研究生: |
林彥伶 Yen-Ling Lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國中學生知覺體育專家與生手教師回饋對學習成就相關性之研究 A study of Relationship of Student’s Perception of Expert and Novice Teacher Feedback to Students’ Achievement in Junior High School Physical Education |
指導教授: |
闕月清
Keh, Nyit-Chin |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
體育學系 Department of Physical Education |
論文出版年: | 2008 |
畢業學年度: | 96 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 120 |
中文關鍵詞: | 學生知覺 、教師回饋行為 、學習成就 、專家教師 、生手教師 |
英文關鍵詞: | student's perception, teacher feedback behavior, learning achievement, expert teacher, novice teacher |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:220 下載:42 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究目的在探討國中學生知覺體育專家與生手教師回饋對學習成就的相關性。研究對象包括一位國中體育專家教師與一位體育生手教師,及任教八年級學生,共68名(專家教師33名、生手教師35名)。教學內容為排球發球與低手傳球兩個單元,共八節課。教學過程全程錄音錄影,採用Fishman 與 Tobey 教師回饋觀察系統工具來蒐集與分析教師回饋行為,以學生知覺教師回饋量表的調查,瞭解學生知覺教師回饋的差異。以相依樣本t檢定比較學生學習成就之差異,以皮爾遜積差相關,分析教師回饋與學習成就之相關,輔以學生知覺訪談,分析學生知覺的教師回饋行為是否有一致。研究結果顯示:(一)體育專家與生手教師在回饋對象與目的的行為類目有不同的表現;(二)體育專家教師以八節共提供510次的回饋總數與每分鐘1.41次的回饋頻率,高於體育生手教師的459次與1.28次;(三)學生學習成就方面,體育專家與生手教師的學生都有進步的表現,且部分回饋類目與學習成就達顯著相關;(四)學生知覺方面,體育生手教師學生知覺教師回饋情形高於體育專家教師學生(生手學生M=3.26、專家學生M=2.31);(五)練習試作成功率方面,體育專家教師學生表現高於體育生手教師學生(專家教師M=.61、生手教師M=.55)。本研究發現可提供師資培育機構、學校體育教師與相關研究人員,在體育課程設計、教學與學術研究之參考。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship of student’s perception of expert and novice teacher feedback to students’ achievement in junior high school physical education class. One junior high school physical education expert and a novice teacher, with 68 eighth grade students in their physical education classes (expert-33 students, novice-35 students) served as the participants of this study. Instruction took place during eight classes of volleyball serve and setting unit. Data were collected by videotaping and audiotaping. The systematic observation instrument used was Fishman and Tobey Teacher Feedback Observation System. A modified “Student Perception of Teacher’s Feedback” Scale was used to investigate the difference of student’s perception in teacher feedback. Dependent t-test was used to determine difference in students’ achievement. Pearson product moment correlation was used to analyze correlation of the teacher feedback and the learning achievement. Individual student’s perception interview was administrated to further understand the consistency of student perceived teacher feedback. Results indicated that: (1) The expert and novice teacher were different in intent and direction feedback categories. (2) The expert teacher provided 510 feedbacks in eight lessons at the rate of 1.41 per minute, which was higher than the novice teacher with a total of 459 times at 1.28 per minute. (3) In student’s achievement, the expert and novice teacher’s students showed improvement in performance, and some feedback categories were significantly correlated with student achievement. (4) In student’s perception, students of the novice teacher scored higher in perceived teacher feedback than the expert teacher’s (the novice teacher’s students M=3.26, the expert teacher’s students M=2.31). (5) In successful rate of practice trial, the expert teacher’s students showed higher performance than novice teacher’s (the expert teacher’s students M=.61, the novice teacher’s student M=.55). These findings have implications for teacher education and physical education teachers, as well as provide insights for researchers.
