研究生: |
彭志偉 Wei-Chih Peng |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
園藝課程對改善特殊教育學校高職部學生行為問題行動研究的成效探究 An action researth study of the effectiveness of horticulture curriculum in reducing behavior problems in the vocational high school students from the special school |
指導教授: |
張正芬
Chang, Cheng-Fen 王華沛 Wang, Hua-Pei |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2014 |
畢業學年度: | 103 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 112 |
中文關鍵詞: | 園藝課程 、特殊教育學校高職部學生 、行為問題 、行動研究 |
英文關鍵詞: | Horticultur curriculum, vocational high school students from the special school, behavioral problems, action research |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:220 下載:6 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究藉由園藝課程的規劃與執行,嘗試對改善特殊教育學校高職部學生行為問題的成效。本研究採行動研究法,對象為某縣特殊教育學校高職部二年級5名學生,實施10週,每週2節課,共10個單元的園藝課程,課堂上採取錄影的方式、教學省思日誌、訪談相關教師等方式來蒐集資料。
研究結果顯示,在行動初期發現以味覺體驗能有效引起學生的學習動機,及運用多媒體的教材讓學生專注;在行動中期適時的調整教具使其操作更簡便,及讓學生對課程有所期待保持著好奇心;最後在行動後期運用多感官刺激、工作分析的方法,適時依學生的學習動機調整教材教法後,確實能提升學生的學習成效,並降低行為問題發生的次數。
從上述可知,適合學生能力現況的園藝課程設計順序安排宜要先了解學生本身學習的上的優勢、多感官刺激園藝活動來提升學習成效、以植物為媒介能舒緩情緒營造安全感的氛圍、運用多媒體的方式呈現教材
,讓學生在課堂上行為問題確實有明顯的改善,學習成效也增加許多。5位學生的導師也給予研究者正向的回饋。
未來研究建議事先了解學生感官學習之優勢,使學生學習更有成效
,融入生命教育課程,讓學生能從照顧植物過程中,瞭解生命的可貴。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the horticulture curriculum in reducing vocational high school students’ behavior problems in the classroom. Participants of this study were five vocational high school students from the special school. The curriculum was implemented twice a week over a 10 week period. The data analyses included tape recordings during classes, reflection of teaching records, and the interviews of teachers involved.
In the beginning phase of this action research study, results showed that the sense of smell experiment could effectively trigger the students’ motivation, and the multimedia teaching aids made students pay more attention in the classroom. In the middle phase, we discovered that the multimedia teaching aids should be adjusted promptly to make it easier to operate, and the students’ curiosity toward the curriculum should be continuously maintained. In the last phase of the study, by using multi-senses stimulus, working analysis method, and by timely adjusting teaching materials, we could effectively improve the students’ learning and decrease the occurrence of students’ negative behaviors.
In conclusion, teachers should first identify students’ strengths and arrange the order of the horticulture curriculum based on students’ abilities. Secondly, using multi-senses horticultural activities can increase learning efficiency. Thirdly, plants can be used as a medium to soothe students’ emotions and create a sense of safety for the students. Lastly, using multimedia to present teaching material could not only significantly reduce the students’ behavioral problems in the classroom but also improve their learning effectiveness. Both student participants and the teachers gave positive feedback to the curriculum.
For future studies, student’s strength of senses should be identified first to make learning more effective. Also, researchers could try to incorporate this horticulture curriculum into the life science educational curriculum. Through the caring for plants, the students can learn the value of life.
