研究生: |
張瓊方 Chiung- Fang Chang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
多媒體教學對在職教師數位教材製作成效之探討 The Effects of Multimedia Learning on Teachers' e-Learning Courseware Productions |
指導教授: | 陳明溥 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
資訊教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education |
論文出版年: | 2005 |
畢業學年度: | 93 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 104 |
中文關鍵詞: | 電腦先備知識 、多媒體教學 、演練範例 、數位教材 |
英文關鍵詞: | prior knowledge of computer, multimedia learning, worked-example, e-Learning courseware productions |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:328 下載:29 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討多媒體學習教學與電腦先備知識對在職教師數位教材製作成效之影響。研究樣本為66位參加北部某縣市教師研習之在職教師,依照參加研習課程期別分派為圖文學習支持組與多媒體學習支持組;而教師所具備之電腦先備知識則分為高先備知識組與低先備知識組。
研究結果發現:(1)在教學設計學習成效上,多媒體教學╳電腦先備知識交互作用未達顯著,多媒體學習組顯著優於圖文學習組;高先備知識組顯著優於低先備知識組。(2)在工具軟體運用學習成效上,多媒體教學╳電腦先備知識交互作用未達顯著,多媒體學習組與圖文學習組無顯著差異;而高先備知識組顯著優於低先備知識組。(3)在學習態度方面,學習者對自身學習成效的滿意度、教材工具輔助特性幫助度、及工具軟體使用的熟練度都具有正向的學習態度。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of type of multimedia learning on teachers’ learning performance and attitudes in e-Learning courseware productions. Participants who joined the e-Learning training program were assigned into two experiment groups: the paper-learning group and the multimedia-learning group, and learners were identified as high prior knowledge of computer and low prior knowledge of computer.
The result showed that, on the performance of instructional design, interactive effect of multimedia learning and prior knowledge of computer was not significant. In terms of multimedia learning, multimedia-learning group outperformed the paper- learning group. In terms of prior knowledge of computer, the high prior knowledge outperformed the low prior knowledge. On the performance of tool application, the interactive effect of multimedia learning and prior knowledge of computer was not significant. In terms of multimedia learning, there was no significant difference between two groups. In terms of prior knowledge of computer, the high prior knowledge outperformed the low prior knowledge. Finally, on the analysis of learners’ attitudes, learners of two groups had highly positive attitude toward the learning activities.
王健華(2003)。從數位學習談國內教育科技的發展。教育研究月刊,5-30。
李雪莉(2001)。 教師運用資訊網路能力調查。天下雜誌2000年教育特刊,64-102。
吳聲毅(2004)。使用免費軟體製作數位教材之經驗分享。中等教育,55(4),55-63。
林敏慧(2001)。網路教學與傳統教學之差異與融合分析,GCCCE2001研討會,中壢。
徐新逸(2003)。學習推動資訊容入教學的實施策略探究。教學科技與媒體,64,68-84。
教育部 (2001): 中小學資訊教育總藍圖。台北:教育部。Retrieved November 28, 2004, from the World Wide Web: http://140.111.1.192/moecc/information/itpolicy/itprojects/itmasterplan.htm。
陳年興(1997)。全球資訊網上Web Title之製作。遠距教學,2,12-21。
陳明溥(2000)。認知負載對網路化學習之影響,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,計畫編號: NSC88-2520-S-003-005 ,台北。
陳麗如、何榮桂(1997)。Web-Title 之使用者介面設計。資訊與教育,64,21-64。
張雅芳(2001)。資訊科技融入國中英語教學之個案研究。教育研究資訊雙月刊,9(5),129-148。
張春興 (1998):教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:臺灣東華書局。
Ainsworth, S., & Th Loizou, A. (2004). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669-681.
Alessi, S. M. & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Method and Development. (3rd ed.) Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Atkinson,R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning form examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181-214.
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
Baggett, P. (1989). Understanding visual and verbal messages. In H. Mandl & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition form text and pictures (pp.101-124). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Baggett, P., & Ehrenfeucht, A. (1983). Encoding and retaining information in the visuals and verbals of an educational movie. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 31, 23-32.
Bagui, S. (1998). Reasons for increased learning using multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(1), 3-18.
Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P. L., & Brown, A. L. (1995). Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 221-252.
Bitner, N. & Bitner, J.(2002). Integrating technology into the classroom: Eight keys to success. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 95-100.
Calfee, R. (1981). Cognitive psychology and educational practice. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (vol. 9, pp. 3- 73). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Carroll, W. M. (1994). Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 360-367.
Catrambone, R. (1994a). The effects of labels in example on problem solving transfer. In A.Ram, & K. Eiselt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 159-164). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Catrambone, R. (1994b). Improving examples to improve transfer to novel problems. Memory & Cognition, 22, 606-615.
Catrambone, R. (1995a). Aiding subgoal learning: Effects on transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 5-17.
Catrambone, R. (1996). Generalizing solution procedures leaned from examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1020-1031.
Catrambone, R. (1998). The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 355-376.
Catrambone, R. & Holyoak, K., J. (1990). Learning and subgoals and methods for solving probability problems. Memory and Cognition, 18, 593-603.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 233-246.
