簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳昭宇
Chen, Chao-Yu
論文名稱: 探討BBL取向體育教學成效及其對教師實務知識的影響
A Study of the Effects of PE Teaching on Brain-Based Learning and Its Influence on Teacher’s Practical Knowledge
指導教授: 林靜萍
Lin, Ching-Ping
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 299
中文關鍵詞: 以腦為基礎的學習與腦相容的課程與教學社會腦運動教育模式教師實務知識
英文關鍵詞: brain-based learning, brain-compatible curriculum and teaching, social brain, sport education model, teacher’s practical knowledge
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:235下載:33
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討BBL取向體育教學成效及其對教師實務知識的影響。本研究係以量為主、質為輔的研究取向,採用「多層次取向研究設計」。研究參與教師以立意取樣選取兩個班作為研究參與對象,一個班為實驗組,實施16節BBL取向體育教學;另一個班為控制組,實施16節傳統體育教學。實驗組與控制組在教學前、後均實施個人概念構圖、學習動機及問題解決能力等測驗,以瞭解學生知識理解、學習動機、問題解決的表現,並透過訪談法、課室觀察、文件分析等方法蒐集質性資料,作為量化資料的解釋與驗證。在資料分析方面,量化資料主要是透過相依樣本t考驗、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子共變數分析處理;質性資料則是以持續比較法(constant comparison method)進行資料的分析與歸納。研究結果發現:實驗組在知識理解與學習動機均優於控制組,實驗組的知識理解、學習動機以及問題解決能力在教學後均有顯著進步,而且BBL取向體育教學對實驗參與教師實務知識有明顯的影響。根據前述結果提出研究結論:
    一、教師以團隊小組的學習型態建立同學間相互依賴的學習群體,師生間的對話與討論激發學生的批判思考,在放鬆且不具威脅的狀態下,以實際行動架構新的「學習地圖」,拓展自然知識的範疇,提升對籃球相關知識的深層理解。
    二、教師以遊戲的方式引導學生學習基本動作,並規劃多元的學習活動,維持挑戰與舒適的動態張力,再以多媒體教學營造新奇且歡愉的學習氣氛,感受「動態的完形」,並發展「學習共同體」來培養反省、深思熟慮以及再組織的能力。
    三、規劃真實且新奇的教材內容吸引學生對教學主題的專注力與鑑賞力,經由成員的相互合作營造「社會腦」的學習歷程,並營造友善且支持性的學習氣氛,藉由好奇與期待鼓勵學生思考並開展解決問題的能力,促進主動學習的意願。
    四、教師在自我知識、教學知識、班級經營、教育情境等四方面均覺知到BBL取向體育教學的魅力與獨特性。在未來班級經營方面會多使用小組競賽方式,創造彼此學習的機會;在體育教學方面則會適時運用BBL取向體育教學方法,營造放鬆的警戒、和諧的沉浸、主動的參與的教學情境。
    根據上述研究結論,本研究針對體育教學與未來研究提出幾點具體建議:
    一、體育教學方面
    (一)營造以腦為基礎的學習情境以增進學生學習成效。
    (二)以「探索」取代「簡化」;以「授權」取代「限制」。
    (三)形塑「學習共同體」開啟「體育教學」的另一扇窗。
    二、未來研究方面
    (一)以協同教學創造更有效的教學成效。
    (二)進行後續的追蹤研究以釐清BBL教學效果的延續性。
    (三)以科技整合來探索BBL取向體育教學的證據。

    The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of PE teaching on Brain-Based Learning and its influence on teacher’s practical knowledge. The study was based on the designs with multilevel use of approaches. The participants in the study were one PE teacher and two classes which are chosen by purposively sampling. Experimental group was give BBL PE teaching, and control group was given PE traditional teaching. Both groups were given Personal Concept Mapping, Learning Motivation test, and test of Problem Solving Ability in Basketball for pre and post-test to examine the effects of different PE teaching. This study was taken qualitative research approach such as semi-structured interview, observation, and document analysis will be adopted, and quantitative data will be conducted with Independent-sample t-test, paired-sample t-test, analysis of covariance, and descriptive analysis to collect and analyze data. The followings were the results: experimental group was achieved better in concept map, learning motivation, and problem solving ability than control group. the conclusions were as following:
    1. Within the small-side group, the students were developed social skills through interactions between PE teacher and students, and games are also offered to enrich the environment, which combined with felt-meaning and deep meaning to expand the scope of nature knowledge.
    2. PE Teacher creates “relaxed alertness” with games and play to maintain the dynamic tension between challenge and comfort. The students are exposed to “orchestrated immersion” to experience a sense of living wholeness and engage complex and real projects. Meanwhile, the students are in “active processing” that is both personally meaningful and conceptually coherent. That is a path to understanding, rather than simply to memory and also includes the process of reflection, contemplation, and creative elaboration.