中文部份
李佩芬(2003)。台灣地區大學院校舞蹈系學生思考風格及其影響因素之研
究─以台灣藝術大學為例。未出版碩士論文,中國文化大學,臺北市。
林逸松(2002)。體育專家教師回饋之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師
範大學,臺北市。
林逸松、闕月清(2001)。小學體育教學中學生思考初探。國際高等教育體
育學術研討會論文集(頁181-184)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
林進財(1999)。教學研究與發展。臺北市:五南。
林俊賢(2007)。教師回饋知覺、目標導向與國中生體育課參與動機之關連。
未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
吳淑靜(2004)。國小體育教師師生互動行為及教學決定因素之研究。未出
版碩士論文,國立新竹師範學院,新竹市。
吳德城(2001)。國小體育專家教師教學行為分析。未出版碩士論文,國立
臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
施登堯(1998)。自動口語提示對動作技能學習效果之研究。未出版碩士論
文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
黃秋芳、闕月清(2001)。體育教師回饋與學習成就。中華民國大專院校九
十一年度體育學術研討會專刊,77-85。
黃淑芬(2002)。幼兒對身體活動教學知覺之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺
灣師範大學,臺北市。
黃秋芳(2003)。體育專家教師與生手教師回饋行為與教學思考之比較研
究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
黃泰源(2005)。國小體育專教師與生手教師教學行為及教學反省之比較研
究。未出版碩士論文,國立體育學院,桃園縣。
孫志麟(1992)。生手如何成為專家呢?教師專業表現之探討。師友月刊,
3,21-25。
夏淑琴(1999)。體育專家教師與生手教師之比較研究-以教師回饋為例。
未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
游恆山(1990)。心理學。臺北市:五南。
路君約等(1987)。心理學。臺北市:中國行為科學社。
張春秀(2000)。體育教學情境中的學生思考研究。臺北市:師大書苑。
張春興(1987)。心理學。臺北市:東華。
張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。
張春興(1994)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。
張春興(1995)。教育心理學-認知取向。臺北市:遠流。
張景媛(1997)。如何讓新手老師成為專家教師。輔導與測驗,145,
3008-3010。
蔡易峻(1998)。專家與生手體育教師教學行為之比較。未出版碩士論文,
國立體育學院,桃園縣。
翰林出版事業股份有限公司(2007)。國民中學健康與體育課本。臺南市:
作者。
簡紅珠(1992)。教學研究的主要派典及其啟示之探析。高雄:復文。
闕月清(2000)。教師回饋與體育教學。運動心理學研究委員會89學年年
度專書(頁103-112)。臺北市:中華民國體育學會。
闕月清(2000)。刺激回憶訪談法。體育教學研究方法(頁221-236)。臺北
市:國立台灣師範大學體育研究與發展中心。
鐘敏華(1995)。國中體育教師回饋與學生學習成就之相關研究。未出版碩
士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
外文部分
Berliner, D. C. (1988). The development of expertise in
pedagogy. Washington, D. C.: American Association of
College for Teacher Education. (Originally presented as
the Charles W. Hunt Memorial lecture at the meetings of
the American Association of College for Teacher
Education, New Orleans, LA., February 17, 1988).
Bilodeau, E. A., & Bilodeau, I. M. (1961). Variation of
temporal intervals among critical events in five
studies of knowledge of result. Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 55, 603-612.
Brandt, R. S. (1986). On the expert teacher: A conversation
with David Berliner. Educational Leadership, 44(2), 4-
9.
Chen, D. D. (2001). Trends in Augmented Feedback Research
and Tips for the Practitioner. Journal of Physical
Education, Recreation, & Dance, 72(1), 32-36.
De Knop, P. (1986). Relationship of Specified instructional
teacher behavior to student gain on tennis. Journal of
teaching in physical education, 5, 71-78.
Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher
effectiveness. Review of Research in Education, 5, 163-
198.
Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. (1974). The study of teaching.
New York: Holt, Reinhart & Wintson.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching elementary students
through their individual learning styles-practical
approaches for grades 3-6. Boston, MA : Simon &
Schuster.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1994). Teaching young children
through their individual learning styles-practical
approaches for grades K-2. Boston, MA : Simon &
Schuster.
Engan, T. (1983). The interaction of knowledge of results
as a response outcome and goal information in motor
skill acquisition. Unpublished master’s thesis,
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
Eghan, T. (1988). The relation of teacher feedback to
student achievement in learning selected tennis skills.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State
University, Baton Rouge, LA.