Chi, M. T., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
Chi, M. T., & VanLehn, K. A. (1991). The content of physics self-explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 69-106.
Choi –kon, S. S. (2000). A problem-solving model of quadratic min values using computer. Journal of Instructional Media, 27(1), 73-82.
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149-210.
Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347-362.
Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., & Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments : Effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 428-434.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction. (2rd ed.) Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Dwyer, D. C. (1996). The imperative to change our school. In C. Fisher, D. C. Dwyer, & K. Yocam (Eds.), Education and technology: Reflections on computing in classrooms (pp. 15-33). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
Glaser, R. (1976). Components of a psychology of instruction: Toward a science of design. Review of Educational Research, 46, 1-24.
Grabe, M. (1986). Attentional processes in education. In G.D. Phye & T. Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning. Orlando: Academic Press.
Harden, R. M., & Laidlaw, J. M. (1996). Task-based learning: An educational strategy for undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing medical education, part 1. Medical Teacher, 18, 7-13.
Hord, S. M., Rutherford, W. L., Huling-Austin, L., & Hall, G. E. (1987). Taking charge of change. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Hummel, H. G. K., Paas, F., & Koper, E. J. R. (2004). Cueing for transfer in multimedia programs: process worksheets vs. worked-out examples. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 20, 387-397.
Iding, M. (2000). Is seeing believing? Features of effective multimedia for learning science. International Journal of Instructional Media, 2000, 27(4), 403-415.
Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L. & Wilson, B. G. (2000). Learning with technology: a constructivist perspective. New Jersey: Practice Hall.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-372.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-371.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 126-136.
Klatzky, R. L. (1980). Human memory: Structures and process (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.
Jo, M. (1996). Computer use in Korean schools: Instruction and administration. Computer & Education, 26(4), 197-205.
Leahy, W., Chanlder, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). When auditory presentations should and should not be a component of Multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 401-418.
Mann, B., Newhouse, P., Pagram, J., Campbell, A., & Schulz, H. (2002). A comparison of temporal speech and text cueing in educational multimedia. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 296-308.
Mayer, R. E. (1989a). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59, 43-64.
Mayer, R. E. (1999c). The promise of educational psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/ Merrill.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R. (2002) Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 87-99.
Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Mayer, R. E. & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 358-368.
Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia- supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 17(3), 215-248.
Mousavi, S., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319-334.
Mwangi, W., & Sweller, J. (1998). Learning to solve compare word problems: The effect of example format and generating self-explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 173-199.
Najjar, L. J. (1996). Multimedia information and learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and hypermedia, 5(2), 129-150.
Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriennboer, J. J. G. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 79, 419-430.
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriennboer, J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122-133.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Pea, R. D. (1983). Logo programming and problem solving. (Technical Report No. 12).New York: Bank Street College, Center for Children and Technology.
Peterson, L.R., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193-198.
Pirolli, P. (1991). Effects of examples and their explanations in a lesson on recursion: A production system analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 207-259.
Ramadhan, H. A. (2000). Programming by discovery. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 83-93.
Recker, M. M., & Priolli, P. (1995). Modeling individual differences in students’ learning strategies. The Journal of the Learning Science, 4, 1-38.
Reed, S. K. (1993). A schema based theory of transfer. In D. K. Detterman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 39-67). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Reed, S. K., & Bolstad, C. A. (1991). Use of examples and procedures in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, cognition, and instruction, 17, 753-766.
Renkl, A. (1997b). Learning form worked-out examples: A study on individual difference. Cognitive Science, 21, 1-29.
Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition form examples study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 15-22.
Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 90-108.
Rieber, L. P. (1990a). Using computer animated graphics in science instruction with children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 135-140.
Rieber, L. (1997). Animation as a distracter to learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23(1), 53-57.
Roos, B. H. (1989). Remindings in learning and instruction. In S. Vosnaiadou & A. Rotony (Eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 438-469). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning Theories: An educational perspectvie . NJ: Prentice- Hall.
Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411-436.
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L., & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy- induced misconceptions in advance knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou, & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 498-531). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12,185-233.
Sweller, J., & Copper, G. A. (1985). The use of examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59-89.
Tabbers, H. K., Martens, R. L., & Van Merroenboer, J. J. G. (2004). British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 71-81.
Tarmizi, R. A. & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424-436.
Trafton, J. G., & Reiser, B. J. (1993). The contributions of studying examples and solving problems to skill acquisition. In M. Polson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1017-1022). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381-403). NewYork: Academic Press.
VanLehn, K., & Jones, R. M. (1993a). Better learners use analogical problem solving sparingly. In P. E. Utgoff (Ed.), Machine learning: Proceedings of the tenth Annual Conference (pp. 338-345). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
VanLehn, K., & Jones, R. M. (1993b). What mediates the self-explanation effect? Knowledge gaps, schemas or analogies? In M. Polson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1034-1039). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ward, M., & Sweller, J. (1990). Structuring effective worked examples. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 1-39.
Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative process of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376.
Zanconi, M., Moroni, N., Senas, P. (1995). An educational project in computer science for primary and high school. SIGCSE Bulletin, 27(3), 27-33.
Zhu, X.,& Simon, H. A. (1987). Learning mathematics form examples and by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 137-166.