    3. Novel and challenge materials are given to students to attract the attention and develop the appreciation. Moreover, the human brain is social brain, the students are supported and consolidated in social relationship and a sense of community which contributes to safety, security and relaxed alertness to reduce threat and develop the problem solving abilities.
    4. PE teacher have perceived the differences between PE teaching on BBL and traditional PE teaching. As the result, PE teaching on BBL has shown its benefits and uniqueness. To create friendly, safety, and enriching environment, PE teacher prefer BBL more than traditional method to create more teaching effects.
    Based on above conclusions, few suggestions are provided for PE teaching and other studies in the future. For PE teaching, first of all, PE teachers can try to build the atmosphere with BBL principles to increase the teaching effects. Secondly, PE teaching method should be substituted with “explore” for “simplification” and “empowerment” for “limitation”. Thirdly, build up the “Learning Community” to unfold the possibilities for PE teaching. Besides, For the studies in the future, firstly, team teaching can be engaged to create better teaching effects. Secondly, the follow-up studies can be engaged to examine the continuous effects of PE teaching on BBL. Finally, try to seek the evidences of BBL PE teaching with interdisciplinary cooperation.

    口試委員與系主任簽字之論文通過簽名表………………………………………………….i 論文授權書………………………………………………………………………………...….ii 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………………...iii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………………..v 謝誌…………………………………………………………………………………………vii 目次………………………………………………………………………………………..viii 表次………………………………………………………………………………………….xi 圖次…………………………………………………………………………………………xiii 第壹章 緒論…………………………………………………………………...1 第一節 研究背景……………………………….……………………………...............2 第二節 研究目的與問題………………………………………………………………9 第三節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………………………..10 第四節 名詞定義……………………………………………………………………..11 第貳章 文獻探討………………………………………………….................13 第一節 以腦為基礎的學習及其理論………………………………………………..14 第二節 從腦神經科學觀點探討對學習的影響……………………………………..23 第三節 與腦相容的課程與教學……………………………………………………..49 第四節 以BBL為基礎的體育教學………..…………………………………………67 第五節 教師實務知識的轉變與建構………………………………………………..83 第參章 研究設計與實施……………………………………….....................96 第一節 研究方法與步驟………………………………………………………..96 第二節 研究工具的編製與實施……………………………………................100 第三節 資料蒐集與質性研究的依據及策略………………………................113 第四節 質性研究的效度與倫理……………………………………................126 第五節 資料處理與分析………………………………………………………133 第肆章 研究結果與討論…………………………………………………...137 第一節 BBL取向體育教學對學生知識理解的分析與討論………………...137 第二節 BBL取向體育教學對學生學習動機的分析與討論………………...162 第三節 BBL取向體育教學對學生問題解決能力的分析與討論…………...176 第四節 BBL取向體育教學對教師實務知識影響的分析與討論…………...186 第伍章 研究結論與建議………………………………………...................246 第一節 研究結論……………………………………………………................246 第二節 研究建議……………………………………………………................247 參考文獻………………………………………………………………….......250 中文部分……………………………………………………………….................250 西文部分……………………………………………………………….................256 附錄……………………………………………………………………….......269 附錄一、國中體育課學生學習動機量表(專家內容效度檢核問卷)……….....269 附錄二、國中體育課學生學習動機量表(正式問卷)……………………….....274 附錄三、學生問題解決能力測驗……………………………………………….....277 附錄四、BBL取向籃球教學計畫……………………………………………….....287 附錄五、BBL取向體育教學規準表……………………………………………....294 附錄六、實際教學情境參照BBL教學規準結果一覽表…………………………295 附錄七、學生上課心得記錄…………………………………………………….....296 附錄八、教學觀察筆記舉偶……………………………………………………......297 附錄九、研究參與同意書………………………………………………………......298 附錄十、個別題項之平均數與標準差…………………………………………......299