Fishman, S., & Tobey, C. (1978). Augmented feedback. In
W.G. Anderson & G. Barrette (Eds.). What’s going on in
gym: Descriptive studies of physical education class.
Motor Skill: Theory into practice. (Monograph 1)
Gentile, A. M. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition
with application to teaching. Quest, 17, 3-23.
Godbout, P., Brunelle, J., & Tousignant, M. (1987). Who
benefits from passing through the program? In G. T.
Barrette R. S. Feingold, C. R. Rees, & M. Pieron
(Eds.). Myths models and methods in sport pedagogy,
(pp. 183-197). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Graham, K. C. (1987). A description of academic work and
student performance during a middle school
volleyball unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical
Education, 7, 22-37.
Griffey, D. C., & Housner, L. D. (1991). Differences
between experienced and inexperienced teachers
planning decisions, interactions, student
engagement and instructional climate. Research
Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62 (2), 196-204.
Gushart, J. L., & Kelly, L. W. (1993). Teachers’
instructional variables in volleyball and students’
improvement in motor skill. Perceptual and Motor
Skills, 76, 1015-1024.
Gushart, J. L., Kelly, I. M., & Rink, J. E. (1997). The
validity of the qualitative measure of teacher
performance scale as measure of teacher effectiveness.
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 196-210.
Hartman, M. D. (1990). The effect of an observational
training program on feedback behaviors of persevere
physical educators in clinical adapted physical
education setting. Unpublished dissertation, Oklahoma
State University.
Hebert, E., & Landin, D. K. (1994). Effects of a learning
model and augmented feedback on tennis skill
acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and
Sport, 65, (3), 250-257.
Keh, N. C., Lee, A. M., & Magill, R. A. (1989, August).
Differential characteristics of teacher feedback for
low-and high-skilled students in the acquisition of
badminton skill. In C. K. Giam, K. K. Chook, & K. C.
Teh (Eds.), Proceeding of the 7th World Congress in
Sport Psychology pp. 101-102). Singapore Sports Council.
Keh, N. C. (1992). Students’ use of teacher feedback
during badminton instruction. Unpublished dissertation,
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
Koka, A., & Hein, V. (2005). The effect perceived teacher
feedback on intrinsic motivation in physical
education. International Journal of Sport Psychology,
36, 91-106.
Lee, A. M. (1997). Contributions of research on student
thinking in physical education. Journal of Teaching in
Physical Education, 16, 262-277.
Lee, M. A., Keh, N. C., & Magill, R. A. (1993).
Instructional effects of teacher feedback in physical
education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,
12, 228-243.
Magill, R. A. (1986). Knowledge of Results and Skill
Acquisition. Dubuque, Iowa: W.C. Brown.
Magill, R. A. (1993). Augmented feedback in skill
acquisition. In R. N. Signer, M. Murphey, & L. K.
Tennant (Eds.), Handbook on research in sport
Psychology (pp.193-212). New York: Macmillan.
Mars, H., Darst, P. W., Vogler, E. W., & Cusimano, B.
(1995). Novice expert physical education teachers:
maybe they think and decide different.... but do they
behave differently? Journal of Teaching in Physical
Education, 14, 340-347.
Martinek, T. J. (1988). Confirmation of a teacher
expectancy model: Student perception and causal
attributions of teaching behaviors. Research Quarterly
for Exercise and Sport, 59, 118-126.
Metzler, M. (1986). Using systematic analysis to promote
teaching skills in physical education, Journal of
Teacher Education, 37, 29-33.
Paese, P. C. (1987). Specific teacher feedback’s effect on
academic learning time and on a novel motor skill. In
G. T. Barrette R. S. Feingold, C. R. Rees, & M. Pieron
(Eds.). Myths models and methods in sport pedagogy,
(pp. 207-213). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Pellett, T. L., Henschel-Pellett, H. A., & Harrison, J.
M. (1994). Feedback effects: Field-based findings.
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14, 75-77.