一、中文部分
王文科(1995):教育研究法。台北市:五南。
王仁癸(2010):園藝治療強化智能障礙生學習。2010年3月18日,取
國語日報特殊教育副刊 http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jwogXcOH2UAhLtr3w1fN6jaYtO4.PyMg--/article?mid=19466
白尊仁(2009):國小特教班從事園藝植栽之行動研究。國立台北教育大
學自然科學教育學系碩士論文。
朱凱薇(2007):一顆種子,一個希望-園藝治療活動在黎明教養院之個
案研究。慈濟大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
何素華(1995):智能不足發展模式。啟智教育教師工作手冊。4(7):4-10。
何華國(2002):啟智教育研究。台北:五南。
林木泉(譯)(2008):C.A. Lewis著。園藝治療入門。台北:紅葉文化。
洪儷瑜(1992)非嫌惡行為處置對智障者問題行為處理之運用。特殊教育季刊,45,9-14。
施顯烇(1995) :嚴重行為問題處理。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
侯禎塘(1999) :情緒及行為障礙學生的鑑定與教育。特教園丁,15(1),12~17。
俞玫妏,(2004) :都市園丁休閒園藝行為與休閒滿意度關係之研究─以台北地區為例,博士論文,國立台灣大學農業推廣研究所。
洪甄苡(2007):園藝治療活動對自閉症患者效果之個案研究。國立中興
大學園藝學系研究所碩士論文。
夏林清等譯(1997):Altrichter, Posch & Somekh 原著。行動研究方法導論─教師動手做研究:台北:遠流。
莊妙芬(2002):中重度智能障礙兒童的異常行為與溝通功能之研究。東台灣特殊教育學報,4,53-76。
高淑珍(2006):台北市立啟智學校高中職中重度智能障礙學生園藝課程
之行動研究。台北科技大學技職研究所碩士論文。
梁仲容(1996):園藝治療輔導方案對國小兒童自我概念、生活適應及休
閒態度影響之研究。初等教育學報(台南師範),民85.06:333-373
陳麗圓、鈕文英(1999):智能障礙學生生態課程計畫彙編。國立高雄
師範大學特殊教育系。
陳郁菁、鈕文英(2004):行為支持計畫對國中自閉症學生行為問題處
理成效之研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育研究所論文。
郭為藩(2002):特殊兒童心理與教育。台北:文景。
郭毓仁(2005):治療景觀與園藝療法。台北市:詹氏。
郭毓仁、王靖雯、李子芬(2002) :園藝在唐氏症患者職業訓練上之利用。
中國園藝,46(4),443—449。
陳國濱(2006) :園藝活動對高職智能障礙學生自我概念及休閒效益之影
響。朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理學系。
張敏(2008):園藝活動對特殊幼兒學習成效之行動研究。屏東科技大學
熱帶農業暨國際合作系所學位論文。
傅秀媚主編(2002)。早期療育中跨專業團隊評估模式相關問題研究。特殊教育學報,16,1-22
曾慈慧(2001):園藝治療活動與其場所介紹。造園季刊,41:47-52。
黃雅鈴(2002):園藝治療理論與應用之探討。第四屆休閒、遊憩、觀光
學術研討會。
鈕文英(2003a):美國智能障礙協會 2002 年定義的內容與意涵。特殊
教育季刊,86,10-15。
曾兆良(2003):台北啟智學校園藝課程對智能障礙者身心差異之影響。
國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文。
畢恆達(2004):自然環境與心理健康。人與環境關係研究學會通訊,4,
5-10。
鈕文英(2009):身心障礙者行為問題處理—正向行為支持取向。台北市:心理。
馮婉儀(2010):教育好夥伴:園藝治療在教育上的應用,2010年9月8
日,取自:
http://parentschool.so-buy.com/front/bin/ptdetail.phtml?
Part=radio100908&Category=351335
楊碧桃(2002) :啟智班學生問題行為及管理的調查研究。屏東師院學報,
16,99-134。
甄曉蘭(2003):課程行動研究─實例與方法解析。台北:師大書苑。
蔡清田(2000):行動研究及其在教育研究上的應用。質的研究方法。
中正大學教育學究所主編。台北:麗文。
蔡清田等譯(2004):Mckernan, J.原著(1996)。課程行動研究:反思實務工作者的方法與資源手冊。台北:麗文。
盧嬿羽(2011):園藝治療團體方案對第二型糖尿病患者心理健康效益
之研究。立臺北護理健康大學研究所論文。
簡含青(2012):園藝治療活動對亞斯伯格症兒童增進社會互動之應用。
國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系學位論文。
身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法(2013)。台北。2012年 9月2日,取自:http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=FL009187&KeyWordHL=&StyleType=135.
身心障礙者權益保障法(2007)。台北。2008年6月29日,取自:
http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/05/news/news-960716.htm
特殊教育法(2012)。台北。2013年1月23日,取自:
http://www.rootlaw.com.tw/LawContent.aspx?LawID=
A040080090003400-1020123.
二、外文部分
Airhart, D. L. & Tristan (1987). Horticultural training for adolescent special
ducation students. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 2 (1), 17-22
Baietto, M., and F. Ferrini. 2002. The importance of school gardening for urban children: A case 16 study in Milan, Italy. J. Therapeutic Horticulture 13: 22-29.
Bo-Young Kim,Sin-Ae Park, Jong-Eun Song, and Ki-Cheol Son(2012). HortTech-nology June 2012 22:320-324
Coleman, J. M. (1996). Emotional and behavioral disorders. Needham Heights, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
Cho, H. (2002). The infjuence of social or task-oriented horticultural
classes on adrenal-immune axis responses, emotions, and common
cold symptoms in female university students PHD thesis, Kansas
State University.
EvanI.M. & Meyer, L. H. (1985). An educative approach to behavior problems: A practical decision model for interventions with severely handicapped learners. Altimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Falvey, M. A.(1989). Community-based instruction : Instructional strategies for students with serve handicaps.Baltimore, MD:Paul H.Brookes Publishing Co.