    中文部分
    方永泉(2003)。從「遊戲」意義的轉折來反思當代遊戲文化的特徵及其引發的教育思考。教育研究集刊,49(3),63-92。
    王文科、王智弘(譯)(2002)。學習心理學-學習理論導論。台北市:五南。(Hergenhahn, B. R., & Olson, M. H., 2001)
    王建雅、陳學志(2009)。腦科學為基礎的課程與教學。教育實踐與研究,22(1),139-168。
    江良規(1968)。體育學原理新論。台北市:台灣商務。
    余民寧(1997)。有意義的學習-概念構圖之研究。台北市:商鼎文化。
    吳樎椒、張與樑(2008)。當「神經科學」遇上「幼兒教育」-省思與重現幼兒教育課程與教學之理路。幼兒教保研究期刊,創刊號,49-66。
    呂天得(1999)。運動教育模式在男女學生學習效果之研究:以國小六年級排球教學為例。未出版碩士論文,國立體育學院,桃園縣。
    呂筱婷(2009)。黃體素調節大鼠的脊髓反射增益現象。未出版碩士論文,私立銘傳大學,台北市。
    李明潔(2001)。體育實習教師對「有效體育教學」知識結構變化之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    李茂興(譯)(1998)。教學心理學。台北市:揚智文化。(Lefrancois, G. R., 1997)
    李學德、張瑛玿、杜伊芳、黃朝慶(2010)。VEGF-A/VEGFR-2訊息傳遞導致CREB磷酸化是前置處理所引發神經及內皮細胞保護作用的共同路徑。成大研發快訊,14(7),文摘。2010年7月2日,取自http://research.ncku.edu.tw/re/articles/c/20100702/4.html
    李鎮哲(2010)。運動教育模式對國小學童動作技能學習效果之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台中教育大學,台中市。
    周宏室、潘義祥(2002)。運動教育學序章。載於周宏室(主編),運動教育學(頁1-39)。台北市:師大書苑。
    周建智、林錚、林信宏、石國棟(2006)。探討概念構圖學習策略、合作學習策略與傳統教學策略在國小體育教學之實驗研究。行政院國家科學委員會,計畫編號:NSC95-2413-H154-006。
    林廷華(2008)。兩位資深幼兒教師實際知識及其發展歷程之研究。未出版博士論文,國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
    林秀珍(2007)。經驗與教育探微-杜威(J.Dewey)教育哲學之詮釋。台北市:師大書苑。
    林佩璇(2002)。空言無物、行之無悟?-課程行動研究中的實踐反省。教育研究集刊,49(3),195-219。
    林章榜(2007)。運動教育模式對提昇運動期望與價值信念之研究。體育學報,40(3),115-127。
    林進財(2000)。有效教學:理論與策略。台北市:五南。
    林靜萍(2002)。體育師資生學科教學知識之研究。未出版博士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    邱浩政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北市:五南。
    邱稚瑋(2008)。合作學習融入運動教育模式在高中生排球學習成效之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    邱憶惠(2001)。國小級任教師知識之個案研究。未出版博士論文,國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    洪蘭(譯)(2001)。腦中有情。台北市:遠流。(LeDoux, J, 1996)
    洪蘭(譯)(2003)。大腦的祕密檔案。台北市:遠流。(Carter, R., 1998)
    洪蘭(譯)(2009)。大腦當家-靈活用腦12守則,學習工作更上層樓。台北市:遠流。(Medina, J., 2008)
    胡名霞(2006)。動作控制與動作學習。台北縣:金名圖書。
    范智晴(2004)。咖啡因濫用之機轉:麩胺酸AMPA受體GluR1次單元之角色。未出版碩士論文,私立慈濟大學,花蓮市。
    徐文星(2009)。臺北市國民中學體育教師知識管理與教學效能之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    徐宗國(1997)。質性研究概論。台北市:巨流。(Strauss, A., & Corbin, J., 1990)
    翁國興(2005)。運動教育模式介入在國小五年級學生排球教學上學習效果之研究。未出版碩士論文,台北市立體育學院運動科學研究所,台北市。
    高博銓(2004)。教學研究的回顧與前瞻。教育研究月刊,121,72-83。
    高敬文(2002)。質化研究方法論。台北市:師大書苑。
    高熏芳、林盈助、王向葵(譯)(2001)。質化研究設計:一種互動取向的方法。台北市:心理。(Maxwell, J. A., 1996)
    張春興(2002)。現代心理學。台北市:東華。
    張春興(2003)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華。
    張秋煉(2001)。台北市石牌國小體育課教學對健康體適能影響之探究。未出版碩士論文,台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所,台北市。
    張筱玫(2009)。運動教育模式融入TGfU應用於樂樂棒球之行動研究。未出版碩士論文,國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    梁世婷(2008)。斯賓諾莎(Benedict de Spinoza)情緒理論及其在情緒教育上之蘊義。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    梁雲霞(譯)(2003)。大腦知識與教學。台北市:遠流。(Jensen, E., 1998)
    莊美鈴(1994)。樂趣化體育教學。國民體育季刊,23(3),12-21。
    許義雄(1989)。學校體育應更具樂趣。國民體育季刊,18(3),4-8。
    許義雄(1992)。樂趣化體育教學。台灣省學校體育,2(1),4-5。
    許義雄、黃月嬋(譯)(2001)。體育教學策略。台北市:麥格羅希爾。(Rink, J. E., 1998)
    郭玉霞(1997)。教師的實務知識。高雄:復文。
    郭彥成(2006)。運動教育模式對學生學習效果之研究-以大學體育桌球教學為例。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    郭滿洲、曾智豐(2003)。運動教育模式與傳統體育教學對國小學童自我概念與人際關係影響之研究。體育學術研討會專刊(上),196-205。