Pellett, T. L., & Harrison, J. M. (1995). The influence of
a teacher’s specific, congruent, and corrective
feedback on female junior high school students’
immediate volleyball practice success. Journal of
Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 53-63.
Place, J. H., & Locke, L. F. (1986). Research on teaching
physical education: New knowledge and caution optimism.
Journal of Teaching Education, 37, 24-28.
Pieron, M. (1982). Effectiveness of teaching a psychomotor
task: Study in a micro-teaching setting. In M. Pieron,
& J. Cheffers (Eds.). Studying the Teaching in Physical
Education (pp.61-68). Liege, Belgium: AIESEP
Rikard, G. L. (1991). The short term relationship of
feedback and student practice. Journal of Teaching in
Physical Education, 10, 175-185.
Rikard, G. L. (1992). The relationship of teacher’s task
refinement and feedback to students’ practice success.
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 349-357.
Rink, J. E. (1985). Teaching physical education for
learning. St. Louis: Time Mirror/Mosby.
Salter, W. B., & Graham, G. (1985). The effects of three
disparate instructional approaches on skill attempts
and student learning in an experimental teaching unit.
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 4, 212-218.
Samoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. W. (1984).
Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and
critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 225-
260.
Santina, B., Solmon, M. A., Cothran, D. J., Loftus, S. J.,
& Davidson, K. S. (1998). Patriarchal consciousness:
Middle school students’ and teachers’perspectives of
motivational practices. Sport, Education & Society, 3,
181-200.
Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor
skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A
Behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human
Kinetics.
Sharpe, T. & Hawkins, A. (1992). Study Ⅲ expert and novice
elementary specialists: a comparative analysis.
Journal of teaching in physical education, 12, 55-75.
Siedentop, D. (1982). Teaching research: The
interventionist view. Journal of Teaching in Physical
Education, 1, 3-14.
Siedentop, D. (1983). Developing teaching skills in
physical education (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
Sidentop, D. (1991). Developing teaching skill in physical
education (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Silverman, S. (1991). Research on teaching in physical
education. Research on Quarterly for Exercise and
Sport, 62, 352-364.
Silverman, S., Tyason, L. A., & Krampitz, J. (1992).
Teacher feedback and achievement in physical education:
Interaction with student practice. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 8, 333-344.
Silverman, S., & Skonie, R. (1997). Research on teaching in
physical education: An analysis of published research.
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 300-311.
Solmon, M. A., & Carter, J. O. (1995). Kindergarten and
first-grade students’perceptions of physical education
in one teachers’ classes. The Elementary School
Journal, 95, 354-365.
Solmon, M. A., & Lee, A. M. (1991). A contrast of planning
behaviors between expert and novice adapted physical
education teachers. Adapted Physical Activity
Quarterly, 8, 115-127.
Solmon, M. A., & Lee, A. M. (1996). Entry characteristics,
practice variables, and cognition: Student mediation of
instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,
15, 136-150.
Tan, S. K. S. (1996). Differences between experienced
inexperienced physical education teachers’ augmented
feedback and interactive teaching decision. Journal of
Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 151-170.
Tjeerdsma, B. L. (1997). A Comparison of teacher and
student perspectives of tasks and feedback. Journal of
Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 388-400.
Weinstein, C. E., & Middlestat, S. E. (1979). Student
perceptions of teacher interactions with male high and
low achievers. Journal of Teaching in Physical
Education, 71, 421-461.
Wittrock, M. C.(1986). Students’ thought processes.
Handbook of research on teaching(3rd ed.). New York:
Macmillan.
Xiang, P., & Lee, A. M. (1998). The development of self-
perceptions of ability and achievement goals and their
relation in physical education. Research Quarterly for
Exercise and Sport, 69, 231-241.
Yerg, B. J. (1981). The impact of selected presage and
process behaviors on the refinement of a motor skill.
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 1(1),38-46.
Yerg, B. J., & Twardy, B. (1982). Relationship of a
specified instructional teacher behaviors to pupil gain
on a motor skill task. In M. Pieron, & J. Cheffers
(Eds.). Studying the Teaching in Physical Education
(pp.61-68). Liege, Belgium: AIESEP