There is a statistically significant difference between the young children’s procsocial behaviors assessed by teachers and ages; there is no significant difference between the young children’s procsocial behaviors assessed by teachers and gender. Five-year-old subjects’ procsocial behaviors above four-year-old subjects.
參考文獻
壹、中文部份
王福兰和任玮(2006)。幼儿在园亲社会行为的观察研究。学前教育
研究,7,57-59。
幼兒教育及照顧法(2013年5月22日)。
卢英俊和马芝妱(2008)。儿童期大脑成熟与行为发展的关连。幼儿
教育(教育科学版),7,64-69。
朱敬先(2004)。幼兒教育。臺北市:五南。
朱經明(2000年12月)。教育大辭書─評定法。【國家教育研究
院】。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1311735/?index=1
任先耀、凌文州、石家胜和刘宁(2010)。基于自然选择理论的动物
利他行为研究。安徽实验科学,38(4),1864-1868。
李法红、李树华、刘国杰、康宁和胡立辉(2008)。苹果树花叶的观
赏活动对人体脑波的影响。西北林学院学报,23(4),62-68。
李昭玲(1986)。學前兒童利社會行為的觀察研究─一個幼稚園大班
的觀察(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學:臺北市。
邢雯吉(2006)。玩具所属性对4~6岁幼儿分享行为的影响。幼儿教
育(教育科学版),10,36-40。
吳馥梅(2003)。腦活動的內幕。新竹市:凡異文化。
林三永(2011)。何謂腦波?科學人雜誌。取自
http://sa.ylib.com/MagCont.aspx?Unit=easylearn&id=1820
官少君(2006)。幼儿亲社会行为的教育措施。早期教育(教师版),
2006(7)。35。
林生傳(2005)。教育社會學。台北:巨流。
林芳菁(2010)。繪本故事講述與討論對幼兒利社會道德推理之影響。
台中教育大學學報:教育版,24(1),107-127。
林佩芬(2010)。以線性及非線性分析研究失智患者之腦波及心電圖
(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學:臺北市。
林威志(2005)。音樂刺激下腦波訊號分析(未出版之碩士論文)。臺
北醫學大學:臺北市。
林清湫(1999)。性別、年級、道德推理、同理心與國小學童利社會
行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義師範學院:嘉
義縣。
林惠雅(2008)。家庭互動型態、子女性別與幼兒社會能力之探討。
中華心理衛生學刊,21(4),351-377。
洪堯群(2000)。故事講述與討論對幼兒助人意願與利社會道德推理
之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學:臺北市。
郭靜姿、林慶波、張馨仁、周坤賢、曾琦芬、張玉佩和林燁虹
(2012)。高中數理能力優異班學生與普通班學生大腦結構及性
別差異之研究。教育科學研究期刊,57(2),25-64。
范曉芬(2013)。新北市國小學生參與服務學習與其利社會行為之相
關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學:臺北市。
马娥和丁继兰(2006)。3-6岁幼儿自由活动时间亲社会行为性别差异
研究。中华女子学院学报,18(5),69-72。
陳怡君和鍾志從(2012)。幼兒園中受忽視與受爭議幼兒的社會能力
探討。人類發展與家庭學報,14,68-94。
陳欣希和鍾志從(2011)。幼兒於樂高活動中兩人合作模式的探討。
人類發展與家庭學報,13,49-74。
陳威宏(2004)。腦波發生的基本原理與機轉。臺灣神經學雜誌,
13(4),203-210。
陳玲玟和郭李宗文(2008)。教師實行故事教學之研究─以幼兒利社會
行為為例。幼兒教育,291,11-36。
陈巍、丁峻和陈箐灵(2008)。社会脑研究二十年:回顾与展望。西
北师大学报(社会科学版),45(6),84-89。
許郡芳(2008)。國小高年級學童同儕關係與利社會行為之研究(未
出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學:臺中市。
許舒雅(2007)。國小學童父母親依附關係、利社會行為與友誼品質
之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學:臺北
市。
黃志成和王淑芬(1995)。幼兒的發展與輔導。臺北市:揚智文化。
黃志成、王淑芬和陳玉玟(2008)。幼兒發展。新北市:揚智。
黃國彥(2000年12月)。教育大辭書─觀察研究法。【國家教育研究
院】。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1315781/?index=50
黃意舒(2000年12月)。教育大辭書─幼兒觀察法。【國家教育研究
院】。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1303912/?index=17
黃意舒(2000年12月)。教育大辭書─利社會行為。【國家教育研究
院】。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1305462/
溫樺(2013)。以腦波儀測量手機遊戲之認知玩興(未出版之碩士論
文)。淡江大學:新北市。
張春興(1996)。教育心理學。臺北市:臺灣東華。
張春興(1999)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:臺灣東華。
張春興(2009)。現代心理學。臺北市:臺灣東華。
楊育(2002)。利他傾向之探討:演化論之檢驗(未出版之碩士論
文)。國立屏東師範學院:屏東縣。
楊惠婷(2004)。國小兒童同儕關係與自我概念、利社會行為之相關