    陳文亮(2004)。運動教育模式在國小學生學習效果之研究。未出版碩士論文,台北市立體育學院運動科學研究所,台北市。
    陳正芬(譯)(2007)。決勝未來的五種能力。台北市:聯經。(Gardner, H., 2006)
    陳沛嵐、曾玉村(2009)。腦科學研究的教育觀點。載於蘇永明、方永泉(主編),面對未來挑戰的教育發展(頁155-177)。台北市:學富。
    陳佳宏(2010)。資訊多媒體融入運動教育模式對國中生排球學習動機與學習成效之影響。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    陳信亨(2004)。國中體育教師實務知識之個案研究--以國三籃球及游泳課程為例。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    陳奎憙(1996)。教育社會學研究(七刷)。台北市:師大書苑。
    陳建志(2005)。運動教育模式結合教學科技的課程設計對國中生學習滿意度之影響-以籃球教學為例。未出版碩士論文,國立體育學院體育研究所,桃園縣。
    陳政吉(2011)。運動教育模式學生教練角色扮演與小組互動之行動研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台中教育大學,台中市。
    陳春蓮(2004)。體育教學的反省與實踐。台北市:師大書苑。
    陳昭宇(2004)。運動教育模式對學生技能學習與學習態度之影響-以八年級籃球課程為例。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    陳昭宇、林靜萍(2011)。從教室生態典範談體育教師實務知識的建構。中華體育,25(1),118-128。
    陳美玉(1996)。教師專業實踐理論與應用。台北市:師大書苑。
    陳國泰(2000)。國小初任教師實際知識的發展之研究。未出版博士論文,國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    陳勝雄(2004)。不同體育課程設計模式對國小學生體育課學習滿意度之比較研究。未出版碩士論文,國立體育學院,桃園縣。
    陳鏏仹(2004)。運動對海馬迴中BDNF基因表現之影響。未出版碩士論文,國立成功大學,台南市。
    曾俊遠(2009)。概念構圖對體育師資生學科教學知識影響之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    黃月美(2005)。敘事研究:一種理解課程與教學的新途徑。教育研究月刊,130,30-44。
    黃立莉(2009)。從師生互動行為看國中體育科實習教師學科教學知識。未出版碩士論文,國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    黃光國(2003)。社會科學的理路。台北市:心理。
    黃至賢(2006)。運動教育模式對國小學童學習效果及人際關係影響之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立新竹教育大學人資處體育教學碩士班,新竹市。
    黃政傑(2002)。教學原理。台北市:師大書苑。
    黃清祥(2004)。國小學生在運動教育模式課程中團隊運作過程之探究。未出版碩士論文,國立新竹師範學院,新竹市。
    黃繼仁(2005)。許瓦布的課程思想。載於黃政傑(主編),課程思想(頁59-102)。台北縣:冠學文化。
    溫明麗(2000)。批判性思考教學理論與師資培育模式之探討。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫,編號:NSC 89-2413-H-003-054。
    甄曉蘭(1996)。從典範轉移的再思論質的研究崛起的意義。嘉義師院學報,10, 113-146。
    甄曉蘭(1997)。教學理論。載於黃政傑(主編),教學原理(頁27-66)。台北市:師大書苑。
    甄曉蘭(2001)。從課程組織的觀點檢討統整課程的設計與實施。課程與教學季刊,4(1),1-20。
    甄曉蘭(2002)。中小學課程改革與教學革新。台北市:高等教育。
    甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務:解構與重建。台北市:高等教育。
    劉一民(2005)。運動哲學新論-實踐知識的想像痕跡。台北市:師大書苑。
    劉政宏、黃博聖、蘇嘉玲、陳學志、吳有城(2010)。國中小學習動機量表之編製及其信、效度研究。測驗學刊,57(3),371-402頁。
    滕德政(2007)。杜威體育理論之研究。屏東教育大學學報,29,35-66。
    潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究-理論與運用。台北:心理出版社。
    蔡承志(譯)(2009)。大腦比天空更遼闊。台北市:商周。(Edelman, G. M., 2004)
    蔡貞雄(2003)。體育的理念。高雄市:復文。
    蔡敏玲、陳正乾(譯)(1997)。社會中的心智 : 高層次心理過程的發展。台北市:心理。(L. S. Vygotsky, 1978)
    鄭之雅(2003)。BDNF與c-Fos在習得無助小鼠腦部的表現。未出版碩士論文,國立陽明大學,台北市。
    鄭谷苑、郭俊賢(譯)(2004)。學習原理:心智、經驗與學校。台北市:遠流。(Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., Donovan, M. S., & Pellegrino, J. W., 2000)
    鄭麗玉(1993)。認知心理學:理論與應用。台北市:五南。
    蕭明芳(2009)。小組檔案評量運用於國小體育教學之行動研究—以運動教育模式為例。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    謝丙南(2011)。運動教育模式團隊互動問題及解決策略之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台中教育大學,台中市。
    謝志偉(2007)。教育研究典範的未來趨勢混和方法論(Mixed Methodology)介紹。屏東教育大學學報,26,175-194。
    謝維玲(譯)(2009)。運動改造大腦:IQ和EQ大進步的關鍵。臺北縣:野人文化。(Ratey, J., & Hagerman, E., 2008)
    簡良平(2005)。國小教師課程意識與教學反省之個案研究:以語文教師為例。初等教育學刊,22,1-20。
    闕月清(2003)。體育初任教師學科教學知識之研究。體育學報,35,193-205。
    顏貝珊(2004)。國小體操專長與非專長教師學科教學知識與學生學習成就之比較研究。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
    顏嘉生(2005)。不同運動教育模式對學生學習效果之比較-以國小六年級巧固球教學為例。未出版碩士論文,國立體育學院,桃園縣。
    西文部分
    Al-Ahmadi, F., & Oraif, F. (2009). Working memory capacity, confidence and scientific thinking. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(2), 225-243.