Foncham, S. A. (1998). Attitudes toward and interest in community gardening in two-income neighborhoods. Unpublished PHD, Texas Techology University.
Gartin, B. C., & Murdick, N. L. (2001). Anew IDEA mandate: The use of
functional assessment of behavior and positivebehavior supports. Remedial and Special Education, 22(6), 344-349.
Haller, R. (1995). Vocational, social, and therapeutic program in
horticulture.P.43-70. In:Horticulture as Therapy-Principles and
Practice. Ed:Simson, S.P., and M.C. Straus. Haworth Press, NY
Hazen, T. & Bennett, C. (1999). Client panel discussion: legacy health
system. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 5 (1), 15-21.
Iwata, B. A., Vollmer, T. R., & Zarcone, J. R. (1990). The experimental
analysis of behavior disorders: Methodology, applications, and
limitations In A. C. Repp, & N.N. Singh(Eds.), Perspective on the use
of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with
developmental disabilities.Sycamore, II: Sycamore.
Janney, R., & Snell, M. E. (2000). Behavioral support. Baltimore, MD: Paul
H.Brookes.
Joe S., Jo A., and Saul B.(2003). Social and Therapeutic Horticulture:
Evidence andmessages from research. Bristol, UK:Policy Press.
Kaplan, R. (1992). The psychological benefits of nearby nature. In D.
Relf(Ed), The role of horticulture in human well-being and social
development: a national aymposium (p. 125-133). New York: Timber
Press Inc.
Kaplan, S. 1978. Perception of an uncertain environment. p.36-48, In
Kaplan, S. and R. Kaplan. (Ed.), Humanscape: Environments for people.
North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.
Kidd, J.L.M.S.W., Pachana, N.A., and Alpass,F.M.,(2000). Benefits of
gardening an exploratory study of mid-age women in New Zealand.
Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture ,6(1),4-19.
Mattson, R. H. (1992). Prescribing Health Benefits Through Horticultural
Activities. InRelf, D. & others (Eds), The Role of Horticultural in
Human Well-Being and SocialDevelopment:A National Symposium,
161-168. Portland, Oregon:Timber press.
Meyer, L.H., & Evans, I. M. (1986). Modification of excess behavior: An
adaptive and functional approach for educational and community
contexts. In R. H. Horner,L. H. Meyer, & H. D. Fredericks (Eds.),
Education of learners with severe handicaps: Exemplary service
strategies (pp.315-350). Baltimore, MD: Paul H.Brookes.
Meyer, L. H., & Evans, I. M. (1989). Nonaversive intervention for behavior
problems: A manual for home and community. Baltimore, MD: Paul
H. Brookes Publishing.
Min-Jung Lee(2010).HortTech-nology December 2010 20:971-976.
Oliver,C.,Hall,S.,Hales,J., Murphy, G.,& Watts,D.(1998). The treatment of
severe self-injurious behavior by the systematic fading of restraints:
Effects on self-injury, self-restraint,adaptive behavior, and behavioral
correlates of affect. Research in Developmental Disabilities,19(2),
143-165.
Parsons, R. 1991. The potential influence of environmental perception on
human health. J. Environ. Psych. 11: 1-23.
Relf, P. D. (1998). People-plant relationship. In S. P. Simson & M. M.
Straus (Eds). Horticulture as therapy: principles and practice: New
York: Food Products Press.
Relf, P. D. (1999). The role of horticulture in human well-being and
quality of life. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 5 (1), 5-14.
Relf,P.D., & Lohr,V.I.(2003).Human issues in horticulture.Hortscience,38(5)
894-993.
Ruef, M. B., Higgins, C., Glaeser, B. J. C., &Patnode, M. (1998). Positive
behavioral support: Strategies for teachers.Intervention in School and
Clinic, 34(1),21-32.
Ryndak, D.L. & Alper, S.(1996).Curriculum content for students with
moderate and serve disabilities in inclusive settings.Needham
Heights,MA:Allyn and Baoon.
Stoneham, J. A., Kendle, A. D., & Thoday, P. R. (1995) Horticultural therapy:
horticulture’s contribution to the quality of life of disabled people. Acta
Horticulture, 391, 67-75
Taylor, M.K.(1990). The healthy gardener. Flower and Garden 34(2):46.
Taylor, R. L.,Richards, S. B.,& Brady, M. P.(2005).Mental retardation :
historial perspectives, current practices, and future directions .
Boston, : Pearson Allyn.
Ulrich, R. S., & Parson, R. (1992). Influences of passive experiences with
plants on individual well-being and health. In D. Relf(Ed.),The role of
horticulture in human well-being and social development: A national
symposium. 93-105, New York: Portland, Oregon: Timber press.