研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院:屏東縣。
趙恕平和鍾志從(2010)。利社會學習對提升幼兒利社會行為效果之
研究。兒童與教育研究,6,1-40。
廖貴貞(2009)。培養孩子利社會行為。師友月刊,502,87-90。
潘秀雯(2006)。幼兒人際衝突中的角色取替能力與其社會計量地位
的關聯(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學:臺北市。
簡佑宏、陳建雄、黃室苗、張文德和江潤華(2005)。運用腦波測量
儀量測聽覺情緒反應。中原學報,33(1),123-131。
顏肇基、陳姣伶、張召雅、周育如和鍾志從(2005)。幼兒利他分享
之認知、情感與行為探討。家庭教育學報,7,30-54。
魏麗敏(2000年12月)。教育大辭書─社會計量技術。【國家教育研究
院】。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1306860/
鐘靜芬(2007)。普通幼兒對特殊幼兒表現利社會行為之研究(未出
版之碩士論文)。國立臺東大學:臺東縣。
蘇建文、林美珍、陳李綢、程小危、吳敏而、林惠雅、柯華葳、幸曼
玲和陳淑美(1995)。發展心理學。臺北市:心理。
貳、英文部份
Akira, S. (2004). Shintei me de mirukarada no mechanism.(透視人體醫
學地圖)。新北市:瑞昇文化。
Bar-Tal, D. (1976). Prosocial behavior: Theory and research. New York,
NY: Halsted Press.
Betti, V., Zappasodi, F., Rossini, P. M., Aglioti, S. M., & Tecchio, F. (2009).
Synchronous with your feelings: Sensorimotor γ band and empathy for
pain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(40), 12384-12392.
Blakeslee, S. (2007, February 6). A small part of the brain, and its
profound effects. The New York Times. Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/06/health/psychology/06brain.html?
pagewanted=all&_r=0
Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (2005). Developmentally appropriate
practicein early childhood programs.(幼教綠皮書─符合孩子身心
發展的專業幼教)。新竹市:和英。
Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-darwinian
rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of
the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 7, 773-789.
Chen, X., Sachdev, P. S., Wen, W., & Anstey, K. J. (2007). Sex differences
in regional gray matter in healthy individuals aged 44-48 years: A
voxel-basedmorphometric study. NeuroImage, 36, 691-699.
Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel — Now? The anterior insula and
human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59-70.
Decety, J., & Michalska, K. J. (2010). Neurodevelopmental changes in the
circuits underlying empathy and sympathy from childhood to
adulthood. Developmental Science, 13(6), 886-899.
Derntl, B., Finkelmeyer, A., Eickhoff, S., Kellermann, T., Falkenberg, D. I., Schneider, F., & Habel, U. (2010). Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities: Neural correlates and gender differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35, 67-82.
Dunbar, R. (2011). How many friends does one person need ?(150法
則:從演化角度解密人類的社會行為)。臺北市:商周出版。
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, A. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3 (6th ed., pp. 646-718). New York: Wiley.
Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1980). Altruism and assessment of empathy
in the preschool years. Child Development, 51, 552-557.
Eisenberg, N., Lennon, R., & Roth, K. (1983). Prosocial development: A
longitudinal study. Development Psychology, 19(6), 846-855.
Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in
children. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Eisenberg, N., & Sadovsky, A. (2004). Prosocial behavior, development of.
In C. Spielberger (Series Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology:
Vol. 3(pp.137-141). Boston, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Eisenberg, N., Shell, R., Pasternack, J., Lennon, R., Beller, R., & Mathy, R. M. (1987). Prosocial development in middle childhood: A longitudinal study. Development Psychology, 23(5), 712-718.
Fitzgerald, M. B. (2010). Pictures of the mind.(心智拼圖:從神經造影
看大腦的成長、學習與改變)。臺北市:遠流。
Fox, N. A., Rubin, K. H., Calkins, S. D., Marshall, T. R., Coplan, R. J.,
Porges, S.W., Long, J. M., & Stewart, S. (1995). Frontal activation
asymmetry and social competence at four years of age. Child
Development, 66, 1770-1784.
Gazzaniga , M. S. (2011). Human: The science behind what makes us
unique.(大腦、演化、人:是什麼關鍵,造就如此奇妙的人
類?)。臺北市:貓頭鷹出版。
Gottlieb, G. (2002). On the epigenetic evolution of species-specific
perception: The developmental manifold concept. Cognitive
Development, 17, 1287-1300.
Gottlieb, G. (2007). Probabilistic epigenesis. Developmental Science,
10(1), 1-11.
Greitemeyer, T., Agthe, M., Turner, R., & Gschwendtner, C. (2012). Acting prosocially reduces retaliation: Effects of prosocial video games on aggressive behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 235-242.
Greitemeyer, T., & Osswald, S. (2011). Playing prosocial video games increases the accessibility of prosocial thoughts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(2), 121-128.
Gur, R. C., Bockow, T., & Gur, R. E. (2010). Gender differences in the functional organization of the brain. In M. J. Legato (Eds.), Principles of gender-specific medicine (2E) (pp. 75-86). Waltham, Massachusetts: Academic Press.
Hay, D. F., Castle, J., Davies, L., Demetriou, H., & Stimson, C. A. (1999). Prosocial action in very early childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(6), 905-916.
Hein, G., & Singer, T. (2008). I feel how you feel but not always: The empathic brain and its modulation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 153-158.
Hein, G., & Singer, T. (2010). Neuroscience meets social psychology: An
interative approach to human empathy and prosocial behavior. In M.
Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and
behavior (pp. 149-167). Washington, DC: American Psychological.
Iacoboni, M. (2009). Mirroring people.(天生愛學樣:發現鏡像神經
元:從模仿、學習到同理,瞭解人我關係的腦際特派員)。臺北
市:遠流。
Jones, N. A., Field, T. F., & Davalos, M. (2000). Right frontal EEG
asymmetry and lack of empathy in preschool children of depressed
mothers. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 30(3), 189-204.
Jones, N. A., Field, T. F., Davalos, M., & Hart, S. (2004). Greater right
frontal EEG asymmetry and nonemphathic behavior are observed in
children prenatally exposed to cocaine. International Journal of
Neuroscience, 114, 459-480.
Jausovec, N., & Jausovec, K. (2010). Resting brain activity: Differences
between genders. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3918-3925.
Goto, K. (2010). 図解入門よくわかる最新「脳」の基本としく
み,(認識大腦的基本常識&構造)。新北市:楓書坊文化。
Kotulak, R. (1998). Inside the brain,(腦力大躍進)。臺北市:平安文
化。
Knafo, A., & Plomin, R. (2006). Prosocial behavior from early to middle childhood: Genetic and environmental influences on stability and change. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 771-786.
Knafo, A., Zahn-Waxler, C., Hulle, C. V., Robinson, J. L., & Rhee, S. H. (2008). The developmental orgins of disposition toward empathy: Genetic and environmental contributions. Emotion, 8(6), 737-752.
Knafo, A., & Israel, S. (2010). Genetic and environmental influences on
prosocial behavior. In M. Mikulincer& P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial
motives, emotions, and behavior (pp. 149-167). Washington, DC:
American Psychological AssociationPress.
Marshall, P. J., Bar-Haim, Y., & Fox, N. A. (2002). Development of EEG
from 5 months to 4 years of age. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113,
1199-1208.