    Alexander, K., & Luckman, J. (2001). Australian teachers’ perceptions and uses of the sport education curriculum. European Physical Education Review, 7(3), 243-268.
    Ayvazo, S. (2009). Applying the sport education model to tennis. Strategies, 23(1), 8-12.
    Bell, A. C., & D’Zurilla, T. J. (2009). The influence of social problem-solving ability on the relationship between daily stress and adjustment. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 33(5), 439-448.
    Bennett, G., & Hastie, P. A. (1997). A sport education curriculum model for a collegiate physical activity course. Journal of Physical Education Recreation, and Dance, 68(1), 39-44.
    Blau, S. F. (1993). Cognitive Darwinism: Rational-emotive therapy and the theory of neuronal group selection. A Review of General Semantics, 50(4), 403-441.
    Browne, T. B. J., Carlson, T. B., & Hastie, P. A. (2004). A comparison of rugby seasons presented in traditional and Sport Education formats. European Physical Education Review, 10(2), 199-214.
    Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 4-16.
    Caine, R. N, & Caine, G. (1997). Education on the edge of possibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
    Caine, R. N., & Caine, C. (1990). Understanding a brain-based approach to learning and teaching. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 66-70.
    Caine, R. N., & Caine, C. (1991). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain (1st ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.
    Caine, R. N., & Caine, C. (1994). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain (2nd ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.
    Caine, R. N., & Caine, C. (1995). Reinventing schools through brain-based learning. Educational Leadership, 52(7), 43-47.
    Carlson, T. B. (1995). "Now I Think I Can." The reaction of eight low-skilled students to sport education. ACHPER Healthy Lifestyles Journal, 42(4), 6-8.
    Carlson, T.B., & Hastie, P. A. (1997). The student social system within sport education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 176-195.
    Caulfield, J., Kidd, S., & Kocher, T. (2000). Brain based instruction in action. Educational Leadership, 58(3), 62-65.
    Clandinin, J. & Connelly, M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363-401). NY: Macmillan.
    Clandinin, J. (1986). Classroom practice: Teachers images in action. London: Falmer Press.
    Clandinin, J., Murphy, M. S., Huber, J., & Orr, A. M. (2010). Negotiating Narrative Inquiries: Living in a Tension-Filled Midst. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(2), 81-90.
    Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305.
    Curtner-Smith, M, D., & Sofo, S. (2007). Preservice teachers' conceptions of teaching within sport education and multi-activity units. Sport, Education and Society, 9(3), 347-377.
    Dayton, D. M. (1999). Case study analysis of teacher change with the sport education model. Accession Number & Update, 2microfiche.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
    Devellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development theory and applications. London: Sage.
    Doyle, W. (1977). Paradigms for research on teacher effectiveness. In L. S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 163-198). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
    Doyle, W. (1979). Classroom tasks and students’ abilities. In P. L. Peterson., & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, finding and implication (pp.193-209). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
    Doyle, W. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.). Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486-516). New York: Macmillan.
    Duman, B. (2010). The effects of brain-based learning on the academic achievement of students with different learning styles. Education Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(4), 2077-2103.
    Eisner, E. W. (1988). The primacy of experience and the politics of method. Educational Research, 15-20.
    Elbaz, F. (1981). The teacher’s ‘practical knowledge’: Report of a case study. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 43-71.
    Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practice knowledge. New York: Nichols.
    Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Miltion Keynes: Open University Press.
    Ennis, C. D. (1999). Creating a sense of family in urban schools using the “sport for peace” curriculum. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(3), 273-285.
    Feldman, A. (2000). Decision making in the practical domain: A model of practical conceptual change. Science Education, 84(5), 606-623.
    Femandez-Balboa, J. M. (1997). Critical postmodernism in human movement, physical education and sport. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    Filak, V. F., & Sheldon, K. M. (2008). Teacher support, student motivation, student need satisfaction, and college teacher course evaluation: Testing a sequential path model. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 711-724.
    Finn, P. (2011). Critical thinking: Knowledge and skills for evidence-based practice. Language, Speech, and Hearing Servicein Schools, 42, 69-72.
    Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Fitzgerald, H. (2009). Bring disability into youth sport. In H. Fitzgerald (Ed.), Disability and youth sport (pp. 1-8). New York: Routledge.
    Foley, J. T., Tindall, D., Lieberman, L., & Kim, S. Y. (2007). How to develop disability awareness using the sport education model. Journal of Physical Education Recreation, and Dance,78(9), 32-36.
    Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind, and brain: A cognitive approach to creativity. New York: Basic Books.
    Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
    Garrahy, D. A., Cothran, D. J., & Kulinna, P. H. (2005). Voices From the Trenches: An Exploration of Teachers' Management Knowledge. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(1), 56-65.
    Gazzaniga, M. (1985). The social brain: Discovery the network of the mind. New York: Basic Books.
    Gillies, R. M., & Khan, A. (2009). Promoting reasoned argumentation, problem-solving and learning during small-group work. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 7-27.
    Giroux, H. A. (1989). Schooling as a form of cultural politics: Toward a pedagogy of and for difference. In H. A. Giroux & P. McLaren (Eds.), Critical pedagogy, the state, and cultural struggle (pp. 125-151). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    Glatthorn, A. A., Jailall, J. (2000). Curriculum for the new millennium. In R. Brandt (Ed.). Education in a new era (pp. 97-121). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Goodlad, J. I., & Su, Z. (1992). Organization of Curriculum. In P.W. Jackson(Ed.). Handbook of research on curriculum (pp.327-344). NY: Macmillan.
    Grant, B.C., Tredinnick, P., & Hodge, K.P. (1992). Sport education in physical education. New Zealand Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 25, 3-6.
    Green, F. E. (1999). Brain and learning research: Implications for meeting the needs of diverse learners. Education, 119(4), 682-688.
    Griffin, P. S. (1985). Boys’ participation styles in a middle school physical education sports unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 4, 100-110.
    Gruhn, W., & Rauscher, F. H. (2007). The neurobiology of music cognition and learning. In R. Colwell & C. Richardson (Eds.), Second handbook on music teaching and learning (pp. 445-460). New York: Oxford University Press.
    GÜLPINAR, M. A. (2005). The principles of brain-based learning and constructivist models in education. Education Science: Theory & Practice, 5(2), 299-306.
    Gurvitch, R., Lund, J., & Metzler, M. W. (2008). Research the adoption of model-based instruction-context and chapter summaries. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27(4), 449-456.
    Hart, L. A. (1981). Brain, language, and new concept of learning. Educational Leadership, 38(6), 443-445.
    Hart, L. A. (1983). Human brain and human learning. NY: White Plains.
    Hastie, P. A. (1996). Student role involvement during a unit of sport education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 88-103.
    Hastie, P. A. (1998a). Skill and tactical development during a sport education season. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69(4), 368-379.
    Hastie, P. A. (1998b). The participation and perception of girls within a unit of sport education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 157-171.
    Hastie, P. A. (2000). An ecological analysis of a sport education season. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19, 355-373.
    Hastie, P. A., & Buchanan, A. M. (2000). Teaching responsibility through sport education: Prospects of a coalition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71(1), 25-35.
    Hastie, P. A., & Curtner-Smith, M, D. (2006). Influence of a hybrid sport education-teaching games for understanding unit on one teacher and his students. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 11(1), 1-27.
    Hastie, P. A., & Sharpe, T. (1999). Effects of a sport education curriculum on the positive social behavior of at-risk rural adolescent boys. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 4(4), 417-430.
    Hastie, P. A., & Siedentop, D. (2006). The classroom ecology paradigm. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), The handbook of physical education (pp. 214-225). London: Sage.
    Hastie, P. A., & Sinelnikov, O. A. (2006). Russian students’ participation in and perceptions of a season of sport education. European Physical Education Review, 12(2), 131-150.
    Hastie, P. A., de Ojeda, D. M., & Luguin, A. C. (2011). A review of research on sport education: 2004 to the present. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 16(2), 103-132.
    Hastie, P.A., & Trost, S.G. (2002). Student physical activity levels during a season of sport education. Pediatric Exercise Science,14, 64-74.
    Hebb, D. O. (1966). A textbook of psychology (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.
    Hendricks, M. N. (2007). Focusing-oriented experiential psychotherapy: How to do it. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 61(3), 271-284.
    Hickson, C. N. (2005). Teacher development: Enhancing effective teaching in elementary school physical education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Canada.
    Hindal, H., Reid, N., Badgaish, M. (2009). Working memory, performance and learner characteristics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 27(2), 187-204.
    Huebner, D. (1967). Curriculum as concern for man’s temporality. Theory into Practice, 6(4), 172-179. Reprinted in W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists (pp. 237-149). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
    Jenkins, J. M. (2004). Sport education in a PETE program. Journal of Physical Education Recreation, and Dance, 75(5), 31-36.
    Jensen, E. (2000a). Brain-based learning: A reality check. Educational Leadership, 57(7), 76-80.
