研究生: |
賴怡汝 Lai, Yi-Ju |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
歷史走入心間:情意教育課程設計對啟聰學校國中生歷史學習影響之行動研究 As Histories Enter into the Heart: An Action Research on the Effects of the Curriculum Design of Affective Education on Junior High School Students of Schools for the Hearing Impaired |
指導教授: |
劉秀丹
Liu, Hsiu-Tan |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2019 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 70 |
中文關鍵詞: | 情意教育 、課程設計 、啟聰學校學生 、歷史學習 、行動研究 |
英文關鍵詞: | affective education, curriculum designs, students of the schools for the hearing impaired, history learning, action research |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201901119 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:177 下載:19 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討情意教育課程設計對啟聰學校國中生歷史學習之影響,採用行動研究的方式,並嘗試跳脫傳統章節名稱,書寫一篇滿懷情意的成長省思歷程。
課程設計分為兩階段,第一階段以社會科文本為基礎,融入情意教育,拉近學生與歷史的距離;第二階段則以歷史人物為楷模,讓學生發現自身性格與歷史人物的異同,發揮優點、省視不足,希冀能對其價值觀與人生觀的建立有所助益。本研究發現,適合設計為情意教育課程的素材有三項:一、從古沿用至今的發明、制度、觀念等,貼近生活經驗,學生更能產生共鳴,並體會現今習以為常的事物中,也有古人的心血結晶。二、可教導學生透過「神入」的方式,試著理解歷史人物做出重大決定當下的時空背景,以及決策背後的用意與苦衷。三、若歷史人物與學生有相似的人格特質,學生會覺得十分親切;歷史人物的處世智慧,亦是楷模學習的良好範例,幫助學生自省與成長。
一學年的研究中,以合作學習、角色扮演、古今對話與楷模學習等方法設計與實施課程,可發現學生不再只是被動聽講,而能主動學習;藉由課堂討論,也能讓學生靜心思考,產生更深刻、具創造力的想法。此外,貼近生活經驗、富有趣味性的課程,使學生樂於學習、減少行為問題。
The subject of the research presented in this paper is to explore the effects of affective education curriculum designs on junior high school students in schools for the hearing impaired. In conducting this research, the “action research” method was adopted, foregoing traditional chapter names with a view to conveying a growing reflection process which is full of affection.
The curriculum design is divided into two stages. The first stage is based on social science texts, integrating it into the affective education in order to bring students closer to the history. The second stage is taking historical figures as role models for students; in this stage the students can consider the ways in which their personalities are similar or different from the personalities of historical figures. This provides the students a way to maximize their advantages and reflect upon their disadvantages. Through these two stages, I hope to help students build up their values and outlook on life. In this research, I found that there are three materials which are suitable for designing affective education. First, the materials may include the inventions, systems, concepts, and so on, which have been used from ancient time to today. This way is closer to students’ life experiences. Students are more likely to resonate with and enter into the experience of things which we typically use today. These things contain the hard works of the ancients. Second, the materials may include the major decisions made by ancient people. This enables students to try to understand the backgrounds, intentions, and difficulties behind the decisions made through empathy. Third, if historical figures and students have similar personalities, this will cause the students to feel close to them. The wisdom of historical figures provides excellent examples of modeling learning, which could aid students’ self-reflection and growth.
Through one academic year of research, by adopting various teaching methods—including cooperative learning, role-play, dialogue between the past and the present, and modelling learning—to design and implement the curriculum, we found that students are not merely listening passively, but also learning actively. By carrying out in-class discussions, students can quietly think and produce deeper, and more creative ideas. In addition, a curriculum which is closer to human life experiences and full of fun could make learning more enjoyable for the students and reduce behavior problems.
中文部分
于珊等(2017):國民中學社會課本第三冊。臺南:翰林出版事業股份有限公司。
于珊等(2018):國民中學社會課本第五冊。臺南:翰林出版事業股份有限公司。
王惠俐(2010):自然手語融入多媒體輔助教學對國中聽障學生閱讀理解學習成效之研究(未出版)。國立臺南大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,臺南。
王曉玲(2011):學生如何看歷史?──以十四歲中學生為例。清華歷史教學,21,95-116。
吳武典(1998):情意智能的理論與實務。發表於中華民國資優教育學會舉辦之「多元智能與成功智能理論」研討會論文集,臺北:中華民國資優教育學會。
呂世浩(2014):秦始皇︰一場歷史的思辨之旅。臺北:平安文化。
宋家復(譯)(2016):像史家一般閱讀:在課堂裡教歷史閱讀素養(Sam Wineburg, Daisy Martin, Chauncey Monte-San著:Reading Like a Historian: Teaching Literacy in Middle and High School History Classrooms)。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。(原著出版於2012)
李姿德、林芃娟(2003):交互教學法對增進聽覺障礙學生閱讀理解能力之研究。特殊教育與復健學報,11,127-152。
李涵鈺、宋家復(2016):像史家一般閱讀──在中學歷史課堂裡教讀寫素養。教科書研究,9(2),165-184。
身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法(2013):中華民國一百零二年九月二日教育部臺教學(四)字第 1020125519B號令修正發布第8~14條條文;並增訂第7-1條條文。
林孟彥(2017):九年級「神入」歷史教學之實踐研究(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,臺北。
林家楠(2017):運用行動載具於聽覺障礙中學生學習地理閱讀之行動研究(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,臺北。
林慈淑(2010):歷史,要教什麼?英、美歷史教育的爭議。臺北:學生書局。
林寶貴、黃玉枝(1997):聽障學生國語文能力及錯誤類型之分析。教育研究學刊,15,109-130。
張元(2012):歷史課堂教學的設計思考。清華歷史教學,22,7-20。
張春興(1990):從情緒發展理論的演變論情意教育。教育心理學報,23,1-12。
郭如育(2011):國中生情意教育的重要性及其課程設計原則。中等教育,62(2),138-154。
陳豐祥(2009):新修訂布魯姆認知領域目標的理論內涵及其在歷史教學上的應用。歷史教育,14,1-53。
教育部(2018):十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校─社會領域。臺北:教育部。
黃春木(2015):為什麼要教/學歷史──關於歷史教育目的之批判。清華歷史教學,24,7-14。
劉秀丹(2006):啟聰學校學生文法手語、自然手語及書面語故事理解能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,30,75-94。
劉俊榮、劉秀丹(2015):聽損兒童平衡取向繪本閱讀教學法之成效。障礙者理解半年刊,14(1),113-133。
劉慧蘭(2012):如何在歷史課培養人文精神:一個國中老師的實踐歷程。清華歷史教學,22,87-102。
蔡清田(2011):行動研究的理論與實踐。國家文官學院T&D飛訊,118,1-20。
錡寶香(2011):聽力損失幼童的早期讀寫萌發與支持。國小特殊教育,52,1-14。
蕭憶梅(2009):理解學生歷史思維的重要性。歷史教育,14,87-102。
英文部分
El Emary, I. M. M. & Hussein, K. Q. (2012). Analyzing the various aspects of e-learning modules for the hearing impaired students. International Journal of Academic Research, 4(3), 122-130.
Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 41(4), 47-56.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.
Wineburg, S., & Martin, D. (2009). Tampering with history: Adapting primary sources for struggling readers. Social Education, 73(5), 212-216.