Masten, C. L., Morelli, S. M., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2011). An fMRI
investigation of empathy for ‘social pain’ and subsequent prosocial
behavior. NeuroImage, 55, 381-388.
Mathur, V. A., Harada, T., Lipke, T., & Chiao, J.Y. (2010). Neural basis of
extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation. NeuroImage, 51,
1468-1475.
McAuliffe, K., & Hauser, M. (2010). Morality and evolution. In M. D.
Breed & J. Moore (Series Ed.), Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior: Vol.
3 (pp.483-488). Boston, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Moir, A., & Jessel, D. (2006). Brain Sex: The real difference between men
and women.(腦內乾坤:男女有別,其來有自)。臺北市:遠流。
Neurosky (n.d.). Body and mind. Quantified. Retrieved May 4, 2014, from
http://neurosky.com/
Nowak, M. A. (2012, July). Why we help: The evolution of cooperation.
Scientific American Magazine, 2012, 34-39.
Paulus, M., Kühn-Popp, N., Licata, M., Sodian, B., & Meinhardt, J. (2013).
Neural correlates of prosocial behavior in infancy: Different
neurophysiological mechanisms support the emergence of helping and
comforting. NeuroImage, 66, 522-530.
Rameson, L. T., Morelli, S. A., & Lieberman, M. D. (2011). The neural
correlates of empathy: Experience, automaticity, and prosocial
behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(1), 235-245.
Robinson, J. (2008). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In M. M. Haith & J.
B. Benson (Series Ed.), Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood
Development: Vol. 3. (pp. 441-450). Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
Roth-Hanania, R., Davidov, M., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2011). Empathy
development from 8 to 16 months: Early signs of concern for others.
Infant Behavior and Development, 34, 447-458.
Saleem, M., Anderson, C. A., & Gentile, D. A. (2012). Effects of prosocial , neutral, and violent video games on children’s helpful and hurtful behaviors. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 281-287.
Scarr, S., & McCarteny, k. (1983). How people make their own environments:Atheory of genotype→environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424-435.
Schmidt, L. A., Fox, N. A., Perez-Edgar, K., & Hamer, D. H. (2009).
Linking gene, brain, and behavior. Psychological Science, 20(7),
831-837.
Shaffer, D. R. (2009). Social and personality development. Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth.
Sherwood, L. (2008). Fundamentals of physiology: A human perspective
(3th ed).(基礎生理學)。臺北市:湯姆生。
Siegel, D. J. (2007). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain
interact to shape who we are.(人際關係與大腦的奧秘)。臺北市:洪葉文化。
Simpon, J. A., & Beckes, L. (2010). Evolutionary perspectives on prosocial
behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives,
emotions, and behavior (pp. 35-53). Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association Press.
Sprafkin, J. N., Liebert, R. M., & Poulos, R. W. (1975). Effects of a
prosocial televised example on children’s helping. Journal of
Experimental Child Psychology, 20, 119-126.
Stephani, C., Vaca, G. F., Maciunas, R., Koubeissi, M., & Luders, H. O.
(2010). Functional neuroanatomy of the insular lobe. Brain Struct
Funct, 216, 137-149. doi: 10.1007/s00429-010-0296-3
Stirling, J. (2003). Cortical functions.(大腦的皮質功能)。臺北市:五
南。
Svetlova, M., Nichols, S. R., & Brownell, C. A. (2010). Toddlers' prosocial
behavior: From instrumental to empathic to altruistic helping. Child
Development, 81(6), 1814-1827.
Tomarken, A. J., Davidson, R. J., Wheeler, R. E., & Doss, R. C. (1992).
Individual differences in anterior brain asymmetry and fundamental
dimensions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
62(4), 676-687.
Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Sympathy through
affective perspective taking and its relation to prosocial behavior in
toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 534-543.
Williamson, R. A., Donohue, M. R., & Tully, E. C. (2010). Learning how to help others: Two-year-olds’ social learning of a prosocial act. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 543-550.
Zahn-Waxler, C., Radke-Yarrow, M., Wagner, E., & Chapman, M. (1992). Developmentof concern for others. Development Psychology, 28(1), 126-136.