    Jensen, E. (2000b). Brain-Based Learning: The New Science of Teaching & Learning. San Diego, CA: The Brain Store.
    Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the brain in mind (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Jensen, E. (2008). Brain-based learning: The new paradigm of teaching. California: Crowin Press.
    Jewett, A. E., Bain L.L., & Ennis, C.D. (1995). The curriculum process in physical education, Georgia: Wm. C. Brown Publishers.
    Killion, J. P., & Todnem, G. R. (1991). A process for personal theory building. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 14-21.
    Kim, J., Penny, D., Cho, M., & Choi, H. (2006). ‘Not business as usual’: Sport education pedagogy in practice. European Physical Education Review, 12(3), 361-379.
    Kinchin, G. D. (1998). Secondary students’ responses to issues of gender in sport and physical activity. Journal of Sport Pedagogy, 4(1), 29-42.
    Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2010). Learning to play, playing to learn: A case study of a ludic learning space. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(1), 26-50.
    Kolb, S. M. (2012). Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research strategies for educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(1), 83-86.
    Kotchabhakdi, N. (2005). Brain based learning: From theories to practice. Retrieved May 30, 2011, from: http://neuroscience.mahidol.ac.th/NBBC2009/NK_BrainBasedLearning_Jan2005a_English.pdf.
    La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 367-384.
    Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257-277.
    LeDoux, J. (1994). Emotion, memory, and the brain. Scientific American, 270(6), 50-57.
    Locke, L. E. (1977). Research on teaching physical education: New hope for a dismal science. Quest, 28, 2-16.
    MacPhail, A., Kirk, D., & Kinchin, G. (2004). Sport education: Promotion team affiliation through physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,23, 106-122.
    Madrazo, G. M., & Motz, L. L. (2005). Brain research: implications to diverse learners. Science Educator, 14(1), 56-60.
    McCaughtry, N., Sofo, S., Rovegno, I., & Curtner-Smith, M, D. (2004). Learning to teach sport education: Misunderstandings, pedagogical difficulties, and resistance. European Physical Education Review, 10(1), 135-155.
    Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 359-377.
    Morton, T. & Gray, J. (2010). Personal practical knowledge and identity in lesson planning conferences on a pre-service TESOL course. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 297-317.
    Muller, J. (2000). What knowledge is of most worth for the millennial citizen? In C. Hamm (Ed.). Philosophical knowledge: social theory curriculum and education policy. (pp. 41-56) London: Routledge Falmer.
    Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Nuangchalerm, P., & Charnsirirattana, D. (2010). A delphi study on brain-based instructional model in science. Canadian Social Science, 6(4), 141-146.
    Nunnelley, J. C., Whaley, J., Mull, R., & Hott, G. (2003). Brain compatible secondary schools: The visionary principal's role. NASSP Bulletin, 87, 48-59.
    O'Sullivan, M. (2003). Learning to teach physical education. In S. J. Silverman & C. D. Ennis (Eds.), Student learning in physical education (pp. 275-294). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    ÖZEL, A., BAYINDIR, N., ÖZEL, E., & ÇİFTÇİOĞLU, İ. (2008). Brain-based learning and student-centrism on curriculum. Ekev Academic Review, 12(35), 343-350.
    Parker, M. B., & Curtner-Smith, M. D. (2005). Health-related fitness in sport education and multi-activity teaching. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10(1), 1-18.
    Pedrana, A. L. (2009). Teachers of English language learners: Tracking personal practical knowledge, reflection, and narrative authority. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 11(1), 175-191.
    Perlman, D. (2010). Change in affect and needs satisfaction for amotivated students within the sport education model. Journal of Teaching Physical Education,29(4), 433-445.
    Perlman, D., & Goc Karp, G. (2010). A self-determined perspective of the sport education model. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(4), 401-418.
    Placek, J. (1983). Conceptions of success in teaching: Busy, happy and good? In T. Templin, & J. Olson (Eds.), Teaching in physical education (pp. 46-56). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Pool, C. R. (1997). Brain-based learning and students. The Education Digest, 63(3), 10-15.
    Pope, C. (2006). Interpretive perspectives in physical education research. In D. Kirk, M. O’Sullivan, & D. Macdonald (Eds.), The handbook of research in physical education (pp. 21-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of Educational Research. New York: Continuum.
    Reid, L. A. (1962). Philosophy and educational assumption. In L. A. Reid (Ed.), Philosophy and education (pp. 17-40). London: Heinemann.
    Respress, T., & Lutfi, G. (2006). Whole brain learning: The fine arts with students at risk. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 15(1), 24-31.
    Rink, J. E. (2003). Effective instruction in physical education. In S. J. Silverman., C. D. Ennis (Eds.), Student learning in physical education (pp. 165-186). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Roberts, J. W. (2002). Beyond learning by doing: The brain compatible approach. Journal of Experiential education, 25(2), 281-285.
    Robinson, D. B. & Melnychuk, N. E. (2009). Students' Experiences Within Physical Education Teacher Education. Physical & Health Education Journal, 74(4), 16-23.
    Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
    Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N. (2003). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 99-111.
    Rovegno, I. (2003). Teachers’ knowledge construction. In S. J. Silverman. & C. D. Ennis (Eds.), Student learning in physical education (pp. 295-310). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Salter, G. (2003). Maori culture and tradition in the mainstream: Teaching Te Reo Kori1 in sport education. Journal of Physical Education New Zealand, 36, 27-41.
    Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation- based learning approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Schneider, R. C., & Marriott, S. T. (2010). Applying the sport education model to basketball. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 81(2), 15-17.
    Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practice. New York: Basic Books.
    Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. In I, Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), (1978) Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays (pp. 287-321). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge of teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
    Siedentop, D. (1994). Sport education: Quality PE through positive sport experience. Champain, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Siedentop, D., Hastie, P. A., & van der Mars, H. (2004). Complete guide to sport education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Silverman, S. J., & Ennis, C. D. (1996). Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Sinelnikov, O. A., & Hastie, P. A. (2010). Students' autobiographical memory of participation in multiple sport education seasons. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 29(2), 167-183.
    Singer, D. G., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2006). Play=learning: How play motivates and enhance children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth. NY: Oxford University Press.
    Smith, F. (1986). Insult to intelligence: The Bureaucratic invasions of our classroom. Portsmouth, N. H.: Heinemann Educational Books.
    Sousa, D. A. (2001). How the brain learns (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
    Sousa, D. A. (2003). The leadership brain: How to lead today’s school more effectively. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
    Spittle, M., & Byrne, K. (2009). The influence of Sport Education on student motivation in physical education. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 14(3), 253-266.
    Sprenger, M. (1999). Learning and memory: The brain in action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Stelter, R. (2000). The transformation of body experience into language. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 33(1), 63-77.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Caruso, D. R. (1985). Practical modes of knowing. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing. Eighty-fourth yearbook of the NSSE (pp. 133-158). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Stran, M., & Curtner-Smith, M. (2009). Influence of occupational socialization on two preservice teachers' interpretation and delivery of the sport education model. Journal of Teaching Physical Education,28(1), 38-53.
    Stran, M., & Curtner-Smith, M. (2010). Impact of different types of knowledge on two preservice teachers' ability to learn and deliver the sport education model. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(3), 243-256.
    Strikwerda, B.J., & Taggart, A. (2001). No longer voiceless and exhausted: Sport education and the primary generalist teacher. ACHPER Healthy Lifestyles Journal, 48, 14-17.
    Sylwester, R. (1995). A celebration of neurons: An educator’s guide to the human brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Synder, P. P. (1997). The effects of a sport education model on the participation and achievement levels of elementary students in physical education class. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
    Tileston, D. W. (2000). Ten best teaching practices: How brain research, learning styles, and standards define teaching competencies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
    Tileston, D. W. (2005). Ten best teaching practices: How brain research, learning styles, and standards define teaching competencies (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
    Tüfekçi, S., & Demirel, M. (2009). The effect of brain based learning on achievement, retention, attitude and learning process. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1782-1791.
    Vallance, E. (1985). Ways of knowing and curricular concepts: Implications for program planning. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing. Eighty-fourth yearbook of the NSSE (pp. 199-217). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    van Manen, M. (1982). Phenomenological pedagogy. Curriculum Inquiry, 12(3), 283-299.
    van Manen, M. (1991). Reflectivity and the pedagogical moment: The normativity of pedagogical thinking and acting. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(6), 507–536.
    Vanderbilt, K. L. (2005). Connecting learning: Brain-based strategies for linking. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 21(7), 21-23.
    Wallhead, T. L., Hagger, M., & Smith, D. T. (2010). Sport education and extracurricular sport participation: An examination using the trans-contextual model of motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81(4), 442-455.
    Wallhead, T.L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004). Effects of a sport education intervention on students’ motivation responses in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,23, 4-18.
    Westwater, A., & Wolfe, P. (2000). The brain-compatible curriculum. Educational Leadership, 58(3), 49-52.
    Willis, J. (2007). Brain-based teaching strategies for improving students' memory, learning, and test-taking success. Childhood Education, 83(5). 310-315.
    Wolfe, P., & Brandt, R. (1998). What do we know from brain research? Educational Leadership, 56(3), 8-13.
    Wright, R. L. (1998). Teacher’s voices, teacher’s knowledge: Reflections on the new? Journal of Correctional Education, 49(2), 45-58.
    Wrisberg, C. A. (1994). The arousal-performance relationship. Quest, 46, 60-77.
    Zmudy, M. H., Curtner-Smith, M. D., & Steffen, J. (2009). Ecology and task structure in advanture education. Journal of Experiential Education, 31(3), 319-340.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE